Chapter published in:
Evidence for Evidentiality
Edited by Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop and Gijs Mulder
[Human Cognitive Processing 61] 2018
► pp. 227256
References

References

Aikhenvald, A. Y.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bielmeier, R.
2000Syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic-epistemic functions of auxiliaries in Western Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area [In B. Bickel (Ed.), Person and evidence in Himalayan languages Part I, special issue], 23(2), 79–125.Google Scholar
Bergqvist, H.
This volume. Evidentiality as stance: Event types and speaker roles.
Brosig, B.
This volume. Factual vs. evidential? The past tense forms of spoken Khalkha Mongolian.
Champa Thupten Zongtse
(Ed.) 1981The biography of Chag lo-tsā-ba chos rje dpal (Dharmasvāmin) by Śākya’i dge-bsñen chos-dpal-dar-dpyan, critically edited by Champa Thupten Zongtse with a preface by Gustav Roth. New Delhi: International Academy of Indian Culture.Google Scholar
Friedman, V. A.
1986Evidentiality in the Balkans: Bulgarian, Macedonian, and Albanian. In: W. Chafe and J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: the linguistic coding of epistemology. (168–187). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Gawne, L. & N. W. Hill
2017The contribution of Tibetan languages to the study of evidentiality. In L. Gawne & N. W. Hill (Eds.), Evidential Systems of Tibetan Languages (1–38). Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter–Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Georg, S.
2001Mongolisch-tibetische Sprachkontakte im Gansu-Korridor. In: S. Wild und H. Schild (Eds.), Akten des 27. Deutschen Orientalistentages. (Bonn - 28. September bis 2. Oktober 1998.) Norm und Abweichung. (763–774). Würzburg: Ergon.Google Scholar
Gipper, S.
This volume. From similarity to evidentiality: Uncertain visual/perceptual evidentiality in Yurakaré and other languages.
Hill, N. W.
2013aContextual semantics of ‘Lhasa’ Tibetan evidentials. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics,10(3), 47–54. http://​www​.skase​.sk​/Volumes​/JTL24​/pdf​_doc​/03​.pdf (last accessed: 30-04-2014).Google Scholar
2013b ḥdug as a testimonial marker in Classical and Old Tibetan. Himalayan Linguistics,12(1),1–16. https://​escholarship​.org​/uc​/item​/9j980579Google Scholar
de Hoop, H.
al. This volume. I think and I believe: evidential expressions in Dutch.
Jäschke, H. A.
1881A Tibetan-English dictionary: with special reference to the prevailing dialects: to which is added an English-Tibetan vocabulary. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Reprint 1995, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Jones, E.
2009Evidentiality and mirativity in Balti. Master’s thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
de Jong, J. W.
(Ed.) 1959Mi la ras pa’i rnam thar: Texte tibétain de la vie de Milarépa. ̓s-Gravenhage: Mouton.Google Scholar
Martin, Dan
2013Pavements like the sea and the name of the Jokhang: King Solomon and the Queen of Sheba in Lhasa? In F. -K. Erhard und P. Maurer (Eds.), Nepalica-Tibetica. Festgabe for Christoph Cüppers. [Band 2] (23–35). Andiast: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.Google Scholar
Mulder, G.
This volume. (Yo) creo que as a marker of evidentiality and epistemic modality: Evidence from Twitter.
Oisel, G.
2013Morphosyntaxe et sémantique des auxiliaires et des connecteurs du tibétain littéraire. Étude diachronique et synchronique. PhD thesis, Laboratoire du LACITO – CNRS.Google Scholar
2017Re-evaluation of the evidential system of Lhasa Tibetan and its atypical functions. Himalayan Linguistics,16(2), 90–128. https://​escholarship​.org​/uc​/item​/9v08z3b4Google Scholar
Quintman, A.
2014The yogin and the madman. Reading the biographical corpus of Tibet’s great saint Milarepa. N.Y.: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Sandman, E. and C., Simon
2016Tibetan as a “model language” in the Amdo Sprachbund: evidence from Salar and Wutun. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics,3(1), 85–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, H.
2012Multiple usages of the verb ‘snang’ in Gagatang Tibetan (Weixi, Yunnan). Himalayan Linguistics,11(1), 1–16. https://​escholarship​.org​/uc​/item​/774554smGoogle Scholar
Tournadre, N.
1994Tibetan ergativity and the trajectory model. In H. Kitamura, T. Nishida and Y. Nagano (Eds.), Current issues in Sino-Tibetan linguistics. (637–648). Osaka: The Organising Committee. Reprint in Senri Ethnological Studies, 41, 261–275.Google Scholar
Tournadre, N. & Konchok Jiatso
2001Final auxiliary verbs in literary Tibetan and in the dialects. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area,24(1), 49–110.Google Scholar
Volkart, M.
2000The meaning of the auxiliary morpheme ʼdug in the aspect systems of some Central Tibetan dialects. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area [In B. Bickel (Ed.), Person and evidence in Himalayan languages Part I, special issue], 23(2), 127–153.Google Scholar
Widmer, M.
2017Rethinking the relationship between egophoricity and evidentiality. [Paper presented at the 50th Annual Meeting of Societas Linguistica Europaea, Zürich 10–13 September 2017].
Zadoks, A.
2004Evidentials in Middle Tibetan texts. [Paper presented at the 37th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, Lund, October 1–3.]
Zeisler, B.
2004Relative tense and aspectual values in Tibetan languages. A comparative study. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Evidentiality and inferentiality: Overlapping and contradictory functions of the so-called evidential markers in Ladakhi (West Tibetan). Extended handout.Google Scholar
Zeisler, B.
2017aDon’t believe in a paradigm that you haven’t manipulated yourself! Evidentiality, speaker’s attitude, and admirativity in Ladakhi (a Tibetic language spoken in the Northwest of India). Cognitive Linguistics [In A. Celle & A. Tsangalidis (Eds.), The linguistic expression of mirativity, special issue] 15(2), 515–538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017bThe emergence of the Ladakhi inferential and experiential markers from a marker for admirativity (non-commitment): the case of ḥdug and snaŋ . Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, 4(2), 250–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Zeisler, Bettina
2021. Marius Zemp: A Grammar of Purik Tibetan. Linguistic Typology 25:2  pp. 401 ff. Crossref logo
Zhou, Yang & Hiroyuki Suzuki
2021. Evidentiality in Selibu. Diachronica Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.