Chapter 11
Words also exist in a world
On the pattern ‘X’ does not exist; it’s called ‘Y’
Clause sequences of the type ‘X’ does not exist – its correct name is ‘Y’ use descriptive negation in the first clause but also have something literally contradictory about them that is reminiscent of metalinguistic negation. I argue that the negative existential in such clause sequences exhibits a use-mention mix without blending descriptive and metalinguistic negation. The apparent contradiction can be resolved by acknowledging that words are not abstract labels lacking any substantial existence but also have a concrete reality in a ‘world of words’. Speakers often use the clause sequence studied here as a rhetorical device to point out that other speakers, for whom a word has currency, have a flawed view of the non-linguistic world.
Article outline
- 1.The question
- 2.Two kinds of negation
- 2.1Distinctive properties
- 2.2Metalinguistic negation: Some further illustrations
- 2.3Literal contradiction: A (frequent) hallmark of metalinguistic negation
- 3.‘Blends of descriptive and metalinguistic negation’ do not exist – they’re called use-mention mixes
- 4.Existing in a world of words
- 4.1Occurring as a word being treated as tantamount to existing as a thing
- 4.2The pattern as a rhetorical device
- 5.Conclusion
-
Notes
-
References