Chapter published in:
Perspectives on Abstract Concepts: Cognition, language and communication
Edited by Marianna Bolognesi and Gerard J. Steen
[Human Cognitive Processing 65] 2019
► pp. 121144
Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., De Deyne, S., Voorspoels, W., & Storms, G.
2014Norms of age of acquisition and concreteness for 30,000 Dutch words. Acta Psychologica 150, 80–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coltheart, M.
1981The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 33A, 497–505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Connell, L., & Lynott, D.
2012Strength of perceptual experience predicts word processing performance better than concreteness or imageability. Cognition 125(3), 452–465. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Douma, P.
1994Wees zo concreet mogelijk. Schrijfadviseurs over concreet en abstract taalgebruik. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing 16(1), 16–31.Google Scholar
Ernestus, M., & Cutler, A.
2015BALDEY: A database of auditory lexical decisions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 68, 8, 1469–1488. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frey, K. P., & Eagly, A. H.
1993Vividness can undermine the persuasiveness of messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65(1), 32–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R., & Zillmann, D.
1994Exaggerated versus representative exemplification in news reports: Perception of issues and personal consequences. Communication Research 21(5), 603–624. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gowers, S. E.
1986The complete plain words. Revised ed. by S. Greenbaum & J. Whitcut. London: Guild Publishing.Google Scholar
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulikowich, J. M.
2011Coh-Metrix: Providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics. Educational Researcher 40(5), 223–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guadagno, R. E., Rhoads, K. V. L., & Sagarin, B. J.
2011Figural vividness and persuasion: Capturing the “elusive” vividness effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37(5), 626–638. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, J., & Wänke, M.
2010Truth from language and truth from fit: The impact of linguistic concreteness and level of construal on subjective truth. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36(11), 1576–1588. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hustinx, L., & de Wit, E.
2012Kunnen levendige getuigenissen je achter de tralies doen belanden? Een experimenteel onderzoek naar het effect van levendig taalgebruik op oordelen over schuld bij leken en ‘experts’. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing 34(3), 213–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Loon-Vervoorn, W. A.
1985Voorstelbaarheidswaarden van Nederlandse woorden. Lisse: Swetz and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
McMaster, K. L., Van den Broek, P., Espin, C. A., White, M. J., Rapp, D. N., Kendeou, P., Bohn-Gettler, C. M., & Carlson, S.
2012Making the right connections: Differential effects of reading intervention for subgroups of comprehenders. Learning and Individual Differences 22(1), 100–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C., McCarthy, P. M., & Cai, Z.
2014Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oostdijk, N., Reynaert, M., Monachesi, P., Noord, G. van Ordelman, R., Schuurman, I., & Vandeghinste, V.
2008From D-Coi to SoNaR: A reference corpus for Dutch. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, J. Odijk, S. Piperidis, & D. Tapias (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’08). Marrakech: European Language Resources Association (ELRA). Available from http://​www​.lrec​-conf​.org​/proceedings​/lrec2008/.Google Scholar
Orwell, G.
1961Politics and the English language. In G. Orwell, Collected essays (337–351). London and Liverpool: Mercury Books.Google Scholar
Paivio, A.
1971Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
1986Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A.
1968Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement 76(1p2), 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pettus, C., & Diener, E.
1977Factors affecting the effectiveness of abstract versus concrete information. The Journal of Social Psychology 103(2), 233–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reyes, R. M., Thompson, W. C., & Bower, G. H.
1980Judgmental biases resulting from differing availabilities of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(1), 2–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sadoski, M.
1999Theoretical, empirical and practical considerations in designing informational text. Document Design 1(1), 24–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Resolving the effects of concreteness on interest, comprehension, and learning important ideas from text. Educational Psychology Review 13(3), 263–281.Google Scholar
Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T., & Rodriguez, M.
2000Engaging texts: Effects of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest and recall in four text types. Journal of Educational Psychology 92(1), 85–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, T., Land, J., & Mulder, G.
2007Linguistics markers of coherence improve text comprehension in functional contexts. Information Design Journal 15(3), 219–235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scharrer, L., Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R.
2014You’d better ask an expert: Mitigating the comprehensibility effect on laypeople’s decisions about science-based knowledge claims. Applied Cognitive Psychology 28(4), 465–471. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shedler, J., & Manis, M.
1986Can the availability heuristic explain vividness effects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(1), 26–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silfhout, G. van, Evers-Vermeul, J., Mak, W. M., & Sanders, T. J. M.
2014Connectives and layout as processing signals: How textual features affect students’ processing and text representation. Journal of Educational Psychology 106(4), 1036–1048. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. M., & Shaffer, D. R.
2000Vividness can undermine or enhance message processing: The moderating role of vividness congruency. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26(7), 769–779. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spooren, W., Smith, B., & Renkema, J.
2000De invloed van stijl en type argumentatie op de overtuigingskracht van een direct mail. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing 22, 344–357.Google Scholar
Spreen, O., & Schulz, R. W.
1966Parameters of abstraction, meaningfulness, and pronounceability for 329 nouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5(5), 459–468. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D.
1973Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology 5(2), 207–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar