Chapter published in:
Grammar and Cognition: Dualistic models of language structure and language processing
Edited by Alexander Haselow and Gunther Kaltenböck
[Human Cognitive Processing 70] 2020
► pp. 267308


Ameka, F.
1992Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 18, 101–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ariel, M.
2009Discourse, grammar, discourse. Discourse Studies 11(1), 5–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auer, P.
1996The pre-front field in spoken German and its relevance as a grammaticalization position. Pragmatics 6(3), 295–322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text 25(1), 7–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009On-line syntax: thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 31(1), 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A.
1997Human memory: Theory and practice. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W.
1983Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition 11(3), 211–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beeching, K., & Detges, U.
(Eds.) 2014Discourse functions at the right and left periphery: Crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language change. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
1999Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Blakemore, D.
2002Relevance and linguistic meaning: The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, C., Bilger, M., Rouget, C., & Van den Eynde, K.
1990Le français parlé: Études grammaticales. Paris: Éditions du CNRS.Google Scholar
Bornkessel-Schlewesky, I., & Schlesewsky, M.
2009Processing syntax and morphology: A neurocognitive perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brady, M., Armstrong, L., & Mackenzie, C.
2006An examination over time of language and abilities following discourse production right hemisphere brain damage. Journal of Neurolinguistics 19(4), 291–310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, L. J.
2008The comment clause in English: Syntactic origins and pragmatic development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, R., & Dapretto, M.
2001Making sense during conversation: An fMRI study. Neuroreport 12 (16), 3625–3632. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W.
1994Discourse, consciousness, and time. The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Christianson, K., & Ferreira, F.
2005Conceptual accessibility and sentence production in a free word order language (Odawa). Cognition, 98, 105–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, N.
2001The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crible, L., & Degand L.
2019Reliability vs. granularity in discourse annotation: What is the trade off? Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 15(1), 71–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuenca, M. J., & Marín, M. J.
2009Co-occurrence of discourse markers in Catalan and Spanish oral narrative. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 899–914. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., & Merikle, P.
1996Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 3(4), 422–433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Danon-Boileau, L., Meunier, A., Morel, M.-A., & Tournandre, N.
1991Intégration discursive et intégration syntaxique. Langages, 104, 111–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Debaisieux, J.-M.
2007La distinction entre dépendance grammaticale et dépendance macrosyntaxique comme moyen de résoudre les paradoxes de la subordination. Faits de Langue, 28, 119–132.Google Scholar
Degand, L., & Simon, A. C.
2009On identifying basic discourse units in speech: Theoretical and empirical issues.” Discours, 4. URL: http://​discours​.revues​.org​/index5852​.html
Dehé, N.
2014Parentheticals in spoken English: The syntax-prosody relation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, A.
2013Turn-design at turn-beginnings: Multimodal resources to deal with tasks of turn-construction in German. Journal of Pragmatics 46(1), 91–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dik, S. C.
1997The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dines, E. R.
1980Variation in discourse – ‘and stuff like that’. Language in Society 9(1), 13–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dostie, G.
2013Les associations de marqueurs discursifs. De la cooccurrence libre à la collocation. Linguistik online 62(5), 15–45Google Scholar
Ford, C., & Thompson, S.
1996Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (134–184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, B.
1999What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31(7), 931–952. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011The sequencing of contrastive discourse markers in English. International Review of Pragmatics 1(2), 293–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015The combining of discourse markers – A beginning. Journal of Pragmatics, 86, 48–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, M.
1990Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T.
1994Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greene, S., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R.
1992Pronoun resolution and discourse models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 266–283.Google Scholar
Gregory, M. L., Raymond, W. D., Bell, A., Fosler-Lussier, E., & Jurafsky, D.
1999The effects of collocational strength and contextual predictability in lexical production. CLS, 35, 151–166.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1985An introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
2004An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Hancil, S., Haselow, A., & Post, M.
(Eds.) 2015Final particles. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haselow, A.
2011Discourse marker and modal particle: The functions of utterance-final then in spoken English. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3603–3623. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Arguing for a wide conception of grammar: The case of final particles in spoken discourse. Folia Linguistica 47(2), 375–424. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016A processual view on grammar: Macrogrammar and the final field in spoken syntax. Language Sciences, 54, 77–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Spontaneous spoken English. An integrated approach to the emergent grammar of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019Discourse marker sequences: Insights into the serial order of communicative tasks in real-time turn production. Journal of Pragmatics, 146, 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, B.
2013On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics 51(6), 1205–1247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019Some observations on the dualistic nature of discourse processing. Folia Linguistica 53(2), 411–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., Kaltenböck, G., Kuteva, T., & Long, H.
2017Cooptation as a discourse strategy. Linguistics, 55, 1–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J.
2013Turn-initial position and some of its occupants. Journal of Pragmatics, 57, 331–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, C. F.
1960The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203, 89–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G.
2002Language description: The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, B.
2002Discourse analysis. Malden, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jucker, A. H., & Smith, S. W.
1998And people just you know like ‘wow’ – Discourse markers as negotiating strategies. In A. H. Jucker, & Y. Ziv (Eds.), Discourse markers. Theory and descriptions (171–201). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A.
1992A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, G., Heine, B., & Kuteva, T.
2011On thetical grammar. Studies in Language, 35, 852–897. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kapatsinski, V. M.
2005Measuring the relationship of structure to use: determinants of the extent of recycle in repetition repair.” Berkeley Linguistics Society, 30, 481–492. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W.
1988The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction–integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koops, C., & Lohmann, A.
2015A quantitative approach to the grammaticalization of discourse markers. Evidence from their sequencing behavior. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20(2), 232–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee-Goldman, R.
2011 No as a discourse marker. Journal of Pragmatics 43(10), 2627–2649. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lenk, U.
1998Marking discourse coherence: Functions of discourse markers in spoken English. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C., & Torreira, F.
2015Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language. In J. Holler, K. Kendrick, M. Casillas, & S. Levinson (Eds.), Turn-taking in human communicative interaction (10–26). Lausanne: Frontiers Media.Google Scholar
Lohmann, A., & Koops, C.
2016Aspects of discourse marker sequencing: Empirical challenges and theoretical implications. In G. Kaltenböck, E. Keizer, & A. Lohmann (Eds.), Outside the clause. Form and function of extra-clausal constituents (417–445). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, D., Baynes, K., & Prat, C.
2005The propositional structure of discourse in the two cerebral hemispheres. Brain and Language 95(3), 383–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marini, A., Carlomagno, S., Caltagirone, C., & Nocentini, U.
2005The role played by the RH in the organization of complex textual structures. Brain and Language, 93, 46–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mauri, C., & Sansò, A.
2018Linguistic strategies for ad hoc categorization: theoretical assessment and cross-linguistic variation. Folia Linguistica, 52, 1–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, M.
2003Talking back: ‘small’ interactional response tokens in everyday conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 36(1), 33–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., & Seidenberg, M.
1978Sentence processing and the clause boundary. In W. J. M. Levelt, & G. B. Flores d’Arcais (Eds.), Studies in the perception of language (119–246). Chicester: J. Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Mauranen, A.
2016Temporality in speech – Linear Unit Grammar. English Text Construction 9(1), 77–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R.
1993Short-term memory and sentence processing: Evidence from neuropsychology. Memory & Cognition 21(2), 176–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Y.
2009Metalanguage in interaction: Hebrew discourse markers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morel, M.-A.
2007Le postrhème dans le dialogue oral en français. L’information grammaticale, 113, 40–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oberauer, K., & Kliegl, R.
2006A formal model of capacity limits in working memory. Journal of Memory and Language 55(4), 601–626. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Overstreet, M.
1999Whales, candlelight, and stuff like that. General extenders in English discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2014The role of pragmatic function in the grammaticalization of English general extenders. Pragmatics 24(1), 105–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pichler, H., & Levey, S.
2011In search of grammaticalization in synchronic dialect data: General extenders in Northeast England. English Language & Linguistics 15(3), 441–471. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M., & Garrod, S.
2006Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(3), 105–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poeppel, E.
1997A hierarchical model of temporal perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1(2), 56–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pons Bordería, S.
2018The combination of discourse markers in spontaneous conversations: keys to undo a gordian knot. Revue Romane 53(1), 121–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prat, C., Long, D., & Baynes, K.
2007The representation of discourse in the two hemispheres: An individual differences investigation. Brain and Language 100(3), 283–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raso, T.
2014Prosodic constraints for discourse markers. In T. Raso, & H. Mello (Eds.), Spoken corpora and linguistic studies (411–467). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Redeker, G.
2006Discourse markers as attentional cues at discourse transitions. In K. Fischer (Ed.), Approaches to discourse particles (339–358). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Roll, M., Lindgren, M., Alter, K., & Horne, M.
2012Time-driven effects on parsing during reading. Brain and Language 121, 267–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roll, M., Gosselke, S., Lindgren, M., & Horne, M.
2013Time-driven effects on processing grammatical agreement. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1004. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rühlemann, C.
2017Integrating corpus-linguistic and conversation-analytic transcriptions in XML: the case of backchannels and overlap in storytelling interaction. Corpus Pragmatics, 1, 201–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, J.
1974Memory in reading and listening to discourse. Memory & Cognition 2(1), 95–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H.
1984Notes on Methodology. In J. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (2–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
1974A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.
1996Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (52–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29, 1–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D.
1987Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schourup, L.
1985Common discourse particles in English conversation. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Schremm, A., Horne, M., & Roll, M.
2015Brain responses to syntax constrained by time-driven implicit prosodic phrases. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 35, 68–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sherratt, S., & Bryan, K.
2012Discourse production after right brain damage: Gaining a comprehensive picture using a multi-level processing model. Journal of Neurolinguistics 25 (4), 213–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stabler, E.
1994The finite connectivity of linguistic structure. In C. Clifton, Jr., L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (303–336). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R.
2002Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25(5–6), 701–721. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Staub, A., & Clifton, C.
2006Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either…or . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1223–1237.Google Scholar
Tompkins, C. A., Fassbinder, W., Lehman-Blake, M. T., & Baumgaertner, A.
2002The nature and implications of right hemisphere language disorders: Issues in search of answers. In A. E. Hillis (Ed.), The handbook of adult language disorders: Integrating cognitive neuropsychology, neurology, and rehabilitation (429–448). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. A., & Mulac, A. J.
1991The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer ‘that’ in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics, 15, 237–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tottie, G., & Hoffmann, S.
2006Tag Questions in British and American English. Journal of English Linguistics 34(4), 283–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Tag Questions in English – The First Century. Journal of English Linguistics, 37, 130–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
1997The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the ICHL XII, Manchester, UK.
van Dijk, T.
1980Macrostructures. An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Vollrath, M., Kazenwadel, J., & Krüger, H. P.
1992A universal constant in temporal segmentation of human speech. Naturwissenschaften 79(10), 479–480. CrossrefGoogle Scholar