Chapter published in:
Grammar and Cognition: Dualistic models of language structure and language processing
Edited by Alexander Haselow and Gunther Kaltenböck
[Human Cognitive Processing 70] 2020
► pp. 133155
References

References

Bates, E.
1999Plasticity, localization and language development. In S. Broman, & J. M. Fletcher (Eds.), The changing nervous system: Neurobehavioral consequences of early brain disorders (214–253). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berwick, R. C., & Chomsky, N.
2016Why Only Us. Language and evolution. Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bock, K.
1987An effect of the accessibility of word forms on sentence structures. Journal of memory and language 26(2), 119–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boye, K., & Harder, P.
2012A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88(1), 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boye, K., & Bastiaanse, R.
2018Grammatical versus lexical words in theory and aphasia: Integrating linguistics and neurolinguistics. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3(1), 29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bundesen, C.
1990A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523–547. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, M. H., Vinther, N. M., Kristensen, L. B., & Boye, K.
Under revision). Grammar as a backgrounder in sentence processing.
Croft, W.
2007Construction Grammar. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (463–508). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Curtiss, S.
2013Revisiting modularity: Using language as a window to the mind. In M. Piatelli Palmarini & R. C. Berwick (Eds.), Rich languages from poor inputs (68–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dabrowska, Ewa
2004Rules or schemas? Evidence from Polish. Language and Cognitive Processes 19(2), 225–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A. R.
1992Aphasia. The New England Journal of Medicine, 326(8), 531–539. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Danelli, L., Cossu, G., Berlingeri, M., Bottini, G., Sberna, M., & Paulesu, E.
2013Is a lone right hemisphere enough? Neurolinguistic architecture in a case with a very early left hemispherectomy. Neurocase 19(3), 209–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C.
2007The weak interface, consciousness, and form-focused instruction: mind the doors. In S. Fotos & H. Nassaji (Eds.), Form-focused Instruction and Teacher Education. Studies in honour of Rod Ellis (17–34). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., & D’Ausilio, A.
2009Broca’s Area in Language, Action, and Music. Ann.NYAcad.Sci, 1169, 448–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, M. F.
1975The analysis of sentence production. In G. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (133–177). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harder, P.
2010Meaning in Mind and Society. A Functional Contribution to the Social Turn in Cognitive Linguistics. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 41). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, K., & J. L. Mackenzie
2008Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ibbotson, P., & Tomasello, M.
2016Evidence Rebuts Chomsky’s Theory of Language Learning. Scientific American 7 September 2016.Google Scholar
Ishkhanyan, B., Sahraoui, H., Harder, P., Mogensen, J., & Boye, K.
2017Grammatical and lexical pronoun dissociation in French speakers with agrammatic aphasia: A usage-based account and REF-based hypothesis. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 44, 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ishkhanyan, B., Boye, K. & Mogensen, J.
2019The meeting point: Where language production and working memory share resources. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 48(1), 61–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, M.
2007Functional similarities between bimanual coordination and topic/comment structure. In S. Ishihara, S. Jannedy, & A. Schwarz (Eds.), Interdisciplinary studies on information structure (ISIS) 8 (Working Papers of the SFB 632) (61–96). Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
1987Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol 1, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M.
1989Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Martínez-Ferreiro, S., Ishkhanyan, B., Rosell-Clarí, V., & Boye, K.
2017Grammatical verbs in Spanish-speaking individuals with aphasia. Studies in Language and Mind, 2, 175–209.Google Scholar
2019Prepositions and pronouns in connected discourse of individuals with aphasia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 33(6), 497–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, J. L., & Patterson, K.
2002Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: What does the evidence rule out? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(11), 465–472. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Messerschmidt, M., Boye, K., Overmark, M. M., Kristensen, S. T., & Harder, P.
2018Sondringen mellem grammatiske og leksikalske præpositioner. [The distinction between grammatical and lexical prepositions]. Ny forskning i grammatik, 25, 89–106.Google Scholar
Michel Lange, V., Messerschmidt, M., Harder, P., Siebner, H. R., & Boye, K.
2017Planning and production of grammatical and lexical verbs in multi-word messages. PLoS ONE, 12.11. e0186685. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michel Lange, V., Messerschmidt, M., & Boye, K.
2018Contrasting grammatical and lexical determiners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47, 467. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mogensen, J.
2011Almost unlimited potentials of a limited neural plasticity: Levels of plasticity in development and reorganization of the injured brain. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18, 13–45.Google Scholar
2014Reorganization of Elementary Functions (REF) after brain injury and in the intact brain: A novel understanding of neurocognitive organization and reorganization. In J. Costa, & E. Villalba (Eds.), Horizons in neuroscience research, Vol. 15 (99–140). New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Nevat, M., Ullman, M. T., Eviatar, Z., & Bitan, T.
submitted). The neural bases of the learning and generalization of morphological inflection. Neuropsychologia.
Pinker, S.
1999Words and Rules. The ingredients of language. New York. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pinker, S., & Prince, A.
1988On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28, 73–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pulvermüller, F., Capelle, B., & Shtyrov, Y.
2013Brain basis of meaning, words, constructions, and grammar. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford Handbooks Online, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, B., Zurif, E., Brownell, H., Garrett, M., & Bradley, D.
1985Grammatical class effects in relation to normal and aphasic sentence processing. Brain and Language 26(2), 287–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rumelhart, D., & McClelland, J.
1986Parallel distributed processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sidtis, J. J., D. V. L. Sidtis, V. Dhawan and D. Eidelberg
2018Switching Language Modes: Complementary Brain Patterns for Formulaic and Propositional Language. Brain Connectivity 8(3): 189–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & D. Wilson
1995Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trousdale, G.
2014On the relationship between grammaticalization and constructionalization. Folia Linguistica, 48, 557–577. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M., Corkin, S., Coppola, M., Hickok, G., Growdon, J. H., Koroshetz, W. J., & Pinker, S.
1997A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 289–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M.
2001The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: the declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4(2), 105–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative-procedural model. Cognition 92(1), 231–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M. T.
2016The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiological model of language learning, knowledge and use. In G. Hickok, & S. A. Small (Eds.). The neurobiology of language (953–968). Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Lancker-Sidtis, D., A. R. McIntosh and S. Grafton
2003PET activation studies comparing two speech tasks widely used in surgical mapping. Brain and Language 85, 245–261. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Lancker Sidtis, D.
2012Formulaic Language and Language Disorders. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 62–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, R.
1993A synopsis of Role and Reference Grammar. In R. Van Valin (Ed.), Advances in Role and Reference Grammar (1–164). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vinther, N. M., Boye, K., & Kristensen, L. B.
2014Grammatikken i baggrunden: Opmærksomhed under læsning [Grammar in the background: Attention in reading]. NyS, 47, 99–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar