Chapter published in:
Grammar and Cognition: Dualistic models of language structure and language processing
Edited by Alexander Haselow and Gunther Kaltenböck
[Human Cognitive Processing 70] 2020
► pp. 159190


Clark, H., & Brennan, S. A.
1991Grounding in communication. In Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (127–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, G.
2006Discourse particles and modal particles as grammatical elements. In Fischer, K. (Ed.), Approaches to discourse particles (403–425). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2013‘Same same but different’ – modal particles, discourse markers and the art (and purpose) of categorization. In Degand, L., Cornillie, B., & Pietrandrea, P. (Eds.), Discourse markers and modal particles: categorization and description (19–46). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, K., & Alm, M.
2013A radical construction grammar perspective on the modal particle-discourse particle distinction. In Degand, L., Cornillie, B. & Pietrandrea, P. (Eds.), Discourse markers and modal particles: categorization and description (47–87). Amsterdam & Phila- delphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fujiwara, Y.
1993Gengo ruikeiron to bunmatsushi [Linguistic typology and sentence-final particles]. Tokyo: Miyai Shoten.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
1979On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Günthner, S.
2011Between emergence and sedimentation: projecting constructions in German interactions. Auer, P., & Pfänder, S. (Eds.), Constructions: Emergent and emerging (156–185). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haselow, A.
2011Discourse marker and modal particle: the functions of utterance-final then in spoken English. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3603–3623. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the negotiation of common ground in spoken discourse: final particles in English. Language and Communication, 32, 182–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Final particles in spoken German. In Hancil, S., Haselow, A., & Post, M. (Eds.), Final particles (77–197). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2016aA processual view on grammar: macrogrammar and the final field in spoken syntax. Language Sciences, 54, 77–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016bIntensifying adverbs ‘outside the clause’: a cognitive analysis. In Kaltenböck, G., Keizer, E., & Lohmann, A. (Eds.), Outside the clause: Form and function of extra-clausal constituents (379–416). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019Discourse marker sequences: insights into the serial order of communicative tasks in real-time turn production. Journal of Pragmatics, 149, 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F.
1991Grammaticalization : A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heine, B., Kaltenböck, G., Kuteva, T., & Long, H.
2013An outline of discourse grammar. In Jany, C., & Bischoff, S. (Eds.). Functional approaches to language (155–206). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., Kuteva, T., & Kaltenböck, G.
2014Discourse grammar, the dual process model, and brain lateralization: some correlations. Language and Cognition, 6, 146–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., Kaltenböck, G., & Kuteva, T.
2015Some observations on the evolution of final particles. In Hancil, S., Haselow, A., & Post, M. (Eds.), Final particles (111–140). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Heine, B.
2018On the dualistic nature of discourse processing: linguistic and neurolinguistic observations. Working paper, prepared for the International Workshop One Brain – Two Grammars? Examining dualistic approaches to grammar and cognition, Rostock, 1–2 March 2018.
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K.
2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Izutsu, M. N., & Izutsu, K.
2014 “ ‘Leap’ or ‘continuum’?: grammaticalization pathways from conjunctions to sentence-final particles.” In Borkent, M., Dancygier, B., & Hinnell, J. (Eds.), Language and the creative mind (83–99). Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
2017Regularity outside argument structure: sequential ordering in final position. A paper presented at IPrA 15, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
2019 Very simple, though, isn’t it?: pragmatic marker sequencing at right periphery. A paper to be presented at IPrA 16, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hon Kong.
Jin, G.
2009 Mongorugo no shujoshi no shosetsu nitsuite: kopasu ni motozuku kijutsuteki kenkyu [On the sequential ordering of Mongolian final particles: a corpus-based descriptive study]. In Tomimori, N., Minegishi, M., & Kawaguchi, Y. (Eds.), Kopasu o mochiita gengo kenkyu no kanosei [Potentials of corpus-based studies] (129–147). Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, G., Heine, B., & Kuteva, T.
2011On thetical grammar. Studies in Language, 35, 852–897. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, G., & Heine, B.
2014Sentence grammar vs. thetical grammar: two competing domains? MacWhinney, B., Malchukov, A., & Moravcsik, E. (Eds.), Competing motivations in grammar and usage (348–363). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klausenburger, J.
1979Morphologization: Studies in Latin and Romance morphophonology. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, C.
1985Grammaticalization: synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e stile, 20, 303–318.Google Scholar
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A.
1981Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lindner, K.
1991‘Wir sind ja doch alte Bekannte’: the use of German ja and doch as modal particles. In Abraham, W. (Ed.), Discourse particles: Descriptive and theoretical investigations on the logical, syntactic, and pragmatic properties of discourse particles in German (163–201). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, A., & Koops, C.
2016Aspects of discourse marker sequencing: empirical challenges and theoretical implications. In Kaltenböck, G., Keizer, E., & Lohmann, A. (Eds.), Outside the clause: Form and function of extra-clausal constituents (417–445). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsumura, A.
(Ed.) 1971Nihon bunpo daijiten [An unabridged dictionary of Japanese grammar]. Tokyo: Meijishoin.Google Scholar
Minami, F.
1993Gendai nihongo bunpo no rinkaku [An outline of present-day Japanese]. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.Google Scholar
Noda, H.
1997“No(da)” no Kino [Functions of no(da)]. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Paik, P. J.
2007Wegugeo roseo eui hangugeo munbeob sajeon [A reference grammar of Korean as a foreign language]. Seoul: Hau.Google Scholar
Paul, W.
2014Why particles are not particular: sentence-final particles in Chinese as heads of a split CP. Studia Linguistica 68(1), 77–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saji, K.
1957 Syujoshi-no kino [Functions of final particles]. Kokugo Kokubun 26(7), 23–31.Google Scholar
Shibatani, M.
1990The languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shinzato, R.
2007(Inter)subjectification, Japanese syntax and syntactic scope increase. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8(2), 171–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shinzato, R., & Masuda, K.
2009Morphophonological variability and form-function regularity: a usage-based approach to the Japanese modal adverb yahari/yappari/yappa . Language Sciences, 31, 813–836. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, A.
2014Sentence-final particles. In Huang, C. T. J., Li, Y. H. A., & Simpson, A. (Eds.), The handbook of Chinese linguistics (156–179). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sohn, H.-M.
1999The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tottie, G., & Hoffmann, S.
2006Tag questions in British and American English. Journal of English Linguistics 34(4), 283–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, M.
1974Kokugo bunporon [A grammatical theory of Japanese]. Tokyo: Kasamashoin.Google Scholar
Yamakoshi, Y.
2012Kuwashiku wakaru mongorugo bunpo [A detailed Mongolian grammar]. Tokyo: Hakusuisha.Google Scholar
Yap, F. H., Yang, Y., & Wong, T.-S.
2014On the development of sentence final particles (and utterance tags) in Chinese. In Beeching, K., & Detges, U. (Eds.), Discourse functions at the left and right periphery: Crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language change (179–220). Leiden & Boston: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar