Review published in:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 46:3 (2019) ► pp. 182191
References

References

Chomsky, Noam
1957Syntactic Structures. Janua Linguarum Series Minor, 4. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1965Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1981Lectures on Government and Binding. Studies in Generative Grammar, 9. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam and Morris Halle
1968Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Kertész, András and Csilla Rákosi
2012Data and Evidence in Linguistics: A Plausible Argumentation Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K.
1989 “The Chomskyan ‘revolution’ and its historiography: Observations of a bystander”. Practicing Linguistic Historiography: Selected Essays ed. by E. F. K. Koerner, 101–146. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995 “Historiography of Linguistics”. Concise History of the Language Sciences: From the Sumerians to the Cognitivists ed. by E. F. K. Koerner and R. E. Asher, 7–16. Cambridge: Pergamon. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 “The Chomskyan Revolution and its Historiography”. Toward a History of American Linguistics ed. by E. F. K. Koerner, 151–209. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “The development of Linguistic Historiography — History, Methodology, and Present State”. History of the Language Sciences: An International Handbook on the Evolution of the Study of Language from the Beginnings to the Present ed. by Sylvain Auroux, E. F. K. Koerner, Hans-Josef Niederehe, and Kees Versteegh, 2802–2820. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S.
1970The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin T.
1989 “The Way we Were: Or, the Real Actual Truth about Generative Semantics: A Memoir”. Journal of Pragmatics 13.939–988. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laudan, Larry
1977Progress and its Problems: Toward a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Stephen O.
1982 “Review of F. Newmeyer, Linguistic Theory in America ”. Historiographia Linguistica 8.107–112.Google Scholar
1989 “Recent studies of American linguistics”. Historiographia Linguistica 16.149–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1986aThe Politics of Linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1986b “Has there been a ‘Chomskyan Revolution’ in Linguistics?”. Language 62.1–19. (Reprinted in Generative Linguistics: A Historical Perspective ed. by F. Newmeyer 1996, pp. 1923–1938. London: Routledge.).Google Scholar
Post, Emil
1944 “Recursively enumerable sets of positive integers and their decision problems”. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 50.284–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ten Hacken, Pius
2007Chomskyan Linguistics and its Competitors. London: Oakville: Equinox.Google Scholar