Chapter published in:
Broader Perspectives on Motion Event Descriptions
Edited by Yo Matsumoto and Kazuhiro Kawachi
[Human Cognitive Processing 69] 2020
► pp. 181204
References

References

Aske, J.
1989Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1–14.Google Scholar
Aurnague, M.
2008Qu’est-ce qu’un verbe de déplacement? Critères spatiaux pour une classification des verbes de déplacement intransitifs du français. In J. Durand, B. Habert, & B. Lacks (Eds.), Actes du Congrès mondial de linguistique française 08’ (1905–1917). Les Ulis: EDP Sciences.Google Scholar
Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Tham, S. W.
2010The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 46, 331–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blomberg, J.
2014Motion in language and experience: Actual and non-actual motion in Swedish, French and Thai. Ph.D. dissertation, Lund University.Google Scholar
Cummins, S.
1996Movement and direction in French and English. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 15(1), 31–54.Google Scholar
Fong, V., & Poulin, C.
1998Locating linguistic variation in semantic templates. In J-P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition (29–39). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Huang, S., & Tanangkingsing, M.
2005Reference to motion events in six Western Austronesian languages: Towards a semantic typology. Oceanic Linguistics 44(2), 307–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
2004Language typologies in our language use: The case of Basque motion events in adult oral narratives. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(3), 317–349. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Path salience in motion events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (403–414). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Kopecka, A.
2004Étude typologique de l’expression de l’espace: Localisation et déplacement en français et en polonais. Thèse de doctorat, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France.Google Scholar
2006The semantic structure of motion verbs in French: Typological perspectives. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (83–101). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y.
2003Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. In S. Chiba et al. (Eds.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: A Festschrift for Masaru Kajita (403–417). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
2017Idoo hyoogen no ruikei ni kansuru kadai [Problems in the typology of motion expressions]. In Y. Matsumoto (Ed.), Idoo hyoogen no ruikeiron [The typology of motion expressions] (1–24). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y., Akita, K., & Takahashi, K.
2017The functional nature of deictic verbs and the coding patterns of Deixis: An experimental study in English, Japanese, and Thai. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Ed.), Motion and space across languages and applications (95–122). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morita, T.
2009La catégorisation des verbes de déplacement en japonais et en français. Thèse de doctorat, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris, France.Google Scholar
2011Intratypological variation in motion events in Japanese and French: Manner and deixis expressions as parameters for cross-linguistics comparison. Cognitextes, 6 [https://​cognitextes​.revues​.org​/498]. Crossref
submitted. What does deixis tell us about motion typology? Linguistic or cultural variations of speaker’s relations to perceived physical events.
Slobin, D. I.
1996Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (195–233). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2000Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In S. Niemeier, & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (107–138). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2006What makes manner of motion salient?: Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (59–81). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sugiyama, Y.
2005Not all verb-framed languages are created equal: The case of Japanese. Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 299–310.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
1991Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 480–519. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. 2: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J.
2007Spatial semantics. In H. Cuyckens & D. Geeraerts (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (318–350). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar