1994The scope of indefinites. Natural Language Semantics 2.2, 83–136.
Ahmed, Tafseer
2006Spatial, temporal, and structural usages of Urdu ko. Paper presented at the LFG06 Conference, University of Konstanz, Germany.
Ahn, Hee-Don
1991Light Verbs, VP-movement, Negation, and Clausal Architecture in Korean and English. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Ph.D. dissertation.
Akiyama, Masahiro
2005On the general tendency to minimize moved elements: Multiple nominative construction in Japanese and its theoretical implications. The Linguistic Review 22.1, 1–68.
Baker, Mark
1988Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Baker, Mark
2015Case: Its Principles and Its Parameters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barcelona, Antonio
2002Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update. In René Dirven and Ralf Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 207–278.
2011Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. In Réka Benczes, Antonio Barcelona, and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (eds.), Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 7–57.
Barðal, Jóhanna
2011Lexical vs. structural case: A false dichotomy. Morphology 21, 619–654.
Basilico, David
2003The topic of small clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 34.1, 1–35.
Bhaskararao, Peri and Karumuri V. Subbarao
(eds.)2004Non-nominative Subjects, vol. 1. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Bickel, Balthasar
2004The syntax of experiencers in the Himalayas. In Peri Bhaskararao and Karumuri V. Subbarao (eds.), Non-nominative Subjects, vol. 1. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 77–111.
Bickel, Balthasar and Johanna Nichols
2009Case marking and alignment. In Andrej Malchukov and Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 304–321.
Bickel, Balthasar and Yogendra P. Yadava
2000A fresh look at grammatical relations in Indo-Aryan. Lingua 110.5, 343–373.
Bickel, Balthasar, Walter Bisang, and Yogendra P. Yadava
1999Face vs. empathy: The social foundations of Maithili verb agreement. Linguistics 37.3, 481–518.
Binnick, Robert I.
2006Aspect and aspectuality. In Bas Aarts and April McMahon (eds.), The Handbook of English Linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., pp. 244–268.
Bittner, Maria and Kenneth Hale
1996The structural determination of case and agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 27.1, 1–68.
Blake, Barry J.
2001Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Borer, Hagit
1999The form, the forming, and the formation of nominals. Unpublished manuscript. University of Southern California.
Borer, Hagit
2003Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanations: Syntactic projections and the lexicon. In John Moore and Maria Polinsky (eds.), The Nature of Explanation in Linguistic Theory. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 31–67.
Bresnan Joan and Sam Mchombo
1995The lexical integrity principle: Evidence from Bantu. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13.2, 181–254.
Broccias, Cristiano
2013Cognitive Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann and Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 191–210
Butt, Miriam
1995The Structure of Complex Predicates in Urdu. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Butt, Miriam
1997Complex predicates in Urdu. In Alex Alsina, Joan Bresnan, and Peter Sells (eds.), Complex Predicates. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 107–149.
Butt, Miriam
2006Theories of Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Butt, Miriam
2009Modern approach to case: An overview. In Andrej Malchukov and Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 27–43.
Bybee, Joan
1998Usage-based phonology. In Michael Darnell, Edith Moravcsik, Frederick M. Newmeyer, Michael Noonan, and Kathleen Wheatley (eds.), Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, vol. 1. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 209–240.
Carlson, Gregory N.
1977Reference to Kinds in English. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Ph.D. dissertation.
Chae, Hee-Rahk
1996Properties of ha- and light predicate constructions. Language Research 32.3, 409–476.
Chae, Hee-Rahk
1997Verbal nouns and light verbs in Korean. Language Research 33.4, 581–600.
Chae, Hee-Rahk and Ilkyu Kim
2008A clausal predicate analysis of Korean multiple nominative constructions. Korean Journal of Linguistics 33.4, 869–900.
Chafe, Wallace L.
1976Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Charles Li (ed.), Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press, pp. 25–56.
Chappell, Hilary and William McGregor
1996Prolegomena to a theory of inalienability. In Hilary Chappell and William McGregor (eds.), The Grammar of Inalienability. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 3–30.
Cho, Sungeun
2000Three Forms of Case Agreement in Korean. Stony Brook, NY: SUNY-Stony Brook Ph.D. dissertation.
Cho, Young-mee Yu and Peter Sells
1995A lexical account of inflectional suffixes in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4.2, 119–174.
Choe, Hyon Sook
1986Syntactic adjunction, A-chains, and the ECP. In Joyce McDonouh and Bernadette Plunkett (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Northeast Linguistic Society, pp. 100–121.
Choe, Hyon Sook
1995Focus and topic movement in Korean and licensing. In Katalin E. Kiss (ed.), Discourse Configurational Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 269–334.
Choe, Jae-woong
1996-man-uy cakyongyek cwunguyseng ‘Scopal ambiguity of Korean particle -man’. Korean Journal of Linguistics 21.1, 673–692 [written in Korean].
Choi, Incheol and Stephen Wechsler
2001Mixed categories and argument transfer in the Korean light verb construction. Paper presented in HPSG-2001.
Choi, Kyu-soo
1999Hankwuke cwuceye-wa imcamal yenkwu ‘Studies on Topic and Subject in Korean’. Busan: Busan National University Press [written in Korean].
Chomsky, Noam
1970Remarks on nominalizations. In Roderick A. Jacobs and Peter S. Rosembaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar. MA: Ginn and Company, pp. 184–221.
Chomsky, Noam
1981Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, Noam
2000Minamalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels, Juan Uriagereka, and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 89–155.
Chomsky, Noam
2001Derivation by phase. In Michael J. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 1–52.
Chun, Soon Ae
1985Possessor ascension for multiple case sentences. In Susumu Kuno (ed.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics I. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing, pp. 30–39.
COBUILD
2001Collins Cobuild English Dictionary for Advanced Learners. Harper Collins Publishers.
Cohen, Ariel and Nomi Erteschik-Shir
2002Topic, focus, and the interpretation of bare plurals. Natural Language Semantics 10.2, 125–165.
Croft, William
1993The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics 4.4, 335–370.
Croft, William
1995Autonomy and functionalist linguistics. Language 71.3, 490–532.
Croft. William
2006Reprint version of Croft 1993. In Dirk Geeraerts (ed), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 269–302.
2012Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Croft, William and Alan Cruse
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dąbrowska, Ewa
1997Cognitive Semantics and the Polish Dative. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dahl, Östen
1985Tense and Aspect System. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Di Sciullo, Anna-Maria and Edwin Williams
1987On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dirven, René
1999Conversion as a conceptual metonymy of event schemata. In Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 275–287.
Donohue, Mark
2008Semantic alignment systems: What’s what, and what’s not. In Mark Donohue and Søren Wichmann (eds.), The Typology of Semantic Alignment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 24–75.
Dowty, David R.
1979Ergativity. Language 55.1, 59–138.
Dowty, David R.
1991Thematic protoroles and argument selection. Language 67.3, 547–619.
Ernst, Thomas
1992The phrase structure of English negation. The Linguistic Review 9.2, 109–144.
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi
1981More on extractability from quasi-NPs. Linguistic Inquiry 12.4, 665–670.
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi
1997The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi
2007Information Structure: The Syntax-Discourse Interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Evans, Vyvyan
2007A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Salt Lake City, UT: The University of Utah Press.
Evans, Vyvyan and Melanie Green
2006Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fauconnier, Gilles
1994Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, Gilles
1997Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fowler, George H.
1987The Syntax of the Genitive Case in Russian. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Ph.D. dissertation.
Fu, Jingqui, Thomas Roeper, and Hagit Borer
2001The VP within process nominals: Evidence from adverbs and the VP anaphora do-so. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19.3. 549–582.
Geeraerts, Dirk and Yves Peirsman
2011Zones, facets, and prototype-based metonymy. In Réka Benczes, Antonio Barcelona, and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (eds.), Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 89–102.
Gerdts, Donna
1985Surface case vs. grammatical relation in Korean: The evidence from quantifier floating. In Susumu Kuno (ed.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics I. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing, pp. 48–61.
Gerdts, Donna and Cheong Youn
1988Korean pysch constructions: Advancement or retreat? In Diane Brentari, Gary Larson, and Lynn Macleod (eds.), Papers from the 24th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 155–175.
Gerdts, Donna and Cheong Youn
1989Non-nominative subjects in Korean. In Susumu Kuno (ed.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics III. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing, pp. 235–248.
Gibson. Edward
1998Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68.1, 1–76.
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, Adele E.
2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2003A Cognitive-Functional Approach to Nominalization in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hiraiwa, Ken
2002Raising and indeterminate agreement. Paper presented at WCCFL21
.
Hoji, Hajime
1991Raising-to-object, ECM, and the major object in Japanese. Paper presented at the Japanese Syntax Workshop. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester.
Hoji, Hajime
2005Major object analysis of the so-called raising-to-object construction in Japanese. Paper presented at the New Horizons in the Grammar of Raising and Control. Harvard University.
Hong Soo-Min
2005“Exceptional” Case-marking and Resultative Construction. College Park, MD: University of Maryland Ph.D. dissertation.
Hong, Ki-Sun
1990Subject-to-object raising in Korean. In Katarzyna Dzimirek, Patrick M. Farrell, and Errapel Meijas-Bikandi (eds.), Grammatical Relations: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 215–226.
Hong, Ki-Sun
1991Argument Selection and Case Marking in Korean. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Ph.D. dissertation.
Hong, Ki-Sun
1997Yenge-wa kwuke-uy insang kwumwun pikyo pwunsek ‘Subject-to-Object raising construction in English and Korean’. Language Research 33.3, 409–434 [Written in Korean].
Hong, Sungshim and Howard Lasnik
2015A note on ‘Raising to Object’ in small clauses and full clauses. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 19.3, 275–289.
Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Im, Hong-Pin
2007Hankwuke-uy cwucey-wa thongsa pwunsek ‘discourse-pragmatic notion of topic and syntactic analyses of Korean’. Seoul: Seoul National University Press [Written in Korean].
Ioup, Georgette
1975Some universals of quantifier scope. In John P. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and Semantics Vol. 4. New York: Academic Press, pp. 37–58.
Jackendoff, Ray
1983Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, Ray
2002Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jang, Youngjun
1998Multiple subjects and characterization. Discourse and Cognition 5.1, 99–116.
Jun, Jong Sup
2003Syntactic and Semantic Basis of Case Assignment: A Study of Verbal Nouns, Light Verbs, and Dative. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University Ph.D. dissertation.
Jun, Jong Sup
2006Semantic constraints on the genitive complements of verbal nouns in Korean. Language Research 42.2, 357–397.
Jun, Youngchul
2015Focus, topic, and contrast. In Lucien Brown and Jaehoon Yeon (eds.), The Handbook of Korean Linguistics. Wiley Blackwell, pp. 179–195.
Kageyama, Taro
1991Light verb constructions and the syntax-morphology interface. In Heizo Nakajima (ed.), Current English Linguistics in Japan. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 169–203.
Kang, Young-se
1985Korean Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Ph.D. dissertation.
Kayne, Richard
1998Overt vs. covert movement. Syntax 1.2, 128–191.
2008Information structure of case on adjuncts in Korean. In Michael Grosvald and Dionne Soares (eds.), Proceedings of the 38th WECOL, Vol 19. Department of Linguistics, University of California, Davis, pp. 93–104.
Kim, Bo Kyoung
2009Case Assignment on Adverbial NPs in Korean. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Ph.D. dissertation.
Kim, Jeong-Ryeol
1993Parsing light verb constructions in Lexical Functional Grammar. Language Research, 29.4. 535–566.
Kim, Jong-Bok
2013Floated numeral classifiers in Korean: A non-derivational, functional account of floating quantifiers. Lingua 133, 189–212.
Kim, Jong-Bok
2016aThe Syntactic Structures of Korean: A Construction Grammar Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kim, Jong-Bok
2016b: A family of topic constructions in Korean: A Construction-based analysis. Language and Information 20, 1–24.
Kim, Jong-Bok and Inchel Choi
2004The Korean case system: A unified constraint-based approach. Language Research 40.4, 885–921.
Kim, Jong-Bok, Jaehyung Yang, and Inchel Choi
2005Capturing and parsing the mixed properties of light verb constructions in a typed feature structure grammar. In Hiroshi Masuichi, Tomoko Ohkuma, Kiyoshi Ishikawa, Yasunari Harada, and Kei Yoshimoto (eds.), Proceedings of PACLIC 18, pp. 81–92.
Kim, Jong-Bok, Kyung-Sup Lim, and Jaehyung Yang
2007Structural ambiguity in the light verb constructions: Lexical relatedness and divergence. Journal of the Linguistic Society of Korea 15.2. 207–231.
Kim, Jong-Bok and Peter Sells
2006Case assignment in the clause on adjuncts. In Susumu Kuno (ed.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics XI. Cambridge, MA: Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, pp. 506–519.
Kim, Jong-Bok and Peter Sells
2010aOn the role of the eventuality in case assignment on adjuncts. Language and Linguistics 11.3, 625–652.
2007Parsing two types of multiple nominative constructions: A constructional approach. Language and Information 11, 25–37.
Kim, Kyumin
2013Non-locative syntax of locative experiencers. Ms., University of Calgary.
Kim, Soowon and Joan Maling
1993Syntactic case and frequency adverbials in Korean. In Susumu Kuno (ed.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics V. Cambridge, MA: Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, pp. 368–378.
1990The Syntax and Semantics of Korean Case: The Interaction between Lexical and Syntactic Levels of Representation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Ph.D. dissertation.
Kiparsky, Paul
1998Partitive case and aspect. In Miriam Butt and Wilhelm Geuder (eds.), The Projection of Argument: Lexical Compositional Factors. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 265–307.
Kittilä, Seppo
2002Remarks on the basic transitive sentence. Language Sciences 24.2, 107–130.
Kittilä, Seppo
2005Remarks on involuntary agent construction. Word 56.3, 381–419.
Klaiman, M. H.
1980Bengali dative subject. Lingua 51.4, 275–295.
Kluender, Robert
1992Deriving island constraints. In Helen Goodluck and Michael S. Rochemnot (eds.), Island Constraint. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 222–258.
Koopman, Hilda
2005Korean (and Japanese) morphology from a syntactic perspective. Linguistic Inquiry 36.4, 601–633.
Kornfilt, Jacklin and Omer Preminger
2015Nominative as no case at all: All argument from raising-to-ACC in Sakha. In Andrew Joseph and Esra Predolac (eds.), 9th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics, pp. 109–208. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
Kövecses, Zoltán
2002Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Zoltán
2010Metaphor: A Practical Introduction (2nd Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Zoltán and Günter Radden
1998Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics 9.1. 37–77.
Kratzer, Angelika
1998Scope or pseudo-scope: Are there wide scope indefinites? In Susan Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 163–96.
Kratzer, Angelika
2004Telicity and the meaning of objective case. In Jacqueline Guéron and Alexander Lecarme (eds.), The Syntax of Time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 389–423.
Kumashiro, Toshiyuki
2000The Conceptual Basis of Grammar: A Cognitive Approach to Japanese Clausal Structure. Sand Diego, CA: UCSD Ph.D. dissertation.
2003Double-subject and complex predicate constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 14.1, 1–45.
Kuno, Susumu
1973The Structure of Japanese Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kuno, Susumu
1976Subject raising. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Japanese Generative Grammar. New York: Academic Press, pp. 17-49.
Kuno, Susumu
1987Functional Syntax. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Kuno, Susume
1991Remarks on quantifier scope. In Heizo Nakajima (ed.), Current English Linguistics in Japan. New York: Mouton, pp. 261–288.
Kuroda, Shige-yuki
1972The categorical and the thetic judgment: Evidence from Japanese syntax. Foundations of Language 9.2, 153–185.
Kuroda, Shige-Yuki
1988Whether we agree or not: A comparative syntax of English and Japanese. In William Poser (ed.), Papers from the Second International Workshop on Japanese Syntax, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 103–142.
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1964The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Ladusaw, William
1994Thetic and categorical, stage and individual, weak and strong. In Mandy Harvey and Lynn Santelmann (eds.), Proceedings of SALT-IV, Cornell University: CLC Publications, pp. 220–229.
Lakoff, George
1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson
1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson
1999Philosophy in the Flash: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lambert, Silke
2010Beyond Recipients: Towards a Typology of Dative Uses. Buffalo, NY: University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Ph.D. dissertation.
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W.
1984Active zones. In Claudia Brugman and Monica Macaulay (eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 10, pp. 172–188.
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W.
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2, Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2004bMetonymy in Grammar. Journal of Foreign Languages 27, 2–24.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2009Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2011On the subject of impersonals. In Mario Brdar, Stefan Th. Gries, and Milena Žic Fuchs, Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and Expansion. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 179–218.
Lapointe, Steve
1980A Theory of Grammatical Agreement. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Ph.D. Dissertation.
Lee, Chungmin
2011Genericity and topicality: Towards dynamic genericity. Journal of Language Sciences 18.1, 233–251.
Lee, EunHee
2017Case alternation in duration and frequency adverbials in Korean: A semantic-pragmatic explanation. Lingua 189-190, 1-18.
Lee, Eun-Ji
1990Exceptional case marking in Korean. In T. Green and S. Uziel (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 12, 113–127.
Lee, Hanjung
2015Case particle ellipsis. In Lucien Brown and Jaehoon Yeon (eds.), The Handbook of Korean Linguistics. Wiley Blackwell, pp. 196–211.
Lee, Hayng-cheon
2007-na, -to, -man ‘Korean particles -na, -do, -man’. Journal of the Linguistic Society of Korea 47, 139–157 [Written in Korean].
Lee, Jeong-Shik
1992Case alternation in Korean: Case minimality. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut Ph.D. dissertation.
Lee, Pir Young
1992Wanhyeng pomwun-eyse-uy cwue insang-ey tayhaye ‘On subject raising from closed complements’. Swulyen Emwun Noncip ‘Swulyen Studies in Language and Literature’ 19, 139–171 [Written in Korean].
Lee, Seong-yong
2007Two subject positions in multiple nominative constructions. Journal of Language Sciences 14.2, 239–262.
Lee, Youngjoo
2005Exhaustivity as agreement: The case of Korean man ‘only’. Natural Language Semantics 13.2, 169–200.
Lees, Robert
1960The Grammar of English Nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton.
Levin Beth and Malka Rappaport Hovav
1995Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levin, Theodore
2017Successive-cyclic case assignment: Korean nominative-nominative case-stacking. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 35.2, 447–498.
Li, Yafei
1990X0-binding and verb incorporation. Linguistic Inquiry 21.3, 399–426.
Lieber, Rochelle
1980On the Organization of the Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Ph.D. dissertation.
Lieber, Rochelle
1992Deconstructing Morphology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Littlemore, Jeannette
2015Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought, and Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2009Case in Cognitive Grammar. In Andrej Malchukov and Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 136–150.
Malchukov, Andrej
2008Split infinitives, experiencer objects, and ‘transimpersonal’ constructions: (Re-)establishing the connection. In Mark Donohue and Søren Wichmann (eds.), The Typology of Semantic Alignment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 76–100.
Maling, Joan
1989Adverbials and structural case in Korean. In Susumu Kuno (ed.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics III. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing. pp. 297–308.
Maling, Joan
1993Of nominative and accusative: The hierarchical assignment of grammatical case in Finnish. In Anders Holmberg and Urpo Nikanne (eds.), Case and Other Functional Categories in Finnish Syntax. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 49–74.
Maling, Joan and Soowon Kim
1992Case assignment in the inalienable possession construction in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1.1, 37–68.
Maling, Joan, Jong Sup Jun, and Soowon Kim
2001Case-marking on duration adverbials revisited. In Hee-Don Ahn and Namkil Kim (eds.), Selected Papers from the 12th International Conference of Korean Linguistics. Seoul: Kyungjin Mwunhwasa, pp. 323–335.
Malouf, Robert
1998Mixed Categories in the Hierarchical Lexicon. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Ph.D. dissertation.
Manning, Christopher
1993Analyzing the verbal noun: Internal and external constraints. In Soonja Choi (ed.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 3. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 236–253.
Manova, Stela and Mark Aronoff
2010Modeling affix order. Morphology 20, 109–131.
Marantz, Alec
1991Case and licensing. In German Wesphal, Benjamin Ao, and Hee-Rahk Chae (eds.), Eastern States Conference on Linguistics 1991 (ESCOL) Vol 8. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, pp. 234–253.
Martin, Samuel
1992A Reference Grammar of Korean. Tokyo: Charles E. Tuttle.
Matsumoto, Yo
1992On the Wordhood of Complex Predicates in Japanese. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Ph.D. dissertation.
McKoon, Gail and Talke Macfarland
2000Externally and internally caused change of state verbs. Language 76.4, 833–858.
Michaelis, Laura A.
2004Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 15.1, 1–67.
Michaelis, Laura and Michelle Gregory
2001Topicalization and left dislocation: A functional opposition revisited. Journal of Pragmatics 33.11, 1665–1706.
Mishra, Mithilesh
1990Dative/experiencer subjects in Maithili. In Manindra K. Verma and Tara Mohanan (eds.), Experiencer Subjects in South Asian Languages. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, PP. 105–117.
Mithun, Marianne
2008The emergence of agentive systems in core argument marking. In Mark Donohue and Søren Wichmann (eds.), The Typology of Semantic Alignment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, PP. 297–333.
Miyagawa, Shigeru
1989Light verbs and the ergative hypothesis. Linguistic Inquiry 20.4, 659–668.
Mohanan, Tara
1997Multidimensionality of representation: NV complex predicates in Hindi. In Alex Alsina, Joan Bresnan, and Peter Sells (eds.), Complex Predicates. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 431–471.
1995On the status of ha-ta in multiple complement structures. Linguistics in the Morning Calm 3. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company, pp. 531–544.
O’Grady, William
1998Korean case: A computational approach. Keynote Paper presented at the 11th International Circle of Korean Linguistics Meeting. Honolulu, HI.
Oka, Toshifusa
1988Abstract case and empty pronouns. Tsukuba English Studies 7, 187–227.
Pak, Miok
2001Verbal nouns in Korean: Categorically unspecified lexical roots. In Susumu Kuno (ed.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics IX. Cambridge, MA: Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, pp. 517–531.
2003The roles of metaphor and metonymy in English -er nominals. In René Dirven and Ralf Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 279–319.
Paradis, Carita
2004Where does metonymy stop?: Senses, facets, and active zone. Metaphor and Symbol 19.4, 245–264.
Paradis, Carita
2011Metonymization: A key mechanism in semantic change. In Réka Benczes, Antonio Barcelona, and Francisco JoseRuiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (eds.), Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Toward a Consensus View. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp 61-88.
Park, Byung-soo
2001Constraints on multiple nominative constructions in Korean: A constraint-based lexicalist approach. The Journal of Linguistic Science 20, 147–190.
2017Cognitive Grammar and English nominalization: Event/result nominals and gerundives. Cognitive Linguistics 28.4, 711–756.
Park, Chongwon and Sook-kyung Lee
2009The evolution of Korean datives: Its formal and functional motivations. Language Research 45.2, 283–318.
Peirsman, Yves and Dirk Geeraerts
2006Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics 17.3, 269–316.
Pereltsvaig, Asya
2000On accusative adverbials in Russian and Finnish. In Artemis Alexiadou and Peter Svenonius (eds.), Adverbs and Adjunction. Potsdam: Universitätsbibliothek Publikationsstelle, pp. 155–176
Pinker, Steven
1999Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language. London: Phenix.
Plank, Frans
(ed.)1995Double Case: Agreement by Suffixaufnahme. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 26.2, 277–325.
Portner, Paul
2002, Topicality and (non-)specificity in Mandarin. Journal of Semantics 19.3, 275–287.
Perminger, Omer
2011Agreement as a Fallible Operation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Ph.D. dissertation.
Preminger, Omer
2014Agreement and Its Failures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Przepiórkowski, Adam
1999Adjuncts as complements: Evidence from case assignment. In Gert Webelhuth, Jean-Pierre Koenig, and Andreas Kathol (eds.), Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 231–245.
Pylkkänen, Liina
2008Argument Introducers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Quirk, Randloph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London and New York: Longman.
Radden, Günter and Zoltán Kövecses
1999Towards a theory of metonymy. In Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 17–59.
1997Quantifier scope: How labor is divided between QR and choice functions. Linguistics and Philosophy 20.4, 335–397.
Ross, Robert J.
1967Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Ph.D. dissertation.
Rothstein, Susan
2004Predicates and their Subjects. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Rubin, E
1915Synsoplevede Figurer: Studier i psykologisk Analyse. Første Del ‘Visually experienced figures: Studies in psychological analysis. Part one’. Copenhagen and Christiania: Gyldendalske Boghandel, Nordisk Forlag.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
2011Metonymy and cognitive operations. In Réka Benczes, Antonio Barcelona, and Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (eds.), Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Toward a Consensus View. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 103–123.
1983Comments on the papers in generative syntax. In Yukio Otsu, Henk van Riemsdijk, Kazuko Inoue, Akio Kamio, and Noriko Kawasaki (eds.), Studies in Generative Grammar and Language Acquisition. Tokyo: International Christian University, pp. 79–89.
Saito, Mamoru
1985Some Asymmetries in Japanese and their Theoretical Implications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Ph.D. dissertation.
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
2002Recent activity in the theory of aspect: accomplishments, achievements, or just non-progressive state?Linguistic Typology 6.2, 199–271.
Sato, Yutaka
1993Complex Predicate Formation with Verbal Nouns in Japanese and Korean: Argument Transfer at LF. Manoa, HI: University of Hawaii Ph.D. dissertation.
Sato, Yutaka
2008A phonologically null copula functioning as a light verb in Japanese. In Mutsuko Endo Hudson, Peter Sells, and Sun-Ah Jun (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 13. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 207–217.
Schütze, Carson T.
1996Korean ‘case stacking’ isn’t: Unifying noncase uses of case particles. In Carson Schütze (ed.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 26. Amherst, MA: GLSA publications, pp. 351–165.
Schütze, Carson T.
2001On Korean ‘case stacking’: The varied functions of the particles ka and lul. The Linguistic Review 18.3, 193–232.
Seiler, Hansjakob
1983Possession as an Operational Dimension of Language. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Selkirk, Elizabeth
1982The Syntax of Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sells, Peter
1990Is there Subject-to-Object raising in Japanese? In Katarzyna Dzimirek, Patrick M. Farrell, and Errapel Meijas-Bikandi (eds.), Grammatical Relations: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 445–458.
Sells, Peter
1995aKorean and Japanese morphology from a lexical perspective. Linguistic Inquiry 26.2, 277–325.
Sells, Peter
1995bThe category and case marking properties of verbal nouns in Korean. In Susumu Kuno (ed.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics VI. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company, pp. 370–386.
Sells, Peter
1996Optimality and economy of expression in Korean and Japanese. Paper presented at the Japanese/Korean Linguistics, UCLA.
Sells, Peter
1997Positional constraints and faithfulness in morphology. In Susumu Kunoet al. (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics VII. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing, pp. 488–503.
Seto, Ken-ichi
1999Distinguishing metonymy from synecdoche. In Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden (eds.). Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 91–120.
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1990The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1999Dative subject constructions twenty-two years later. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 29.2, 45–76.
Sigurðsson, Halldor Armann
1989Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Ph.D. dissertation.
Smith, Miachel
1985An analysis of German dummy subject constructions. In Scott DeLancey and Russell S. Tomlin (eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Pacific Linguistics Conference 1, pp. 412–425.
Sohn, Ho-Min
1999The Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Song, Jae Jung
1995The organization and document construction in Korean: A relational analysis. Linguistics 33.6, 763–808.
Song, Jae Jung
2011There’s more than “more animate”. In Seppo Kittilä, Katja Västi, and Jussi Ylikoski (eds.), Case, Animacy, and Semantic Roles. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 183–206.
Song, Jae-Gyun
1994Clause-embedding Verbs and the Interpretation of wh in-situ. Austin, TX: University of Texas Ph.D. dissertation.
Sportiche, Dominuque
1998Atoms and Partitions of Clause Structure. London: Routledge.
Steedman, Mark
1985Dependency and coordination in the grammar of Dutch and English. Language 61.3, 523–568.
Steedman, Mark
2000The Syntactic process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Steele, Susan
1977On being possessed. In Kenneth Whistler, Robert D. Van Valin, Jr., Chris Chiarello, Jeri J. Jaeger, Miriam Patrick, Henry Thompson, Ronya Javkin, and Anthony Woodbury (eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 3, 114–131.
Strawson, Peter F.
1964Identifying reference and truth values. Theoria 30.2, 96–118.
Subbarao, Karumuri V.
2001Agreement in South Asian languages and the minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Peri Bhaskararao and Karumuri V. Subbarao (eds.), The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2001. London: Sage, pp. 457–492.
Sullivan, William
1998Space and Time in Russian: A Description of the Locus Prepositions of Russian. München: LINCOM Europa.
Takano, Yuji
2003Nominative objects as proleptic objects. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21.4, 779–834.
Talmy, Leonard
1972Semantic Structures in English and Atsugewi. Berkeley, CA: University of California Ph.D. dissertation.
Talmy, Leonard
1983How language structures space. In Herbert L. Pick and Linda P. Acredolo (eds.), Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research, and Application. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 225–282.
Talmy, Leonard
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3, Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–149.
Talmy, Leonard
2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. 1,
Concept Structuring Systems
. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tanaka, Hidekazu
2002Raising to objects out of CP. Linguistic Inquiry 33.4, 637–652.
Taylor, John
1996Possessives in English: An Exploration in Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, John
2002Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, John
2003Linguistic Categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Terada, Michiko
1990Incorporation and Argument Structure in Japanese. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Ph.D. dissertation.
1992First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tomioka, Satoshi and Chang-Yong Sim
2005Event structure of inalienable possession in Korean. In Sudha Arunachalam, Tatjana Scheffler, Sandhya Sundaresan, and Joshua Tauberer (eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual Penn linguistics colloquium, pp. 279–292.
Tomioka, Satoshi and Chang-Yong Sim
2007The event semantic root of inalienable possession. Unpublished manuscript, University of Delaware.
1999Checking theory and dative constructions in Japanese and Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8.3, 223–254.
Uriagereka, Juan
2004Spell-Out Consequences. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Maryland.
Urushibara, Saeko
1991-ey/-eykey: A postposition or a case marker? In Susumu Kuno (ed.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics IV, Seoul: Hanshin Publishing, pp. 421–432.
Vermeulen, Reiko
2005Possessive and adjunct multiple nominative constructions in Japanese. Lingua 115.10, 1329–1363.
Wechsler, Stephen and Yae-Sheik Lee
1996The domain of direct case assignment. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 14.3, 629–664.
Wichmann, Søren
2008The study of semantic alignment: Retrospect and state of the art. In Mark Donohue and Søren Wichmann (eds.), The Typology of Semantic Alignment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–23.
1996Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wierzbicka, Anna
2009Case in NSM: A reanalysis of the Polish dative. In Andrej Malchukov and Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 151–169.
Woolford, Ellen
2006Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry 37.1, 111–130.
Yadava, Yogendra P.
2004Non-nominative subjects in Maithili. In Peri Bhaskararao and Karumuri V. Subbarao (eds.), Non-nominative Subjects, vol. 2. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 253–263.
Yang, In-Seok
1972Korean Syntax: Case Marking, Delimiters, Complementation and Relativization. Seoul: Paek Hap Sa.
Yeon, Jaehoon
1999A cognitive account of the constraints on possessor-ascension constructions. Language Research 35.2, 211–230.
Yeon, Jaehoon
2003Korean Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning. London: Saffron.
Yeon, Jaehoon
2010Constraints on double-accusative external possession constructions in Korean: A cognitive approach. In Jaehoon Yeon and Jieun Klaer (eds.), Selected Papers from the 2nd European Conference on Korean Linguistics (Lincom studies in Asian linguistics). Munchen: Lincom Europa, pp. 188–201.
Yi, Nam-Soon
1988Kwuke-uy pwucengkyek-kwa kyekphyoci saynglyak ‘A Study on the Indefinite Case and Case-marker ellipsis in Korean’. Seoul: Top Press [Written in Korean].
Yip, Moria, Joan Maling, and Ray Jackendoff
1987Case in tiers. Language 63.2, 217–250.
Yoon, James H.
1986Some queries concerning the syntax of MNCs in Korean. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 16, 215–236.
Yoon, James H.
1987Some queries concerning the syntax of multiple nominative constructions in Korean. In Susumu Kuno (ed.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics II. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing, pp. 138–162.
Yoon, James H.
1989The grammar of inalienable possession constructions in Korean, Mandarin, and French. In Susumu Kuno (ed.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics III. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing, pp. 357–368.
Yoon, James H.
1990Theta theory and the grammar of inalienable possession constructions. In Juli Carter (ed.), Proceedings of the 20th Meeting of the Northeast Linguistic Society, pp. 502–516.
Yoon, James H.
1991Theta operations and the syntax of multiple complement constructions in Korean. In Susumu Kuno (ed.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics IV. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing, pp. 433–446.
Yoon, James H.
1995Nominal, verbal, and cross-categorial affixation in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4.4, 325–356.
Yoon, James H.
1996Ambiguity of government and chain condition. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 14.1, 105–162.
Yoon, James H.
2001Multiple (identical) case constructions: A case study focusing on inalienable possession type multiple accusative constructions. LSA Lecture Notes. Unpublished manuscript. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.
Yoon, James H.
2004aNon-nominative subjects and case stacking in Korean. In Peri Bhaskararao and Karumuri V. Subbarao (eds.), Non-nominative Subjects, Vol. 2. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 265–314.
Yoon, James H.
2004bThe independence of grammatical case from interpretive factors. Paper presented at the 2004 Linguistic Society of Korea International Conference, Seoul, Korea.
2007Raising of major arguments in Korean and Japanese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25.3, 615–653.
Yoon, James H.
2009The distribution of subject properties in MNCs. In Yukinori Takubo, Tomohide Kinuhata, Szymon Grzelak, and Kayo Nagai (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 16, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 64–83.
Yoon, James H.
2015Double nominative and double accusative constructions. In Lucien Brown and Jaehoon Yeon (eds.), The Handbook of Korean Linguistics. Wiley Blackwell, pp. 79–97.
Yoon, James H. and Chongwon Park
2008Process nominals and morphological complexity. In Mutsuko Endo Hudson, Peter Sells, and Sun-Ah Jun (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 13. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 231–242.
Yoon, Jeong-Me
1989ECM and multiple subject constructions in Korean. In Susumu Kuno (ed.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics III. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing, pp. 369–381.
Yoon, Jeong-Me
1997The argument structure of relational nouns and inalienable possessor constructions in Korean. Language Research 33.2, 231–264.
Yoon, Jeong-Me
2009Aspect and agentivity in Korean multiple subject constructions. Studies in Generative Grammar 19, 211–237.
Yoon, Jeong-Me
2011Double relativization in Korean – An explanation based on the processing approach to island effects. Korean Journal of Linguistics 36, 133–169.
Yoon, Jeong-Me
2015Constructions sharing similar restrictions with MSCs in Korean and the processing approach to island effects. Studies in Generative Grammar 25, 377–411.
Youn, Cheong
1990A Relational Analysis of Korean Multiple Nominative Constructions. Buffalo, NY: SUNY-Buffalo Ph.D. dissertation.
Zaenen, Annie, Joan Maling, and Höskuldur Thráinsson
1985Case and grammatical functions: The Icelandic passive. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 3.4, 441–483.
Zlatev, Jordan
2007Spatial Semantics. In Dirk Geeraerts and Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 318–350.