Article published in:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 46:3 (2019) ► pp. 73130
References

References

Anderson, Stephen R.
1985Phonology in the Twentieth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, and Carol Padden
2011 “Sign Language Verb Agreement and the Ontology of Morphosyntactic Categories”. Theoretical Linguistics 37.143–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aurora, Simone
2017 “From Structure to Machine: Deleuze and Guattari’s Philosophy of Linguistics”. Deleuze Studies 11.405–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bach, Emmon
1996 “The Politics of Universal Grammar”. LSA Presidential Address held on January 6th 1996.Google Scholar
Benítez-Burraco, Antonio & Victor Longa
2010 “Evo-Devo — of Course, but Which One? Some Comments on Chomsky’s Analogies between the Biolinguistic Approach and Evo-Devo”. Biolinguistics 4.308–23.Google Scholar
Berreby, David
1994 “The Linguistics Wars”. The Sciences 34.44–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa
ed. 2008The Limits of Syntactic Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Bernard
1946 “Notes”. Language 22.267.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz
1911/1963Introduction to the Handbook of American Indian Languages. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan
2015 “Suppletion: Some Theoretical Implications”. Annual Review of Linguistics 1.1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borsley, Robert D.
1991Syntacic Theory: A Unified Approach. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Botha, Rudolf
1992Challenging Chomsky: The Generative Garden Game. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
2009 “Language Universals and Usage-Based Theory”. Language Universals ed. by M. H. Christiansen, C. Collins & S. Edelman, 17–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Gregory, Brian Joseph, and Sarah G. Thomason
Carroll, John B.
1953The Study of Language. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chao, Yuen-Ren
1934 “The Nonuniqueness of Phonemic Solutions of Phonetic Systems”. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 4, part 4.363–97. (Repr. in Readings in Linguistics ed. by M. Joos, 38–54. New York: American Council of Learned Societies 1957.)Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1957Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1962a “Explanatory Models in Linguistics”. Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science ed. by E. Nagel, P. Suppes & A. Tarski, 528–50. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1962b “A Transformational Approach to Syntax”. Proceedings of the Third Texas Conference on Problems of Linguistic Analysis in English ed. by A. Hill, 124–58. Austin: University of Texas Press. (Repr. in The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language ed. by J. A. Fodor & J. J. Katz, 211–243. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall 1964.)Google Scholar
1964 “The Logical Basis of Linguistic Theory”. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists, ed. by H. G. Lunt, 914–77. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1986Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
2007a “Biolinguistic Explorations”. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15.1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007b “Of Minds and Language”. Biolinguistics 1.9–27.Google Scholar
2008 “On Phases”. Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud ed. by R. Freidin, C. P. Otero & M.-L. Zubizarreta, 133–66. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “Minimal Recursion: Exploring the Prospects”. Recursion: Complexity in Cognition ed. by T. Roeper & M. Speas, 1–15. Basel: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle
1965 “Some Controversial Questions in Phonological Theory”. Journal of Linguistics 1.97–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1968The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Luigi Rizzi
2010 “The Cartography of Syntactic Structures”. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis ed. by B. Heine & H. Narrog, 51–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter & Gabi Hermon
2015 “Grammar of Binding in the Languages of the World: Innate or Learned?”. Cognition 141.138–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
2001 “Theories of Universal Grammar in the Late 20th Century”. History of the Language Sciences: An International Handbook on the Evolution of the Study of Language from the Beginnings to the Present, Vol. 2 ed. by S. Auroux, E. F. K. Koerner, H.-J. Niederehe & K. Versteegh, 1461–1467. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cook, Vivian J.
2011 “Linguistic Relativity and Language Teaching”. Language and Bilingual Cognition ed. by V. J. Cook & B. Bassetti. Abingdon: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2000 “Parts of Speech as Language Universals and as Language-Particular Categories”. Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes ed. by P. M. Vogel & B. Comrie, 65–102. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Typology and Universals: Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2017 “Typology and Universals”. The Blackwell Handbook of Linguistics, 2nd Edition ed. by M. Aronoff & J. Rees-Miller, 39–55. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diller, Karl
1971Generative Grammar, Structural Linguistics, and Language Teaching. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
1978The Language Teaching Controversy. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Falk, Julia S.
2004 “Saussure and American Linguistics”. The Cambridge Companion to Saussure ed. by C. Sanders, 107–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A.
1978 “Historical Background of Universals Research”. Universals of Human Language. Vol. 1: Method and Theory ed. by J. H. Greenberg, 7–32. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gass, Susan & Josh Ard
1980 “L2 Data: Their Relevance for Language Universals”. TESOL Quarterly 14.443–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, Henry A.
1988Theories in Conflict: North American Linguistics in the Fifties and Sixties. Unpublished ms, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Godel, Robert
ed. 1969A Geneva School Reader in Linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Graves, Mortimer
1950A Neglected Facet of the National Security Problem. Washington: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
1951 “Comments in the Session Entitled ‘Meeting the Government’s Need in Languages’”. Report on the Second Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Teaching ed. by J. De Francis, 1. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1975 “Research on Language Universals”. Annual Review of Anthropology 4.75–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hakuta, Kenji
1986Mirror of Language: The Debate on Bilingualism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hall, Robert A.
1951–1952 “American Linguistics, 1925–1950”. Archivum Linguisticum 3–4.101–25, 1–16.Google Scholar
1987 “Review of C. Hockett, The State of the Art ”. Linguistics and Pseudo-Linguistics ed. by R. A. Hall, 58–79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990 “A Further Note on the Joos Notes”. Historiographia Linguistica 17.231–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991 “165 Broadway”. Historiographia Linguistica 18.153–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris
1959The Sound Pattern of Russian. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hamp, Eric
1961 “General Linguistics — the United States in the Fifties”. Trends in European and American Linguistics, 1930–1960 ed. by C. Mohrmann, A. Sommerfelt & J. Whatmough, 165–95. Utrecht: Spectrum.Google Scholar
1966 “Preface”. Readings in Linguistics II ed. by E. Hamp, F. W. Householder & R. Austerlitz, v–vii. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1995a “Foreword”. Readings in Linguistics I and II: Abridged Edition ed. by E. Hamp, F. W. Householder & R. Austerlitz, v–viii. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1995b “Preface to Volume 2 of Readings in Linguistics ”. Readings in Linguistics I and II: Abridged Edition ed. by E. Hamp, F. W. Householder & R. Austerlitz, xi–xii. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hamp, Eric, Fred W. Householder & Robert Austerlitz
eds. 1966Readings in Linguistics II. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
eds. 1995Readings in Linguistics I and II: Abridged Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Randy A.
1993The Linguistics Wars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig S.
1951Methods in Structural Linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1957 “Co-occurrence and Transformation in Linguistic Structure”. Language 33.283–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, Einar
1951 “Directions in Modern Linguistics”. Language 27.211–22. (Repr. in Readings in Lingistics ed. by M. Joos, 357–63. New York: American Council of Learned Societies 1957.)Google Scholar
Hill, Archibald A.
ed. 1962Proceedings of the Second Texas Conference on Problems of Linguistic Analysis in English. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1964 “History of the Linguistic Institute”. ACLS Newsletter 15.1–12.Google Scholar
1979 “Obituary: Martin Joos”. Language 55.665–69.Google Scholar
1991 “The Linguistic Society of America and North American Linguistics, 1950–1968”. Historiographia Linguistica 18.49–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F.
1943 “A System of Descriptive Phonology”. Language 18.3–21. (Repr. in Readings in Linguistics ed. by M. Joos, 97–108. New York: American Council of Learned Societies 1957.)Google Scholar
1980 “Preserving the Heritage”. First Person Singular: Papers from the Conference on an Oral Archive for the History of American Linguistics ed. by B. Davis & R. O’cain, 99–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell
1958 “Review of M. Joos (ed.), Readings in Linguistics ”. American Anthropologist 60.416–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
ed. 1964Language in Culture and Society: A Reader in Linguistics and Anthropology. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell & John Fought
1975 “American Structuralism”. Current Trends in Linguistics, Vol. 13: Historiography of Linguistics ed. by T. A. Sebeok, 903–1176. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1981American Structuralism. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1925Mankind, Nation and Individual from a Linguistic Point of View. Oslo: H Aschehoug.Google Scholar
Joos, Martin
1948Acoustic Phonetics [= Language Monograph 23, Supplement to Language 24: 2]. Baltimore: Waverly Press.Google Scholar
1950 “Description of Language Design”. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 22.701–08. (Repr. in Readings in Linguistics ed. by M. Joos, 349–356. New York: American Council of Learned Societies 1957.)Google Scholar
1957a “Preface”. Readings in Linguistics: The Development of Descriptive Linguistics in America since 1925 ed. by M. Joos, v–vii. New York: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
ed. 1957bReadings in Linguistics: The Development of Descriptive Linguistics in America since 1925. New York: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
1958 “Preface”. Readings in Linguistics, Second Edition ed. by M. Joos, v–vii. New York: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
1961 “Linguistic Prospects in the United States”. Trends in European and American Linguistics, 1930–1960 ed. by C. Mohrmann, A. Sommerfelt & J. Whatmough, 11–20. Utrecht: Spectrum.Google Scholar
1962The Five Clocks. Bloomington: Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology.Google Scholar
1964The English Verb: Form and meanings. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
1966a “Preface”. Readings in Linguistics I: The Development of Descriptive Linguistics in America 1925–1956 ed. by M. Joos, v–viii. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
ed. 1966bReadings in Linguistics I: The Development of Descriptive Linguistics in America 1925–56, Fourth Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1972 “Semantic Axiom Number One”. Language 48.257–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1986Notes on the Development of the Linguistic Society of America 1924 to 1950. Ithaca: Privately printed by J. M. Cowan and C. Hockett.Google Scholar
Joos, Martin & F. R. Whitesell
1951Middle High German Courtly Reader. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J.
1981Language and Other Abstract Objects. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Koerner, Ernst F. K.
2002 “American Structuralist Linguistics and the ‘Problem of Meaning’”. Toward a History of American Linguistics ed. by E. F. K. Koerner, 75–104. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert
In press. “Mid-Century American Phonology: The Post-Bloomfieldians”. Oxford Handbook of the History of Phonology ed. by B. E. Dresher & H. Van Der Hulst Oxford Oxford University Press
Lehmann, Christian
2004 “Documentation of Grammar”. Lectures on Endangered Languages 4.61–74.Google Scholar
2010 “Roots, Stems and Word Classes”. Parts of Speech: Empirical and Theoretical Advances ed. by U. Ansaldo, J. Don & R. Pfau, 43–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lightner, Theodore
1968 “Review of M. Joos (ed.), Readings in Linguistics, 4th Edition”. General Linguistics 8.44–61.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Bjorn
1990 “Models of Phonetic Variation and Selection”. Phonetic Experimental Research, Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm 11.65–100.Google Scholar
MacQueen, John
1957 “Review of M. Joos (Ed.), Readings in Linguistics ”. Quarterly Journal of Speech 43.324.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter H.
1993Grammatical Theory in the United States from Bloomfield to Chomsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCawley, James D.
1974 “Interview Conducted by Herman Parret”. Discussing Language: Dialogues with Wallace L. Chafe, Noam Chomsky, Algirdas J. Greimas [and Others] ed. by H. Parret, 249–77. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
McQuown, Norman A.
1952 “Review of Z. Harris, Methods in Structural Linguistics ”. Language 28.495–504. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mencken, Henry L.
1948The American Language: An Inquiry into the Development of English in the United States; Supplement II. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Moore, Terence & Christine Carling
1982Language Understanding: Towards a Post-Chomskyan Linguistics. New York: St. Martin’s Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moulton, William G.
1961 “Linguistics and Language Teaching in the United States 1940–1960”. Trends in European and American Linguistics, 1930–1960 ed. by C. Mohrmann, A. Sommerfelt & J. Whatmough, 82–109. Utrecht: Spectrum.Google Scholar
Murray, Stephen O.
1980 “Gatekeepers and the ‘Chomskyan Revolution’”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 16.73–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1983Group Formation in Social Science. Edmonton: Linguistic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
1994Theory Groups and the Study of Language in North America: A Social History. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1980Linguistic Theory in America. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1986 “Has There Been a ‘Chomskyan Revolution’ in Linguistics?”. Language 62.1–19. (Repr. in Generative Linguistics: A historical perspective, 23–38. London: Routledge 1996.)Google Scholar
2005Possible and Probable Languages: A Generative Perspective on Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
In preparation. “Crisis in the LSA: The Contested Presidential Election of 1970”.
Parker, William R.
1954The National Interest and Foreign Languages. Washington: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara
1971 “On the Requirement That Transformations Preserve Meaning”. Studies in Linguistic Semantics ed. by C. J. Fillmore & D. T. Langendoen, 1–21. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Pei, Mario
1967 “Review of M. Joos, Readings in Linguistics, Volume I (4th edition) and Eric Hamp, Fred Householder & Robrt Austerlitz, Readings in Linguistics, Volume II ”. Modern Language Journal 51.312–314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L.
1947a “Grammatical Prerequisites to phonemic analysis”. Word 3.155–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1947bPhonemics: A technique for reducing Languages to Writing. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
1958 “Discussion”. Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Linguists. Oslo: Oslo University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven
1994The Language Instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: Morrow. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K.
2017 “Theory, Data, and the Epistemology of Syntax”. Grammatische Variation: Empirische Zugänge und theoretische Modellierung ed. by M. Konopka & A. Wöllstein, 283–298. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Read, Allen W.
1991 “A Personal Journey through Linguistics”. First Person Singular II ed. by E. F. K. Koerner, 273–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reibel, David & Sanford Schane
eds. 1969Modern Studies in English. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Ritchie, William C. & Tej K. Bhatia
eds. 1996Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rusiecki, Jan
1976 “The Development of Contrastive Linguistics”. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin 1.12–44.Google Scholar
Samarin, William J.
1998 “C’est passionant d’être passionné”. First Person Singular III: Autobiographies by North American Scholars in the Language Sciences ed. by E. F. K. Koerner, 187–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey
1975The Form of Language. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
1979 “A Non-Nativist Account of Language Universals”. Linguistics and Philosophy 3.99–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1980Schools of Linguistics. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1997Educating Eve: The language instinct debate. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1925 “Sound Patterns in Language”. Language 1.37–51. (Repr. in Readings in Linguistics ed. by Martin Joos, 19–25. New York: American Council of Learned Societies 1957.)Google Scholar
1926 “Review of O. Jespersen, Mankind, Nation and Individual from a Linguistic Point of View ”. American Review of Sociology 32.488–99. (Repr. in The Collected Works of Edward Sapir I, 203. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter 2008.)Google Scholar
Smith, Neil
1989The Twitter Machine: Reflections on Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1999Chomsky: Ideas and Ideals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stankiewicz, Edward
1966 “Slavic Morphophonemics in Its Typological and Diachronic Aspect”. Current Trends in Linguistics, Vol.3: Theoretical Foundations ed. by T. A. Sebeok, 495–520. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Teeter, Karl V.
1963 “Lexicostatistics and Genetic Relationship”. Language 39.638–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1964 “Descriptive Linguistics in America: Triviality vs. Irrelevance”. Word 20.197–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Margaret
2002 “Roger Bacon and Martin Joos: Generative Linguistics’ Reading of the Past”. Historiographia Linguistica 29.339–378. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trager, George L.
1946 “Changes of Emphasis in Linguistics: A Comment”. Studies in Philology 48.461–64.Google Scholar
1950 “Review of K. Pike, Phonemics: A technique for reducing languages to writing ”. Language 26.152–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1958 “Review of M. Joos (ed.), Readings in Linguistics ”. Studies in Linguistics 13.34–36.Google Scholar
Trager, George L. & Henry Lee Smith
1951An Outline of English Structure. Norman, Oklahoma: Battenburg Press.Google Scholar
Uhlenbeck, Eugenius M.
1959 “Review of M. Joos (ed.), Readings in Linguistics ”. Lingua 8.327–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1963 “An Appraisal of Transformation Theory”. Lingua 12.1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1979 “Linguistics in America 1924–1974: A detached view”. The European Background of American Linguistics: Papers of the Third Golden Anniversary Symposium of the Linguistic Society of America ed. by Henry M. Hoenigswald, 121–145. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vachek, Josef
ed. 1964A Prague School Reader in Linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D.
2007 “Some Thoughts on the Reason for the Lesser Status of Typology in the USA as Opposed to Europe”. Linguistic Typology 11.253–57.Google Scholar
Voegelin, Charles F.
1954 “The ACLS Language Program”. International Journal of American Linguistics 20.70–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1958 “Review of M. Joos (ed.), Readings in Linguistics ”. International Journal of American Linguistics 24.86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Voegelin, Charles F. & Florence M. Voegelin
1963 “On the History of Structuralizing in 20th Century America”. Anthropological Linguistics 5.12–35.Google Scholar
Wardhaugh, Ronald
1970 “The Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis”. TESOL Quarterly 4.123–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whitehall, Harold
1951Structural Essentials of English. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin L.
1952Collected Papers on Metalinguistics. Washington: Foreign Service Institute.Google Scholar
1956Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
2012 “Understanding Others Requires Shared Concepts”. Pragmatics and Cognition 20.356–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yallop, Colin L.
1978 “The Problem of Linguistic Universals”. Philosophia Reformata 43.61–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Newmeyer, Frederick
2021. A post-Bloomfieldian’s last stand: Charles Hockett’s attempt to resign from the LSA in 1982. Language & History 64:1  pp. 44 ff. Crossref logo
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2020. Crisis in the Linguistic Society of America. Historiographia Linguistica 47:1  pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.