Cover not available
Part of
Collocations as a Language Resource: A functional and cognitive study in English phraseology
Sonja Poulsen
[Human Cognitive Processing 71] 2022
► pp. 309–326

References

Aisenstadt, E.
1979 Collocability restrictions in dictionaries. In R. R. K. Hartmann, (Ed.), Dictionaries and their users (71–74). Exeter: University of Exeter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aitchison, J.
1987 Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. J.
1978 Fixed expressions in English: a linguistic, psycholinguistic, sociolinguistic and didactic study. Part I. Anglistik und Englischunterricht, 7, 181–202.Google Scholar
1987 Problems in understanding and teaching idiomaticity in English. Anglistik und Englischunterricht, 32, 105–122.Google Scholar
1997 Aspects of verbal humour in English [Language in Performance 13]. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Aristotle
1933 Metaphysics. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Algeo, J.
1995 Having a look at the expanded predicate. In B. Aarts & C. Meyer (Eds.), The verb in contemporary English theory and description (203-217). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Atkins, B. T. S., Fillmore, C. J., & Johnson, C. R.
2003 Lexicographic relevance: Selecting information from corpus evidence. International Journal of Lexicography, 16, 251–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bache, C.
1985 Verbal aspect: A general theory and its application to present-day English [Odense University studies in English 8]. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
2002 On categories in linguistics. International Journal of Linguistics. Acta Linguistica Hafniensis, 32, 71–105, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bache, C., & Davidsen-Nielsen, N.
1997 Mastering English grammar. An advanced grammar for non-native and native speakers. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bally, C.
1909 Traité de stylistique française. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Baranov, A. N., & Dobrovol’skii, D. O.
1996 Cognitive modeling of actual meaning in the field of phraseology. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 409–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron, I., & Herslund, M.
1998 Verbo-nominal predicates and the object relation. In K. Van Durme, & L. Schøsler (Eds.), Studies in valency IV: Valency and verb typology (89–127). Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, L.
2001 Morphological productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benson, M.
1985 Collocations and idioms. ELT Documents: Dictionaries, lexicography and language learning, 61–68.Google Scholar
Bereiter, C.
2002 Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Publishers.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, M.
1981 Basic issues in the development of word meaning. In W. Deutsch (Ed.), The child’s construction of language (341–387). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1983 Semantische und konzeptuelle Repräsentationen lexikalischer Einheiten. In R. Ruzicka, & W. Motsch, (Eds.), Untersuchungen zur Semantik (61–69). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Blumenthal-Dramé, A.
2012 Entrenchment in usage-based theories: What corpus data do and do not reveal about the mind. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 What corpus-based Cognitive Linguistics can and cannot expect from neurolinguistics. Looking back, looking forward. Cognitive Linguistics, 27 (4), 507–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Entrenchment from a psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic perspective. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning. How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge (129–152). Washington, DC: De Gruyter Mouton & American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bobrow, S., & Bell, S.
1973 On catching on to idiomatic expressions. Memory and cognition, 1, 343–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye, K., & Harder, P.
2017 Konstruktionsgrammatik, regler og funktionsbaseret struktur i neurokognitiv belysning. Ny forskning i Grammatik, 24, 45–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, L. J., & Akimoto, M.
(Eds.) 1999a Collocational and idiomatic aspects of composite predicates in the history of English. [Language Companion Series 47]. Philadelphia, Pa: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, L. J. & Akimoto, M.
1999b Introduction. In L. J. Brinton & M. Akimoto (Eds.), Collocational and idiomatic aspects of composite predicates in the history of English. [Language Companion Series 47]. Philadelphia, Pa: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999c The origins of the composite predicate in Old English In L. J Brinton, & M. Akimoto (Eds.), Collocational and idiomatic aspects of composite predicates in the history of English. [Language Companion Series 47]. Philadelphia, Pa: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L.
1985 Morphology. A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L., Perkins R., & Pagliuca W.
1994 The Evolution of grammar. Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bühler, K.
2009 Theory of language: The representational function of language [Foundations of Semiotics 25]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burger, H.
2005 30 Jahre germanistische Phraseologieforschung. Hermes, 35, 17–43.Google Scholar
Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P.
1988 The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 668–683. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, L.
2001 The history of linguistics. In M. Aronoff & J. Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics. Oxford, UK & Malden, Massachusetts, USA.Google Scholar
Campbell, L., & Janda, R.
2000 Introduction: Conceptions of grammaticalization and their problems. Language Sciences, 23, 93–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Catford, J. C.
1969 J. R. Firth and British Linguistics. In A. Hill (Ed.), Linguistics (247–257). [Voice of America Forum Series]. Washington D.C.: United States Information Agency.Google Scholar
Chafe, W.
1968 Idiomaticity as an anomaly in the Chomskian paradigm. Foundations of Language, 4, 109–127.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1957 Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton & Co. [Reprinted in Berlin & New York, 1985]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1980 Rules and representations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B.
1976 Aspect [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Condon, N.
2008 How cognitive linguistic motivations influence the learning of phrasal verbs. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (133–158). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J.
1988 Chomsky’s universal grammar. An introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J., & Newson, M.
1996 Chomsky’s universal grammar. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Coulson, S.
2000 Semantic leaps. Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cowie, A. P.
1978 The place of illustrative material and collocations in the design of a learner’s dictionary. In P. Strevens (Ed.), In honour of A.S. Hornby (127–139). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1981 The treatment of collocations and idioms in learners’ dictionaries. In P. Strevens (Ed.), In honour of A.S. Hornby, 223–235. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1986 Collocational dictionaries – a comparative view. In M. Murphy (Ed.), Proceedings of the fourth Anglo-Soviet English studies seminar, London: The British Council.Google Scholar
1998a Creativity and formulaic language. Linguistica e Filologia, 8, 159–170.Google Scholar
(Ed.) 1998b Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications [Oxford Studies in Lexicography and Lexicology]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1998c Semantic frame theory and the analysis of phraseology. Moscow State University bulletin, 19, 40–50.Google Scholar
1999 English dictionaries for foreign learners: A history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2000 The EFL dictionary pioneers and their legacies. Kernerman Dictionary News, 8, 1–6.Google Scholar
Cowie, A. P., & Howarth, P.
1996 Phraseological competence and written proficiency. In G. M. Blue, & R. Mitchell (Eds.), Language and education (80–93). Clevedon, Philadelphia & Adelaide: British Association for Applied Linguistics in association with Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar
Cowie, A. P., Mackin, R., & McCaig, I. R.
1983 General introduction. In A. P. Cowie, R. Mackin, & I. R. McCaig (Eds.), The Oxford dictionary of current idiomatic English (x–xvii). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cowie, C.
1995 Grammaticalization and the snowball effect. Language and Communication 15(2), 181–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft W.
1998 Linguistic evidence and mental representations. Cognitive Linguistics 9(2), 151-174.Google Scholar
2009 Toward a social cognitive linguistics. In V. Evans & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics 395-420. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cruse, D. A.
1986 Lexical semantics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cutler A.
1983 Lexical complexity. In G.B. Flores d'Arcais & R.J Jarvella (Eds.), The process of language understanding. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Cuyckens, H., & Zawada, B.
(Eds) 2001 Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dabrowska E., & Divjak, D.
2015 (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (HSK) 39]. De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dienhart, J. M., & Kasch, H.
2000 A gentle introduction to regular expressions (for use in searching large corpora). Biskit. Bulletins from the IT center of the Institute of Language and Communication, University of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
Dik, S. C.
1989 The theory of functional grammar (Part I: The structure of the clause). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Divjak, D., Levshina, N., & Klavan J.
(Eds.) 2016 Editorial to the special issue: Looking back, looking forward. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4), 447–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobrovol'skij, D. O. and Filipenko, T.
2007 Russian phraseology. In H. Burger, D. Dobrovol'skij, P. Kühn & N. Norrick (Eds.), Phraseologie. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobrovol’skii, D.O.
2007 Cognitive approaches to idiom analysis. In D. Dobrovol’skij, H. Burger, P. Kühn, & N. R. Norick (Eds.), Phraseologie. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung (789–818). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobrovol’skii, D.O., & Piirainen E.
2005 Figurative language: Cross-cultural and cross-linguistic perspectives. Amsterdam et al: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Dodge, E., & Lakoff, G.
2005 Image schemas: From linguistic analysis to neural grounding. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning. Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donald, M.
1991 Origins of the modern mind. Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis N. & Ferreia-Junior F.
2009 Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. The Modern Language Journal 93(3), 370–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erman, B.
2007 Cognitive processes as evidence of the idiom principle. Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12 (1), 25–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Formulaic language from a learner perspective. What the learner needs to know. In R. Corrigan, E. A. Moravcsik, H. Quali, & K. M. Wheatley (Eds.), Formulaic Language, Volume 2, Acquisition, loss, psychological reality, and functional explanations (323–346). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, V.
2006 Lexical concepts, cognitive models and meaning-construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(4), 491–534. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007b The cognitive linguistics enterprise: An overview. In Evans, V., Bergen, B., & Zinken, J. (Eds.), The Cognitive Linguistics reader (2–36). London: Equinox Publishing Company.Google Scholar
2007a A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. University of Utah Press: N. America & Edinburgh University Press: Rest of world. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, V., & Green, M.
2006 Cognitive linguistics. An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Everaert, M., van der Linden, E., Schenk, A., & Schreuder, R.
1995 Introduction. In van der Linden, E.-J., Everaert, M., Schenk, A., & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Idioms: Structural and psychological perspectives (1–13). Hillsdale, New Jersey & Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G.
1997 Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Sweetser, E.
1996 Cognitive links and domains. In G. Fauconnier, & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Spaces, worlds and grammar (1–28). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
1998 Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22, 133–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J.
1968 The Case for Case. In E. Bach, & R. Harms (Eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory (1–88). New York: Holt, Reichard & Winston.Google Scholar
1977a The case for case reopened. In P. Cole, & J. M. Sadock (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Volume 8. Grammatical relations (59–81). New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1977b Scenes-and-frames semantics. In A. Zampolli (Ed.), Linguistic structures processing (55–81). Amsterdam, New York & Oxford: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
1982 Frame semantics. In Linguisti. Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (111–137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.Google Scholar
1985 Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6, 222–255.Google Scholar
1992 “Corpus linguistics” or “computer-aided armchair linguistics”. In J. Svartvik (Ed.), Directions in corpus linguistics. Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82, Stockholm, 4–8 August 1991 (35–60). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Multiword expressions: An extremist approach. Presented at Collocations and idioms 2003: Linguistic, computational, and psycholinguistic perspectives. Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin, Germany, 18–20 September 2003. [Link to presentation as pdf-file available at kollokationen.bbaw.de: Startseite, Aktivitäten, die Collocation-Conference 2003, Präsentation als PDF-Datei. Last accessed: 18 August 2020].Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., & Atkins, B. T. S.
1994 Starting where the dictionaries stop: the challenge of corpus lexicography. In B. T. S. Atkins, & A. Zampolli (Eds.), Computational Approaches to the Lexicon (349–393). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Baker, C. F., & Sato, H.
2002 Seeing arguments through transparent structures. Paper presented at The third international conference on language processes and evaluation (LREC), Las Palmas. [Accessible at Irec-conf.org and at researchgate.net; last accessed 19 August 2020].Google Scholar
Firth, J. R.
1957 Papers in linguistics, 1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1968a A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–1955. In F. R. Palmer (Ed.), Selected papers of J. R. Firth 1952–1959 (168–205). London: Longmans.Google Scholar
1968b Descriptive linguistics and the study of English. In F. R. Palmer (Ed.), Selected papers of J. R. Firth 1952–1959 (96–113). London: Longmans.Google Scholar
1968c Linguistic analysis as a study of meaning. In F. R. Palmer (Ed.), Selected papers of J. R. Firth 1952–1959 (12–26). London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Fischer, O., Rosenbach, A, & Stein, D.
2000 (Eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English [Studies in language companion series]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fontenelle, T.
1997 Turning a bilingual dictionary into a lexical-semantic database [Lexicographica. Series Maior 13]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabelentz, G. von der
1891 Die Sprachwissenschaft. Ihre Aufgaben, Methoden, und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig: Weigel.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S.
2005 How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallese V. & Lakoff G.
2005 The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neurophysioloy, 22(3), 455-479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, H.
1995 Green ideas sleeping furiously. The New York Review of Books, March 23 1995. [Accessible at nybooks.com; last accessed: 18 August 2020].Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D.
1990 The lexicographical treatment of prototypical polysemy. In T.S. Tsohatzidis (Ed.), Meanings and prototypes. Studies in Linguistics (195–210). London and New York,Google Scholar
1997 Diachronic prototype semantics: A contribution to historical lexicology. [Oxford studies in lexicography and lexicology]. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
2006a Methodology in cognitive linguistics. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibánez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (21–49). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2006b A rough guide to Cognitive Linguistics. Introduction to D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings (1-28). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Entrenchment as onomasiological salience. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning. How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge (153–171). Washington, DC: De Gruyter Mouton & American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D. & Cuyckens, H.
2007 Introducing Cognitive Linguistics. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (3–21). Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D., Kristiansen, G., & Peirsman, Y.
2010 Introduction. In D. Geeraerts, G. Kristiansen, & Y. Peirsman, (Eds.), Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics (1–20). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
Jr 1980 Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation. Memory and cognition, 8, 149–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jr 1995 Idiomaticity and human cognition. In E.-J. van der Linden, M. Everaert, A. Schenk, & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Idioms: Structural and psychological perspectives (97–116). Hillsdale, New Jersey & Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr
2005 The psychological status of image schemas. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning. Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics (113–135). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
Jr 2007 Why cognitive linguists should care more about empirical methods. In I. Mittelberg, M. Gonzales-Marquez, S. Coulson, & M. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics (2–18), Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. & Nayak, N. P.
1989 Psycholinguistic studies on the syntactic behaviour of idioms. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 100–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. & Matlock, T.
1999 Psycholinguistics and mental representation: A comment. Cognitive Linguistics 10, 263–269.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. Nayak, N. P., & Cutting, C.
1989 How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of Memory and Language 28, 576–593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. & Gonzales, G.
1985 Syntactic frozenness in processing and remembering idioms. Cognition, 20, 234–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. J.
1977 The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw, & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing. Toward an ecological psychology (67–82). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gilquin, G.
2010 Language production: A window to the mind? In Götzche, H. (Ed.), Memory, mind and language (89–102). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
1971 Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: An archaeologist’s field trip. In Papers from the 7th meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (394–415). Chicago: The Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1989 Mind, code and context. Essays in pragmatics. Hillsdale & New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gläser, R.
1988 The grading of idiomaticity as a presupposition for a taxonomy of idioms. In W. Hüllen, & R. Schultze (Eds.), Understanding the lexicon: Meaning, sense and world knowledge in lexical semantics (264–279). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
1995 Constructions. A Construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gramley, S., & Pätzold, K. M.
2004 Words in combination. In A survey of modern English. 2nd ed. (48–66). London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th., Hampe, B., & Schönfeld, D.
2005 Converging evidence: Bringing together experimental and corpus data on the observation of verbs and constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 16, 635–676. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, S.
1970 Verb-intensifier collocations in English. An experimental approach. [Janua Linguarum Series Minor 86]. The Hague: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grondelaers, S., & Geeraerts, D.
2003 Towards a pragmatic model of cognitive onomasiology. In H. Cuyckens, R. Dirven, & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to lexical semantics 67–92) Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1966 Lexis as a linguistic level. In J. C. Catford, C. E. Bazell, M. A. K. Halliday, & R. H. Robins (Eds.), In Memory of J. R. Firth (148–162). London: Longmans.Google Scholar
1978 Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
1994 An introduction to functional grammar. London, New York, & Sydney, Auckland: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C.
1999 Construing experience through meaning. A language-based approach. London & New York: Cassell.Google Scholar
Hampe, B.
2005. (Ed.), From perception to meaning. Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Image schemas in Cognitive linguistics: Introduction. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning. Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics (1–12). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanks, P.
2000 Contributions of lexicography and corpus linguistics to a theory of language performance. In U. Heid, S. Evert, E. Lehmann, & C. Rohrer (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth euralex International Congress, euralex 2000 (2–13). Stuttgart: Universität Stuttgart, Institut für Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung.Google Scholar
2005 Johnson and modern lexicography. International Journal of Lexicography, 18(2), 243–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M. Mosegaard
1998 Funktionel og kognitiv lingvistik. In A. B. Hansen, L. Schösler, & E. Strudsholm (Eds.), Seks foredrag om de lingvistiske skoledannelser (159–186). København: Romansk Institut, Københavns Universitet.Google Scholar
Harder, P.
1996a Functional semantics: A theory of meaning, structure and tense in English. [Trends in linguistics. Studies and monographs 87]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996b Linguistic structure in a functional grammar. In M. Fortescue, E. Engberg-Pedersen, P. Harder, L. Heltoft, & L. Falser Jacobsen (Eds.), Content, Expression and Structure. Studies in Danish Functional Grammar (423–452). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 Partial autonomy. Ontology and methodology in cognitive linguistics. In T. Jannssen, & G. Redeker (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Foundations, scope and methodology (195–222). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harder P.
2003 The status of linguistic facts: Rethinking the relation between cognition, social institution and utterance from a functional point of view. Mind & Language 18(1), 52-76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harder, P.
2001 Kognition i funktionelt perspektiv. Lecture handout and notes. Odense Linguistics Circle. Odense, Denmark: University of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
2010 Meaning in mind and society. A functional contribution to the social turn in Cognitive Linguistics. [Cognitive Linguistics Research]. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Z.
1991 A theory of language and information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
1999 Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics, 37, 1034–1068. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hausmann, F. J.
1985 Kollokationen im deutschen Wörterbuch. Ein Beitrag zur Theorie des lexikographischen Beispiels. In H. Bergenholtz, & J. Mugdan (Eds.), Akten des Essener Kolloquiums zur Grammatik im Wörterbuch. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B.
2003 Grammaticalization. In B. D. Joseph, & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (575–601). Oxford: Blackwells. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., Claudi U., & Hünnemeyer, F.
1991 Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hendriks-Jansen, H.
1996 Catching ourselves in the act: Situated activity, interactive emergence, evolution, and human thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herbst, T.
1996 What are collocations: Sandy beaches or false teeth? English Studies 77(4), 379–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J.
1987 Emergent Grammar. In J. Aske, N. Berry, L. Michaelis, & H. Filip (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General session and parasession on grammar and cognition (139–157). Berkeley, California, USA: Berkeley Linguistics Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hjelmslev, L.
1953 Proglomena to a theory of language.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C.
2003 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howarth, P. A.
1996 Phraseology in English academic writing [Lexicographica Series Maior 75]. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. (Subsequently published in Cowie (1998b). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudson R.A.
1996 Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Humboldt, W. von.
1825 Über das Entstehen der grammatischen Formen und ihren Einfluss auf die Ideenentwicklung. In Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin (401–430). Berlin: Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
1995 The boundaries of the lexicon. In E.-J. van der Linden, M. Everaert, A. Schenk, & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Idioms: Structural and psychological perspectives (133–165). Hillsdale, New Jersey & Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O.
1924 The philosophy of grammar. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. R., Fillmore, C. J., Wood, E. J., Ruppenhofer, J., Urban, M., Petruck, M. R. L., & Baker, C. F.
2001 The frame semantic basis. In The FrameNet project:Tools for lexicon building. [Last accessed 25 July 2021 at [URL]Google Scholar
Johnson, C. R., Fillmore, C. J., Petruck, M. R. L., Baker, C. F., Ellsworth, M., Ruppenhofer, J., & Wood, E. J.
2003 FrameNet: Theory and Practice, Version 1.1. Printed December 29, 2003. [Accessible at the publications server of the Leibniz-Institut für deutsche Sprache: ids-pub.bsz-bw.de; last accessed 18 August 2020].Google Scholar
Johnson, M.
1987 The body in the mind. The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 The philosophical significance of image schemas. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning. Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics (15–33). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S.
1755 Dictionary of the English language. London: J. & P. Knapton.Google Scholar
Jones, S., & Sinclair, J. M.
1974 English lexical collocations. A study in computational linguistics. Cahiers de Lexicologie, 24, 15–61.Google Scholar
Katz, J. J. & Postal, P. M.
1963 Semantic interpretation of idioms and sentences containing them. MIT Research Laboratory of Electronics, Quarterly Progress Report, 70, 275–282.Google Scholar
1964 An integrated theory of linguistic description. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Katz, J. J.
1973 Compositionality, idiomaticity, and lexical substitution. In S. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (Eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A.
2005 Language is never, ever, ever, random. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(2), 263-276.Google Scholar
Klappenbach, R.
1968 Probleme der Phraseologie. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Karl-Marx-Universität, 221–227.Google Scholar
Koffka, K.
1935 Principles of Gestalt Psychology. London: Lund Humphries.Google Scholar
Krenn, B.
2000 Empirical implications on lexical association measures. In U. Heid, S. Evert, E. Lehmann, & C. Rohrer (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth euralex International Congress, euralex 2000 (359–371). Stuttgart: Universität Stuttgart, Institut für Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung.Google Scholar
Kuhn, W.
2007 An image-schematic account of spatial categories. Conference proceedings of the 8th International Conference on spatial information theory. [Accessible at researchgate.net; last accessed 18 August 2020]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Köhler, W.
1921 Intelligenzprüfungen am Menschenaffen. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
1987 Women, fire and dangerous things. What categories tell us about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990 The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics 1(1), 39–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought, 2nd Edition (202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. Chelsea Green, Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing company.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
1980 Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1999 Philosophy in the flesh. The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff G. & Johnson M.
2002 Why cognitive linguistics requires embodied realism. Cognitive Linguistics 13, 245–263.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
1977 Syntactic reanalysis. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change (59–139). Austin: University of Texas Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Theoretical prerequisites. Volume I. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1988 A view of linguistic semantics. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (49–90). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990 Concept, image, and symbol. The cognitive basis of grammar [Cognitive Linguistics Research 1]. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1997 The contextual basis of cognitive semantics. In J. Nuyts & E. Pederson (Eds.), Language and conceptualization (229–52), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999a Assessing the cognitive linguistic enterprise. In T. Janssen & G. Redeker (Eds.), Foundations and scope of Cognitive Linguistics (13–57). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker R.W.
1999b Grammar and conceptualization. [Cognitive Linguistics Research 14]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
2000 Grammar and conceptualization [Cognitive Linguistics Research 14]. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2006 On the continuous debate about discreteness. Cognitive Linguistics 17(1), 107–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Working towards a synthesis. Looking back, looking forward. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(4), 465–477. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Memory consolidation. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning. How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge (39–56). Washington, DC: De Gruyter Mouton & American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Langendoen, D. T.
1968 The London School of Linguistics: A study of the linguistic theories of B. Malinowsky and J. R. Firth. Cambridge, Mass.: The M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Langlotz, A.
2006 Idiomatic creativity. A cognitive-linguistic model of idiom representation and idiom-variation in English. [Human cognitive processing 17]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
L’Homme, M. & Bertrand, C.
2000 Specialized lexical combinations: Should they be described as collocations or in terms of selectional restrictions. In U. Heid, S. Evert, E. Lehmann, & C. Rohrer (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth euralex International Congress, euralex 2000 (497–506). Stuttgart: Universität Stuttgart, Institut für Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung.Google Scholar
Lindström, T. Å. M.
2004 The history of the concept of grammaticalisation. PhD project, Department of English language and linguistics, Sheffield University.Google Scholar
Lipka, L.
1994 Lexicalization and institutionalization. In R. E. Asher (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2164–2167). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Maier, N.R.F.
1930 Reasoning in humans: I On direction. Journal of Comparative Psychology 10, 115–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1931 Reasoning in humans: II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative Psychology 12, 181–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Makkai, A.
1993 Idiomaticity as a reaction to “l’arbitraire du signe” in the the universal process of semeio-genesis. In C. Cacciari, & P. Tabossi (Eds.), Idioms: Processing, structure, and interpretation. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(Ed.) 1977 Linguistics at the crossroads. Jupiter PrGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, B.
1935 Coral gardens and their magic. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M.
1992 How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review 99, 587–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 How to build a baby: III. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning. Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics (137–163). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, M.
1999 Composite predicates in middle English. In L. J. Brinton & M. Akimoto (Eds.), Collocational and idiomatic aspects of composite predicates in the history of English. [Language Companion Series 47]. Philadelphia, Pa: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McClelland J., Rumelhart D.
, & the PDP Research Group 1986 Parallel distributed processing. Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Meillet, A.
1912 L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Bologna: N. Zanichelli; Paris: F. Alcan; London: Williams et Norgate.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, I.
1988 Semantic description of lexical units in an explanatory, combinatorial dictionary: Basic principles and heuristic criteria. International Journal of Lexicography 1, 165–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 Collocations and lexical functions. In A. P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology. Theory, analysis, and applications (23–53). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. F.
1971 Linguistic ‘goings-on’: Collocations and other lexical matters arising on the syntagmatic record. Archivum Linguisticum, 35–69.Google Scholar
Moon, R.
1998 Fixed expressions and idioms in English: A corpus-based approach [Oxford Studies in Lexicography and Lexicology]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2000 Phraseology and early English dictionaries: The growth of tradition. In U. Heid, S. Evert, E. Lehmann, & C. Rohrer (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth euralex International Congress, euralex 2000 (507–516). Stuttgart, Germany: Universität Stuttgart, Institut für Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung.Google Scholar
Nesselhauf, N.
2004 What are collocations? In D.J Allerton, N. Nesselhauf, & P. Skandera (Eds.), Phraseological units: Basic concepts and their application (1–21). Basel: Schwabe Verlag.Google Scholar
2005 Collocations in a learner corpus. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevat, M., Ullman, M.T., Eviatar, Z. & Bitan, T.
2017 The neural bases of the learning and generalization of morphological inflection. Neuropsychologia 98. 139–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J.
1998 Language form and language function. Cambridge, Mass. & London, England: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000 Deconstructing grammaticalization. Language Sciences 23(2–3), 187–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, F.J.
2003 Grammar is Grammar and Usage is Usage. Language 79, 682–707.Google Scholar
Nichols, J.
1984 Functional theories of grammar. Annual Review of Anthropology, 13, 97–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nolan, C.
1988 Under the eye of the clock. London: Pan.Google Scholar
Nuyts, J.
2007 The basic principles: “Functionalism” and “Cognition”. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens, (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2005 Brothers in arms? On the relations between Cognitive and Functional Linguistics. In F. J. R. de Mendoza Ibánez & M. S. P. Cervel, (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics. Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction [Cognitive Linguistics Research 32]. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Palmer, F.R.
1968 Selected papers of J.R. Firth 1952-1959. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Palmer, H. E.
1933a Second interim report on English collocations. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
1933b Some notes on construction-patterns [IRET Institute Leaflet 38]. Tokyo: IRET.Google Scholar
Palmer, R.
1996 Towards a theory of cultural linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Pauwels, P.
2000 Put, set, lay and place: A cognitive linguistic approach to verbal meaning [lincom Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 19]. Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Pawley, A.
1985 Lexicalization. In D. Tannen & J. Alatis (Eds.), Language and linguistics: the interdependence of theory, data and application. Washington DC: University of Georgetown.Google Scholar
Pedersen, J.
1995 The identification and selection of collocations in technical dictionaries. Lexicographica, 11, 60–73.Google Scholar
Peters, A. M.
1977 Language-learning strategies: Does the whole equal the sum of the parts? Language, 53, 560–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1983 The units of language acquisition [Cambridge monographs and texts in applied psycholinguistics]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J.
1952 The origin of intelligence in the child. New York: Basic Books. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Popper, K.
1972 Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Posner M. I.
1986 Empirical studies of prototypes. In C. C. Craig (Ed.), Noun classes and categorization (53–62). [Typological Studies in Language] John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poulsen, S.
1991 Word combinations as lexical building blocks. A theoretical framework and a possible concept for a specialized dictionary of English collocations for text production. Prize paper. Institute for Language and Communication, Odense University.Google Scholar
2002 Creative collocations and conceptual integration. In A. Hougaard & S. Nordahl Lund (Eds.), The Way We Think, Vol. II. Odense Working Papers in Language and Communication, 23, 105–126.Google Scholar
2005 Collocations as a language resource. A functional and cognitive study in English phraseology. Ph.D. thesis. Odense, Denmark: Institute of Language and Communication, University of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
2008 Collocations can be creative, too. Presentation at ESSE-9, the Ninth International Conference of the European Society for the Study of English. Cross-linguistic and Cross-cultural Approaches to Phraseology. August 22–26, Aarhus, Denmark.Google Scholar
Reddy, M. J.
1979 The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (284–324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rohrer, T.
2006 Three dogmas of embodiment. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (119–146). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rosch, E.
1973 Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4(3), 328–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1975 Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 532–547. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosch E.
1978 Principles of categorization. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Ruppenhofer, J., Baker, C. F., & Fillmore, C. J.
2002 Collocational information in the FrameNet database. In A. Braasch & C. Povlsen, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth euralex International Congress, euralex 2002 (359–369), Copenhagen, Denmark: Center for Sprogteknologi.Google Scholar
Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M. R. L., Johnson, C. R., & Scheffczyk, J.
2016 FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice. [Accessible at: framenet2.isci.berkeley.edu; last accessed: November 3 2021].Google Scholar
Saeed, J. I.
1997 Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Sandra D. & Rice S.
1995 Network analyses of prepositional meaning: Mirroring whose mind – The linguist's or the language user's? Cognitive Linguistics 6, 89–130.Google Scholar
Sandra D.
1998 What linguists can and can't tell you about the human mind: A reply to Croft. Cognitive Linguistics 9(4), 361–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saussure, F. de, Bally, C., Sechehaye, A., Riedlinger, A., & Baskin W.
1966 Course in general linguistics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.Google Scholar
Schmid, H.-J.
2000 English abstract nouns as conceptual shells. From corpus to cognition. [Topics in English Linguistics 34]. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Collocations: Hard to pin down, but bloody useful. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 51(3), 235–258.Google Scholar
2007 Entrenchment, salience and basic levels. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 2nd ed. (117–138). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2014 Lexico-grammatical patterns, pragmatic associations and discourse frequency. In T. Herbst, H.-J. Schmid, & S. Faulhaber (Eds.), Constructions collocations patterns [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and monographs 282] (239–293). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 A blueprint of the entrenchment-and-conventionalization model. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 3, 3–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Entrenchment in usage-based theories. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge. Boston: American Psychological Association & Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schmid, H.-J. & Küchenhoff, H.
2013 Collostructional analysis and other ways of measuring lexicogrammatical attraction: Theoretical premises, practical problems and cognitive underpinnings. Cognitive Linguistics 24(3), 531–577. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schøsler, L.
2003 Grammaticalisation of valency patterns?– An investigation into valency patterns and support verb constructions, based on diachronic corpora. Forum for Modern Language Studies, 39, 400–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R.
1983 Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle J.R.
1984 Minds, Brains and Science. Cambridge MA: Harward University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R.
2000 Consciousness. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 557–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle J.R.
2004 mind: A brief introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N. & Hulstijn, J.
2005 Automaticity in bilingualism and second language learning. In J. F. Kroll, & A.M.B de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism. (349–388). Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W.
1949 A mathematical model of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Shore, B.
1996 Culture in mind: Cognition, culture, and the problem of meaning. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. M.
1991 Corpus, concordance, collocation [Describing English Language]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1992 Trust the text. In M. Davies & L. Ravelli (Eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics: Recent theory and practice (5–19). London: Pinter.Google Scholar
2004 Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. Edited with R. Carter. London & New York. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 The phrase, the whole phrase, and nothing but the phrase. In S. Granger & F. Meunier, (Eds.), Phraseology. An interdisciplinary perspective (407–410). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J. M., Jones, S., & Daley R.
2004 English Collocation Studies: The OSTI Report (Ed.), R. Krishnamurthy. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Sinha, C.
2007 Cognitive Linguistics, psychology and cognitive science. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (1266–1294). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinha, C. & López, K. Jensen de
2000 Language, culture and the embodiment of spatial cognition. Cognitive Linguistics 1, 17–41.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F.
1957 Verbal behaviour. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries, S. Th.
2003 Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2), 209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. In V. Evans, B. K. Bergen, & J. Zinken (Eds), The Cognitive Linguistics Reader. [Advances in Cognitive Linguistics] (75–105). London & Oakville, Equinox Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M.
1993 British traditions in text analysis: From Firth to Sinclair. In M. Baker, G. Francis, & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and technology: in honour of John Sinclair (1–33). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 Text and corpus analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E. E.
1988 Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. In S. Axmaker, A. Jaisser, & H. Singmaster (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (389–405). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swinney, D. & Cutler, A.
1979 The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 18, 523–534. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szudarski, P.
2017 Corpus linguistics for vocabulary: A guide for research. Abingdon, Oxon & New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takashima, A. & Bakker, I.
2017 Memory consolidation. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning. How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge (177–200). Washington, DC: De Gruyter Mouton & American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. R.
1992 How many meanings does a word have? Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics, 25, 133–168.Google Scholar
1995 Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2003 Cognitive models of polysemy. In B. Nerlich, Z. Todd, V. Herman, & D. D. Clarke (Eds.), Trends in Linguistics: Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language (31–48). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J.R.
2008 Polysemy and the lexicon. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics (51-80). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter MoutonGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. R.
2015 Prototype effects in grammar. In E. Dabrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (562–578). Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Telija, V., Bragina, N., Oparina, E., & Sandomirskaya, I.
1994 Lexical collocations: Denominative and cognitive aspects. In W. Martin, W. Meijs, M. Moerland, E. ten Pas, P: van Sterkenburg, & P. Vossen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress on Lexicography, euralex 1994 (368–377), Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Euralex.Google Scholar
Teubert, W.
2004 Interview with John Sinclair by Wolfgang Teubert. In R. Krishnamurthy (Ed.), English collocation studies: The OSTI report (xxi–xxii). London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Tolkien, J. R. R.
1974 The lord of the rings. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M.
1999 The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2003 Constructing a language. A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, Mass., & London, England: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
1999 A historical overview of complex predicate types. In L. J. Brinton, & M. Akimoto (Eds.), Collocational and idiomatic aspects of composite predicates in the history of English (9–274). Philadelphia, Pa.: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C.
1979 Instincts for human understanding and for cultural cooperation: Their development in infancy. In M. von Cranach, K. Foppa, W. Lepenies, and D. Ploog (Eds.), Human ethology: Claims and limits of a new discipline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tuggy, D.
1999 Linguistic evidence for polysemy in the mind: a response to William Croft and Dominiek Sandra. Cognitive Linguistics 10(4), 343–368.Google Scholar
Tummers, J., Heylen, K., & Geeraerts, D.
2005 Usage-based approaches in Cognitive Linguistics: A technical state of the art. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1, 225–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, M.
1993 An image-schematic constraint on metaphor. In R. A. Geiger, & R. Ostyn Brygida (Eds.), Conceptualizations and mental processing in language (291–306). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tversky, B., & Hemenway, K.
1984 Objects, parts and categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 113, 169–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van den Eynde, K.
1997 From verbal to nominal valency: some methodological reflections. In K. Van Durme (Ed.), The valency of nouns, Odense Working Papers in Language and communication, 15, 3–29. Odense: Odense University.Google Scholar
Walenski M. & Ullman M.T.
2005 The science of language. The Linguistic Review, 22, 327-346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van de Voort, M. E. C., & Vonk, W.
1995 You don’t die immediately when you kick an empty bucket: A processing view on semantic and syntactic characteristics of idioms. In E.-J. van der Linden, M. Everaert, A. Schenk, & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Idioms: Structural and psychological perspectives (284–299). Hillsdale, New Jersey & Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Van Durme, K., & Van den Eynde, K.
1998 A verb typology on a distributional basis I: General typology. In K. Van Durme & L. Schøsler, (Eds.), Studies in valency IV: valency and verb typology (9–19). Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
Van Lancker Sidtis, D.
2006 Formulaic expressions in spontaneous speech of left- and right-hemisphere-damaged subjects. Aphasiology 20(5), 411–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Lancker, Sidtis D.
2006 Where in the brain is nonliteral language? Metaphor and symbol? 21, 213–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, R. D.
Jr. 2001 Functional linguistics. In M. Aronoff, & J. Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (319–336). Malden, Mass. & Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Walenski M. & Ullman M. T.
2005 The Science of Language. The Linguistic Review 22, 327–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walker, C.
2008 Factors which influence the process of collocation. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (291–308). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wanner, L.
(Ed.) 2007 Selected lexical and grammatical issues in the meaning-text theory. In honour of Igor Mel’čuk. Amsterdam, the Netherlands & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, U.
1969 Problems in the analysis of idioms. In J. Puhvel (Ed.), Substance and structure of language (23–81). Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wertheimer M.
1925 Drei Abhandlungen zur Gestalttheorie. Erlangen: Verlag derPhilosophischen Akademie.Google Scholar
1959 Productive thinking. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.
1953 Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wood, D.
2015 Fundamentals of formulaic language. An introduction. London, Oxford, New York, New Delhi, & Sydney: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.Google Scholar
Wray, A.
2002 Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Identifying formulaic language: persistent challenges and new opportunities. In R. Corrigan, E. A. Moravcsik, H. Quali, & K. M. Wheatley (Eds.), Formulaic Language, Volume 1. Distribution and historical change (27–54). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 What do we (think we) know about formulaic language? An evaluation of the current state of play. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32, 231–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziemke, T., Zlatev, J., & Frank, R. M.
(Eds.) 2007 Body, language and mind. Volume 1. Embodiment. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J.
2005 What’s in a schema? Bodily mimesis and the grounding of language. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning. Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zysko, K.
2017 A Cognitive Linguistics account of wordplay. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

Dictionaries, text books and general reference books

Benson, M., Benson, E., & Ilson, R.
1986 The BBI combinatory dictionary of English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 The BBI dictionary of English word combinations. 2nd edition. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 The BBI Combinatory Dictionary of English. Your guide to collocations and grammar. 3rd edition, revised by Robert Ilson. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowie, A. P.
(Ed.) 1989 Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kjellmer, G.
1994 A Dictionary of English collocations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lea, D.
(Ed.) 2002 Oxford Collocations Dictionary for Students of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. & O’Dell, F.
2005 English collocations in use. Intermediate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary Online
[URL]: Oxford University Press.
Sinclair, J.
(Ed.) 1995 Collins Cobuild English Dictionary: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
Swan, M.
1995 Practical English Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Databases

Corpus Concordance Sampler
[URL]: Collins Cobuild.
The British National Corpus
The search engine, at [URL], developed by Eckhard Bick, project leader of visl, “Visual Interactive Syntax Learning”. a research and development project at the Institute of Language and Communication, University of Southern Denmark, Odense Campus.