Cover not available
Part of
Cognitive Linguistics and the Study of Chinese
Edited by Dingfang Shu, Hui Zhang and Lifei Zhang
[Human Cognitive Processing 67] 2019
► pp. 95–120

Chapter 3
A corpus-based study of subjectification and the disposal construction in modern Mandarin

The BA construction vs. the BA-GE construction

| Hunan University
| Hunan University
The BA construction, also known as the ‘disposal’ construction, is a morphosyntactic phenomenon unique to the Chinese language. Based on the findings of a collexeme analysis of corpus data and in line with subjectification proposed by Langacker, we provide evidence that the BA-pattern and the BA-GE-pattern constitute different constructions and we uncover the dynamic processes of meaning change regarding the concept of ‘disposal’ in the two constructions. The BA construction does indeed focus on the description of disposal events, whereas, in the BA-GE construction, the objective meaning of ‘disposal’ is backgrounded and the speaker’s subjective perspective becomes foregrounded. Such changes in conceptual construal demonstrate the importance of subjectification, a crucial cognitive tool in the construction of meaning and syntactic structure.
Keywords: collexeme analysis, construal, meaning change
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Research methodology and theoretical background
  • 3.BA0 and BA1 as near-synonymous constructions
    • 3.1Results of the collocation analysis
    • 3.2BA0 and BA1: From subjective disposal to subjective assessment
  • 4.Subjectification and the semantic and syntactic adjustment of BA1
    • 4.1Emphasis on modality by means of V-DE
    • 4.2The attenuation of properties of the proto-agent role and the meaning of ‘disposal’
    • 4.3The attenuation of the properties of proto-patient roles and the meaning of ‘disposal’
  • 5.BA1: Focusing on speaker’s modality
    • 5.1Expression of speaker’s belief
    • 5.2Expression of speaker’s perspective
    • 5.3Expression of speaker’s preference
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 20 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.67.05li
References (43)
References
Chen, P. 1994. Shilun Hanyu zhong sanzhong juzi chengfen yu yuyi chengfen de peiwei yuanze. Studies of the Chinese Language, 3, 161–168.Google Scholar
Cheng, G. 1995. Ping ‘Tiyuan yuanxing juese yu lunyuan xuanze’. Contemporary Linguistics, 3, 31–35.Google Scholar
Cui, X. 1995. BA-ziju de ruogan jufa yuyi wenti. Chinese Teaching in the World, 3, 14–23.Google Scholar
Dowty, D. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67(3), 547–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fan, X. 2001. Valency of verbs and Chinese Ba-sentence. Studies of the Chinese Language, 4, 23–33.Google Scholar
Gao, L. 2004. The cognitive representation schema of the ‘Ba’-construction. Psychological Science, 1, 117–119.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th. 2001. A multifactorial analysis of syntactic variation: Particle movement revisited. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 8, 33–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th., & Stefanowitsch, A. 2004a. Covarying collexemes in the into-causative. In M. Achard, & S. Kemmer (Eds), Language, culture and mind (pp. 225–236). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th., & Stefanowitsch, A. 2004b. Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 1, 97–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hu, J., & Zhang, J. 2012. Collostructional analysis: An integration of cognitive linguistics and corpus linguistics. Journal of Foreign Languages, 4, 61–69.Google Scholar
Jin, L. 1997. ‘Ba’ ziju de jufa, yuyi, yujing tezheng. Studies of the Chinese Language, 6, 17–25.Google Scholar
Jin, L., & Wang, H. 2014. Ergative case, absolutive case and the classification of verbs. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 1, 45–57; 158–159.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1990. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 5–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. II: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1999. Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. 2002. Deixis and subjectivity. In F. Brisard (Ed.), Grounding: The epistemic footing of deixis and reference (pp. 1–28). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. 2006. Subjectification, grammaticization, and conceptual archetypes. In A. Athanasiadou, C. Canakis, & B. Cornillie (Eds.), Subjectification: Various paths to subjectivity (pp. 17–40). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Construal. In E. Dabrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), The handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 120–143). Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. 1989. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Y. 1974. What does ‘disposal’ mean? Features of the verb and noun in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 2(2), 200–218.Google Scholar
Liu, Z., & Cui, G. 2005. Fei fanchouhua yu V-V jiegou zhong V2 de wanchengti yiyi. Foreign Language Research, 6, 31–38.Google Scholar
Lü, S. 1944/1984. Yu dongci hou de yu bu youguan zhi cixu wenci. In S. Lü (Ed.), Hanyu yufa lunwenji (pp. 133–144). Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Rao, C. 1990. Ba ziju Bei ziju. Beijing: People’s Education Press.Google Scholar
Ren, Y. 2005. Xiandai hanyu fei shoushi binyuju yanjiu. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.Google Scholar
Shen, J. 2002. Can the disposal construction be disposed of? On the subjectivity of Ba construction in Mandarin Chinese. Studies of the Chinese Language, 5, 387–399.Google Scholar
Shen, Y. 1997. Mingci duanyu de duochong yiwei xingshi ji baziju de gouzao guocheng yu yuyi jieshi. Studies of the Chinese Language, 6, 402–414.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. Th. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 2, 209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sugimura, H. 2002. On the measure word ‘gè + object of bǎ’ in the Bǎ-sentence in Modern Chinese. Chinese Teaching in the World, 1, 16–25.Google Scholar
Sun, C. 1996. Word-order change and grammaticalization in the history of Chinese. Standford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Tao, H., & Zhang, B. 2000. The status of the indefinite Ba (把)-constructions in modern and contemporary Chinese and its implications. Studies of the Chinese Language, 5, 51–64.Google Scholar
Wang, H. 1985. ‘Ba’ ziju zhong ‘ba’ de binyu. Studies of the Chinese Language, 1, 48–51.Google Scholar
Wang, L. 1943/1985. Zhongguo xiandai yufa. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Xue, F. 1987. Shilun ‘ba’ ziju de yuyi tezheng. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, 1, 5–23.Google Scholar
Ye, K., & Pan, H. 2012. The Chinese ‘Ba (把)’ construction: A cross-linguistic perspective. Language Science, 6, 604–620.Google Scholar
Zhan, K. 1985. Dongjieshi dongci yu ‘ba’ ziju de bianhuan guanxi. In Z. G. Zhang (Ed.), Yuwen Lunji 1 (pp. 26–40). Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, B. 2000. Lun ‘ba’ ziju de jushi yuyi. Linguistic Research, 1, 28–40.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. 2007. Explanation of the bǎ-construction in Chinese on cognitive typology. Chinese Teaching in the World, 3, 52–63.Google Scholar
Zhang, W. 1991. ‘Ba-zi jiegou’ de yuyi jiqi yuyong fenxi. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, 3, 89–104.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. 2005a. On the sentence pattern of ‘ba (把)+ge (个)+NP+VC’ in contemporary Chinese. Linguistic Research, 3, 14–19.Google Scholar
2005b. On the sentence pattern of ‘ba (把)+ge (个)+NP+VC’ in Chinese. Chinese Linguistics, 3, 2–12.Google Scholar