References
Bourdin, P.
2005Venir en français contemporain : De deux fonctionnements périphrastiques. In H. B-Z. Shyldkrot & N. Le Querler (Eds.), Les périphrases verbales (261–278). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N.
2003Demonstratives in space and interaction: Data from Lao speakers and implications for semantic analysis. Language, 79, 82–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C.
1971Santa Cruz lectures on deixis. [Published in 1997 as Lectures on deixis]. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Gathercole, G.
1977A Study of the comings and goings of the speakers of four languages: Spanish, Japanese, English, and Turkish. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 2, 61–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ikegami, Y.
2015‘Subjective construal’ and ‘objective construal’: A typology of how the speaker of language behaves differently in linguistically encoding a situation. Journal of Cognitive Linguistics [The journal of Japanese Cognitive Linguistics Association], 1, 1–21.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R.
1959On linguistic aspects of translation. In R. A. Brower (Ed.), On translation (232–239). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
1990Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics, 5, 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y., Akita, K., & Takahashi, K.
2017The functional nature of deictic verbs and the coding patterns of Deixis: An experimental study in English, Japanese, and Thai. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Ed.), Motion and space across languages (95–122). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y.
2017Idoo hyoogen no ruikeiron [Typology of motion expressions]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publisher.Google Scholar
Morita, T.
2011Intratypological variations in motion events in Japanese and French: Manner and deixis expressions as parameters for crosslinguistic comparison. Cognitextes, 6, [URL]; DOI logo
2013Imiteki bunrui no kagakuteki datoosei [On the scientific acceptability of semantic categories]. Gengo Kenkyu, 144, 29–53.Google Scholar
2017Toraekata no imiron: Daikushisu ni kansuru nitifutsu taisho kenkyu [Semantics of construal: A contrastive study of deixis in Japanese and French]. In S. Aoki (Ed.) Furansu go gaku no saizensen [Studies at the forefront of French linguistics] vol.5 (31–67). Tokyo: Hituzi Shobo.Google Scholar
2020Attraction of attention in perceived motion events weighed against typology and cognitive cost: An experimental study of French. In Y. Matsumoto & K. Kawachi (Eds.), Broader perspectives on motion event descriptions (181–204). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, M.
2006Directional verbs in Japanese. In. E. Shay & U. Seibert (Eds.) Motion, direction, and location in languages: In honor of Zygmunt Frajzyngier (259–285). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
1996From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2004The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative vol. 2: Typological and contextual perspectives (219–257). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
2000Toward a cognitive semantics, vol.2: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Uehara, S.
2006Toward a typology of linguistic subjectivity: A cognitive and cross-linguistic approach to grammaticalized deixis. In A. Athanasiadou, C. Canakis & B. Cornillie (Eds.), Subjectification: Various paths to subjectivity (75–117). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar