Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 45:3 (2018) ► pp.289–324

An American at the origins of European Sprachwissenschaft and Italian historiographical thought

William Dwight Whitney and his approach to linguistic issues

| Università di Napoli Federico II
This contribution is dedicated to William Dwight Whitney (1827–1897), a scholar who generally has a modest space dedicated to him in the historiography of linguistics, despite his name and works having had considerable circulation among his contemporaries. His originality and method are outlined with particular attention being given to his reception in Europe and in the setting of Italian studies of theoretical and empirical linguistics.
Whitney was among the first to contest Schleicher’s concept of language as a natural fact, claiming, instead, that it has social nature, as an ‘institution’ created by man; he was a forerunner in recognizing the relevance of signs and their value, and of language acquisition. In his demonstrations and in his methods he proposes a science of historical linguistics but at the same time it is open to 20th century linguistics and the concept of language as a complex system ordered and crossed by relationships. Both his unique approach to the study of Sanskrit, which emphasised the study of its use and its variants, and his interest for modern languages, makes him a particularly interesting scholar, as he and his reception testify the rise, in Europe and especially in Italy, of a new approach to linguistic issues, no longer exclusively historical-comparative, but also theoretical and general.
Nonetheless, Whitney ought to occupy a prominent place in the history of linguistics, because he was also the author of one of the first introductory texts of the discipline, which was published in 1875; in that same year a French translation came out, which was soon followed by an Italian, and a German translation (both 1876).The number of almost contemporaneous translations gives an idea of the gap which a general and introductory work like Whitney’s filled and illustrates that there was a clear need for it.
In several works, including recent ones, De Mauro identified the specific characteristics of Italian linguistic studies: we can find a good many of these traits in Whitney as well. Although the fruitful contribution of Whitney’s ideas in an environment which is ‘naturally’ inclined towards the themes and methods the American linguist dealt with, i.e., the ‘Italian linguistic school’, has not been fully recognised until now, it is undeniable that his ideas provided an important stimulus for new interpretations and new models.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. “Ma… e le leggi fonetiche?”. Tradition and originality in the sources of Italian linguistic historiography
  • 3.The influence of the American William Dwight Whitney
  • 4.The use of the metaphor as explanatory method
  • 5.Some concluding observations
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.00028.dov
References (81)
References
Alter, Stephen G. 2005. Whitney and the Science of Language. Baltimore & London: Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
2010. “William Dwight Whitney at the Social Dimension of Lexical Diffusion”. HL 371.321–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andresen, Julie Tetel. 1990. Linguistics in America 1769–1924: A critical history. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Belardi, Walter. 1990[1978]. “Il luogo dell’interferenza linguistica”. Linguistica generale, filologia e critica dell’espressione, 57–68. Roma: Bonacci.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola. 1994. “Linguistica e dialettologia italiana”. Lepschy 1994:525–644.Google Scholar
Bolelli, Tristano. 1965. Per una storia della ricerca linguistica. Testi e note introduttive. Napoli: Morano.Google Scholar
Bologna, Maria Patrizia. 1986. “Whitney in Italia”. Historiographia Linguistica 131.43–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016 [1981]. “Una nota di William Dwight Whitney sull’interferenza linguistica” Bologna 2016.109–121.Google Scholar
. 2016[1997]. Linguistica generale e indianistica: La Science of Language secondo W. D. Whitney. Bologna 2016.95–108.Google Scholar
. 2016. Itinerari ottocenteschi tra linguistica storico-comparativa e linguistica generale. Roma: il Calamo.Google Scholar
Corti, Maria, ed. 1970. “Introduzione”. Terracini 1963.9–31.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold. 1880. Einleitung in das Sprachstudium. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte und Methodik der vergleichenden Sprachforschung. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.Google Scholar
. 1897. “From Berthold Delbrück, Professor of Sanskrit and Comparative Philology, University of Jena, Germany, Member of the Royal Saxon Society of Sciences”. A Report of that Session of the First American Congress of Philologists, which was devoted to the memory of the Late Professor William Dwight Whitney. Appendix I: Original Text of the Letters from Foreign Scholars Concerning Professor Whitney. Lanman: 67–105, in particular, pp. 83–84.Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio, ed. 1970[1967]. Ferdinand de Saussure, Corso di linguistica generale. Introduzione, traduzione e commento. Bari: Editori Laterza.Google Scholar
. 1980. Idee e ricerche linguistiche nella cultura italiana. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
. 1991. “La nascita della Società di Linguistica Italiana”. La linguistica italiana oggi ed. by Alberto Varvaro, 13–29. Roma: Bulzoni (repr. 1998: 37–67; repr. Dovetto 2018: 61–80).Google Scholar
. 1994 [ recte : 1996]. “La scuola linguistica romana”. Le grandi scuole della Facoltà. Atti del Convegno, Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia, 11–12 maggio 1994 ed. by Emanuele Paratore, 173–187. Roma: Università degli Studi ‘La Sapienza’ (repr. De Mauro 1998: 112–133. [This ed. is quoted in this paper.].)Google Scholar
. 1998. Prima persona singolare passato prossimo indicativo, Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
De Palo, Marina. 2016. Saussure e gli strutturalismi. Il soggetto parlante nel pensiero linguistico del Novecento. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Dovetto, Francesca M. 2017a. “Appunti di storiografia linguistica del secondo Ottocento: manuali e metafore. The Life and Growth of Language di William Dwight Whitney”. Ce qui nous est donné, ce sont les langues. Studi linguistici in onore di Maria Pia Marchese ed. by Monica Ballerini, Francesca Murano & Letizia Vezzosi, 251–271. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
. 2017b. “Pisani, le isoglosse e le onde”. L’opera scientifica di Vittore Pisani nel quadro della glottologia indeuropea fra Ottocento e Novecento ed. by Mario Negri, Giovanna Rocca & Marta Muscariello. Ἀλεξάνδρεια Alessandria 111.33–41.Google Scholar
2018. Tullio De Mauro e la Società di Linguistica Italiana: 50 anni di storia della linguistica. Un percorso comune, 61–80. Roma: Bulzoni. [This ed. is quoted in this paper.]Google Scholar
in prep. “Benvenuto Terracini, un linguista attore della diaspora italiana in Argentina”. Atti del Convegno “Leggi razziali (1938): pratiche e testimonianze degli ebrei italiani esiliati / Leyes raciales (1938): prácticas y testimonios de los judíos italianos exiliados (Buenos Aires, 4 de mayo 2018, Muntref-Museo de la Inmigración).
D’Ovidio, Francesco. 1882–1883. [rev.] “Whitney, On mixture in language: extract from transactions of American Philological Association, 1881: p. 26”. La Cultura 31.74–79.Google Scholar
. 1895. “Commemorazione di G. Dwight Whitney”. Rendiconti dell’Accademia dei Lincei, s.V1.128–134.Google Scholar
Elia, Annibale. 1978. Per Saussure, contro Saussure: Il “sociale” nelle teorie linguistiche del Novecento. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Frezza, Giulia & Elena Gagliasso. 2014. “Fare metafore e fare scienza”. Aisthesis 7:2.25–42.Google Scholar
Gabelentz, Georg von der. 1891. Die Sprachwissenschaft, ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig: Weigel.Google Scholar
Gensini, Stefano. 2011. “Darwin e il dibattito linguistico coevo”. Paradigmi. Rivista di critica filosofica 21.47–66.Google Scholar
Godel, Robert. 1957. Les sources manuscrites du Cours de Linguistique générale de F. de Saussure. Genève: Droz & Paris: Minard.Google Scholar
Hombert, Isabelle. 1978. “Whitney: Notes sur une entreprise théorique pré-saussurienne”. Langages 491.112–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1971. “The World Response to Whitney’s Principles of Linguistic Science”. Silverstein 1971: xxv–xlv (French transl., “Les réactions du monde aux principes linguistiques de Whitney”. Essais de linguistique générale 2. Rapports internes et externes du langage, 272–286. Paris: De Minuit, 1973.)Google Scholar
Joseph, John E. 2002. From Whitney to Chomsky: Essays in the history of American linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K. 1973. Ferdinand de Saussure: Origin and Development of his Linguistic Thought on Western Studies of Language. A contribution to the History and Theory of Linguistics. Braunschweig: Vieweg. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1979. “L’importance de William Dwight Whitney pour les jeunes linguistes de Leipzig et pour F. de Saussure”. Studies in Diachronic, Synchronic, and Typological Linguistics: Festschrift for Oswald Szemerényi on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday ed. by Bela Brogyanayi, 437–454. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lanman, Charles R., ed. 1897. The Whitney Memorial Meeting. A Report of That Session of the First American Congress of Philologists, Which Was Devoted to the Memory of the Late Professor William Dwight Whitney, of Yale University; Held at Philadelphia, Dec. 28, 1894. Ed. for the Joint Committees of Publication. Boston: Ginn & Company.Google Scholar
Lazzeroni, Romano. 2015. “Fra filologia e linguistica. Divagazioni sulla conoscenza del vedico nell’Ottocento”. Carmina Indica. Figure dell’India in Occidente dal Settecento a oggi ed. by Luca Clerici, Marcello Meli & Paola Mura, 69–80. Padova: Padova University Press.Google Scholar
Lepschy, Giulio C., ed. 1994. Storia della linguistica. Vol. III1. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Lubello, Sergio. 1998. “Alle origini della filologia romanza in Italia. Dalla scuola tedesca alla scuola italiana attraverso uno dei primi rappresentanti: Francesco D’Ovidio”. Parallela 6. Italiano e tedesco in contatto e a confronto. Atti del VII Incontro italo-austriaco dei linguisti — Italienisch und Deutsch im Kontakt und im Vergleich. Akten des VII Treffens der italienischen und österreichischen Linguisten ed. by Patrizia Cordin, Maria Iliescu & Heidi Siller-Runggaldier, 567–580. Trento: Dipartimento di Scienze Filologiche e Storiche.Google Scholar
. 2009. “La cultura milanese nel carteggio Ascoli D’Ovidio. Graziadio Isaia Ascoli ‘milanese’. Giornate di studio 28 Febbraio — 1 Marzo 2007 ed. by Silvia Morgana & Angela Bianchi Robbiati, 69–84. Milano: LED.Google Scholar
. 2018. “Ascoli, ascoliani e il nuovo paradigma della grammatica storico-comparativa”, La cultura linguistica italiana in confronto con le culture linguistice di altri paesi europei. Atti dall’ottocento in poi Congresso internazionale SLI ed. by Federica Da Milano, Andrea Scala, Massimo Vai & Rita Zama, 271–284. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Mancini, Marco. 2013. “Il paradosso darwiniano: convergenze e divergenze di paradigma”. Sull’origine del linguaggio e delle lingue storico-naturali. Un confronto fra linguisti e non linguisti ed. by Emanuele Banfi, 105–142. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Appunti sulla protostoria dello strutturalismo in Italia”. Le relazioni irresistibili. Scritti in onore di Nunzio La Fauci per il suo sessantesimo compleanno ed. by Ignazio Mauro Mirto, 11–54. Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
. 2018. “Il ‘caso’ Pagliaro tra linguistica, dottrina e politica”. Saussure e la Scuola linguistica romana. Da Antonio Pagliaro a Tullio De Mauro ed. by Marina De Palo & Stefano Gensini, 33–78. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Morpurgo Davies, Anna. 1994. “La linguistica dell’Ottocento”. Lepschy, ed. 1994:11–399. (Repr. 1996. [This ed. is quoted in this paper].Google Scholar
Morresi, Ilaria. 2007. Benvenuto Terracini: Modi e forme della libertà linguistica. Alessandria: Edizioni Dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Mounin, Georges. 1972. La linguistique du XXe siècle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (Italian transl. Milano: Feltrinelli, 1983 [1974]. [This ed. is quoted in this paper.].)Google Scholar
Müller, F[riedrich] Max. 1861. Lectures on the Science of Language Delivered at the Royal Institution of Great Britain in April, May & June 1861. London: Longman (Italian transl. by Gherardo Nerucci. Milano: Daelli, 1864.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, F. Max. 1864. Lectures on the Science of Language Delivered at the Royal Institution of Great Britain in February, March, April & May 1863. London: Longman (Italian transl. by Gherardo Nerucci. Milano: Treves, 1870.)Google Scholar
Nerlich, Brigitte. 1990. Change in Language: Whitney, Bréal, and Wegener. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pagliaro, Antonino. 1930. Sommario di linguistica arioeuropea. Fascicolo I: Cenni storici e questioni teoriche. Roma: L’Universale (Repr., with foreword by Tullio De Mauro. Palermo: Novecento, 1993.) [This ed. is quoted in this paper.]Google Scholar
Paris, Gaston. 1905. Mélanges linguistiques. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1880 [21886, 51920]. Principien der Sprachgeschichte. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Rocher, Rosane. 1979. “The Past Up to the Introduction of Neogrammarian Thought: Whitney and Europe, Background of American Linguistics”. Paper on the Third Golden Anniversary Symposium of the Linguistic Society of America ed. by Henry M. Hoenigswald, 5–22. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Roggenbuck, Simone. 2005. Die Wiederkehr der Bilder: Arboreszenz und Raster in der interdisziplinären Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey. 1980. Schools of Linguistics: Competition and evolution. London-Melbourne-Sydney-Auckland-Johannesburg: Huitchinson (Italian transl., Milano: Mondadori, 1983. [This ed. is quoted in this paper.])Google Scholar
Santamaria, Domenico. 2015. Benvenuto Terracini esegeta di Graziadio Isaia Ascoli. Storiografia e teoria linguistica. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1922 [1916]. Cours de linguistique générale. Ed. by Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye with the assistance of Albert Riedlinger. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Saussure/Engler. 1974. Ferdinand de Saussure, Cours de linguistique générale. Édition critique par Rudolf Engler. Tome 2, fasc. 4. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Johannes. 1872. Die Verwantschaftverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo. 1900. Über die Klassification der romanischen Mundarten. Probe-Vorlesung gehalten zu Leipzig am 30. April 1870. Graz: Universitäts-Buchdruckerei “Styria”.Google Scholar
Segre, Cesare. 1986. “Benvenuto Terracini e la linguistica del Novecento”. The History of Linguistics in Italy ed. by Paolo Ramat & Hans-Joseph Niederehe & Konrad Koerner, 259–276. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sériot, Patrick. 1999. Structure et totalit:. Les origines intellectuelles du structuralisme en Europe centrale et orientale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France (Re-ed., Limoges: Lambert-Lucas, 2012. [This ed. is quoted in this paper].)Google Scholar
Seymour, Thomas Day. 1966. “William Dwight Whitney”. Portraits of Linguists: A biographical source book for the history of western linguistics, 1746–1963 ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, 399–439. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1971. Whitney on Language. Selected Writings of William Dwight Whitney. Introductory Essay by Roman Jakobson. Cambridge, Mass. & London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tagliavini, Carlo. 1936. Introduzione alla glottologia. Vol. I1. Lingua e linguaggio — Storia ed evoluzione della linguistica — Le lingue e i problemi della classificazione — Premesse psicologiche. Bologna: Pàtron. (7th ed., 1969. [This ed. is quoted in this paper.].)Google Scholar
Tani, Ilaria. 2013. “Confini e mescolanze delle lingue. Schuchardt e il problema della classificazione in linguistica”. Blityri 21.95–113.Google Scholar
Terracini, Benvenuto. 1949. “Le origini della linguistica generale: Whitney”. Guida allo studio della linguistica storica. I. Profilo storico-critico, 73–121. Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo. [“W. D. Whitney y la linguística general”. Revista de Filología Hispánica 51.105–147 (1943.].Google Scholar
. 1963. Lingua libera e libertà linguistica. Introduzione alla linguistica storica 2nd ed. with an introduction by Maria Corti. Torino: Einaudi, 1970. [This ed. is quoted in this paper.]Google Scholar
. 1996. Conflitti di lingue e di cultura. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Timpanaro, Sebastiano. 1979. “Giacomo Lignana e i rapporti tra filologia, filosofia, linguistica e darwinismo nell’Italia del secondo Ottocento”. Critica storica. 151.406–503 (Repr., Sulla linguistica dell’Ottocento, 105–223. Bologna: il Mulino, 2005. [This ed. is quoted in this paper.].)Google Scholar
Venier, Federica. 2017. Appunti di viaggio. Percorsi linguistici, fra storia, filologia e retorica. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1953. Languages in Contact. Findings and Problems. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York, (Italian transl. by Giorgio R. Cardona. Torino: Boringhieri, 1974; new ed. by Vincenzo Orioles. Torino: UTET, 2008. [This ed. is quoted in this paper.]).Google Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight. 1867. Language and the Study of Language: Twelve Lectures on the Principles of Linguistic Science. New York: Scribner (2nd ed. augmented by an analysis. London: Trübner, 1868.)Google Scholar
. 1871. “Schleicher and the Physical Theory of Language”. Transactions of the American Philological Association 21.35–64 (repr. Oriental and Linguistic Studies. First Series. The Veda; the Avesta; the Science of Language, 298–331. New York: Scribner’s Sons).Google Scholar
. 1875a. The Life and Growth of Language: An Outline of Linguistic Science. New York: Appleton (Fr.transl. Paris: Libraire Germer Ballière, 1875. Germ.transl. by August Leskien. Leipzig: Brockhaus, 1876. It.transl. by Francesco D’Ovidio. Milano: Dumolard, 1876; repr. with presentation by Luigi Rosiello, introduction and comment of Giuseppe Carlo Vincenzi. Milano: Rizzoli, 1990 [This ed. is quoted in this paper.]).Google Scholar
. 1875b. “Are Languages Institutions?”. Contemporary Review 251.713–732.Google Scholar
. 1879. A Sanskrit Grammar, Including Both the Classical Language, and the Older Dialects, of Veda and Brāhmaṇa. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel (2.nd ed. 1889).Google Scholar
. 1880. “Logical Consistency in Views of Language”. Americal Journal of Philology 11.327–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1881. “On Mixture in Language”. Transactions of the American Philological Association 121:5–26 (repr. Silverstein 1971:170–191). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1885. “Philology. Part I: Science of Language in General”. Encyclopaedia Britannica. 9 ed., vol.XVIII1, 765–780. Edinburgh: Adam & Charles Black.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Covino, Sandra
2023. Francesco D’Ovidio tra Ascoli e Schuchardt: dalle reazioni etniche alla Sprachmischung . Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 139:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Dovetto, Francesca M.
2022. Geometric Metaphors and Linguistic Genealogy. In Imagine Math 8, ► pp. 425 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.