Cover not available
Part of
Language Learning, Discourse and Cognition: Studies in the tradition of Andrea Tyler
Edited by Lucy Pickering and Vyvyan Evans
[Human Cognitive Processing 64] 2018
► pp. 63–82

Chapter 3
Senior confessions

Narratives of self-disclosure

This study is an ethnographic analysis of narratives of self-disclosure in the context of recurring happy hour events among “the new old” – people in their sixties who are recently retired or who are about to do so. The storytellers herein share recollections that divulge past transgressions, disclosing identities that are sometimes conflicting. In so doing, they reveal identities of foolishness at a younger age that they claim to have “remedied” through maturation. Revealing personal information is, in general, perceived as a risky business. For the conversations observed here, these groups form a ‘temporary’ bond that seeks common ground and accepts a ‘temporary’ understanding of what this personal information means and how it is to be evaluated.
Keywords: discourse analysis, narrative, relational identity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Method and data
  • 3.Literature review
  • 4.The study
    • 4.1Out of “wedlock”
    • 4.2The “good old days”
    • 4.3Neglectful parenting
    • 4.4All work and no play
    • 4.5Skirting the law
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Humor
    • 5.2Gender differences
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 20 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.64.04box
References (35)
References
Altman, I., & Taylor, D. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Archer, R. L., & Earle, W. (1983). The interpersonal orientations of disclosure. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Basic group processes (pp. 289–314). New York: Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bamberg, M. (1997). Narrative development: Six approaches. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boxer, D. (2011). The lost art of the good schmooze. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
Boxer, D., & Cortés-Conde, F. (1997). From bonding to biting: Conversational joking and identity display. Journal of Pragmatics 27, 275–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boxer, D. & Matsumoto, Y. (2015). Funny in hindsight: Gender, age and humor in self-disclosure stories across cultures, Paper presented at IPrA, 2015, Antwerp, Belgium.
Bucholtz, M., Liang, A., & Sutton, L. (Eds.). (1999). Bad examples: Transgression and progress in language and gender studies. Reinventing identities: The gendered self in discourse (pp. 3–24). New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chelune, G. (1987). A neuropsychological perspective of interpersonal communication. In V. J. Delega & J. H. Berg (Eds.), Self-disclosure: Theory, research, and therapy (pp. 9–34). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Coates, J. (1983). Women, men and language. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cortés-Conde, F. & Boxer, D. (2010). Humorous self-disclosures as resistance to socially imposed gender roles. Gender and Language, 4(1), 73–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Francisco, V. (1991). The sounds of silence: How men silence women in marital relations. Discourse & Society, 4, 413–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derlega, V. J., & Grzelak, J. (1979). Appropriateness of self-disclosure. In G. J. Chelune (Ed.). Self-Disclosure: Origins, patterns and implications of openness in interpersonal relationships (pp. 1–9). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 106–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 461–490 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edelsky, C. (1981). Who’s got the floor? Language in society, 10(3), 383–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (2001). The place of gender in developmental pragmatics: Cultural factors. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34(1), 131–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S., & Lampert, M. (1992). Gender differences in the construction of humorous talk. In K. Hall, M. Bucholtz, and B. Moonwoman (Eds.), Locating power (pp. 10–117). Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S., Lampert, M., Escalera, E., and Reyes, I. (2004). ‘It was a hecka funny:’ Some features of children’s conversational development. Texas Linguistic Forum, 48, 1–16.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. New York: Harper Colophon.Google Scholar
Herring, S., Johnson, D., & DiBenedetto, T. (1992). Participation in electronic discourse in a ‘Feminist Field’. In K. Hall, M. Bucholtz, and B. Moonwoman (Eds.), Locating power (pp. 250–262). Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1984). On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 346–369). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keltner, D. & Capps, L. (2001). Just teasing: A conceptual analysis and empirical review Psychological Bulletin , 127(2), 229–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lampert, M. & Ervin-Tripp, S. (2006). Risky laughter: Teasing and self-directed joking among male and female friends Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 51–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linde, C. (1993). Life stories: The creation of coherence. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. (2011). Painful to playful: Quotidian frames in the conversational discourse of older Japanese women Language in Society, 40, 591–616. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Dealing with life changes: Humour in painful self-disclosures by elderly Japanese women. Ageing & Society, 29, 929–952. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N. (2009). The construction of multiple identities in elderly narrators’ stories. Ageing & Society, 29, 903–927. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubin, L. (1983). Intimate strangers. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Schnurr, S. & Holmes, J. (2007). Humour and masculinity at work. Paper presented at the International Pragmatics Association conference, Goteborg, Sweden.
Spack, R. (1988). Initiating ESL students into the academic discourse community: How far should we go? TESOL Quarterly (21: 1).Google Scholar
Takanashi, H. (2007). Framing self-directed humor by Japanese women. Paper presented at the International Pragmatics Association conference, Goteborg, Sweden.
Tannen, D. (1984). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
West, C. & Zimmerman, D. (1983). Women’s place in everyday talk: Reflections on parent-child interaction. Social Problems, 24, 521–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar