Chapter in:
Time Representations in the Perspective of Human Creativity
Edited by Anna Piata, Adriana Gordejuela and Daniel Alcaraz Carrión
[Human Cognitive Processing 75] 2022
► pp. 233242
Cienki, A.
(2012) Usage events of spoken language and the symbolic units we (may) abstract from them. In J. Badio & K. Kosecki (Eds.), Cognitive processes in language (pp. 149–158). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2015a) The dynamic scope of relevant behaviors in talk: A perspective from cognitive linguistics. In Proceedings of the 2nd European and the 5th Nordic Symposium on Multimodal Communication, Tartu, Estonia, http://​www​.ep​.liu​.se​/ecp​_article​/index​.en​.aspx​?issue​=110;article​=002
(2015b) The notion of the dynamic scope of relevant behaviors in cognitive linguistic theory. In A. A. Kibrik & A. D. Koshelev (Eds.), Language and thought: Contemporary cognitive linguistics (pp. 560–573). Moscow: Languages of Slavic Culture.Google Scholar
(2017a) Analysing metaphor in gesture: A set of metaphor identification guidelines for gesture (MIG-G). In E. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 131–147). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2017b) Ten lectures on spoken language and gesture from the perspective of cognitive linguistics: Issues of dynamicity and multimodality. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017c) Utterance Construction Grammar (UCxG) and the variable multimodality of constructions. Linguistics Vanguard 3 (s1), 20160048 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Insights for linguistics and gesture studies from film studies: A view from researching cinematic metaphor. In S. Greifenstein, D. Horst, T. Scherer, C. Schmitt, H. Kappelhoff, & C. Müller (Eds.), Cinematic metaphor in perspective: Reflections on a transdisciplinary framework (pp. 53–68). Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2020) A multimodal perspective on MCA: Cues of (possible) metacommunicative awareness. In C. Di Biase-Dyson & M. Egg (Eds.), Drawing attention to metaphor: Case studies across time periods, cultures and modalities (pp. 63–92). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H.
(1996) Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending the and mind’s hidden complexities. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J.
(1985) Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6 (2), 222–254.Google Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., Kronrod, A., Elnatan, E., Shuval, N., & Zur, A.
(2004) Weapons of mass distraction: Optimal innovation and pleasure ratings. Metaphor & Symbol, 19 (2), 115–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M.
(2014) Gestures and second language acquisition. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body–language–communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (vol. 2, pp. 1868–1875). Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar, volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.
(1988) A usage-based model. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (pp. 127–161). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C.
(2008) What gestures reveal about the nature of metaphor. In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 219–245). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C. & Tag, S.
(2010) The dynamics of metaphor: Foregrounding and activating metaphoricity in conversational interaction. Cognitive Semiotics, 6 , 85–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, T.
(2009) From attention to meaning. Bern: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, C., & Zamm, A.
(2017) Interactions in ensemble music performance: Empirical and mathematical accounts. In M. Lessaffre, P.-J. Maes, & M. Leman (Eds.), The Routledge companion on embodied music interaction (pp. 370–379). London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, M. J.
(1993) The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 164–201) (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P.
(1977) Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Shore, B.
(1996) Culture in mind: Cognition, culture, and the problem of meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D.
(1986) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Turner, M.
(1996) The literary mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar