Chapter published in:
Cognitive Linguistics and the Study of Chinese
Edited by Dingfang Shu, Hui Zhang and Lifei Zhang
[Human Cognitive Processing 67] 2019
► pp. 227259
References
Baggio, G., & Hagoort, P.
2011The balance between memory and unification in semantics, A dynamic account of the N400. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 1338–1367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barkema, H.
1996Idiomaticity and terminology: A multi-dimensional descriptive model. Studia Linguistica, 50(2), 125–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bobrow, S. A., & Bell, S. M.
1973On catching on to idiomatic expressions. Memory & Language, 1, 343–346.Google Scholar
Boudewyn, M., Gordon, P., Long, D., Polse, L., & Swaab, T. Y.
2012Does discourse congruence influence spoken language comprehension before lexical association? Evidence from event-related potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(5), 698–733. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P.
1988The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 668–683. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caillies, S., & Butcher, K.
2007Processing of idiomatic expressions: Evidence for a new hybrid view. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 79–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Camblin, C. C., Gordon, P. C., & Swaab, T. Y.
2007The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERP and eye-tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 03–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chi, Q. T.
2004On the stability of three-character idioms (浅析三字格惯用语的稳固性). Guangxi Social Science, 8, 177–179.Google Scholar
Coulson, S., & Van Petten, C.
2002Conceptual integration and metaphor: An event-related potential study. Memory & Cognition, 30(6), 958–968. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Federmeier, K. D., & Laszlo, S.
2009Time for meaning: Electrophysiology provides insight into the dynamics of representation and processing in semantic memory. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51,1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr., & Colston, H. L.
2012Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., & Fein, O.
1999On understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1601–1618. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R.
2003On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S.
2001Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S.
1959On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horváth, J., Czigler, I., Birkás, E., & Gervai, J.
2007Age-related differences in distraction and reorientation in an auditory task. Neurobiology of Aging, 30(7), 1157–1172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayser, J., & Tenke, C. E.
2006aPrincipal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: I. Evaluation with auditory oddball tasks. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117(2), 348–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayser, J., &Tenke, C. E.
2006bPrincipal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: II. Adequacy of low-density estimates. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117(2), 369–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W.
1998Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
King, J. W., & Kutas, M.
1995Who did what adn when? Using word- and claue- level ERPs to monitor working momory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(3), 376–379. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D.
2011Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of event related potentials (ERPs). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S.
1984Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kutas, M., Van Petten, C., & Besson, M.
1988Event-related potential asymmetries during the reading of sentences. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 69, 218–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kutas, M., Van Petten, C., & Kluender, R.
2006Psycholinguistics electrified III: 1994–2005. In M. Traxler, & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd edition) (pp. 659–724). New York: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W
1987Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langlotz, A
2006aOccasional adnominal idiom modification: A cognitive linguistic approach. International Journal of English Studies, 6(1), 85–108.Google Scholar
2006bIdiomatic creativity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C-L., & Federmeier, K. D.
2009Wave-ering: An ERP study of syntactic and semantic context effects on ambiguity resolution for noun/verb homographs. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 538–555. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, P., & Shu, H.
2010Language and brain: Computational and neuro imaging evidence from Chinese. In M. Bond (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Psychology (pp. 69–92). Oxford: Oxford Universitty Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Li, P., Hua, H., Zhang, Q., & Chen, L.
2010Structure and meaning in Chinese: An ERP study of idioms. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 23, 615–630. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lou, L. G., Fan, S. L., & Kuang, P. Z.
1989ERP reflects the mismatch between Chinese characters and their mental templates. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 3, 321–327.Google Scholar
McGlone, S., Matthew, G., Glucksberg, S., & Cacciari, S.
1994Semantic productivity and idiom comprehension. Discourse Processes, 17, 167–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J.
2006When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(7), 1098–1111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reale, R. A., Calvert, G. A., Thesen, T., Jenison, R. L., Kawasaki, H. Oya, H., Howard, M. A., & Brugge, J. F.
2007Auditory-visual processing represented in the human superior temporal gyrus. Neuroscience, 145, 162–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shi, J. H
2007A study of tri-syllable idiomatic phrases (现代汉语三音节惯用语问题研究). MA thesis, Shanghai Normal University.Google Scholar
Sprenger, S. A., Levelt, W. J. M., & Kempen, G.
2006Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 161–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stauder, J., Smeets, E., Van Mill, S., & Curfs, L.
2006The development of visual- and auditory processing in Rett syndrome: An ERP study. Brain and Development, 28(8), 487–497. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sun, W. Z
1989Chinese phraseology (汉语熟语学). Jilin: Jilin Education Press.Google Scholar
Swaab, T. Y., Ledoux, K., Camblin, C. C., & Boudewyn, M. A.
2012Language-related ERP components. In S. K. Luck, & E. S. Kappenman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of event-related potential components (pp. 379–440). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swinney, D., & Cutler, A.
1979The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal behaviour, 18, 523–534. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Titone, D. A., & Connine, C. M.
1999On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1655–1674. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trambley, A., & Baayen, H.
2010Holistic processing of regular four-word sequences: A behavioral and ERP study of the effects of structure, frequency, and probability on immediate free recall. In D. Woods (Ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication (pp. 151–173). London and New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Underwood, G., Schmitt, N., & Galpin, A
2004The eyes have it: A eye-movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences (pp. 153–172). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Berkum, J. J., Brown, A., Hagoort, P., & Zwitserlood, P.
2003Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 40, 235–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Berkum, J. J. A.
2008Understanding sentences in context: What brain waves can tell us. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 276–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009The neuropragmatics of ‘simple’ utterance comprehension: An ERP review. In U. Sauerland, & K. Yatsushiro (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics: From experiment to theory (pp. 276–317). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Vega Moreno, R. E
2007Creativity and convention: The pragmatics of everyday figurative speech. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wlotko, E. W., & Federmeier, K. D.
2012So that’s what you meant! Event-related potentials reveal multiple aspects of context use during construction of message-level meaning. NeuroImage, 62, 356–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H., Yang Y., Gu, J., & Ji, F.
2013ERP correlates of compositionality in Chinese idiom comprehension. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 26(1), 89–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, S., Zhou, W., & Chen, X.
2004Spatiatemporal analysis of ERP during Chinese idiom comprehension. Brain Topography, 1, 27–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar