Chapter published in:
Language Learning, Discourse and Cognition: Studies in the tradition of Andrea Tyler
Edited by Lucy Pickering and Vyvyan Evans
[Human Cognitive Processing 64] 2018
► pp. 301310
References

References

Bardovi-Harlig, K., Mossman, S., & Vellenga, H. E.
(2015a) The effect of instruction on pragmatic routines in academic discussion. Language Teaching Research, 19, 324–350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015b) Developing corpus-based materials to teach pragmatic routines. TESOL Journal, 6, 499–526.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, R. & J. Sherzer
(1975), The Ethnography of Speaking. Annual Review of Anthropology, 4, 95–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boxer, D. & Cortés-Conde, F.
(1997) From bonding to biting: Conversational joking and identity display. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 275–294.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2006) Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, C. E.
(2018) Culture, gender, ethnicity, identity in discourse: Exploring cross-cultural communicative competence in American university contexts. In L. Pickering & V. Evans (Eds.), Language learning, discourse and cognition: Studies in the tradition of Andrea Tyler (pp. 11–36). Amsterdam: John Bejamins.Google Scholar
Davies, C. E., & A. Tyler
(1994) Demystifying cross-cultural (mis)communication: Improving performance through balanced feedback in a situated context. In C. Madden & C. Myers (Eds.), Discourse and Performance of International Teaching Assistants (pp. 201–220). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.Google Scholar
Davies, C. E., & Tyler, A.
(2005) Discourse strategies in the context of cross-cultural institutional talk: Uncovering interlanguage pragmatics in the university classroom. In K. Bardovi-Harlig & B. S. Hartford, (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics: Exploring institutional talk (pp. 133–156). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dolgova, N.
(2018) The use of hedging devices in L2 legal writing: A cognitive functional perspective. In L. Pickering & V. Evans (Eds.), Language learning, discourse and cognition: Studies in the tradition of Andrea Tyler (pp. 275–300). Amsterdam: John Bejamins.Google Scholar
Grady, J.
(1997) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J.
(1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D.
(1972) On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269–293). Baltimore: Penguin.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mahpeykar, N.
(2018) The role of embodiment in the semantic analysis of phrasal verbs: A corpus-based study. In L. Pickering & V. Evans (Eds.), Language learning, discourse and cognition: Studies in the tradition of Andrea Tyler (pp. 111–130). Amsterdam: John Bejamins.Google Scholar
Nakahama, Y., Tyler, A., & van Lier, L.
(2001) Negotiation of meaning in conversational and information gap activities: A comparative discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 377–405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L., Lee, S., & Miyata, M.
XXXX). What is happened? Your amazon.com order has shipped: Overpassivization and unaccusativity as L2 construction learning. In L. Pickering & V. Evans Eds. Language learning, discourse and cognition: Studies in the tradition of Andrea Tyler pp. XXX Amsterdam John Bejamins
Ortega, L. & Tyler, A.
(2016) Introduction: The vibrant and expanded study of usage-based language learning and Bilingualism, In Ortega, L., Tyler, A. E., Park, H. I., & Uno, M. (Eds.), The usage-based study of language learning and multilingualism (pp. 1–12). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D.
(1978) Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis (BLS No. 4). University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley Linguistics Society.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C.
(1975) Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 382–439.Google Scholar
Simpson, R. C., Briggs, S. L., Ovens, J., & Swales, J. M.
(2002) The Michigan corpus of academic spoken English. Ann Arbor, MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Tapper, G., Drzazga, G., Mendoza, M., & Grill, J. C.
(2018) Discourse management strategies revisited: Building on Tyler’s early insights regarding international teaching assistant comprehensibility. In L. Pickering & V. Evans (Eds.), Language learning, discourse and cognition: Studies in the tradition of Andrea Tyler (pp. 37–62). Amsterdam: John Bejamins.Google Scholar
Tsujita, M.
(2018) Synthesthetic metaphors of sound: An analysis of the semantics of English and Japanese adjectives. In L. Pickering & V. Evans (Eds.), Language learning, discourse and cognition: Studies in the tradition of Andrea Tyler (pp. 131–158). Amsterdam: John Bejamins.Google Scholar
Tyler, A.
(1994) Effective role-play situations and focused feedback: A case for pragmatic analysis in the classroom. In C. Madden & C. Myers (Eds.), Discourse and performance of international teaching assistants (pp. 116–133). Alexandria, VA: TESOLGoogle Scholar
(2010) Usage-based approaches to language and their applications to second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 270–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Cognitive linguistics and second language learning: Theoretical basics and experimental evidence. NY: Routledge.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A., & Davies, C.
(1990) Cross-linguistic communication missteps. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 10(4), 385–412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A., & Evans, V.
(2001) Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: The case of over . Language, 77(4), 724–765.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Applying cognitive linguistics to pedagogical grammar: The case of over . Cognitive linguistics, Second language acquisition, and Foreign Language Teaching, 18, 257–280.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A., Jefferies, A., & Davies, C. E.
(1988) The effect of discourse structuring devices on listener perceptions of coherence in non-native university teachers’ spoken discourse. World Englishes 7(2), 101–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar