Chapter published in:
Evidence for Evidentiality
Edited by Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop and Gijs Mulder
[Human Cognitive Processing 61] 2018
► pp. 173198
References

References

Aikhenvald, A.
2003aEvidentiality in Tariana. In A. Y. Aikhenvald, & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Studies in evidentiality [Typological Studies in Language 54] (131–164). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003bEvidentiality in typological perspective. In A. Y. Aikhenvald, & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Studies in evidentiality [Typological Studies in Language 54] (1–31). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2006Evidentiality in grammar. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics Vol. IV (320–325). Oxford: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Semi-direct speech: Manambu and beyond. Language Sciences, 30(4), 383–422. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, L. B.
1986Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In W. Chafe, & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (273–312). New Jersey: Ablex.Google Scholar
Bednarek, M.
2006Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: A text-driven approach. Text & Talk, 26(6), 635–660. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Botne, R.
1997Evidentiality and epistemic modality in Lega. Studies in Language, 21, 509–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boye, K.
2010aEvidence for what? Evidentiality and scope. STUF – Language Typology and Universals, 63(4), 290–307.Google Scholar
2010bSemantic maps and the identification of cross-linguistic generic categories: Evidentiality and its relation to epistemic modality. Linguistic Discovery, 8(1), 4–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Epistemic meaning: A crosslinguistic and functional-cognitive study [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 43]. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boye, K., & Harder, P.
2009Evidentiality. Linguistic categories and grammaticalization. Functions of Language, 16(1) 9–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bühler, K.
1934Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
Carlsen, L.
1994Redewiedergebende Sätze mit präpositionalen Quellenangaben. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 95(4), 467–492.Google Scholar
Chirikba, V.
2003Evidential category and evidential strategy in Abkhaz. In A. Y. Aikhenvald, & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Studies in evidentiality [Typological Studies in Language 54] (243–272). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chojnicka, J.
2012Reportive evidentiality and reported speech: Is there a boundary? Evidence of the Latvian oblique. In A. Usoniené, N. Nau, & I. Dabašinskiené (Eds.), Multiple perspectives in linguistic research on Baltic languages (170–192). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Cornillie, B.
2007Evidentiality and epistemic modality in Spanish (semi)auxiliaries. A cognitive-functional approach [Application of cognitive linguistics series 5]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2009Evidentiality and epistemic modality: On the close relationship between two different categories. In L. Ekberg, & C. Paradis (Eds.), Evidentiality in language and cognition: Special Issue of Functions of Language ,16(1), 44–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dendale, P., & L. Tasmowski
2001Le conditionnel en français. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Diewald, G.
1999Die Modalverben im Deutschen [Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 208]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, G., & Smirnova, E.
2010aAbgrenzung von Modalität und Evidentialität im heutigen Deutsch. In A. Katny, & A. Socka (Eds.), Modalität/Temporalität in kontrastiver und typologischer Sicht [Danziger Beiträge zur Germanistik 30] (113–131). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2010bEvidentiality in German: Linguistic realization and regularities in grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010cLinguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages. In G. Diewald, & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 49] (1–14). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Evidentialität als neues Feld der germanistischen Forschung neben der Modalität – Einleitung zu den Beiträgen. In G. Diewald, & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Modalität und Evidentialität – Modality and evidentiality [FOKUS. Linguistisch-Philologische Studien 37] (1–10). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
2012From deontic to reportive and quotative: the case of German sollen. Presentation at New Reflections on Grammaticalisation V, Edinburgh, July 16–19.Google Scholar
2013Kategorien der Redewiedergabe im Deutschen: Konjunktiv I versus sollen . Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, 41(3), 1–29.Google Scholar
Ekberg, L., & Paradis, C.
2009Editorial. Evidentiality in language and cognition. In L. Ekberg, & C. Paradis (Eds.), Evidentiality in language and cognition: Special Issue of Functions of Language , 16(1), 5–7. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faller, M.
2011Reportative evidentials and modal subordination. Presentation at Chronos, Birmingham, April 18–20.
Frawley, W.
1992Linguistic semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Giacalone R. A., & Topadze, M.
2007The coding of evidentiality: A comparative look at Georgian and Italian. Rivista di Linguistica Italiana, 19(1), 7–38.Google Scholar
Glas, R.
1984 Sollen im heutigen Deutsch: Bedeutung und Gebrauch in der Schriftsprache. [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 27]. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Güldemann, T.
2008Quotative indexes in African languages: a synchronic and diachronic survey [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 34]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Haan, F.
1999Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 18, 83–101. http://​www​.u​.arizona​.edu​/~fdehaan​/papers​/SWJL99​.pdfGoogle Scholar
2001The relation between modality and evidentiality. In M. Reis, & R. Müller (Eds.):. Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen. Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft, 9, 201–216. http://​www​.u​.arizona​.edu​/~fdehaan​/papers​/lb01​.pdfGoogle Scholar
2005aCoding of evidentiality. In M. Haspelmath, & M. S. Dryer (Eds.), World atlas of language structures. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​www​.u​.arizona​.edu​/~fdehaan​/papers​/evid1​.pdf Google Scholar
2005bSemantic distinctions of evidentiality. In M. Haspelmath, & M. S. Dryer (Eds.), World atlas of language structures. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​www​.u​.arizona​.edu​/~fdehaan​/papers​/evidsem​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
1993A grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holvoet, A.
2005Evidentialität, Modalität und interpretative Verwendung. In B. Hansen, & P. Karlik (Eds.), Modality in Slavonic languages. New perspectives (115–125). München: Verlag Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J.
1991On some principles of grammaticalization. In E. C. Traugott, & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol . I (17–35). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ifantidou, E.
2001Evidentials and relevance. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jäger, S.
(Ed.) 1971Der Konjunktiv in der deutschen Sprache der Gegenwart. Untersuchungen an ausgewählten Texten[Heutiges Deutsch I/1]. München: Hueber.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, G.
1976Die indirekte Rede und mit ihr konkurrierende Formen der Redeerwähnung[Heutiges Deutsch III/1]. München: Hueber.Google Scholar
Kwon, I.
2012Viewpoints in the Korean verbal complex: Evidence, perception, assessment, and time. Phd dissertation. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
1991Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2008Cognitive grammar: a basic introduction. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lazard, G.
2001On the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 359–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, C.
2002aNew reflections on grammaticalization and lexicalization. In I. Wischer, & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (1–18). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002b [1982] Thoughts on grammaticalization. Second, revised edition [ASSidUE 9]. Erfurt: Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität.Google Scholar
Leiss, E.
2009Drei Spielarten der Epistemizität, drei Spielarten der Evidentialität und drei Spielarten des Wissens. In W. Abraham, & E. Leiss (Eds.), Modalität. Epistemik und Evidentialität bei Modalverb, Adverb, Modalpartikel und Modus [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 77] (3–24). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Letnes, O.
1997 Sollen als Indikator für Redewiedergabe. In F. Debus, & O. Leirbukt (Eds.), Studien zu Deutsch als Fremdsprache III. Aspekte der Modalität im Deutschen – auch in kontrastiver Sicht [Germanistische Linguistik 136] (119–134). Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
2008Quotatives sollen und Sprecherhaltung. In O. Letnes, E. Maagerø, & H. Vater (Eds.),Modalität und Grammatikalisierung – Modality and grammaticalization [FOKUS. Linguistisch-Philologische Studien 34] (23–37). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
2011Über werden und sollen als modale und/oder evidentielle Marker. In G. Diewald, & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Modalität und Evidentialität – Modality and evidentiality [FOKUS. Linguistisch-Philologische Studien 37] (109–123). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
Li, C. N.
1986Direct speech and indirect speech: A functional study. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Direct speech and indirect speech [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 31] (29–46). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marín Arrese, J. I., Haßler, G., & Carretero, M.
Eds. 2017Evidentiality revisited. Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives. [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 271]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marschall, M.
2002Indirekte Rede ohne–wiedergabe. In D. Baudot (Ed.), Redewiedergabe, Redeerwähnung. Formen und Funktionen des Zitierens und Reformulierens im Text [Eurogermanistik 17] (27–40). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Maslova, E.
2003Evidentiality in Yukaghir. In A. Y. Aikhenvald, & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Studies in evidentiality [Typological Studies in Language 54] (219–236). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mortelmans, T.
1999 Die Modalverben sollen und müssen im heutigen Deutsch unter besonderer Berücksichtigung ihres Status als subjektivierten ‘grounding predications’ ,. PhD University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
2009Erscheinungsformen der indirekten Rede im Niederländischen und Deutschen: zou-, soll(te)- und der Konjunktiv I. In W. Abraham, & E. Leiss (Eds.), Modalität. Epistemik und Evidentialität bei Modalverb, Adverb, Modalpartikel und Modus [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 77] (171–187). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Mortelmans, T. & Vanderbiesen, J.
2011Dies will ein Parlamentarier aus zuverlässiger Quelle erfahren haben. Reportives wollen zwischen sollen und dem Konjunktiv I der indirekten Rede. In G. Diewald, & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Modalität und Evidentialität – Modality and Evidentiality [FOKUS. Linguistisch-Philologische Studien 37] (69–88). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
Mushin, I.
2001Evidentiality and epistemological stance: narrative retelling [Pragmatics & Beyond, new series 87]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Narrog, H.
2005Book review. Aikhenvald, A. 2004. Evidentiality. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 18, 379–388.Google Scholar
Nuyts, J.
2001Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization: A cognitive-pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, F. R.
1986Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pérennec, M. -H.
2002Fiktive und nicht-fiktive Texte. In D. Baudot (Ed.), Redewiedergabe, Redeerwähnung. Formen und Funktionen des Zitierens und Reformulierens im Text [Eurogermanistik 17] (41–53). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Pietrandrea, P., & Stathi, K.
2010What counts as an evidential unit? The case of evidential complex constructions in Italian and Modern Greek. STUF – Language Typology and Universals, 63(4), 333–344.Google Scholar
Plungian, V. A.
2001The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 349–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pütz, H.
1989Referat – vor allem Berichtete Rede – im Deutschen und Norwegischen. In W. Abraham, & T. Janssen (Eds.), Tempus – Aspekt – Modus. Die lexikalischen und grammatischen Formen in den germanischen Sprachen (183–223). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ramat, P.
2012aReview. Diewald, G., & Smirnova, E., Evidentiality in German: Linguistic realization and regularities in grammaticalisation. Linguistic Typology, 16, 167–175.Google Scholar
2012bReview. G. Diewald, & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages. Linguistic Typology, 16, 175–181.Google Scholar
de Reuse, W. J.
2003Evidentiality in Western Apache (Athabaskan). In A. Y. Aikhenvald, & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Studies in evidentiality [Typological Studies in Language 54] (79–100). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schenner, M.
2009Semantics of evidentials: German reportative modals. In S. Blaho, C. Constantinescu, & B. le Bruyn (Eds.), Proceedings of ConSOLE XVI (179–198). Leiden: Universiteit Leiden.Google Scholar
2010Embedded evidentials in German. In G. Diewald, & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages[Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 49] (157–186). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Smirnova, E., & Diewald, G.
2011Indirekte Rede zwischen Modus, Modalität und Evidentialität. In G. Diewald, & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Modalität und Evidentialität – Modality and Evidentiality [FOKUS. Linguistisch-Philologische Studien 37] (89–108). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
Squartini, M.
2001The internal structure of evidentiality in Romance. Studies in Language, 25(2), 297–334. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Disentangling evidentiality and epistemic modality in Romance. Lingua, 114, 873–895. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Lexical vs. grammatical evidentiality in French and Italian. Linguistics, 46(5), 917–947. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sridhar, S. N.
1990Kannada. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, P. M.
2003Evidentiality in Shipibo-Konibo, with a comparative overview of the category in Panoan. In A. Y. Aikhenvald, & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Studies in evidentiality [Typological Studies in Language 54] (33–62). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vanderbiesen, J.
2014 wollen: On the verge between quotative and reportive evidential. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 2, 167–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Mixed points of view and the quotative-reportive cline in German reported speech. In B. Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu, & A. Verhagen (Eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning. [Cognitive Linguistics Research 55] (41–91. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vliegen, M.
2010Verbbezogene Redewiedergabe: Subjektivität, Verknüpfung und Verbbedeutung. Deutsche Sprache, 38(3), 210–233.Google Scholar
von Roncador, M.
(Ed.) 1988Zwischen direkter und indirekter Rede. Nichtwörtliche direkte Rede, erlebte Rede, logophorische Konstruktionen und Verwandtes[Linguistische Arbeiten 192]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, B.
2010Hearsay in European languages: toward an integrative account of grammatical and lexical marking. In G. Diewald, & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages[Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 49] (59–130). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wiemer, B., & Stathi, K.
2010The database of evidential markers in European languages. A bird’s eye view of the conception of the database (the template and problems hidden beneath it). STUF – Language Typology and Universals, 63(4), 275–289.Google Scholar
Willett, T.
1988A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language, 12(1), 51–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar