Chapter published in:
The Semantics of Dynamic Space in French: Descriptive, experimental and formal studies on motion expression
Edited by Michel Aurnague and Dejan Stosic
[Human Cognitive Processing 66] 2019
► pp. 218246
References

References

Aurnague, M.
(2000)  Entrer par la petite porte, passer par des chemins de traverse: À propos de la préposition par et de la notion de “trajet”. Carnets de Grammaire, 7.Google Scholar
(2011) How motion verbs are spatial: The spatial foundations of intransitive motion verbs in French. Lingvisticæ Investigationes, 34(1), 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blomberg, J., & Zlatev J.
(2014) Actual and non-actual motion: Why experimentalist semantics needs phenomenology (and vice versa). Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13(3), 395–418. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Non-actual motion: Phenomenological analysis and linguistic evidence. Cognitive Processing, 16(Suppl. 1), 153–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boons, J.-P.
(1987) La notion sémantique de déplacement dans une classification syntaxique des verbes locatifs. Langue Française 76(1), 5–40.Google Scholar
Boons, J.-P., Guillet, A., & Leclère, C.
(1976) La structure des phrases simples en français: Constructions intransitives. Genève & Paris: Droz.Google Scholar
Cappelli, F.
(2013) Etude du mouvement fictif à travers un corpus d’exemples du français: Perspective sémantique du lexique au discours. PhD dissertation. Toulouse: Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail.Google Scholar
Cappelli, G.
(2012) Travelling in space: Spatial representation in English and Italian tourism discourse. Textus, 25(1), 19–35.Google Scholar
Cornish, F.
(2001) L’inversion “locative” en français, italien et anglais: Propriétés syntaxiques, sémantiques et discursives. Cahiers de Grammaire, 26, 101–123.Google Scholar
Demi, S.
(2009) The Geometry of fictive motion and location in English and Italian. PhD dissertation. Pisa: University of Pisa.Google Scholar
Emirkanian, L.
(2008) Sémantique du verbe monter: Proposition d’un noyau de sens. In B. Habert, B. Laks, & J. Durand (Eds.), Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française – CMLF’08 (pp. 2009–2020). Paris: Institut de Linguistique Française. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, C., & Fournier, N.
(2003) Du rôle cadratif des compléments localisants initiaux selon la position du sujet nominal. Travaux de linguistique, 47(2), 79–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gross, M.
(1975) Méthodes en syntaxe. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Guillet A. & Leclère C.
(1992) La structure des phrases simples en français: Les constructions transitives locatives. Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
Honda, A.
(1994) From spatial cognition to semantic structure: The role of subjective motion in cognition and language. English Linguistics, 11, 197–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1986) Abstract motion. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 455–471). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
(1999) Virtual reality. Studies in Linguistic Sciences, 29, 77–103.Google Scholar
(2005) Dynamicity, fictivity, and scanning. The imaginative basis of logic and linguistic meaning. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition. The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 164–197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laur, D.
(1991) Sémantique du déplacement et de la localisation en français: Une étude des verbes, des prépositions et de leurs relations dans la phrase simple. PhD dissertation. Toulouse: Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail.Google Scholar
Le Pesant, D.
(2012) Critères syntaxiques pour une classification sémantique des verbes de localisation. Филолошки Преглед, 39(1), 37–52.Google Scholar
Lebas, F., & Cadiot, P.
(2003)  Monter et la construction extrinsèque du référent. Langages, 150(2), 9–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C.
(1996) Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Cross-linguistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 109–169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mani, I., & Pustejovsky, J.
(2012) Interpreting motion. Grounded representations for spatial language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matlock, T.
(2004a) Fictive motion as cognitive simulation. Memory & Cognition, 32(8), 1389–1400.Google Scholar
(2004b) The conceptual motivation of fictive motion. In G. Radden, & K.-U. Panther (Eds.) Studies in linguistic motivation (pp. 221–248). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Matlock, T., & Bergmann, T.
(2015) Fictive motion. In E. Dabrowska, & D. Divjak, (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 546–562). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y.
(1996a) Subjective-change expressions in Japanese and their cognitive and linguistic bases. In G. Fauconnier, & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Spaces, worlds, and grammar (pp. 124–156). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1996b) Subjective motion and English and Japanese verbs. Cognitive Linguistics, 7(2), 183–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nordhal, H.
(1977)  Assez avez alé: Estre et avoir comme auxiliaires du verbe aler en ancien français. Revue Romane, XII(1), 54–67.Google Scholar
Rojo, A., & Valenzuela, J.
(2003) Fictive motion in English and Spanish. International Journal of English Studies, 3(2), 123–149.Google Scholar
Sarda, L.
(1999) Contribution à l’étude de la sémantique de l’espace et du temps: Analyse des verbes de déplacement transitifs directs du français. PhD dissertation. Toulouse: Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail.Google Scholar
Smith, C.
(2003) Modes of discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stosic, D.
(2009) La notion de “manière” dans la sémantique de l’espace. Langages, 175(3), 103–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
(1996) Fictive motion in language and “ception”. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 211–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. A., & Tversky, B.
(1996) Perspective in spatial descriptions. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 371–391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, B.
(1996) Spatial perspective in descriptions. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 463–491). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vandeloise, C.
(2003) Containment, support and linguistic relativity. In R. Dirven, & J. T. H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to lexical linguistics (pp. 393–425). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z.
(1957) Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66(2), 143–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vuillaume, M.
(2012) D’où vient l’ambiguité de La route s’élargit ? In L. de Saussure, A. Borillo, & M. Vuillaume (Eds.), Grammaire, lexique, référence. Regards sur le sens. Mélanges offerts à Georges Kleiber pour ses quarante ans de carrière (pp. 117–131). Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Waliński, J. T.
(2015) Instrumentality of fictive motion in coextension paths. Kwartalnik Neofilologiczny, LXII(1), 87–102.Google Scholar