Chapter published in:
Analogy and Contrast in Language: Perspectives from Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by Karolina Krawczak, Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk and Marcin Grygiel
[Human Cognitive Processing 73] 2022
► pp. 159192
References
Aikhenvald, A. Y.
2000Classifiers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Andrews, E., Aver’janova, G. N., & Pjadusova, G. I.
2001The Russian verb: Form & function. Moscow: Russkij jazyk.Google Scholar
Avilova, N. S.
1976Vid glagola i semantika glagol’nogo slova. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Bach, E.
1986The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9, 5–16.Google Scholar
Biber, D., S. Johansson, G. Leech, S. Conrad, & E. Finegan
1999Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Bisang, W.
1999Classifiers in east and southeast Asian languages: Counting and beyond. In J. Gvozdanović (Ed.), Numeral types and changes worldwide (113–185). Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bondarko, A. V.
1971Vid i vremja russkogo glagola. Moscow: Prosveščenie.Google Scholar
Carlson, L.
1981Aspect and quantification. In P. J. Tedeschi, & A. Zaenen (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 14. Tense and aspect (31–64). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Čertkova, M.
1996Grammatičeskaja kategorija vida v sovremennom russkom jazyke. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta.Google Scholar
Childers, J. B., & Tomasello, M.
2006Are nouns easier to learn than verbs? Three experimental studies. In K. A. Hirsh-Pasek, & R. M. Golinkoff (Eds.), Action meets word: How children learn verbs. Oxford Scholarship Online. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cubberly, P.
2002Russian: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö.
1985Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Deepadung, S.
1997Extension in the usage of the Thai classifier /tua/. Southeast Asian Linguistic Studies in Honour of Vichin Panupong (49–55). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
Dickey, S. M.
2000Parameters of Slavic aspect: A cognitive approach. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Dickey, S. M., & Janda, L. A.
2015Slavic aspectual prefixes and numeral classifiers: Two kinds of lexico-grammatical unitizers. Lingua, 168, 57–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Durst-Andersen, P.
1992Mental grammar: Russian aspect and related issues. Columbus, OH: Slavica.Google Scholar
Eckhoff, H. M., Janda, L. A., & Lyashevskaya, O.
2017Predicting Russian aspect by frequency across genres. Slavic and East European Journal, 64, 844–875.Google Scholar
Endresen, A., Janda, L. A., Reynolds, R., & Tyers, F. M.
2016Who needs particles? A challenge to the classification of particles as a part of speech in Russian. Russian Linguistics, 40, 103–132. Crossref.Google Scholar
Forsyth, J. A.
1970Grammar of aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gagarina, N.
2004Does the acquisition of aspect have anything to do with aspectual pairs? ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 33, 39–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Galton, H.
1976The main functions of the Slavic verbal aspect. Skopje: Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts.Google Scholar
Gao, M. Y., & Malt, B. C.
2009Mental representation and cognitive consequences of Chinese individual classifiers. Languages and Cognitive Processes, 24, 1124–1179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D.
1982Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In S. A. Kuczaj II (Ed.), Language development: Vol. 2. Language, thought and culture (301–344). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Boroditsky; L.
2001Individuation, relativity, and early word learning. In M. Bowerman, & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (215–256). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gjervold, J. H.
2014Prefix variation in Russian. A comparison between occasional verbs and standardized language. MA Thesis, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway.Google Scholar
Glovinskaja, M. Ja
1982Semantičeskie tipy vidovyx protivopostavlenij russkogo glagola. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Gvozdev, A. N.
1961Voprosy izučenija detskoj reči. Moscow: APN RSFSR.Google Scholar
Isačenko, A. V.
1960Grammatičeskij stroj russkogo jazyka v sopostavlenii s slovackim – Čast’ vtoraja: morfologija. Bratislava: Izdatel’stvo akademii nauk.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. O.
1957/1971Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. In Selected writings II. The Hague: Mouton, 130–147.Google Scholar
Janda, L. A.
2003A user-friendly conceptualization of aspect. Slavic and East European Journal, 47, 251–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004A metaphor in search of a source domain: The categories of Slavic aspect. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 471–527. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Aspectual clusters of Russian verbs. Studies in Language, 31, 607–648. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Russkie pristavki kak sistema glagol’nyx klassifikatorov. Voprosy jazykoznanija 6, 3–47.Google Scholar
Janda, L. A., & Lyashevskaya, O.
2011Grammatical profiles and the interaction of the lexicon with aspect, tense and mood in Russian. Cognitive Linguistics, 22, 719–763. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janda, L. A., Endresen, A., Kuznetsova, J., Lyashevskaya, O., Makarova, A., Nesset, T., & Sokolova, S.
2013Why Russian aspectual prefixes aren’t empty: Prefixes as verb classifiers. Bloomington, IN: Slavica.Google Scholar
Janda, L. A., & Reynolds, R. J.
2019Construal vs. redundancy: Russian aspect in context. Cognitive Linguistics, 30, 467–497. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janda, L. A., & Tyers, F. M.
2018Less is more: Why all paradigms are defective, and why that is a good thing. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 17(1), 109–141. Crossref.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
1987Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
1980Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
1987Nouns and verbs. Language, 63, 53–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2008Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, J. A.
1992Grammatical categories and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Systems of nominal classification: A concluding discussion. In G. Senft (Ed.), Systems of nominal classification (326–341). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyashevskaya, O.
2016Korpusnye instrumenty v leksiko-grammaticheskikh issledovavijakh russkogo jazyka. Moscow: Languages of Slavic culture press.Google Scholar
Majsak, T. A.
2005Tipologija grammatikalizacii konstrukcij s glagolami dviženija i glagolami pozicii. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskix kul’tur.Google Scholar
Martelle, W.
2011Testing the aspect hypothesis in L2 Russian. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Maslov, J. S.
1965Sistema osnovnyx ponjatij i terminov slavjanskoj aspektologii. Voprosy obščego jazykoznanija, 1, 53–80.Google Scholar
McGregor, W. B.
2002Verb classification in Australian languages. ( Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 25). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mehlig, H. R.
1996Some analogies between the morphology of nouns and the morphology of aspect in Russian. Folia Linguistica, 30, 87–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mikaelian, I., Shmelev, A., & Zaliznjak, A.
2007Imperfectivization in Russian. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Meaning Text Theory, Klagenfurt, May 20–24, 315–23. [ Wiener slawistischer Almanach, 60.]Google Scholar
Mironova, L. Ju
2004Vid glagola i sootnošenie leksiko-semantičeskix variantov mnogoznačnogo slova. Tambov: Avtoreferat.Google Scholar
Morrow, D. G.
1986Grammatical morphemes and conceptual structure in discourse processing. Cognitive Science, 10, 423–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mourelatos, A.
1978Events, processes, and states. Linguistics and Philosophy, 2, 415–434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Offord, D.
1996Using Russian. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Padučeva, E. V.
1996Semantičeskie issledovanija. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Plungjan, V. A.
2011Vvedenie v grammatičeskuju semantiku: Grammatičeskie značenija i grammatičeskie sistemy jazykov mira. Moscow: Rossijskij gosudarstvennyj gumanitarnyj institut.Google Scholar
Šaxmatov, A. A.
1952Učenie o častjax reči. Moscow: Učebno- pedagogičeskoe izdatel’stvo.Google Scholar
Stoll, S. E.
2001The acquisition of Russian aspect. UC Berkeley PhD Dissteration.Google Scholar
Timberlake, A.
2004A reference grammar of Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tixonov, A. N.
1964Čistovidovye pristavki v sisteme russkogo vidovogo formoobrazovanija. Voprosy jazykoznanija, 1, 42–52.Google Scholar
1998Vidovye korrelacii v sovremennom russkom jazyke. In Marina Ju. Čertkova (Ed.), Tipologija vida: Problemy, poiski, rešenija, (466–477). Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
van Schooneveld, C. H.
1958The so-called ‘préverbes vides’ and neutralization. Dutch Contributions to the Fourth International Congress of Slavistics (159–61). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Vey, M.
1952Les préverbes ‘vides’ en tchéque moderne. Revue des études slaves, 29, 82–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vinogradov, V. V.
1972Russkij jazyk. Moscow: Vysšajaškola.Google Scholar
Zaliznjak, A. A., & Šmelev, A. D.
2000Vvedenie v russkuju aspektologiju. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Zhang, N. N.
2013Classifier structures in Mandarin Chinese. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zipf, G.
1949Human behavior and the principle of least effort. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar