Part of
Perspectives on Abstract Concepts: Cognition, language and communication
Edited by Marianna Bolognesi and Gerard J. Steen
[Human Cognitive Processing 65] 2019
► pp. 167184
References
Agrillo, C., Miletto Petrazzini, M. E. & Bisazza, A.
2014Numerical acuity of fish is improved in the presence of moving targets, but only in the subitizing range. Animal Cognition 17(2), 307–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allan, K.
1980Nouns and countability. Language 56, 541–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allen, R., & Hulme, C.
2006Speech and language processing mechanisms in verbal serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language 55(1), 64–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D.
(1986) Working Memory. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Barner, D., & Snedeker, J.
2005Quantity judgments and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns count. Cognition 97, 41–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baroni, M., Bernardini, S., Ferraresi, A., & Zanchetta, E.
2009The WaCky Wide Web: A Collection of Very Large Linguistically Processed Web-Crawled Corpora. Language Resources and Evaluation 43 (3), 209–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baroni, M., & Ueyama, M.
2006Building general-and special-purpose corpora by web crawling. In Proceedings of the 13th NIJL international symposium, language corpora: Their compilation and application, 31–40.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A. K., & Wilson, C. D.
2003Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(2), 84–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergelson, E., & Swingley, D.
2012At 6–9 months, human infants know the meanings of many common nouns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(9), 3253–3258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Binder, J. R., Conant, L. L., Humphries, C. J., Fernandino, L., Simons, S. B., Aguilar, M., & Desai, R. H.
2016Toward a brain-based componential semantic representation. Cognitive neuropsychology 33(3–4), 130–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bisiacchi, P., Mondini, S., Angrilli, A., Marinelli, K., & Semenza, C.
2005Mass and count nouns show distinct EEG cortical processes during an explicit semantic task. Brain and Language 95(1), 98–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bleasdale, F. A.
1987Concreteness-dependent associative priming: Separate lexical organization for concrete and abstract words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 13(4), 582–594.Google Scholar
Bloom, P., & Kelemen, D.
1995Syntactic cues in the acquisition of collective nouns. Cognition 56, 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolognesi, M., & Steen, G.
(Eds.) 2018Abstract Concepts: Structure, Processing and Modeling. Editors’ introduction. Topics in Cognitive Science 10(3), 490–500.Google Scholar
Bunt, H. C.
2006Mass expressions. Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics . Amsterdam: Elsevier. 5757–5760.Google Scholar
Cantlon, J. F. & Brannon, E. M.
2006Shared system for ordering small and large numbers in monkeys and humans. Psychological Science 17(5), 401–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carandini, M., Demb, J. B., Mante, V., Tolhurst, D. J., Dan, Y., Olshausen, B. A., Gallant, J. & Rust, N. C.
2005Do we know what the early visual system does? Journal of Neuroscience 25(46), 10577–10597. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carey, S.
2009The origin of concepts. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Case, R.
(1985) Intellectual Development from Birth to Adulthood. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, C. Y.
(1973) Response to Moravcsik. J. Hintikka, J. M.E. Moravcsik, & P. Suppes (eds.). Approaches to Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel, 286-288.Google Scholar
Chiarelli, V., El Yagoubi, R., Mondini, S., Bisiacchi, P., & Semenza, C.
2011The syntactic and semantic processing of mass and count nouns: An ERP study. PloS one 6(10), e25885. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chichy, R. M., Khosla, A., Pantazis, D., Torralba, A., & Oliva, A.
(2016) Comparison of deep neural networks to spatio-temporal cortical dynamics of human visual object recognition reveals hierarchical correspondence. Scientific reports, 6, 27755.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., Patterson, K., & Marshall, J. C.
1987Deep dyslexia since 1980. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Deep dyslexia (2nd ed.). New York, NY, US: Routledge. 407–451.Google Scholar
Crutch, S. J., & Jackson, E. C.
2011Contrasting graded effects of semantic similarity and association across the concreteness spectrum. The Quarterly Journal of ExperimentalPsychology 64(7), 1388–1408.Google Scholar
Crutch, S. J., Williams, P., Ridgway, G. R., & Borgenicht, L.
2012The role of polarity in antonym and synonym conceptual knowledge: Evidence from stroke aphasia and multidimensional ratings of abstract words. Neuropsychologia 50(11), 2636–2644. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crutch, S. J., Troche, J., Reilly, J., & Ridgway, G. R.
2013Abstract conceptual feature ratings: the role of emotion, magnitude, and other cognitive domains in the organization of abstract conceptual knowledge. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7.Google Scholar
Crystal, D.
1995The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, E., & Shapiro, A. G.
2014Paradoxical effect of spatially homogenous transparent fields on simultaneous contrast illusions. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 31(27), A307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, E. L., & Shapiro, A. G.
2017Spatial filtering, color constancy, and the color-changing dressDixon & Shapiro. Journal of Vision 17(3), 7–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
El Yagoubi, R., Mondini, S., Bisiacchi, P., Chiarelli, V., Angrilli, A., & Semenza, C.
2006The elctrophysiological basis of mass and count nouns. Brain and Language 99, 187–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franklin, S., Howard, D., & Patterson, K.
1995Abstract word anomia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 12(5), 549–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feigenson, L., Carey, S., & Hauser, M.
2002The representations underlying infants’ choice of more: Object files versus analog magnitudes. Psychological Science 13(2), 150–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franzon, F., Arcara, G., & Zanini, C.
2016Lexical categories or frequency effects? A feedback from quantitative methods applied to psycholinguistic models in two studies on Italian. Corazza, Montemagni, & Semeraro (eds.).Proceedings of the Third Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2016. Accademia University Press, 152–156.Google Scholar
Franzon, F., Zanini, C., & Rugani, R.
2018Do non-verbal number systems shape grammar? Numerical cognition and Number morphology compared. Mind and Language 2018 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frisson, S., & Frazier, L.
2005Carving up word meaning: Portioning and grinding. Journal of Memory and Language 53(2), 277–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, V. C.
1985He has too much hard questions: The acquisition of the linguistic mass-count distinction in much and many . Journal of Child Language 12(2), 395–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gillon, B., Kehayia, E., & Taler, V.
1999The mass/count distinction: Evidence from on-line psycholinguistic performance. Brain and Language 68, 205–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilhooly, K., & Logie, R.
1980Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words. Behavior Research Methods 12(4), 395–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giusti, G., & Leko, N.
2005The categorial status of quantity expressions. In Linguistički Vidici. Sarajevo: Ed. Forum Bosne, 121–184.Google Scholar
Gordon, P.
1985Evaluating the semantic categories hypothesis: The case of the count/mass distinction. Cognition 20(3), 209–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hespos, S. J., Ferry, A L., & Rips, L. J.
2009Five-month-old infants have different expectations for solids and liquids. Psychological Science 20(5), 603–611. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hespos, S. J., & van Marle, K.
2012Physics for infants: Characterizing the origins of knowledge about objects, substances, and number. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 3(1), 19–27.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K
2002The Cambridge grammar of English. Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huntley-Fenner, G., Carey, S., & Solimando, A.
2002Objects are individuals but stuff doesn’t count: Perceived rigidity and cohesiveness influence infants’ representations of small groups of discrete entities. Cognition 85(3), 203–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Imai, M., & Gentner, D.
1997A cross-linguistic study of early word meaning: Universal ontology and linguistic influence. Cognition 62(2), 169–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
(1991) Parts and Boundaries. Cognition 41, 9-45.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O.
1917Negation in English and other languages. Kobenhavn: Host.Google Scholar
Katz, R. B., & Goodglass, H.
1990Deep dysphasia: Analysis of a rare form of repetition disorder. Brain and Language 39(1), 153–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, G., & Zamparelli, R.
2012Quantifying Count/Mass Elasticity. J. Choi et al. (eds). Proceedings of the 29th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 371–379.Google Scholar
Kulkarni, R., Rothstein, S., & Treves, A.
2013A Statistical Investigation into the Cross-Linguistic Distribution of Mass and Count Nouns: Morphosyntactic and Semantic Perspectives. Biolinguistics 7, 132–168.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
1980Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press.Google Scholar
Landau, B., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. S.
1988The importance of shape in early lexical learning. Cognitive development 3(3), 299–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landau, B., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S.
1992Syntactic context and the shape bias in children’s and adults’ lexical learning. Journal of Memory and Language 31(6), 807–825. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landy, M. S., & Kojima, H.
2001Ideal cue combination for localizing texture-defined edges. JOSA A 18(9), 2307–2320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
2008Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leventhal, A. G., Wang, Y., Schmolesky, M. T., & Zhou, Y.
1997Neural correlates of boundary perception. Visual neuroscience 15(6), 1107–1118.Google Scholar
Marcantonio, A. & Pretto, A. M.
2001Il nome. L. Renzi, G. Salvi, & A., Cardinaletti (eds.). Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione. Bologna: Il Mulino. 329–346.Google Scholar
Markman, E. M.
1990Constraints Children Place on Word Meanings. Cognitive Science 14, 57–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, N., & Saffran, E. M.
1992A computational account of deep dysphasia: Evidence from a single case study. Brain and Language 43(2), 240–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mély, D. A., Kim, J., McGill, M., Guo, Y., & Serre, T.
2016A systematic comparison between visual cues for boundary detection. Vision research 120, 93–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondini, S., Angrilli, A., Bisiacchi, P., Spironelli, C., Marinelli, K., & Semenza, C.
2008Mass and Count nouns activate different brain regions: An ERP study on early components. Neuroscience Letters 430, 48–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondini, S., Kehaya, E., Gillon, B., Arcara, G., & Jarema, G.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A.
1986Concreteness, imagery and meaningfulness values for 925 words. Journal of Experimental Psychology 76(Suppl.), 1–25.Google Scholar
Papagno, C., Capasso, R., Zerboni, H., & Miceli, G.
2007A reverse concreteness effect in a subject with semantic dementia. Brain and Language 103(1–2), 90–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pelletier, F. J
2012Lexical Nouns are Neither Mass nor Count, but they are Both Mass and Count. D. Massam (ed.). Oxford: OUP. 9–26.Google Scholar
Prasada, S., Ferenz, K., & Haskell, T.
2002Conceiving of entities as objects and as stuff. Cognition 83(2), 141–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rivest, J. A., Cavanagh, P. B.
1996Localizing contours defined by more than one attribute, Vision Research 36 (1), 53–66 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roeltgen, D. P., Sevush, S., & Heilman, K. M.
1983Phonological agraphia: Writing by the lexical-semantic route. Neurology 33(6), 755–765. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, S.
2010Counting and the Mass/Count Distinction. Journal of Semantics 27(3), 343–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rugani, R., Vallortigara, G. & Regolin, L.
2013Numerical abstraction in young domestic chicks (gallus gallus). PLoS One 8(6), e65262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, L. K., & Horst, J. S.
2007Dynamic noun generalization: moment-to-moment interactions shape children’s naming biases. Infancy 11(1), 97–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, L. K., & Smith, L. B.
1999Early noun vocabularies: do ontology, category structure and syntax correspond? Cognition 73(1), 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiehlen, M., & Spranger, K.
2006The Mass–Count Distinction: Acquisition and Disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (Vol. 277).Google Scholar
Schwanenflugel, P. J., Harnishfeger, K. K., & Stowe, R. W.
1988Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Journal of Memory and Language,27(5), 499–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soja, N. N.
1992Inferences about the meanings of nouns: The relationship between perception and syntax. Cognitive development 7(1), 29–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soja, N. N., Carey, S., & Spelke, E.
1991Ontological categories guide young children’s inductions of word meaning: Object terms and substance terms. Cognition 38, 179–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Song, Y., & Baker, C.
2007Neuronal response to texture- and contrast-defined boundaries in early visual cortex. Visual Neuroscience 24(1), 65–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spelke, E. S.
2000Core knowledge. American psychologist 55(11), 1233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spelke, E., Lee, S. A., & Izard, V.
2010Beyond core knowledge: Natural geometry. Cognitive science 34(5), 863–884. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J.
(1988) The triarchic mind: A new theory of human intelligence. New York, Viking.Google Scholar
Steinhauer, K., Pancheva, R., Newman, A. J., Gennari, S., & Ullman, M. T.
2001How the mass counts: An electrophysiological approach to the processing of lexical features. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology 12(5), 999–1005.Google Scholar
Strickland, B
2017Language Reflects “Core” Cognition: A New Theory About the Origin of Cross-Linguistic Regularities. Cognitive science 41(1), 70–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M.
2003Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Troche, J., Crutch, S. J., & Reilly, J.
2014Clustering, hierarchical organization, and the topography of abstract and concrete nouns. Frontiers in Psychology 5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Troche, J., & Reilly, J.
2016Eye Tracking & Pupillometry as a Means to Determine the Validity of the Multidimensional Semantic Space. Paper presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Convention Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Uller, C., Carey, S., Huntley-Fenner, G., & Klatt, L.
1999What representations might underlie infant numerical knowledge? Cognitive Development 14(1), 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Marle, K., & Wynn, K.
2011Tracking and quantifying objects and non-cohesive substances. Developmental science 14(3), 502–515. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van de Walle, G. A., Carey, S., & Prevor, M.
2000Bases for object individuation in infancy: Evidence from manual search. Journal of Cognition and Development 1(3), 249–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vermote, T., Lauwers, P., & De Cuypere, L.
2017Transcending the lexical vs. grammatical divide regarding the mass/count distinction. Evidence from corpus studies and acceptability surveys in French and Dutch. Language Sciences 62, 37–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vianello, R., & Marin, M. L.
1997Dal pensiero intuitivo al pensiero operatorio concreto: prove per la valutazione del livello di sviluppo. Bergamo: edizioni junior.Google Scholar
Vianello, R., Lanfranchi, S., Pulina, F., & Bidinost, S.
2012Italian standardization of the dynamic version of the Logical Operations and Conservation Test (LOC-DV). Life Span and Disability 15(1), 69–96.Google Scholar
Walker, I., & Hulme, C.
1999Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25(5), 1256–1271.Google Scholar
Warrington, E. K.
1975The selective impairment of semantic memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 27(4), 635–657. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiemer-Hastings, K., Krug, J., & Xu, X.
2001Imagery, context availability, contextual constraint and abstractness. Proceedings of the XXIII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Edinburgh, Scotland, August 1–4 2001.Google Scholar
Wynn, K.
(1992) Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature, 358(6389), 749.Google Scholar
Yamins, D. L., Hong, H., Cadieu, C. F., Solomon, E. A., Seibert, D., & DiCarlo, J. J.
2014Performance-optimized hierarchical models predict neural responses in higher visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(23), 8619–8624. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zanini, C., Benavides-Varela, S., Lorusso, R., & Franzon, F.
2017Mass is more: The conceiving of (un) countability and its encoding into language in 5-year-old-children. Psychonomic bulletin & review 24(4), 1330–1340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Franzon, Francesca & Chiara Zanini
2023. The Entropy of Morphological Systems in Natural Languages Is Modulated by Functional and Semantic Properties. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 30:1  pp. 42 ff. DOI logo
Strik Lievers, Francesca, Marianna Bolognesi & Bodo Winter
2021. The linguistic dimensions of concrete and abstract concepts: lexical category, morphological structure, countability, and etymology. Cognitive Linguistics 32:4  pp. 641 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.