Cover not available
Review published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 46:3 (2019) ► pp.182–191
Book review

The Historiography of Generative Linguistics. By András Kertész

Reviewed by
| University of Washington | University of British Columbia | Simon Fraser University
Published online: 17 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.00058.new
References
Chomsky, Noam
1957 Syntactic Structures. Janua Linguarum Series Minor, 4. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Studies in Generative Grammar, 9. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam and Morris Halle
1968 Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Kertész, András and Csilla Rákosi
2012 Data and Evidence in Linguistics: A Plausible Argumentation Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K.
1989 “The Chomskyan ‘revolution’ and its historiography: Observations of a bystander”. Practicing Linguistic Historiography: Selected Essays ed. by E. F. K. Koerner, 101–146. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 “Historiography of Linguistics”. Concise History of the Language Sciences: From the Sumerians to the Cognitivists ed. by E. F. K. Koerner and R. E. Asher, 7–16. Cambridge: Pergamon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 “The Chomskyan Revolution and its Historiography”. Toward a History of American Linguistics ed. by E. F. K. Koerner, 151–209. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “The development of Linguistic Historiography — History, Methodology, and Present State”. History of the Language Sciences: An International Handbook on the Evolution of the Study of Language from the Beginnings to the Present ed. by Sylvain Auroux, E. F. K. Koerner, Hans-Josef Niederehe, and Kees Versteegh, 2802–2820. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S.
1970 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin T.
1989 “The Way we Were: Or, the Real Actual Truth about Generative Semantics: A Memoir”. Journal of Pragmatics 131.939–988. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laudan, Larry
1977 Progress and its Problems: Toward a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Stephen O.
1982 “Review of F. Newmeyer, Linguistic Theory in America ”. Historiographia Linguistica 81.107–112.Google Scholar
1989 “Recent studies of American linguistics”. Historiographia Linguistica 161.149–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1986a The Politics of Linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1986b “Has there been a ‘Chomskyan Revolution’ in Linguistics?”. Language 621.1–19. (Reprinted in Generative Linguistics: A Historical Perspective ed. by F. Newmeyer 1996, pp. 1923–1938. London: Routledge.).Google Scholar
Post, Emil
1944 “Recursively enumerable sets of positive integers and their decision problems”. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 501.284–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ten Hacken, Pius
2007 Chomskyan Linguistics and its Competitors. London: Oakville: Equinox.Google Scholar