Chapter 1
Introduction: The description of motion events
On deixis, asymmetries and constructions
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Motion and deixis
- 3.Motion and asymmetries
- 4.Motion and constructions
-
Notes
-
References
References (94)
References
Anderson, J. M. 1971. The Grammar of Case: Towards a Localistic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, S. & Keenan, E. L. 1985. Deixis. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, volume 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (259–308). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aurnague, M. 2019. About asymmetry of motion in French. In M. Aurnague & D. Stosic (Eds.), The Semantics of Dynamic Space in French: Descriptive, experimental and formal studies on motion expression (32–65). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 

Beavers, J., B. Levin & S. W. Tham. 2010. The Typology of Motion Expression Revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 46(3), 331–377. 

Bourdin, P. 1997. On goal-bias across languages: modal, configurational and orientational parameters. In Bohumil Palek (ed.) Proceedings of LP’96. Typology: Prototypes, Item Ordering and Universals, 185–218. Prague: Charles University Press.
Bowerman, M. 1996. Learning how to structure space for language: a crosslinguistic perspective. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel & M. Garrett (Eds.), Language and Space (385–436). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Bowerman, M., Gullberg, M., Majid, A., & Narasimhan, B. 2004. Put project: The cross-linguistic encoding of placement events. In A. Majid (Ed.), Field Manual Volume 9 (10–24). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Bühler, K. 1982 [1934]. Sprachtheorie: die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
Casasanto, D. & Boroditsky, L. 2008. Time in the Mind: Using Space to Think about Time. Cognition, 106(2), 579–593. 

Corballis, M. C. 2010. Mirror neurons and the evolution of language. Brain and language, 112(1), 25–35. 

Cornish, F. 1999. Anaphora, Discourse, and Understanding: Evidence from English and French. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Cornish, F. 2007. English Demonstratives: Discourse Deixis and Anaphora. A Discourse-Pragmatic Account. In R. A. Nilsen, N. Aba Appiah Amfo and K. Borthen (Eds.), Interpreting Utterances; Pragmatics and its Interfaces. Essays in Honour of Thorstein Fretheim, (pp. 147–166). Oslo: Novus Press.
Croft, W. 2001. Radical construction grammar: syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Croft, W. 2010. Relativity, linguistic variation and language universals. CogniTextes. Revue de l’Association française de linguistique cognitive, 4. 

Denny, J. P. 1978. Locating the universals in lexical systems for spatial deixis. In D. Farkas, W. M. Jacobsen & K. W. Todrys (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on the lexicon (71–84). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Denny, J. P. 1985. Was ist universal am raumdeiktischen Lexikon? In H. Schweizer (Ed.), Sprache und Raum (111–130). Stuttgart: J.B. Metzlersche Verlagsbuchhandlung und Carl Ernst Poeschel Verlag. 

Fillmore, C. 1971. Santa Cruz Deixis Lectures. [[URL]].
Fillmore, C. 1997. Lectures on Deixis. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Fortis, J.-M. 2010. De l’hypothèse de Sapir-Whorf au prototype : sources et genèse de la théorie d’Eleanor Rosch. Corela, 8(2). 

Fortis, J.-M. 2014. Sapir’s form-feeling and its aesthetic background, History and Philosophy of the Language Sciences. [URL].
Goddard, C. 2003a. ‘Thinking’ across languages and cultures: Six dimensions of variation. Cognitive Linguistics, 14(2/3), 109–140. 

Goddard, C. 2003b. Whorf meets Wierzbicka: Variation and universals in language and thinking. Language Sciences, 25(4), 393–432. 

Grice, H. P. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, Mass. & London: Harvard University Press.
Gumperz, J. J., Levinson, S. C. 1996. Rethinking Linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haspelmath, M. 1997. From space to time. Temporal adverbials in the world’s languages. (LINCOM studies in theoretical linguistics 3). München/Newcastle: LINCOM Europa.
Haspelmath, M. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language, 86(3), 663–687. 

Hill, J. H. & Mannheim, B. 1992. Language and World View. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 381–406. 

Hjelmslev, L. 1935–1937 [1972]. La catégorie des cas. Copenhagen: Universitetsforlager I Aarhus [reprinted in La catégorie des cas, München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1972].
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2009. Path salience in motion events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, 403–414. New York: Psychology Press.
Ikegami, Y. 1984. ‘Source’ vs ‘Goal’: a case of linguistic dissymmetry. In R. Dirven & G. Radden (Eds.), Concepts of Case (122–146). Tübingen: Günter Narr Verlag.
Imai, S. 2009. Spatial deixis. How finely do languages divide space ? Berlin: Dr. Müller Verlag.
Ishibashi, M., Kopecka, A., & Vuillermet, M. (2006). Trajectoire: Matériel visuel pour élicitation des données linguistiques. Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, CNRS / Université Lyon 2. Projet de Fédération de recherche en Typologie et Universaux Linguistiques. [URL]
Jackendoff, R. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.
Kopecka, A. & Ishibashi, M. 2011. L’(a)symétrie dans l’expression de la Source et du But : perspective translinguistique. Les Cahiers de Faits de Langues, 3, 131–149. 

Kopecka, A. & Vuillermet, M. (eds). 2021. Source-Goal (a)symmetries across languages – Special issue of Studies in Language, 45(1).
Kryk-Kastovsky, B. 1996. The linguistic, cognitive and cultural variables of the conceptualization of space. In M. Pütz & R. Dirven (Eds.), The construal of space in language and thought (329–344). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 

Laanest, A. 1982. Einführung in die ostseefinnischen Sprachen. Hamburg, H. Buske.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought, New York, Basic Books.
Lakusta, L., & Landau, B. 2005. Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition, 96–1, 1–33. 

Lakusta, L., Wagner, L., O’Hearn, K., & Landau, B. 2007. Conceptual Foundations of Spatial Language: Evidence for a Goal Bias in Infants. Language Learning and Development, 3, 179–197. 

Lakusta, L. & Landau, B. L. 2012. Language and Memory for Motion Events: Origins of the Asymmetry Between Source and Goal Paths. Cognitive Science 36, 517–544. 

Levin, B. & Rappaport Hovav, M. 2013. Lexicalized Meaning and Manner/Result Complementarity. In B. Arsenijević, B. Gehrke & R. Marín (Eds.), Subatomic Semantics of Event Predicates (49–70). Dordrecht: Springer. 

Levin, B. & Rappaport Hovav, M. 2019. Lexicalization Patterns. In R. Truswell (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Event Structure (395–425). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Levinson, S. C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marchello-Nizia, C. 2006. From personal deixis to spatial deixis. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: linguistic systems and cognitive categories (103–120). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 

Matsumoto, Y. 2003. Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: clarifications and reformulations. In S. Chiba et al. (Eds.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: a festschrift for Masaru Kajita (403–418). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Michelsen, C. 1843. Philosophie der Grammatik: Kasuslehre der lateinischen Sprache. Berlin: T. Trautwein.
Nam, S. 2004. Goal and source: Asymmetry in their syntax and semantics. Paper presented at the Workshop on Event Structure, Leipzig, Germany, March 2004.
Ozga, J. 1996. Prosodic and paralinguistic signals of distance. In Martin Pütz & René Dirven (eds), The Construal of Space in Language and Thought, Berlin / New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 63–71. 

Pajusalu, R. 2006. Death of a Demonstrative: Person and Time – The Case of Estonian too. Linguistica Uralica, 4, 241–253. 

Papafragou, A. 2010. Source-goal asymmetries in motion representation: Implications for language production and comprehension. Cognitive science, 34(6), 1064–1092. 

Pottier, B. 1992. Sémantique générale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Rappaport Hovav, M., & Levin, B. 2010. Reflections on Manner/Result Complementarity. In E. Doron, M. Rappaport Hovav & I. Sichel (Eds.), Syntax, Lexical Semantics, and Event Structure (21–38). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 

Rauh, G. (Ed.). 2003. Essays on Deixis. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Regier, T., & Xu, Y. 2017. The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis and inference under uncertainty. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 8(6), e1440. 

Regier, T., & Zheng, M. 2007. Attention to endpoints: a cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science, 31(4), 705–719. 

Ricca, D. 1993. I verbi deittici di movimento in Europa: una ricerca interlinguistica. Florence: La Nuova Italia.
Schultze-Berndt, E. 2000. Simple and complex verbs in Jaminjung. A study of event categorisation in an Australian language. Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen.
Senft, G. (Ed.). 1997. Referring to space. Studies in Austronesian and Papuan languages. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Slobin, D. I. 1994. The many ways to search for a frog, Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In R. A. Berman & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study (219–257). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Slobin, D. I. 1996. From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slobin, D. I. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narratives, vol. 2. Typological and contextual perspectives (219–257). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. [URL]
Slobin, D. I. 2008. From S-language and V-language to PIN and PIV. Paper presented at the workshop Human Locomotion across Languages, Nijmegen, 06 June 2008.
Slobin, D. I. 2017. Typologies and language use. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Ed.), Motion and Space across Languages. Theory and Applications (419–446). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 

Stefanowitsch, A. 2018. The goal bias revisited: A collostructional approach. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 6(1), 143–166. 

Stefanowitsch, A., & Rodhe, A. 2004. The goal bias in the encoding of motion events. In G. Radden & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Studies in Linguistic Motivation (249–267). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stosic, D. 2009. La notion de manière dans la sémantique de l’espace. Langages, 175, 103–121. 

Subbiondo, J. L. 2005. Benjamin Lee Whorf’s theory of language, culture, and consciousness: A critique of western science. Language & Communication, 25, 149–159. 

Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, volume 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (57–143). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. 1. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.
Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. 2. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.
Talmy, L. 2016. Properties of Main Verbs. Cognitive Semantics, 2(2), 133–163. 

Ungerer, F., & Schmidt, H. 1996. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London & New York: Routledge.
Vandeloise, C. 1986. L’espace en français. Paris: Seuil.
Verspoor, M. H., Dirven, R. & Radden, G. 1997. Putting concepts together: syntax. In R. Dirven & M. H. Verspoor (Eds.), Introduction to Language and Linguistics: A Cognitive Approach (89–116). Duisburg: Gerhard-Mercator-Universität/Gesamthochschule.
Wälchli, B. (2001). A typology of displacement (with special reference to Latvian). Sprachtypologie Und Universalienforschung (STUF), 54(3), 298–323. 

Whorf, B. L. 1956. Language, Thought, and Reality. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.
Wilkins, D. P. 1991. The semantics, pragmatics and diachronic development of ‘associated motion’ in Mparntwe Arrernte. Buffalo papers in linguistics, 1, 207–257.
Zlatev, J. & Yangklang, P. 2004. A third way to travel: The place of Thai in Motion-Event typology. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (159–190). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Tuuri, Emilia & Maija Belliard
2024.
Boundary-crossing situations and the use of deictic verbs in Finnish and Estonian expressions of non-actual motion.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 56:1
► pp. 58 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.