Chapter published in:
Language Learning, Discourse and Cognition: Studies in the tradition of Andrea Tyler
Edited by Lucy Pickering and Vyvyan Evans
[Human Cognitive Processing 64] 2018
► pp. 18
References

References

Bardovi-Harlig, K.
(2009) Conventional expressions as a pragmalinguistic resource: Recognition and production of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 9, 755–795.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., Mossman, S., & Vellenga, H. E.
(2015a) The effect of instruction on pragmatic routines in academic discussion. Language Teaching Research, 19, 324–350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boxer, D. & Cortés-Conde, F.
(1997) From bonding to biting: Conversational joking and identity display. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 275–294.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, C. E., & Tyler, A.
(1994) Demystifying cross-cultural (mis)communication: Improving performance through balanced feedback in a situated context. In C. Madden & C. Myers (Eds.), Discourse and performance of international teaching assistants (pp. 201–220). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.Google Scholar
(2005) Discourse strategies in the context of cross-cultural institutional talk: Uncovering interlanguage pragmatics in the university classroom. In K. Bardovi-Harlig & B. S. Hartford (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics: Exploring institutional talk (pp. 133–156). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Grady, J.
(1999) A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs. resemblance. In R. W. Gibbs & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nakahama, Y., Tyler, A., & van Lier, L.
(2001) Negotiation of meaning in conversational and information gap activities: A comparative discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 377–405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Porte, G.
(2012) Replication research in applied linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tapper, G., Drzazga, G., Mendoza, M., & Grill, J. C.
XXXX). Discourse management strategies revisited: Building on Tyler’s early insights regarding international teaching assistant comprehensibility. In L. Pickering & V. Evans Eds. Language learning, discourse and cognition: Studies in the tradition of Andrea Tyler pp. XXX Amsterdam John Bejamins
Tyler, A.
(1992a) Discourse structure and specification of relationships: A cross-linguistic analysis. Text Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 12(1), 1–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992b) Discourse structure and the perception of incoherence in international teaching assistants’ spoken discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 26(4), 713–729.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1994a) The role of repetition in perceptions of discourse coherence. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(6), 671–688.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1994b) The role of syntactic structure in discourse structure: Signaling logical and prominence relations. Applied Linguistics, 15(3), 243–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) The co-construction of cross-cultural miscommunication. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(2), 129–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012a) Cognitive linguistics and second language learning: Theoretical basics and experimental evidence. NY: Routledge.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012b) Spatial language, polysemy, and cross-linguistic semantic mismatches: Cognitive linguistics insights into challenges for second language learners, spatial cognition & computation. An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(4), 305–335.Google Scholar
Tyler, A., & Bro, J.
(1992) Discourse structure in nonnative English discourse: The effect of ordering and interpretive cues on perceptions of comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(1), 71–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A., & Davies, C. E.
(1990) Cross-linguistic communication missteps. Text, 10(4), 385–411.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A. & Evans, V.
(2001) Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks. Language 77(4), 724–765.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A., & Evans, V.
(2003) The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Applying cognitive linguistics to pedagogical grammar: The case of over . In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics, Second language Acquisition, and Foreign Language Teaching (pp. 257–280). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A., Jefferies, A., & Davies, C. E.
(1988) The effect of discourse structuring devices on listener perceptions of coherence in non-native university teachers’ spoken discourse. World Englishes 7(2), 101–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar