1971The Grammar of Case: Towards a Localistic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, S. & Keenan, E. L.
1985Deixis. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, volume 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (259–308). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2019About asymmetry of motion in French. In M. Aurnague & D. Stosic (Eds.), The Semantics of Dynamic Space in French: Descriptive, experimental and formal studies on motion expression (32–65). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Beavers, J., B. Levin & S. W. Tham
2010The Typology of Motion Expression Revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 46(3), 331–377.
Bourdin, P.
1997On goal-bias across languages: modal, configurational and orientational parameters. In Bohumil Palek (ed.) Proceedings of LP’96. Typology: Prototypes, Item Ordering and Universals, 185–218. Prague: Charles University Press.
1996Learning how to structure space for language: a crosslinguistic perspective. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel & M. Garrett (Eds.), Language and Space (385–436). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Bowerman, M., Gullberg, M., Majid, A., & Narasimhan, B.
2004Put project: The cross-linguistic encoding of placement events. In A. Majid (Ed.), Field Manual Volume 9 (10–24). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Bühler, K.
1982 [1934]Sprachtheorie: die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
Casasanto, D. & Boroditsky, L.
2008Time in the Mind: Using Space to Think about Time. Cognition, 106(2), 579–593.
Corballis, M. C.
2010Mirror neurons and the evolution of language. Brain and language, 112(1), 25–35.
Cornish, F.
1999Anaphora, Discourse, and Understanding: Evidence from English and French. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Cornish, F.
2007English Demonstratives: Discourse Deixis and Anaphora. A Discourse-Pragmatic Account. In R. A. Nilsen, N. Aba Appiah Amfo and K. Borthen (Eds.), Interpreting Utterances; Pragmatics and its Interfaces. Essays in Honour of Thorstein Fretheim, (pp. 147–166). Oslo: Novus Press.
Croft, W.
2001Radical construction grammar: syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Croft, W.
2003Lexical rules vs. constructions: A false dichotomy. In H. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Motivation in Language: Studies in honor of Günter Radden (49–68). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Croft, W.
2010Relativity, linguistic variation and language universals. CogniTextes. Revue de l’Association française de linguistique cognitive, 4.
Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V. & Taoka, C.
1978Locating the universals in lexical systems for spatial deixis. In D. Farkas, W. M. Jacobsen & K. W. Todrys (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on the lexicon (71–84). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Denny, J. P.
1985Was ist universal am raumdeiktischen Lexikon? In H. Schweizer (Ed.), Sprache und Raum (111–130). Stuttgart: J.B. Metzlersche Verlagsbuchhandlung und Carl Ernst Poeschel Verlag.
1935–1937 [1972]La catégorie des cas. Copenhagen: Universitetsforlager I Aarhus [reprinted in La catégorie des cas, München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag 1972].
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
2009Path salience in motion events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, 403–414. New York: Psychology Press.
1984‘Source’ vs ‘Goal’: a case of linguistic dissymmetry. In R. Dirven & G. Radden (Eds.), Concepts of Case (122–146). Tübingen: Günter Narr Verlag.
Imai, S.
2009Spatial deixis. How finely do languages divide space ? Berlin: Dr. Müller Verlag.
Ishibashi, M., Kopecka, A., & Vuillermet, M.
(2006) Trajectoire: Matériel visuel pour élicitation des données linguistiques. Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, CNRS / Université Lyon 2. Projet de Fédération de recherche en Typologie et Universaux Linguistiques. [URL]
Jackendoff, R.
1983Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.
Kopecka, A. & Ishibashi, M.
2011L’(a)symétrie dans l’expression de la Source et du But : perspective translinguistique. Les Cahiers de Faits de Langues, 3, 131–149.
Kopecka, A. & Vuillermet, M.
(eds)2021Source-Goal (a)symmetries across languages – Special issue of Studies in Language, 45(1).
Kryk-Kastovsky, B.
1996The linguistic, cognitive and cultural variables of the conceptualization of space. In M. Pütz & R. Dirven (Eds.), The construal of space in language and thought (329–344). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Laanest, A.
1982Einführung in die ostseefinnischen Sprachen. Hamburg, H. Buske.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
1999Philosophy in the flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought, New York, Basic Books.
Lakusta, L., & Landau, B.
2005Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition, 96–1, 1–33.
Lakusta, L., Wagner, L., O’Hearn, K., & Landau, B.
2007Conceptual Foundations of Spatial Language: Evidence for a Goal Bias in Infants. Language Learning and Development, 3, 179–197.
Lakusta, L. & Landau, B. L.
2012Language and Memory for Motion Events: Origins of the Asymmetry Between Source and Goal Paths. Cognitive Science 36, 517–544.
Levin, B. & Rappaport Hovav, M.
2013Lexicalized Meaning and Manner/Result Complementarity. In B. Arsenijević, B. Gehrke & R. Marín (Eds.), Subatomic Semantics of Event Predicates (49–70). Dordrecht: Springer.
Levin, B. & Rappaport Hovav, M.
2019Lexicalization Patterns. In R. Truswell (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Event Structure (395–425). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Levinson, S. C.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyons, J.
1977Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marchello-Nizia, C.
2006From personal deixis to spatial deixis. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: linguistic systems and cognitive categories (103–120). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Matsumoto, Y.
2003Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: clarifications and reformulations. In S. Chibaet al. (Eds.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: a festschrift for Masaru Kajita (403–418). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Michelsen, C.
1843Philosophie der Grammatik: Kasuslehre der lateinischen Sprache. Berlin: T. Trautwein.
Nam, S.
2004Goal and source: Asymmetry in their syntax and semantics. Paper presented at the Workshop on Event Structure, Leipzig, Germany, March 2004.
Ozga, J.
1996Prosodic and paralinguistic signals of distance. In Martin Pütz & René Dirven (eds), The Construal of Space in Language and Thought, Berlin / New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 63–71.
Pajusalu, R.
2006Death of a Demonstrative: Person and Time – The Case of Estonian too. Linguistica Uralica, 4, 241–253.
Papafragou, A.
2010Source-goal asymmetries in motion representation: Implications for language production and comprehension. Cognitive science, 34(6), 1064–1092.
Pottier, B.
1992Sémantique générale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Rappaport Hovav, M., & Levin, B.
2010Reflections on Manner/Result Complementarity. In E. Doron, M. Rappaport Hovav & I. Sichel (Eds.), Syntax, Lexical Semantics, and Event Structure (21–38). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Rauh, G.
(Ed.)2003Essays on Deixis. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Regier, T., & Xu, Y.
2017The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis and inference under uncertainty. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 8(6), e1440.
Regier, T., & Zheng, M.
2007Attention to endpoints: a cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science, 31(4), 705–719.
Ricca, D.
1993I verbi deittici di movimento in Europa: una ricerca interlinguistica. Florence: La Nuova Italia.
Sarda, L.
2019French motion verbs – Insights into the status of locative PPs. In M. Aurnague & D. Stosic (Eds.), The Semantics of Dynamic Space in French: Descriptive, experimental and formal studies on motion expression (68–107). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Schultze-Berndt, E.
2000Simple and complex verbs in Jaminjung. A study of event categorisation in an Australian language. Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen.
Senft, G.
(Ed.)1997Referring to space. Studies in Austronesian and Papuan languages. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Slobin, D. I.
1994The many ways to search for a frog, Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In R. A. Berman & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study (219–257). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Slobin, D. I.
1996From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slobin, D. I.
2004The many ways to search for a frog: linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narratives, vol. 2. Typological and contextual perspectives (219–257). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. [URL]
Slobin, D. I.
2008From S-language and V-language to PIN and PIV. Paper presented at the workshop Human Locomotion across Languages, Nijmegen, 06 June 2008.
Slobin, D. I.
2017Typologies and language use. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Ed.), Motion and Space across Languages. Theory and Applications (419–446). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Stefanowitsch, A.
2018The goal bias revisited: A collostructional approach. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 6(1), 143–166.
Stefanowitsch, A., & Rodhe, A.
2004The goal bias in the encoding of motion events. In G. Radden & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Studies in Linguistic Motivation (249–267). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stosic, D.
2009La notion de manière dans la sémantique de l’espace. Langages, 175, 103–121.
2005Benjamin Lee Whorf’s theory of language, culture, and consciousness: A critique of western science. Language & Communication, 25, 149–159.
Talmy, L.
1985Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, volume 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (57–143). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L.
2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. 1. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.
Talmy, L.
2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. 2. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.
Talmy, L.
2016Properties of Main Verbs. Cognitive Semantics, 2(2), 133–163.
Talmy, L.
2017Past, present, and future of motion research. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Ed.), Motion and Space across Languages. Theory and Applications (1–12). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ungerer, F., & Schmidt, H.
1996An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London & New York: Routledge.
Vandeloise, C.
1986L’espace en français. Paris: Seuil.
Verspoor, M. H., Dirven, R. & Radden, G.
1997Putting concepts together: syntax. In R. Dirven & M. H. Verspoor (Eds.), Introduction to Language and Linguistics: A Cognitive Approach (89–116). Duisburg: Gerhard-Mercator-Universität/Gesamthochschule.
Wälchli, B.
(2001) A typology of displacement (with special reference to Latvian). Sprachtypologie Und Universalienforschung (STUF), 54(3), 298–323.
1956Language, Thought, and Reality. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.
Wilkins, D. P.
1991The semantics, pragmatics and diachronic development of ‘associated motion’ in Mparntwe Arrernte. Buffalo papers in linguistics, 1, 207–257.
Zlatev, J. & Yangklang, P.
2004A third way to travel: The place of Thai in Motion-Event typology. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (159–190). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.