Chapter 8
Different degrees of abstraction from visual cues in processing concrete nouns
Concreteness has been defined as a semantic property related to physical perception. In this paper we tackle the concreteness issue from the viewpoint of countability by arguing that uncountable expressions (e.g., some cake), although concrete, are more abstract than countable ones (e.g., one cake) since the former entail the suppression of the reference to shape, which is a salient property in the representation of entities.
We report empirical data collected with preschool children in which we show that the uncountable reference is dispreferred. We discuss possible reasons for this phenomenon, which involve the roles played by shape and by language (and in particular grammar) in early perceptual processing, and we suggest how these factors may relate to our ability to abstract from perceptual experience.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.On countability
- 2.1The distribution of countability in language use
- 2.2The processing of countability in adults
- 2.3The processing of countability in acquisition
- 2.3.1A study relating countability and abstraction abilities in acquisition
- 3.The relevance of boundaries in conceiving referential entities
- 4.Conclusions
-
References
References
Agrillo, C., Miletto Petrazzini, M. E. & Bisazza, A.
2014 Numerical acuity of fish is improved in the presence of moving targets, but only in the subitizing range.
Animal Cognition 17(2), 307–316.
Allan, K.
1980 Nouns and countability.
Language 56, 541–567.
Allen, R., & Hulme, C.
2006 Speech and language processing mechanisms in verbal serial recall.
Journal of Memory and Language 55(1), 64–88.
Baddeley, A. D.
(
1986)
Working Memory. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Barner, D., & Snedeker, J.
2005 Quantity judgments and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns count.
Cognition 97, 41–66.
Baroni, M., Bernardini, S., Ferraresi, A., & Zanchetta, E.
2009 The WaCky Wide Web: A Collection of Very Large Linguistically Processed Web-Crawled Corpora.
Language Resources and Evaluation 43 (3), 209–226.
Baroni, M., & Ueyama, M.
2006 Building general-and special-purpose corpora by web crawling. In
Proceedings of the 13th NIJL international symposium, language corpora: Their compilation and application, 31–40.
Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A. K., & Wilson, C. D.
2003 Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(2), 84–91.
Bergelson, E., & Swingley, D.
2012 At 6–9 months, human infants know the meanings of many common nouns.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(9), 3253–3258.
Binder, J. R., Conant, L. L., Humphries, C. J., Fernandino, L., Simons, S. B., Aguilar, M., & Desai, R. H.
2016 Toward a brain-based componential semantic representation.
Cognitive neuropsychology 33(3–4), 130–174.
Bisiacchi, P., Mondini, S., Angrilli, A., Marinelli, K., & Semenza, C.
2005 Mass and count nouns show distinct EEG cortical processes during an explicit semantic task.
Brain and Language 95(1), 98–99.
Bleasdale, F. A.
1987 Concreteness-dependent associative priming: Separate lexical organization for concrete and abstract words.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 13(4), 582–594.
Bloom, P., & Kelemen, D.
1995 Syntactic cues in the acquisition of collective nouns.
Cognition 56, 1–30.
Bolognesi, M., & Steen, G.
(Eds.) 2018 Abstract Concepts: Structure, Processing and Modeling. Editors’ introduction.
Topics in Cognitive Science 10(3), 490–500.
Bunt, H. C.
2006 Mass expressions. Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics
. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 5757–5760.
Cantlon, J. F. & Brannon, E. M.
2006 Shared system for ordering small and large numbers in monkeys and humans.
Psychological Science 17(5), 401–406.
Carandini, M., Demb, J. B., Mante, V., Tolhurst, D. J., Dan, Y., Olshausen, B. A., Gallant, J. & Rust, N. C.
2005 Do we know what the early visual system does? Journal of Neuroscience 25(46), 10577–10597.
Carey, S.
2009 The origin of concepts. Oxford University Press.
Case, R.
(
1985)
Intellectual Development from Birth to Adulthood. New York: Academic Press.
Cheng, C. Y.
(
1973)
Response to Moravcsik.
J. Hintikka,
J. M.E. Moravcsik, &
P. Suppes (eds.).
Approaches to Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel, 286-288.
Chiarelli, V., El Yagoubi, R., Mondini, S., Bisiacchi, P., & Semenza, C.
2011 The syntactic and semantic processing of mass and count nouns: An ERP study.
PloS one 6(10), e25885.
Chichy, R. M., Khosla, A., Pantazis, D., Torralba, A., & Oliva, A.
(
2016)
Comparison of deep neural networks to spatio-temporal cortical dynamics of human visual object recognition reveals hierarchical correspondence.
Scientific reports, 6, 27755.
Coltheart, M., Patterson, K., & Marshall, J. C.
1987 Deep dyslexia since 1980. In
M. Coltheart,
K. Patterson, &
J. C. Marshall (Eds.),
Deep dyslexia (2nd ed.). New York, NY, US: Routledge. 407–451.
Crutch, S. J., & Jackson, E. C.
2011 Contrasting graded effects of semantic similarity and association across the concreteness spectrum.
The Quarterly Journal of ExperimentalPsychology 64(7), 1388–1408.
Crutch, S. J., Williams, P., Ridgway, G. R., & Borgenicht, L.
2012 The role of polarity in antonym and synonym conceptual knowledge: Evidence from stroke aphasia and multidimensional ratings of abstract words.
Neuropsychologia 50(11), 2636–2644.
Crutch, S. J., Troche, J., Reilly, J., & Ridgway, G. R.
2013 Abstract conceptual feature ratings: the role of emotion, magnitude, and other cognitive domains in the organization of abstract conceptual knowledge.
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7.
Crystal, D.
1995 The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dixon, E., & Shapiro, A. G.
2014 Paradoxical effect of spatially homogenous transparent fields on simultaneous contrast illusions.
Journal of the Optical Society of America A 31(27), A307.
Dixon, E. L., & Shapiro, A. G.
2017 Spatial filtering, color constancy, and the color-changing dressDixon & Shapiro.
Journal of Vision 17(3), 7–7.
El Yagoubi, R., Mondini, S., Bisiacchi, P., Chiarelli, V., Angrilli, A., & Semenza, C.
2006 The elctrophysiological basis of mass and count nouns.
Brain and Language 99, 187–188.
Franklin, S., Howard, D., & Patterson, K.
1995 Abstract word anomia.
Cognitive Neuropsychology 12(5), 549–566.
Feigenson, L., Carey, S., & Hauser, M.
2002 The representations underlying infants’ choice of more: Object files versus analog magnitudes.
Psychological Science 13(2), 150–156.
Franzon, F., Arcara, G., & Zanini, C.
2016 Lexical categories or frequency effects? A feedback from quantitative methods applied to psycholinguistic models in two studies on Italian.
Corazza, Montemagni, &
Semeraro (eds.).Proceedings of the Third Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2016. Accademia University Press, 152–156.
Franzon, F., Zanini, C., & Rugani, R.
2018 Do non-verbal number systems shape grammar? Numerical cognition and Number morphology compared.
Mind and Language 2018 1–22.
Frisson, S., & Frazier, L.
2005 Carving up word meaning: Portioning and grinding.
Journal of Memory and Language 53(2), 277–291.
Gathercole, V. C.
1985 He has too much hard questions: The acquisition of the linguistic mass-count distinction in much and many
.
Journal of Child Language 12(2), 395–415.
Gillon, B., Kehayia, E., & Taler, V.
1999 The mass/count distinction: Evidence from on-line psycholinguistic performance.
Brain and Language 68, 205–211.
Gilhooly, K., & Logie, R.
1980 Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words.
Behavior Research Methods 12(4), 395–427.
Giusti, G., & Leko, N.
2005 The categorial status of quantity expressions. In
Linguistički Vidici. Sarajevo: Ed. Forum Bosne, 121–184.
Gordon, P.
1985 Evaluating the semantic categories hypothesis: The case of the count/mass distinction.
Cognition 20(3), 209–242.
Hespos, S. J., Ferry, A L., & Rips, L. J.
2009 Five-month-old infants have different expectations for solids and liquids.
Psychological Science 20(5), 603–611.
Hespos, S. J., & van Marle, K.
2012 Physics for infants: Characterizing the origins of knowledge about objects, substances, and number.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 3(1), 19–27.
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K
2002 The Cambridge grammar of English. Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–23.
Huntley-Fenner, G., Carey, S., & Solimando, A.
2002 Objects are individuals but stuff doesn’t count: Perceived rigidity and cohesiveness influence infants’ representations of small groups of discrete entities.
Cognition 85(3), 203–221.
Imai, M., & Gentner, D.
1997 A cross-linguistic study of early word meaning: Universal ontology and linguistic influence.
Cognition 62(2), 169–200.
Jackendoff, R.
(
1991)
Parts and Boundaries.
Cognition 41, 9-45.
Jespersen, O.
1917 Negation in English and other languages. Kobenhavn: Host.
Katz, R. B., & Goodglass, H.
1990 Deep dysphasia: Analysis of a rare form of repetition disorder.
Brain and Language 39(1), 153–185.
Katz, G., & Zamparelli, R.
2012 Quantifying Count/Mass Elasticity.
J. Choi et al. (eds).
Proceedings of the 29th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 371–379.
Kulkarni, R., Rothstein, S., & Treves, A.
2013 A Statistical Investigation into the Cross-Linguistic Distribution of Mass and Count Nouns: Morphosyntactic and Semantic Perspectives.
Biolinguistics 7, 132–168.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
1980 Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press.
Landau, B., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. S.
1988 The importance of shape in early lexical learning.
Cognitive development 3(3), 299–321.
Landau, B., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S.
1992 Syntactic context and the shape bias in children’s and adults’ lexical learning.
Journal of Memory and Language 31(6), 807–825.
Landy, M. S., & Kojima, H.
2001 Ideal cue combination for localizing texture-defined edges.
JOSA A 18(9), 2307–2320.
Langacker, R. W.
2008 Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press.
Leventhal, A. G., Wang, Y., Schmolesky, M. T., & Zhou, Y.
1997 Neural correlates of boundary perception.
Visual neuroscience 15(6), 1107–1118.
Marcantonio, A. & Pretto, A. M.
2001 Il nome.
L. Renzi,
G. Salvi, &
A., Cardinaletti (eds.).
Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione. Bologna: Il Mulino. 329–346.
Markman, E. M.
1990 Constraints Children Place on Word Meanings.
Cognitive Science 14, 57–77.
Martin, N., & Saffran, E. M.
1992 A computational account of deep dysphasia: Evidence from a single case study.
Brain and Language 43(2), 240–274.
Mély, D. A., Kim, J., McGill, M., Guo, Y., & Serre, T.
2016 A systematic comparison between visual cues for boundary detection.
Vision research 120, 93–107.
Mondini, S., Angrilli, A., Bisiacchi, P., Spironelli, C., Marinelli, K., & Semenza, C.
2008 Mass and Count nouns activate different brain regions: An ERP study on early components.
Neuroscience Letters 430, 48–53.
Mondini, S., Kehaya, E., Gillon, B., Arcara, G., & Jarema, G.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A.
1986 Concreteness, imagery and meaningfulness values for 925 words.
Journal of Experimental Psychology 76(Suppl.), 1–25.
Papagno, C., Capasso, R., Zerboni, H., & Miceli, G.
2007 A reverse concreteness effect in a subject with semantic dementia.
Brain and Language 103(1–2), 90–91.
Pelletier, F. J
2012 Lexical Nouns are Neither Mass nor Count, but they are Both Mass and Count.
D. Massam (ed.). Oxford: OUP. 9–26.
Prasada, S., Ferenz, K., & Haskell, T.
2002 Conceiving of entities as objects and as stuff.
Cognition 83(2), 141–165.
Rivest, J. A., Cavanagh, P. B.
1996 Localizing contours defined by more than one attribute,
Vision Research 36 (1), 53–66
Roeltgen, D. P., Sevush, S., & Heilman, K. M.
1983 Phonological agraphia: Writing by the lexical-semantic route.
Neurology 33(6), 755–765.
Rothstein, S.
2010 Counting and the Mass/Count Distinction.
Journal of Semantics 27(3), 343–397.
Rugani, R., Vallortigara, G. & Regolin, L.
2013 Numerical abstraction in young domestic chicks (gallus gallus).
PLoS One 8(6), e65262.
Samuelson, L. K., & Horst, J. S.
2007 Dynamic noun generalization: moment-to-moment interactions shape children’s naming biases.
Infancy 11(1), 97–110.
Samuelson, L. K., & Smith, L. B.
1999 Early noun vocabularies: do ontology, category structure and syntax correspond? Cognition 73(1), 1–33.
Schiehlen, M., & Spranger, K.
2006 The Mass–Count Distinction: Acquisition and Disambiguation. In
Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (Vol. 277).
Schwanenflugel, P. J., Harnishfeger, K. K., & Stowe, R. W.
1988 Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words.
Journal of Memory and Language,27(5), 499–520.
Soja, N. N.
1992 Inferences about the meanings of nouns: The relationship between perception and syntax.
Cognitive development 7(1), 29–45.
Soja, N. N., Carey, S., & Spelke, E.
1991 Ontological categories guide young children’s inductions of word meaning: Object terms and substance terms.
Cognition 38, 179–211.
Song, Y., & Baker, C.
2007 Neuronal response to texture- and contrast-defined boundaries in early visual cortex.
Visual Neuroscience 24(1), 65–77.
Spelke, E. S.
2000 Core knowledge.
American psychologist 55(11), 1233.
Spelke, E., Lee, S. A., & Izard, V.
2010 Beyond core knowledge: Natural geometry.
Cognitive science 34(5), 863–884.
Sternberg, R. J.
(
1988)
The triarchic mind: A new theory of human intelligence. New York, Viking.
Steinhauer, K., Pancheva, R., Newman, A. J., Gennari, S., & Ullman, M. T.
2001 How the mass counts: An electrophysiological approach to the processing of lexical features.
Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology 12(5), 999–1005.
Strickland, B
2017 Language Reflects “Core” Cognition: A New Theory About the Origin of Cross-Linguistic Regularities.
Cognitive science 41(1), 70–101.
Tomasello, M.
2003 Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Troche, J., Crutch, S. J., & Reilly, J.
2014 Clustering, hierarchical organization, and the topography of abstract and concrete nouns.
Frontiers in Psychology 5.
Troche, J., & Reilly, J.
2016 Eye Tracking & Pupillometry as a Means to Determine the Validity of the Multidimensional Semantic Space. Paper presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Convention Philadelphia, PA.
Uller, C., Carey, S., Huntley-Fenner, G., & Klatt, L.
1999 What representations might underlie infant numerical knowledge? Cognitive Development 14(1), 1–36.
Van Marle, K., & Wynn, K.
2011 Tracking and quantifying objects and non-cohesive substances.
Developmental science 14(3), 502–515.
Van de Walle, G. A., Carey, S., & Prevor, M.
2000 Bases for object individuation in infancy: Evidence from manual search.
Journal of Cognition and Development 1(3), 249–280.
Vermote, T., Lauwers, P., & De Cuypere, L.
2017 Transcending the lexical vs. grammatical divide regarding the mass/count distinction. Evidence from corpus studies and acceptability surveys in French and Dutch.
Language Sciences 62, 37–51.
Vianello, R., & Marin, M. L.
1997 Dal pensiero intuitivo al pensiero operatorio concreto: prove per la valutazione del livello di sviluppo.
Bergamo: edizioni junior.
Vianello, R., Lanfranchi, S., Pulina, F., & Bidinost, S.
2012 Italian standardization of the dynamic version of the Logical Operations and Conservation Test (LOC-DV).
Life Span and Disability 15(1), 69–96.
Walker, I., & Hulme, C.
1999 Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall.
Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25(5), 1256–1271.
Warrington, E. K.
1975 The selective impairment of semantic memory.
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 27(4), 635–657.
Wiemer-Hastings, K., Krug, J., & Xu, X.
2001 Imagery, context availability, contextual constraint and abstractness.
Proceedings of the XXIII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Edinburgh, Scotland, August 1–4 2001.
Wynn, K.
(
1992)
Addition and subtraction by human infants.
Nature, 358(6389), 749.
Yamins, D. L., Hong, H., Cadieu, C. F., Solomon, E. A., Seibert, D., & DiCarlo, J. J.
2014 Performance-optimized hierarchical models predict neural responses in higher visual cortex.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(23), 8619–8624.
Zanini, C., Benavides-Varela, S., Lorusso, R., & Franzon, F.
2017 Mass is more: The conceiving of (un) countability and its encoding into language in 5-year-old-children.
Psychonomic bulletin & review 24(4), 1330–1340.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Franzon, Francesca & Chiara Zanini
2023.
The Entropy of Morphological Systems in Natural Languages Is Modulated by Functional and Semantic Properties.
Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 30:1
► pp. 42 ff.
Strik Lievers, Francesca, Marianna Bolognesi & Bodo Winter
2021.
The linguistic dimensions of concrete and abstract concepts: lexical category, morphological structure, countability, and etymology.
Cognitive Linguistics 32:4
► pp. 641 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.