Cover not available
Part of
Analogy and Contrast in Language: Perspectives from Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by Karolina Krawczak, Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk and Marcin Grygiel
[Human Cognitive Processing 73] 2022
► pp. 47–60

Chapter 2
Diagrammatic iconicity and rendering time in a narrative text

Analogies and contrasts

| Jagiellonian University, Kraków

Like contrast and analogy, iconicity defined as correspondence of form and meaning stems from the ability of human mind to observe similarity between entities. When similarity is perceived and considered with reference to difference, it gives rise to analogy. In this sense, analogy and contrast can be seen as two sides of a single “cognitive coin”. Both underlie iconicity (especially individual types of diagrammatic iconicity), which is a significant property of texts, with the difference between “the literary” and “the non-literary” being mainly a matter of degree. I discuss some examples of the functioning of diagrammatic iconicity on all levels of text organization and substantiate the claim that it is one of the reasons why a translation of a text can only be partly analogous (equivalent?) to the original, the relation between the two being that of (stronger or weaker) contrast.

Keywords: equivalence, text organization, translation
Article outline
  • 1.Preliminary
  • 2.Iconicity
  • 3.The text: “The railway station in Dębica”
    • 3.1The book: The experience of time
    • 3.2The book: Two extracts
  • 4.The workings and the underminings of IP
  • 5.Analogy and contrast
  • 6.Translation
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 27 October 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.73.02tab
References
Elleström. L.
2013 Spatiotemporal aspects of iconicity. In L. Elleström, O. Fischer, & Ch. Ljungberg (Eds.), Iconic investigations [Iconicity in Language and Literature 12] (95–117). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elleström, L.
2015 Visual, auditory and cognitive iconicity in written literature. The example of Emily Dickinson’s ‘Because I could not stoop for Death.’ In M. K. Hiraga, W. J. Herlofsky, K. Shinoara, & K. Akita (Eds.), Iconicity. East meets West [Iconicity in Language and Literature 14] (207–218). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, O., & Cohen, I.
2015 Two passages from a novel by Tobias Hill. In M. K. Hiraga, W. J. Herlofsky, K. Shinoara, & K. Akita (Eds.), Iconicity. East meets West [Iconicity in Language and Literature 14], (163–184). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freadman, A.
2013 The days pass… Iconicity and the experience of time. In L. Elleström, O. Fischer, & Ch. Ljungberg (Eds.), Iconic investigations [Iconicity in Language and Literature 12], (185–205). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
1991 Concept, image and symbol. The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nöth, W.
2015 Three paradigms of iconicity research in language and literature. In M. K. Hiraga, W. J. Herlofsky, K. Shinoara, & K. Akita (Eds.), Iconicity. East meets West [Iconicity in Language and Literature 14], (13–34). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paprotté, W.
1988 A discourse perspective on tense and aspect in Standard Modern Greek and English In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics (447–505). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Powell, I.
2016 The daughter who sold her mother. A biographical memoir. Bloomington: Autorhouse.Google Scholar
2020 Córka, która sprzedała matkę (tłum. E. Tabakowska). Kraków: AusteriaGoogle Scholar