Chapter published in:
Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions
Edited by Yo Matsumoto and Kazuhiro Kawachi
[Human Cognitive Processing 69] 2020
► pp. 105–140

Syntactic and semantic structures of Thai motion expressions

| Kanda University of International Studies
Thai expressions for a single motion event usually take the form of a single clause that is typically composed of serial verb phrases encoding sub-events (semantic components) of the motion event. The present chapter aims to show that the syntactic and semantic structures of such expressions can be adequately formulated based on the ‘force-dynamic’ structures (cf. Talmy 1988, 2000a) of motion events and ‘aspectual’ types (cf. Vendler 1967) of motion verbs. The event structures and verb types that are relevant to the syntactic patterns of the expressions reflect Thai speakers’ conventional construals for expressing motion events in the Thai language.
Keywords: aspectual types, event structures, serial verbs
Published online: 11 August 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.69.04tak
References

References

Bisang, W.
2003 Aspect in East and Mainland Southeast Asian languages: A first step. MANUSYA: Journal of Humanities, Special issue No.6: Thai from linguistics perspectives, 43–56.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J., Enfield, N. J., Essegbey, J., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Kita, S., & Lüpke, F.
2007 Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language, 83(3), 495–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J. & Van Valin, R. D., Jr.
2017 The macro-event property and the layered structure of the clause. Studies in Language, 41, 142–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M.
1975 Coverbs and case in Vietnamese. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
2003 Typology and universals, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2012 Verbs: Aspectual and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filbeck, D.
1975 A grammar of verb serialization in Thai. In J. G. Harris & J. R. Chamberlin (Eds.), Studies in Tai linguistics in honor of William J. Getney (112–129). Bangkok: Central Institute of English Language, Office of State Universities.Google Scholar
Haiman, J.
1980 The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language 56(3) (515–540). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kessakul, R.
2005 The semantic structure of motion expressions in Thai. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Tokyo.Google Scholar
Lamarre, C.
2007 The linguistic encoding of motion events in Chinese: With reference to cross-dialectal variation. In C. Lamarre & T. Ohori (Eds.), Typological studies of the linguistic expressions of motion events, Volume 1: Perspectives from East and Southeast Asia (3–33). Tokyo: 21st Century COE Program, Center for Evolutionary Cognitive Sciences at the University of Tokyo.Google Scholar
Matisoff, J.
1973 The grammar of Lafu. California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y.
2018 Motion event descriptions in Japanese: Typological perspectives. In P. Pardeshi & T. Kageyama (Eds.), Handbook of Japanese contrastive linguistics (273–289). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y., Akita, K., & Takahashi, K.
2017 The functional nature of deictic verbs and the coding patterns of Deixis. In I. Barretxe-Antuñano (Ed.), Motion and space across languages: Theory and applications (95–122). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muansuwan, N.
2002 Verb complexes in Thai. Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Peyraube, A.
2006 Motion events in Chinese: A diachronic study of directional complements. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (121–135). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prasithrathsint, A.
2010 Grammaticalization of nouns into prepositions in Thai. Journal of Language and Linguistics, 28(2), 68–83.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
2004 The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative, Vol. 2: Typological and contextual perspectives (219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Takahashi, K.
2005 The allative preposition in Thai. In P. Sidwell (Ed.), SEALS XV: Papers from the 15th meeting of the Southeast Asian linguistics society (2005) (111–120). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
2007 Accomplishment constructions in Thai: Diverse cause-effect relationships. In S. Iwasaki, A. Simpson, K. Adams, & P. Sidwell (Eds.), SEALS XIII: Papers from the 13th meeting of the Southeast Asian linguistics society (2003) (263–277). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
2008 Grammaticalization paths of the Thai verb /dây/: A corpus-based study. In P. Sidwell & U. Tadmor (Eds.), SEALS XVI: Papers from the 16th meeting of the Southeast Asian linguistic society (2006) (121–133). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
2009a Basic serial verb constructions in Thai. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 1, 215–229.Google Scholar
2009b Thai motion event expressions: A literature review. In M. Minegishi, K. Thepkanjana, W. Aroonmanakun, & M. Endo (Eds.), Proceedings of the Chulalongkorn-Japan linguistics symposium (29–43). Tokyo: Global COE Program: Corpus-based Linguistics and Language Education, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
2009c Arrival expressions in Thai. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 2, 175–193.Google Scholar
2017a Taigo no idoo-hyoogen [Motion expressions in Thai]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo-hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (129–158). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
2017b Mandarin Chinese and Thai expressions of caused motion: Different caused-motion components in verb-serializing languages. Language and Linguistics in Oceania, 9, Special issue No. 2: South East Asian linguistics , 43–69.Google Scholar
2018a Deictic motion constructions in Japanese and Thai. In P. Pardeshi & T. Kageyama (Eds.), Handbook of Japanese contrastive linguistics (291–312). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018b Taigo no yooto no hiroi keiro-doosi no goi-soo o saikoo suru: Bideo-kurippu jikken kara erareta idoo-hyoogen no iti-bunseki [On lexical aspects of versatile path verbs in Thai: An analysis of motion descriptions elicited by a video-based experiment]. Kanda gaigo daigaku kiyoo [Journal of Kanda University of International Studies], 30, 435–453.Google Scholar
2020 Kanjoo-idoo o arawasu taigo-doosi won no goi-soo [On different lexical aspects of the Thai verb won that expresses motion in a circle]. In Working group for a festschrift to honor Yo Matsumoto on the occasion of his 60th birthday (Ed.), Ninti-gengogaku no habataki [A new development of cognitive linguistics] (39–52). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
1988 Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12, 49–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991 Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. In Proceedings of the 17th annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistics society (480–519). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
2000a Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000b Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2016 Properties of main verbs. Cognitive Semantics, 2(2), 133–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thepkanjana, K.
1986 Serial verb constructions in Thai. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
2006 Nùaj sâaŋ kariyaa riaŋ tôn bɛ̀ɛp naj phaasǎa thaj [Prototypical serial verb constructions in Thai]. In A. Prasithrathsint (Ed.), Nùaj sâaŋ thîi mii khɔ̂ɔ khàt yɛ́ɛŋ naj wajyaakɔɔn thaj: Nùaj sâaŋ khunaanúprayòok, nùaj sâaŋ prayòok tәәm tem, nùaj sâaŋ kariyaa riaŋ lɛ́ɂ nùaj sâaŋ kamwaacòk [Controversial constructions in Thai grammar: Relative clause constructions, complement clause constructions, serial verb constructions, and passive constructions] (66–173). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, R. D., Jr.
2005 Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z.
1967 Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J.
2003 Holistic spatial semantics of Thai. In E. H. Casad & G. B. Palmer (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics and non-Indo-European languages (305–355). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J., & David, C.
2003 Motion event constructions in Swedish, French and Thai: Three different language types? MANUSYA: Journal of Humanities, Special issue No.6: Thai from linguistics perspectives, 18–42.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., & Yangklang, P.
2004 A third way to travel: The place of Thai in motion-event typology. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative, Vol. 2: Typological and contextual perspectives (159–190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar