Chapter published in:
Perspectives on Abstract Concepts: Cognition, language and communicationEdited by Marianna Bolognesi and Gerard J. Steen
[Human Cognitive Processing 65] 2019
► pp. 121–144
Chapter 6Determinants of abstractness and concreteness and their persuasive effects
The writing guideline to avoid abstractness and to use concrete language instead has a long and well-deserved reputation. Nevertheless, it is not clear what constitutes concrete language. In this chapter we report two studies. The first investigates the determinants of concreteness and abstractness using a rating task. The results show that for all word classes sensory perceptibility is an important component and that the determinants specificity and drawability/filmability vary with word class. In the second study, we used the insights from study 1 to manipulate a text from the National Budgeting Institute (Nibud) that addresses adolescents from different educational levels. The results only show effects of educational level on comprehension and persuasive power; no effects of concreteness were found. The studies raise issues about the validity of the writing guideline to be concrete.
Keywords: abstractness, comprehension, concreteness, determinants, persuasion
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Study 1: Determinants of concreteness and abstractness
- 2.1Method
- 2.1.1Word list
- 2.1.2Participants and procedure
- 2.1.3Results
- 2.2Conclusion and discussion
- 2.1Method
- 3.Study 2: Effects of concreteness
- 3.1Introduction
- 3.2Method
- 3.2.1Materials
- Original version
- Abstract version
- Concrete version
- Concrete version with detailed examples
- 3.2.2Participants and design
- 3.2.3Instruments
- 3.2.4Procedure
- 3.2.5Statistical analysis
- 3.2.1Materials
- 3.3Results
- 3.3.1Text appreciation
- 3.3.2Persuasive impact
- 3.3.3Comprehensibility
- 3.3.4Other measures
- 3.4Conclusion and discussion
- 4.General discussion
-
Acknowledgment -
Notes -
References
Published online: 06 June 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.65.07hus
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.65.07hus
References
Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., De Deyne, S., Voorspoels, W., & Storms, G.
Coltheart, M.
Connell, L., & Lynott, D.
Douma, P.
Ernestus, M., & Cutler, A.
Frey, K. P., & Eagly, A. H.
Gibson, R., & Zillmann, D.
Gowers, S. E.
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulikowich, J. M.
Guadagno, R. E., Rhoads, K. V. L., & Sagarin, B. J.
Hansen, J., & Wänke, M.
Hustinx, L., & de Wit, E.
van Loon-Vervoorn, W. A.
McMaster, K. L., Van den Broek, P., Espin, C. A., White, M. J., Rapp, D. N., Kendeou, P., Bohn-Gettler, C. M., & Carlson, S.
McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C., McCarthy, P. M., & Cai, Z.
Oostdijk, N., Reynaert, M., Monachesi, P., Noord, G. van Ordelman, R., Schuurman, I., & Vandeghinste, V.
2008 From D-Coi to SoNaR: A reference corpus for Dutch. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, J. Odijk, S. Piperidis, & D. Tapias (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’08). Marrakech: European Language Resources Association (ELRA). Available from http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2008/.
Orwell, G.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A.
Pettus, C., & Diener, E.
Reyes, R. M., Thompson, W. C., & Bower, G. H.
Sadoski, M.
Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T., & Rodriguez, M.
Sanders, T., Land, J., & Mulder, G.
Scharrer, L., Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R.
Shedler, J., & Manis, M.
Silfhout, G. van, Evers-Vermeul, J., Mak, W. M., & Sanders, T. J. M.
Smith, S. M., & Shaffer, D. R.
Spooren, W., Smith, B., & Renkema, J.
Spreen, O., & Schulz, R. W.