Part of
Language Learning, Discourse and Cognition: Studies in the tradition of Andrea TylerEdited by Lucy Pickering and Vyvyan Evans
[Human Cognitive Processing 64] 2018
► pp. 301–310
Edited by Lucy Pickering and Vyvyan Evans
[Human Cognitive Processing 64] 2018
► pp. 301–310
AfterwordThe theoretical and applied foundations of Andrea Tyler’s approach to the study of language
References
Bardovi-Harlig, K., Mossman, S., & Vellenga, H. E.
(2015a) The effect of instruction on pragmatic routines in academic discussion. Language Teaching Research, 19, 324–350. 
(2015b) Developing corpus-based materials to teach pragmatic routines. TESOL Journal, 6, 499–526.
Bauman, R. & J. Sherzer
(1975), The Ethnography of Speaking. Annual Review of Anthropology, 4, 95–119.
Boxer, D. & Cortés-Conde, F.
(1997) From bonding to biting: Conversational joking and identity display. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 275–294.
Bybee, J.
(2006) Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Davies, C. E.
(2018) Culture, gender, ethnicity, identity in discourse: Exploring cross-cultural communicative competence in American university contexts. In L. Pickering & V. Evans (Eds.), Language learning, discourse and cognition: Studies in the tradition of Andrea Tyler (pp. 11–36). Amsterdam: John Bejamins.
Davies, C. E., & A. Tyler
(1994) Demystifying cross-cultural (mis)communication: Improving performance through balanced feedback in a situated context. In C. Madden & C. Myers (Eds.), Discourse and Performance of International Teaching Assistants (pp. 201–220). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Davies, C. E., & Tyler, A.
(2005) Discourse strategies in the context of cross-cultural institutional talk: Uncovering interlanguage pragmatics in the university classroom. In K. Bardovi-Harlig & B. S. Hartford, (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics: Exploring institutional talk (pp. 133–156). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dolgova, N.
(2018) The use of hedging devices in L2 legal writing: A cognitive functional perspective. In L. Pickering & V. Evans (Eds.), Language learning, discourse and cognition: Studies in the tradition of Andrea Tyler (pp. 275–300). Amsterdam: John Bejamins.
Grady, J.
(1997) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Gumperz, J. J.
(1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hymes, D.
(1972) On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269–293). Baltimore: Penguin.
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, R.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Mahpeykar, N.
(2018) The role of embodiment in the semantic analysis of phrasal verbs: A corpus-based study. In L. Pickering & V. Evans (Eds.), Language learning, discourse and cognition: Studies in the tradition of Andrea Tyler (pp. 111–130). Amsterdam: John Bejamins.
Nakahama, Y., Tyler, A., & van Lier, L.
(2001) Negotiation of meaning in conversational and information gap activities: A comparative discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 377–405.
Ortega, L., Lee, S., & Miyata, M.
XXXX). What is happened? Your amazon.com order has shipped: Overpassivization and unaccusativity as L2 construction learning. In L. Pickering & V. Evans Eds. Language learning, discourse and cognition: Studies in the tradition of Andrea Tyler pp. XXX Amsterdam John Bejamins
Ortega, L. & Tyler, A.
(2016) Introduction: The vibrant and expanded study of usage-based language learning and Bilingualism, In Ortega, L., Tyler, A. E., Park, H. I., & Uno, M. (Eds.), The usage-based study of language learning and multilingualism (pp. 1–12). Georgetown University Press.
Perlmutter, D.
(1978) Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis (BLS No. 4). University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C.
(1975) Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 382–439.
Simpson, R. C., Briggs, S. L., Ovens, J., & Swales, J. M.
(2002) The Michigan corpus of academic spoken English. Ann Arbor, MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan.
Tapper, G., Drzazga, G., Mendoza, M., & Grill, J. C.
(2018) Discourse management strategies revisited: Building on Tyler’s early insights regarding international teaching assistant comprehensibility. In L. Pickering & V. Evans (Eds.), Language learning, discourse and cognition: Studies in the tradition of Andrea Tyler (pp. 37–62). Amsterdam: John Bejamins.
Tsujita, M.
(2018) Synthesthetic metaphors of sound: An analysis of the semantics of English and Japanese adjectives. In L. Pickering & V. Evans (Eds.), Language learning, discourse and cognition: Studies in the tradition of Andrea Tyler (pp. 131–158). Amsterdam: John Bejamins.
Tyler, A.
(1994) Effective role-play situations and focused feedback: A case for pragmatic analysis in the classroom. In C. Madden & C. Myers (Eds.), Discourse and performance of international teaching assistants (pp. 116–133). Alexandria, VA: TESOL
(2010) Usage-based approaches to language and their applications to second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 270–291.
(2012) Cognitive linguistics and second language learning: Theoretical basics and experimental evidence. NY: Routledge.
Tyler, A., & Davies, C.
(1990) Cross-linguistic communication missteps. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 10(4), 385–412.
Tyler, A., & Evans, V.
(2001) Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: The case of over
. Language, 77(4), 724–765.
(2003) The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2004) Applying cognitive linguistics to pedagogical grammar: The case of over
. Cognitive linguistics, Second language acquisition, and Foreign Language Teaching, 18, 257–280.
Tyler, A., Jefferies, A., & Davies, C. E.
(1988) The effect of discourse structuring devices on listener perceptions of coherence in non-native university teachers’ spoken discourse. World Englishes 7(2), 101–110.