Chapter published in:Evidence for Evidentiality
Edited by Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop and Gijs Mulder
[Human Cognitive Processing 61] 2018
► pp. 281–304
Chapter 11What do different methods of data collection reveal about evidentiality?
In this chapter, different types of data used in evidentiality studies are discussed. We first discuss reference grammars, which are necessary for any cross-linguistic study of evidentials. This is followed by a discussion of (different types of) usage-based data, as well as natural language data and stimulus-based data collection used in linguistic fieldwork. We end our discussion by examining data collected by means of questionnaires and acceptability judgments. It is shown that all the types of data discussed are relevant for a full understanding of evidentiality, but they differ in their contribution and complement each other. For example, usage-based data is necessary for studying frequencies in languages, while reference grammars reveal what is common across languages.
- 2.Reference grammars and the typological perspective
- 3.Usage-based data
- 4.Field linguistics
- 4.1Naturally occurring speech
- 4.2Controlled and staged events
- 5.Questionnaires and acceptability judgments
Published online: 19 July 2018
Chafe, W. L., and J. Nichols
Cheung, J. C. K., Leung, M., Yang, A. Xing, D. & Tse, J.
Curnow, T. J.
2001 Evidentiality and me: The interaction of evidentials and first person. In C. Allen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2001 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society. http://www.als.asn.au
Foley, W. A.
Heritage, J., & Raymond, G.
Itkonen, E., & Pajunen, A.
2017 Comparison of evidentiality terminology. A paper presented at the symposium ‘The expression of knowledge: epistemicity and beyond’, Helsinki, 23.8.2017.
Mittelberg, I., Farmer, T., & Waugh, L. R.
Nuckolls, J., & Michael, L.
San Roque, L., Gawne, L., Hoenigman, D., Miller, J. C., Rumsey, A., Spronck, S., Carroll, A., & Evans, N.
2012 Getting the story straight: Language fieldwork using a narrative problem-solving task. Language Documentation & Conservation, 6, 135–174. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4504.
Silva, W., & AnderBois, S.
Whitt, R. J.
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.