Chapter published in:
Grammar and Cognition: Dualistic models of language structure and language processing
Edited by Alexander Haselow and Gunther Kaltenböck
[Human Cognitive Processing 70] 2020
► pp. 309354
References

References

Babarczy, A.
2006The development of negation in Hungarian child language. Lingua, 116, 377–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bahlmann, G., & Friederici, A. D.
2006Hierarchical and linear sequence processing: Anelectrophysiological exploration of two different grammar types. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18(11), 1829–1842. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bannard, C., & Matthews, D.
2008Stored Word Sequences in Language Learning. Psychological Science 19(3), 241–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bartha, P.
2019Analogy and Analogical Reasoning. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019 Edition). https://​plato​.stanford​.edu​/archives​/spr2019​/entries​/reasoning​-analogy/
Bates, E.
1999Plasticity, localization and language development. In S. Broman, & J. M. Fletcher (Eds.), The changing nervous system: Neurobehavioral consequences of early brain disorders (214–253). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bergen, B., & Chang, N.
2013Embodied Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D.
1990Language and species. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998Catastrophic evolution: the case for a single step from protolanguage to full human language. In J. R. Hurford, M. Studdert-Kennedy, & C. Knight (Eds.), Approaches to the evolution of language: social and cognitive bases (341–358). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R.
1973A first language. The early stages. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Cameron-Faulkner, Th., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M.
2003A constructio based analysis of child directed speech. Cognitive Science, 27, 843–873. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, M. H., Misyak, J. B., & Tomblin, J.
2009Statistical learning of nonadjacencies predicts on-line processing of long-distance dependencies in natural language. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 31(31).Google Scholar
Cowan, N.
2000The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, E., & Lieven, E.
2005Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 16(3), 437–474. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, E.
2008Questions with long-distance dependencies: A usage-based perspective Cognitive Linguistics 19(3). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drienkó, L.
2012Agreement groups analysis of mother-child discourse. Talk presented at the 4th UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference, King’s College London , UK, 10–12th July 2012.
2013aDistributional cues for language acquisition: a cross-linguistic agreement groups analysis. Poster presentation for the 11th International Symposium of Psycholinguistics , Tenerife, Spain 20–23 March, 2013.
2013bAgreement groups coverage of mother-child language. Talk presented at the Child Language Seminar , Manchester, UK, 23–25 June 2013.
2013cAgreement groups coverage of Hungarian mother-child language. Poster presentation for the 11th International Conference on the Structure of Hungarian . 29–31 August 2013, Piliscsaba, Hungary.
2014Agreement groups analysis of mother-child discourse. In G. Rundblad, A. Tytus, O. Knapton & C. Tang (Eds.), Selected Papers from the 4th UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference (52–67). London: UK Cognitive Linguistics Association. ISSN 2046-9144. http://​www​.uk​-cla​.org​.uk​/proceedings​/volume​_2​_36​/36​-32
2015Discontinuous coverage of English mother-child speech. Talk presented at the Budapest Linguistics Conference , 18–20 June 2015, Budapest, Hungary.
2016aAgreement groups coverage of English mother-child utterances for modelling linguistic generalisations. Journal of Child Language Acquisition and Development – JCLAD 4(3), 113–158.Google Scholar
2016bDiscovering utterance fragment boundaries in small unsegmented texts. In A. Takács, V. Varga, & V. Vincze (Eds.), XII. Magyar Számítógépes Nyelvészeti Konferencia (273–281). (12th Hungarian Computational Linguistics Conference). ISBN: 978-963-306-450-4. http://​rgai​.inf​.u​-szeged​.hu​/mszny2016/
2017aAgreement groups processing of context-free utterances: coverage, structural precision, and category information Talk presented at the 2nd Budapest Linguistics Conference , 1–3 June 2017, Budapest, Hungary. Online:http://​www​.academia​.edu​/20646809​/Agreement​_groups​_processing​_of​_context​-free​_utterances​_coverage​_structural​_precision​_and​_category​_information
2017bLargest chunks as short text segmentation strategy: a cross-linguistic study. In A. Wallington, A. Foltz, & J. Ryan (Eds.), Selected Papers from the 6th UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference (273–292). http://​www​.uk​-cla​.org​.uk​/files​/downloads​/15​_drienko​_273​_292​.pdf
2018aLargest-Chunk strategy for syllable-based segmentation. Language and Cognition 10(3), 391–407. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018bAnalogous sequence processing in Agreement Groups and Discrete Combinatorial Neuronal Assemblies: The regulatory role of category information. Draft available: https://​www​.academia​.edu​/37517985​/Analogous​_sequence​_processing​_in​_Agreement​_Groups​_and​_Discrete​_Combinatorial​_Neuronal​_Assemblies​_The​_regulatory​_role​_of​_category​_information
2019Word-based largest chunks for Agreement Groups processing: cross-linguistic observations. Talk for the Linguistics Beyond and Within (LingBaW) Conference , 17–18 October 2019. Lublin, Poland.
(2020) The effects of semantic category information on Agreement Groups syntactic processing. Talk for the UK Cognitive Linguistic Conference, University of Birmingham, 25-29 July, 2020.Google Scholar
Evans, V., & Green, M.
2006Cognitive Linguistics. An Introduction. Edinburgh University.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Ch. J.
1988The Mechanisms of “Construction Grammar”. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 35–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Finch, S., Chater, N., & Redington, M.
1995Acquiring syntactic information from distributional statistics. In J. P. Levy, D. Bairaktaris, J. A. Bullinaria, & P. Cairns (Eds.) Connectionist models of memory and language (229–242). UCL Press: London.Google Scholar
Ganger, J., & Brent, M. R.
2004Reexamining the Vocabulary Spurt. Developmental Psychology 40(4), 621–632. Crossref. PMID 15238048.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalizations in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2009The Nature of Generalization in Language. Cognitive Linguistics 20(1), 93–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A.
1987The development of categorization in the second year and its relations to other cognitive and linguistic developments. Child Development, 58, 1523–1531. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gershkoff-Stowe, L., & Thelen, E.
2004U-Shaped Changes in Behavior: A Dynamic Systems Perspective. Journal of Cognition and Development 5(1), 11–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Z. S.
1951Methods in structural linguistics. Chicago, IL, US: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1952Discourse analysis. Language 28(1), 1–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
1999Possible stages in the evolution of the language capacity. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 272–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiss, G. R.
1973Grammatical word classes: A learning process and its simulation. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 7, l–41.Google Scholar
Küntay, A., & Slobin, D. I.
1996Listening to a Turkish mother: Some puzzles for acquisition. In D. I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis, & J. Guo (Eds.), Social interaction, social context, and language: Essays in honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp (265–286). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2009Cognitive (Construction) Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 20(1), 167–176. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lieven, E., Behrens, H., Speares, J., & Tomasello, M.
2003Early syntactic creativity: a usage-based approach. Journal of Child Language, 30, 333–370. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
2000The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk. 3rd Edition. Vol. 2: The Database. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A.
1956The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63(2), 81–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mintz, T. H.
2003Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech. Cognition 90(1), 91–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, T. M.
1997Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Montes, R.
1987Secuencias de clarificación en conversaciones con niños. Morphe, 3–4. Universidad Autónoma de Puebla.Google Scholar
Montes, R. G.
1992Achieving understanding: Repair mechanisms in mother–child conversations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Newport, E. L.
1990Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14, 11–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S.
1979Formal models of language learning. Cognition, 7, 217–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Progovac, L.
2016A gradualist scenario for language evolution: precise linguistic reconstruction of early human (and Neandertal) grammars. Front. Psychol. 7, 1714. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Réger, Z.
1986The functions of imitation in child language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7, 323–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Redington, M., Chater, N., & Finch, S.
1998Distributional Information: A Powerful Cue for Acquiring Syntactic Categories. Cognitive Science 22(4), 425–469. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, H., & Frank, M. C.
2014Markers of topical discourse in child-directed speech. Cognitive Sciene 38(8), 1634–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sag, I. A., Boas, H. C., & Kay, P.
2012Introducing Sign-Based Construction Grammar. In H. C. Boas, & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar. CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Sidtis, J. J., Sidtis, D. V., Dhawan, V., & Eidelberg, D.
2018Switching Language Modes: Complementary Brain Patterns for Formulaic and Propositional Language. Brain connectivity, 189–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
St. Clair, M. C., Monaghan, P., & Christiansen, M. H.
2010Learning grammatical categories from distributional cues: Flexible frames for language acquisition. Cognition 116(3), 341–360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stoll, S., Abbot-Smith, K., & Lieven, E.
2009Lexically Restricted Utterances in Russian, German, and English Child-Directed Speech. Cognitive Science, 33, 75–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, S.
1982Ancestral and descendent behaviours: The case of U-shaped behavioural growth. In T. G. Bever (Ed.), Regressions in mental development: Basic phenomena and theories (191–220). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Inc.Google Scholar
Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V., Pine, J. M., & Rowland, C. F.
2001The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: an alternative account. Journal Child Language 281, 127–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M.
2003Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Van Lancker Sidtis, D.
2009Formulaic and novel language in a ‘dual process’ model of language competence: evidence from surveys, speech samples, and schemata. In R. L. Corrigan, E. A. Moravcsik, H. Ouali, & K. M. Wheatley (Eds.), Formulaic Language: Volume 2. Acquisition, loss, psychological reality, functional applications (151–176). Amsterdam: Benjamins Publishing Co. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Trijp, R., Steels, L., Beuls, K., & Wellens, P.
2012Fluid construction grammar: the new kid on the block. In Proceedings of the Demonstrations at the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL ’12). Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 63–68.Google Scholar
Wang, H., & Mintz, T. H.
2010From Linear Sequences to Abstract Structures: Distributional Information in Infant-direct Speech. In J. Chandlee, K. Franich, K. Iserman, & L. Keil (Eds.), Proceedings Supplement of the 34th Boston University Conference on Language Development.Google Scholar
Waterfall, H. R., Sandbank, B., Onnis, L., & Edelman, S.
2010An empirical generative framework for computational modeling of language acquisition. Journal Child Language, 37, 671–703. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waterfall, H. R., & Edelman, S.
2009The neglected universals: Learnability constraints and discourse cues. Behavioral & Brain Sciiences, 32, 471–472. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weisleder, A., & Waxman, S. R.
2010What’s in the input? Frequent frames in child-directed speech offer distributional cues to grammatical categories in Spanish and English. Journal Child Language 37(5), 1089–108. Epub. 2009 Aug 24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar