Part of
Perspectives on Abstract Concepts: Cognition, language and communication
Edited by Marianna Bolognesi and Gerard J. Steen
[Human Cognitive Processing 65] 2019
► pp. 215238
Aziz-Zadeh, L., & Damasio, A.
2008Embodied semantics for actions: Findings from functional brain imaging. Journal of Physiology-Paris 102 (1), 35–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. W.
2008Grounded cognition. Annual Review Psychology 59, 617–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016Can cognition be reduced to action? Processes that mediate stimuli and responses make human action possible. In A. K. Engel, K. J. Friston and D. Kragic, (Eds.), The Pragmatic Turn: Toward Action-Oriented Views in Cognitive Science. Series: Strüngmann forum reports, 18. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brown, S. W.
2014From visual prototype of action to metaphors extending the IMAGACT ontology of action to secondary meanings (ISO-10). In H. Bunt (Ed.), Proceedings 10th Joint ISO – ACL SIGSEM, Workshop on Interoperable Semantic Annotation, Reykjavik, Iceland, 26 May 2014 (53–56).Google Scholar
Brugman, C.
1988The Story of over. Polysemy, Semantics and the Structure of the Lexicon. New York: Garland [originally : M.A. thesis at the University of California, Berkeley 1981].Google Scholar
Cienki, A.
1997Some properties and groupings of image schemas. In M. Verspoor, K. Lee, and E. Sweetser (Eds.), Lexical and syntactical constructions and the construction of meaning: proceedings of the bi-annual ICLA meeting in Albuquerque July 1995 (3–15). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998STRAIGHT: An image schema and its metaphorical extensions. Cognitive Linguistics 9 (2), 107–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clausner, T. C., & Croft, W.
1999Domains and image schemas, Cognitive Linguistics, 10, 1, 1–31.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Desai, R. H., Binder, J. R., Conant, L. L., Mano, Q. R., & Seidenberg, M. S.
2011The neural career of sensory-motor metaphors. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 23 (9), 2376–2386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekberg, L.
1995The mental manipulation of the vertical axis: How to go from “up” to “out” or from “above” to “behind”. In M. Verspoor, K. Dong, and E. Sweetser (Eds.), Lexical and syntactical constructions and the construction of meaning: proceedings of the bi-annual ICLA meeting in Albuquerque July 1995 (69–88). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Feldman, J., & Narayanan, S.
2004Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Brain and Language 89, 385–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G.
2005The Brain’s concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22 (3/4), 455–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Colston, H. L.
1995The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics 6, 347–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
2006Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hampe, B.
2005When down is not bad, and up not good enough: A usage-based assessment of the plus–minus parameter in image-schema theory. Cognitive Linguistics 16 (1), 81–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hampe, B., & Grady, J.
2005From Perception to Meaning Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics.Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M.
1987The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kiefer, M., & Pulvermüller, F.
2011Conceptual representations in mind and brain: theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex 48 (7), 805–825. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopecka, A., & Narasimhan, B.
(Eds.) 2012Events of Putting and Taking. A Crosslinguistic Perspective. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
2000Metaphor and Emotion. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2015Where Metaphors Come from: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzeszowski, T. P.
1993The axiological parameter in preconceptual image schemata. In R. A. Geiger, and B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Eds.), Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language (307–329). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997Angels and devils in hell: Elements of axiology in semantics. Warsaw: Wydawn.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990The Invariance Hypothesis: is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics 1 (1), 39–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (203–249). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., Swenson, J., & Schwartz, A.
1991Master Metaphor List (2nd ed.). Technical report, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
1980Metaphors we Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1999Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
1986Abstract motion. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, (455–471). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
1987Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Majid, A., & Bowerman, M.
(Eds.) 2007 Cutting and breaking events: A crosslinguistic perspective [Special Issue]. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandler, J. M.
1992How to build a baby: ii. Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review 99, 597–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandler, J. M., & Canovas, C. P.
2014On defining image schemas. Language and Cognition 6, 510–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matlock, T.
2004The conceptual motivation of fictive motion. In G. Radden and K. Panther (Eds.), Studies in Linguistic Motivation (221–248). New York/Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y.
1996Subjective motion and English and Japanese verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 7, 183–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moneglia, M.
1998Teoria empirica del senso e partizione semantica del lessico. Studi di grammatica italiana 17, 363–398.Google Scholar
2014Natural language ontology of action, a gap with huge consequences for natural language understanding and machine translation. In: Z. Vetulani and J. Mariani (Eds.), Human Language Technology Challenges for Computer Science and Linguistics (379–395). Berlin and New York: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Moneglia, M., Monachini, M., Calabrese, O., Panunzi, A., Frontini, F., Gagliardi, G., & Russo, I.
2012The IMAGACT Cross-linguistic Ontology of Action. A new infrastructure for natural language disambiguation. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, M. Uğur Doğan, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, J. Odijk, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (948–955). Paris: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).Google Scholar
Moneglia, M.
2014The Semantic variation of action verbs in multilingual spontaneous speech corpora. In T. Raso and H. Mello (Eds.), Spoken Corpora and Linguistics Studies (152–190). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oakley, T.
2010Image schemas. In D. Geeraerts, and H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (214–235). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Panunzi, A., & Moneglia, M.
2004La Variazione Primaria del verbo nel lessico dei corpora di parlato. In F. Albano Leoni, F. Cutugno, M. Pettorino and R. Savy (Eds.), Atti del Convegno Il Parlato Italiano, volume CD-ROM, C4 (1–24). Napoli: D’Aura Edizioni.Google Scholar
Panunzi, A., De Felice, I., Gregori, L., Jacoviello, S., Monachini, M., Moneglia, M., & Quochi, V.
2014Translating action verbs using a dictionary of images: the IMAGACT ontology. In A. Abel, C. Vettori, and N. Ralli (Eds.), Proceedings of the XVI EURALEX International Congress: The user in focus (1163–1170). Bolzano: EURAC research.Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F.
2005Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6, 576–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quinn, N.
1991The cultural basis of metaphor. In J. W. Fernandez (Ed.), Beyond Tropes: The Theory of Tropes in Anthropology (56–93). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rohrer, T.
2006Image Schemata in the Brain. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics (165–196), Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
1983How language structures space. In H. L. Pick and L. P. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research, and Application, (225–282). New York/London: Plenum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996Fictive motion in language and ‘ception’. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel and M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and Space, (211–276). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Turner, M.
1991Reading minds: The study of English in the age of cognitive science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Vernillo, P.
2015La variazione marcata di verbi di azione generali ad alta frequenza. MA diss, University of Florence.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.
1953Philosophische Untersuchungen. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Cai, Tianyuan, Ho Hung Lim, John S. Y. Lee & Meichun Liu
2022. 2022 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP),  pp. 413 ff. DOI logo
Vernillo, Paola
2021. Grounding Abstract Concepts in Action. In Concepts in Action [Language, Cognition, and Mind, 9],  pp. 167 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.