Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 45:3 (2018) ► pp.289324
References
Alter, Stephen G.
2005Whitney and the Science of Language. Baltimore & London: Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Andresen, Julie Tetel
1990Linguistics in America 1769–1924: A critical history. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Belardi, Walter
1990[1978] “Il luogo dell’interferenza linguistica”. Linguistica generale, filologia e critica dell’espressione, 57–68. Roma: Bonacci.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola
1994 “Linguistica e dialettologia italiana”. Lepschy 1994:525–644.Google Scholar
Bolelli, Tristano
1965Per una storia della ricerca linguistica. Testi e note introduttive. Napoli: Morano.Google Scholar
Bologna, Maria Patrizia
1986 “Whitney in Italia”. Historiographia Linguistica 131.43–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 [1981] “Una nota di William Dwight Whitney sull’interferenza linguistica” Bologna 2016.109–121.Google Scholar
2016[1997]Linguistica generale e indianistica: La Science of Language secondo W. D. Whitney. Bologna 2016.95–108.Google Scholar
2016Itinerari ottocenteschi tra linguistica storico-comparativa e linguistica generale. Roma: il Calamo.Google Scholar
Corti, Maria
ed. 1970 “Introduzione”. Terracini 1963.9–31.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold
1880Einleitung in das Sprachstudium. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte und Methodik der vergleichenden Sprachforschung. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.Google Scholar
1897 “From Berthold Delbrück, Professor of Sanskrit and Comparative Philology, University of Jena, Germany, Member of the Royal Saxon Society of Sciences”. A Report of that Session of the First American Congress of Philologists, which was devoted to the memory of the Late Professor William Dwight Whitney. Appendix I: Original Text of the Letters from Foreign Scholars Concerning Professor Whitney. Lanman: 67–105, in particular, pp. 83–84.Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio
ed. 1970[1967]Ferdinand de Saussure, Corso di linguistica generale. Introduzione, traduzione e commento. Bari: Editori Laterza.Google Scholar
1980Idee e ricerche linguistiche nella cultura italiana. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
1991 “La nascita della Società di Linguistica Italiana”. La linguistica italiana oggi ed. by Alberto Varvaro, 13–29. Roma: Bulzoni (repr. 1998: 37–67; repr. Dovetto 2018: 61–80).Google Scholar
1994 [ recte : 1996] “La scuola linguistica romana”. Le grandi scuole della Facoltà. Atti del Convegno, Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia, 11–12 maggio 1994 ed. by Emanuele Paratore, 173–187. Roma: Università degli Studi ‘La Sapienza’ (repr. De Mauro 1998: 112–133. [This ed. is quoted in this paper.].)Google Scholar
1998Prima persona singolare passato prossimo indicativo, Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
De Palo, Marina
2016Saussure e gli strutturalismi. Il soggetto parlante nel pensiero linguistico del Novecento. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Dovetto, Francesca M.
2017a “Appunti di storiografia linguistica del secondo Ottocento: manuali e metafore. The Life and Growth of Language di William Dwight Whitney”. Ce qui nous est donné, ce sont les langues. Studi linguistici in onore di Maria Pia Marchese ed. by Monica Ballerini, Francesca Murano & Letizia Vezzosi, 251–271. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
2017b “Pisani, le isoglosse e le onde”. L’opera scientifica di Vittore Pisani nel quadro della glottologia indeuropea fra Ottocento e Novecento ed. by Mario Negri, Giovanna Rocca & Marta Muscariello. Ἀλεξάνδρεια Alessandria 111.33–41.Google Scholar
2018Tullio De Mauro e la Società di Linguistica Italiana: 50 anni di storia della linguistica. Un percorso comune, 61–80. Roma: Bulzoni. [This ed. is quoted in this paper.]Google Scholar
in prep. “Benvenuto Terracini, un linguista attore della diaspora italiana in Argentina”. Atti del Convegno “Leggi razziali (1938): pratiche e testimonianze degli ebrei italiani esiliati / Leyes raciales (1938): prácticas y testimonios de los judíos italianos exiliados (Buenos Aires, 4 de mayo 2018, Muntref-Museo de la Inmigración).
D’Ovidio, Francesco
1882–1883 [rev.] “Whitney, On mixture in language: extract from transactions of American Philological Association, 1881: p. 26”. La Cultura 31.74–79.Google Scholar
1895 “Commemorazione di G. Dwight Whitney”. Rendiconti dell’Accademia dei Lincei, s.V1.128–134.Google Scholar
Elia, Annibale
1978Per Saussure, contro Saussure: Il “sociale” nelle teorie linguistiche del Novecento. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Frezza, Giulia & Elena Gagliasso
2014 “Fare metafore e fare scienza”. Aisthesis 7:2.25–42.Google Scholar
Gabelentz, Georg von der
1891Die Sprachwissenschaft, ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig: Weigel.Google Scholar
Gensini, Stefano
2011 “Darwin e il dibattito linguistico coevo”. Paradigmi. Rivista di critica filosofica 21.47–66.Google Scholar
Godel, Robert
1957Les sources manuscrites du Cours de Linguistique générale de F. de Saussure. Genève: Droz & Paris: Minard.Google Scholar
Hombert, Isabelle
1978 “Whitney: Notes sur une entreprise théorique pré-saussurienne”. Langages 491.112–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1971 “The World Response to Whitney’s Principles of Linguistic Science”. Silverstein 1971: xxv–xlv (French transl., “Les réactions du monde aux principes linguistiques de Whitney”. Essais de linguistique générale 2. Rapports internes et externes du langage, 272–286. Paris: De Minuit 1973.)Google Scholar
Joseph, John E.
2002From Whitney to Chomsky: Essays in the history of American linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K.
1973Ferdinand de Saussure: Origin and Development of his Linguistic Thought on Western Studies of Language. A contribution to the History and Theory of Linguistics. Braunschweig: Vieweg. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1979 “L’importance de William Dwight Whitney pour les jeunes linguistes de Leipzig et pour F. de Saussure”. Studies in Diachronic, Synchronic, and Typological Linguistics: Festschrift for Oswald Szemerényi on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday ed. by Bela Brogyanayi, 437–454. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lanman, Charles R.
ed. 1897The Whitney Memorial Meeting. A Report of That Session of the First American Congress of Philologists, Which Was Devoted to the Memory of the Late Professor William Dwight Whitney, of Yale University; Held at Philadelphia, Dec. 28, 1894. Ed. for the Joint Committees of Publication. Boston: Ginn & Company.Google Scholar
Lazzeroni, Romano
2015 “Fra filologia e linguistica. Divagazioni sulla conoscenza del vedico nell’Ottocento”. Carmina Indica. Figure dell’India in Occidente dal Settecento a oggi ed. by Luca Clerici, Marcello Meli & Paola Mura, 69–80. Padova: Padova University Press.Google Scholar
Lepschy, Giulio C.
ed. 1994Storia della linguistica. Vol. III1. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Lubello, Sergio
1998 “Alle origini della filologia romanza in Italia. Dalla scuola tedesca alla scuola italiana attraverso uno dei primi rappresentanti: Francesco D’Ovidio”. Parallela 6. Italiano e tedesco in contatto e a confronto. Atti del VII Incontro italo-austriaco dei linguisti — Italienisch und Deutsch im Kontakt und im Vergleich. Akten des VII Treffens der italienischen und österreichischen Linguisten ed. by Patrizia Cordin, Maria Iliescu & Heidi Siller-Runggaldier, 567–580. Trento: Dipartimento di Scienze Filologiche e Storiche.Google Scholar
2009 “La cultura milanese nel carteggio Ascoli D’Ovidio. Graziadio Isaia Ascoli ‘milanese’. Giornate di studio 28 Febbraio — 1 Marzo 2007 ed. by Silvia Morgana & Angela Bianchi Robbiati, 69–84. Milano: LED.Google Scholar
2018 “Ascoli, ascoliani e il nuovo paradigma della grammatica storico-comparativa”, La cultura linguistica italiana in confronto con le culture linguistice di altri paesi europei. Atti dall’ottocento in poi Congresso internazionale SLI ed. by Federica Da Milano, Andrea Scala, Massimo Vai & Rita Zama, 271–284. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Mancini, Marco
2013 “Il paradosso darwiniano: convergenze e divergenze di paradigma”. Sull’origine del linguaggio e delle lingue storico-naturali. Un confronto fra linguisti e non linguisti ed. by Emanuele Banfi, 105–142. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
2014 “Appunti sulla protostoria dello strutturalismo in Italia”. Le relazioni irresistibili. Scritti in onore di Nunzio La Fauci per il suo sessantesimo compleanno ed. by Ignazio Mauro Mirto, 11–54. Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
2018 “Il ‘caso’ Pagliaro tra linguistica, dottrina e politica”. Saussure e la Scuola linguistica romana. Da Antonio Pagliaro a Tullio De Mauro ed. by Marina De Palo & Stefano Gensini, 33–78. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Morpurgo Davies, Anna
1994 “La linguistica dell’Ottocento”. Lepschy, ed. 1994:11–399. (Repr. 1996 [This ed. is quoted in this paper].Google Scholar
Morresi, Ilaria
2007Benvenuto Terracini: Modi e forme della libertà linguistica. Alessandria: Edizioni Dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Mounin, Georges
1972La linguistique du XXe siècle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (Italian transl. Milano: Feltrinelli 1983 [1974] [This ed. is quoted in this paper.].)Google Scholar
Müller, F[riedrich] Max
1861Lectures on the Science of Language Delivered at the Royal Institution of Great Britain in April, May & June 1861. London: Longman (Italian transl. by Gherardo Nerucci. Milano: Daelli 1864.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, F. Max
1864Lectures on the Science of Language Delivered at the Royal Institution of Great Britain in February, March, April & May 1863. London: Longman (Italian transl. by Gherardo Nerucci. Milano: Treves 1870.)Google Scholar
Nerlich, Brigitte
1990Change in Language: Whitney, Bréal, and Wegener. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pagliaro, Antonino
1930Sommario di linguistica arioeuropea. Fascicolo I: Cenni storici e questioni teoriche. Roma: L’Universale (Repr., with foreword by Tullio De Mauro. Palermo: Novecento 1993.) [This ed. is quoted in this paper.]Google Scholar
Paris, Gaston
1905Mélanges linguistiques. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann
1880 [21886, 51920] Principien der Sprachgeschichte. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Rocher, Rosane
1979 “The Past Up to the Introduction of Neogrammarian Thought: Whitney and Europe, Background of American Linguistics”. Paper on the Third Golden Anniversary Symposium of the Linguistic Society of America ed. by Henry M. Hoenigswald, 5–22. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Roggenbuck, Simone
2005Die Wiederkehr der Bilder: Arboreszenz und Raster in der interdisziplinären Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey
1980Schools of Linguistics: Competition and evolution. London-Melbourne-Sydney-Auckland-Johannesburg: Huitchinson (Italian transl., Milano: Mondadori 1983 [This ed. is quoted in this paper.])Google Scholar
Santamaria, Domenico
2015Benvenuto Terracini esegeta di Graziadio Isaia Ascoli. Storiografia e teoria linguistica. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1922 [1916]Cours de linguistique générale. Ed. by Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye with the assistance of Albert Riedlinger. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Saussure/Engler
1974Ferdinand de Saussure, Cours de linguistique générale. Édition critique par Rudolf Engler. Tome 2, fasc. 4. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Johannes
1872Die Verwantschaftverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo
1900Über die Klassification der romanischen Mundarten. Probe-Vorlesung gehalten zu Leipzig am 30. April 1870. Graz: Universitäts-Buchdruckerei “Styria”.Google Scholar
Segre, Cesare
1986 “Benvenuto Terracini e la linguistica del Novecento”. The History of Linguistics in Italy ed. by Paolo Ramat & Hans-Joseph Niederehe & Konrad Koerner, 259–276. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sériot, Patrick
1999Structure et totalit:. Les origines intellectuelles du structuralisme en Europe centrale et orientale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France (Re-ed., Limoges: Lambert-Lucas 2012 [This ed. is quoted in this paper].)Google Scholar
Seymour, Thomas Day
1966 “William Dwight Whitney”. Portraits of Linguists: A biographical source book for the history of western linguistics, 1746–1963 ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, 399–439. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1971Whitney on Language. Selected Writings of William Dwight Whitney. Introductory Essay by Roman Jakobson. Cambridge, Mass. & London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tagliavini, Carlo
1936Introduzione alla glottologia. Vol. I1. Lingua e linguaggio — Storia ed evoluzione della linguistica — Le lingue e i problemi della classificazione — Premesse psicologiche. Bologna: Pàtron. (7th ed. 1969 [This ed. is quoted in this paper.].)Google Scholar
Tani, Ilaria
2013 “Confini e mescolanze delle lingue. Schuchardt e il problema della classificazione in linguistica”. Blityri 21.95–113.Google Scholar
Terracini, Benvenuto
1949 “Le origini della linguistica generale: Whitney”. Guida allo studio della linguistica storica. I. Profilo storico-critico, 73–121. Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo. [“W. D. Whitney y la linguística general”. Revista de Filología Hispánica 51.105–147 (1943.].Google Scholar
1963Lingua libera e libertà linguistica. Introduzione alla linguistica storica 2nd ed. with an introduction by Maria Corti. Torino: Einaudi 1970 [This ed. is quoted in this paper.]Google Scholar
1996Conflitti di lingue e di cultura. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Timpanaro, Sebastiano
1979 “Giacomo Lignana e i rapporti tra filologia, filosofia, linguistica e darwinismo nell’Italia del secondo Ottocento”. Critica storica. 151.406–503 (Repr., Sulla linguistica dell’Ottocento, 105–223. Bologna: il Mulino 2005 [This ed. is quoted in this paper.].)Google Scholar
Venier, Federica
2017Appunti di viaggio. Percorsi linguistici, fra storia, filologia e retorica. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel
1953Languages in Contact. Findings and Problems. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York, (Italian transl. by Giorgio R. Cardona. Torino: Boringhieri 1974; new ed. by Vincenzo Orioles. Torino: UTET 2008 [This ed. is quoted in this paper.]).Google Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight
1867Language and the Study of Language: Twelve Lectures on the Principles of Linguistic Science. New York: Scribner (2nd ed. augmented by an analysis. London: Trübner 1868.)Google Scholar
1871 “Schleicher and the Physical Theory of Language”. Transactions of the American Philological Association 21.35–64 (repr. Oriental and Linguistic Studies. First Series. The Veda; the Avesta; the Science of Language, 298–331. New York: Scribner’s Sons).Google Scholar
1875aThe Life and Growth of Language: An Outline of Linguistic Science. New York: Appleton (Fr.transl. Paris: Libraire Germer Ballière 1875 Germ.transl. by August Leskien. Leipzig: Brockhaus 1876 It.transl. by Francesco D’Ovidio. Milano: Dumolard 1876; repr. with presentation by Luigi Rosiello, introduction and comment of Giuseppe Carlo Vincenzi. Milano: Rizzoli 1990 [This ed. is quoted in this paper.]).Google Scholar
1875b “Are Languages Institutions?”. Contemporary Review 251.713–732.Google Scholar
1879A Sanskrit Grammar, Including Both the Classical Language, and the Older Dialects, of Veda and Brāhmaṇa. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel (2.nd ed. 1889).Google Scholar
1880 “Logical Consistency in Views of Language”. Americal Journal of Philology 11.327–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1881 “On Mixture in Language”. Transactions of the American Philological Association 121:5–26 (repr. Silverstein 1971:170–191). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1885 “Philology. Part I: Science of Language in General”. Encyclopaedia Britannica. 9 ed., vol.XVIII1, 765–780. Edinburgh: Adam & Charles Black.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Covino, Sandra
2023. Francesco D’Ovidio tra Ascoli e Schuchardt: dalle reazioni etniche alla Sprachmischung . Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 139:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Dovetto, Francesca M.
2022. Geometric Metaphors and Linguistic Genealogy. In Imagine Math 8,  pp. 425 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.