Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 47:2/3 (2020) ► pp.231–249

L. V. Ščerba’s conception of language

| University of Glasgow

This contribution offers an introduction to an essay by the Russian linguist Lev Vladimirovič Ščerba (1880–1944), “О трояком аспекте языковых явлений и об эксперименте в языкознании” (“The threefold aspect of linguistic phenomena and experiment in linguistics”), which was first published in 1931. This introduction is followed by an annotated translation of Ščerba’s essay, proposed here for the first time to an English-speaking readership (Read the English translation at ).

The critical introduction provides the backstory behind Ščerba’s conception of language as a means of helping the reader to understand the connectedness of the various strands of his linguistic research. As is shown in our introduction, Ščerba’s general distinction between linguistic raw material, the linguistic system and individual speech activity (the “threefold aspect” alluded to in the title of his essay) serves as a framework to conceptualise metalinguistic practice and the relation of the social dimension of language to its individual embodiment. An examination of the explanatory potential of Ščerba’s conception of language for general linguistic problems suggests that his achievements lay in formulating a cohesive account of the interconnectedness of language phenomena, identifying the linguistic means with which to understand the social nature of language, and providing a theoretical basis for addressing the practical tasks of linguistics.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Baudouin de Courtenay and the St. Petersburg school of linguistics
  • 3.Dialectological studies and European linguistics
  • 4.Ontological paradigms in linguistic research at the time of Ščerba’s writing
  • 5.Interlude
  • 6.Ščerba’s conception of language
  • 7.Concluding remarks
  • Translation
  • Notes to the text
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 March 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.00074.cam
References
Brandist, Craig
2006 “The Rise of Soviet Sociolinguistics from the Ashes of Völkerpsychologie ”. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences 42:3. 261–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm
2010 Selected Works: Understanding the Human World ed. by Rudolf A. Makkreel & Frithjof Rodi. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gilliéron, Jules
1902–10 Atlas linguistique de la France. (Nine1 volumes.) Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1971 “The Kazan’s School of Polish Linguistics and its Place in the International Development of Phonology”. Selected Writings, vol. II: Word and Language, 394–428. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Koerner, Konrad
1991 “Toward a History of Modern Sociolinguistics”. American Speech 66:1.57–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, William K.
1948 “The Japhetic Theory”. The Slavonic and East European Review 27:68.172–192.Google Scholar
Muller, Henri F.
1937 “Antoine Meillet, 1866–1936.” Romanic Review 28:1.63–66.Google Scholar
Nerlich, Brigitte & David Clarke
1998 “The Linguistic Repudiation of Wundt.” History of Psychology 1:3.179–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1921 Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1959 Course in General Linguistics. English translation by Wade Baskin. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Ščerba, Lev V.
1957 [1904] “O služebnom i samostojatel’nom značenii grammatiki kak učebnogo predmeta” [Ancillary and independent status of grammar as a school subject]. Izbrannye raboty po russkomu jazyku ed. by Margarita I. Matusevič, 11–20. Moskva: Izd. “Učpedgiz”.Google Scholar
1912 “Russkie glasnye v kačestvennom i količestvennom otnošenii” [Russian vowels in qualitative and quantitative respects]. Zapiski Istoriko-Filologičeskogo Fakul’teta Imperatorskago S. Petersburgskago Universiteta, Čast’ CVII [Notes of the Historical-Philological Faculty of the Imperial St. Petersburg University, Part 107] St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
1915 “Vostočno-lužickoe narečije” [East-Lusatian Dialect]. Dissertation. Part I, Vol. CXXVIII1. Petrograd: Istoriko-filologičeskij fakul’tet Petrogradskogo Universiteta 11.113–129.Google Scholar
1957 [1929] “I. A. Boduène de Kurtenè i ego značenie v nauke o jazyke” [I. A. Baudouin de Courtenay and his place in language sciences]. Izbrannye raboty po russkomu jazyku ed. by Margarita Matusevič, 85–96. Moskva: Izd. “Učpedgiz”.Google Scholar
1974 [1930] “I. A. Boduène de Kurtenè. Nekrolog” [I. A. Baudouin de Courtenay. In memoriam]. Jazykovaja sistema i rečevaja dejatel’nost’ ed. by Zinder, Lev R. & Margarita I. Matusevič, 381–394. Leningrad: Izd. “Nauka”.Google Scholar
1974 [1931] “O trojakom aspekte jazykovyx javlenij i ob eksperimente v jazykoznanii” [The threefold aspect of linguistic phenomena and experiment in linguistics]. Jazykovaja sistema i rečevaja dejatel’nost’ ed. by Zinder, Lev R. & Margarita I. Matusevič, 24–39. Leningrad: Izd. “Nauka”.Google Scholar
1974 [1947] Prepodavanie inostrannyx jazykov v srednej škole: Obščije voprosy metodiki [Teaching foreign languages in secondary schools: General matters of teaching methodology] ed. by Raxmanov, Igor V. 2nd edition. Moskva: Izd. “Vysšaja Škola”.Google Scholar
1974 [1966] “Pamjati A. Meje” [In memory of A. Meillet]. Jazykovaja sistema i rečevaja dejatel’nost’ ed. by Zinder, Lev R. & Margarita I. Matusevič, 405–412. Leningrad: Izd. “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Stankiewicz, Edward
1972 A Baudouin de Courtenay Anthology: The beginnings of structural linguistics. Bloomington (Indiana): Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Vinogradov, Viktor V.
1951 “Obščelingvističeskie i grammatičeskie vzgljady akademika L. V. Ščerby”. [Views of academician L. V. Ščerba on general linguistics and grammar] in Pamjati akademika L’va Vladimiroviča Ščerby (1880–1944): Sbornik statej ed. by Boris A. Larin, Lev R. Zinder & Margarita I. Matusevič, 31–62. Leningrad: Leningrad State University Press.Google Scholar