Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 47:2/3 (2020) ► pp.266302
References (124)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2007. “Linguistic Fieldwork: Setting the scene”. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 60:1.3–11.Google Scholar
Andresen, Julie Tetel. 1990. Linguistics in America 1769–1924: A Critical History. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Austin, Peter K. 2006. “Data and Language Documentation”. In Gippert, Himmelmann & Mosel, 87–112.Google Scholar
Berman, Judith. 1994. “George Hunt and the Kwak’wala Texts”. Anthropological Linguistics 36:4.482–515.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1917. “Tagalog Texts with Grammatical Analysis”. University of Illinois Studies in Language and Literature 31:2–41.157–566. Champaign, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
. 1944. “Preface”. Linguistic Structures of Native America ed. by Harry Hoijer, 5. New York: Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology No. 6.Google Scholar
Boas, Frans. 1966. “Introduction”. Handbook of American Indian Languages, Part 1 ed. by Preston Holder, 1–79. Lincoln, Neb.: University of Nebraska Press. [Originally published by Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, 1911.]Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1917. “Introductory”. International Journal of American Linguistics 1:1.1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bochnak, M. Ryan & Lisa Matthewson, eds. 2015. Methodologies in Semantic Fieldwork. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borchgrevink, Axel. 2003. “Silencing Language: Of anthropologists and interpreters”. Ethnography 4:1.95–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouquiaux, Luc & Jacqueline M. C. Thomas. 1992. Studying and Describing Unwritten Languages trans. by James Thomas. Dallas, Texas: Summer Institute of Linguistics. [Originally published as Enquête et description des langues à tradition orale. Paris: Société d’Études Linguistiques et Anthropologiques de France, 1st ed., 1971; 2nd ed., 1976.]Google Scholar
Bowern, Claire. 2008. Linguistic Fieldwork: A practical guide. New York: Palgrave Macmillian. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bulletin of the Linguistic Society of America. 1940. No. 13.Google Scholar
. 1946. No. 19.Google Scholar
. 1947. No. 20.Google Scholar
Burling, Robbins. 1984. Learning a Field Language. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press. (2nd ed. Prospect Heights, Ill.: Waveland Press, 2000.)Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah, Elizabeth Frazer, Penelope Harvey, M. B. H. Rampton & Kay Richardson. 1992. “Introduction”. Researching Language: Issues of power and method ed. by Deborah Cameron, Elizabeth Frazer, Penelope Harvey, M. B. H. Rampton & Kay Richardson, 1–28. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chelliah, Shobhana L. 2001. “The Role of Text Collection and Elicitation in Linguistic Fieldwork”. In Newman & Ratliff 2001a, 152–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chelliah, Shobhana L. & Willem J. de Reuse, eds. 2011. Handbook of Descriptive Linguistic Fieldwork. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1966. “The Current Scene in Linguistics: Present directions”. College English 27:8.587–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chronology of the Life and Work of KL Pike. 2019. Posted on the website of SIL International. Accessed 6 October 2019 at [URL]
Cowan, George. 1975. “The Monolingual Approach to Studying Amuzgo”. Language Learner’s Field Guide ed. by Alan Healey, 272–276. Ukarumpa, Papua New Guinea: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Crowley, Terry. 2007. Field Linguistics: A beginner’s guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Czaykowska-Higgins, Ewa. 2009. “Research Models, Community Engagement, and Linguistic Fieldwork: Reflections on working within Canadian indigenous communities”. Language Documentation and Conservation 3:1.15–50.Google Scholar
Dallas International University. 2019. “Language Learning Demonstration Promo”. Dallas, Texas: Dallas International University. Video accessed 6 October 2019 at [URL]
Darnell, Regna. 1990. “Franz Boas, Edward Sapir, and the Americanist Text Tradition”. Historiographia Linguistica 17:1/2.129–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. And Along Came Boas: Continuity and revolution in Americanist anthropology (= Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science, 86). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Debenport, Erin. 2010. “The Potential Complexity of ‘Universal Ownership’: Cultural property, textual circulation, and linguistic fieldwork”. Language and Communication 301.204–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2016. “Fieldwork Elicitation Showcase (Parts 1–3)”. Video filmed 27 November 2016. Eugene, Ore.: University of Oregon. Accessed 6 October 2019 at [URL]
Dixon, R[obert] M[alcolm] W[ard]. 2007. “Field Linguistics: A minor manual”. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 60:1.12–31.Google Scholar
Dobrin, Lise M. 2008. “From Linguistic Elicitation to Eliciting the Linguist: Lessons in community empowerment from Melanesia”. Language 84:2.300–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
, ed. 2009. “SIL International and the Disciplinary Culture of Linguistics”. Language 85:3.618–658. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobrin, Lise M. & Saul Schwartz. 2016. “Collaboration or Participant Observation? Rethinking Models of ‘Linguistic Social Work’”. Language Documentation and Conservation 101.253–277.Google Scholar
Dobrushina, Nina & Michael Daniel. 2018. “Field Linguistics in Daghestan: A very personal account”. In Sarvasy & Forker, 79–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, Arienne M. 2006. “Ethics and Practicalities of Cooperative Fieldwork”. In Gippert, Himmelmann & Mosel, 31–66.Google Scholar
Escalante, Fernando. 1990. “Setting the Record Straight on Yaqui Passives”. International Journal of American Linguistics 56:2.289–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Everett, Daniel L. 1983. A Língua Pirahã e a Teoria da Sintaxe: Descrição, perspectivas e theoria. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.]Google Scholar
2001. “Monolingual Field Research”. In Newman & Ratliff 2001a, 166–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. “Monolingual Fieldwork”. Video filmed April 2002 at Live Issues in Descriptive Linguistic Analysis: A seminar in honor of Kenneth L. Pike, produced by A. L. Becker & Mark Sicoli. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan. Accessed 29 February 2020 at [URL]
2005. “Cultural Constraints on Grammar and Cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language”. Current Anthropology 46:4.621–646. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. Language: The cultural tool. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
2013. “Monolingual Demonstration”. Video filmed at Linguistic Society of America Institute, 24 June to 19 July 2013, produced by LSA-ISS Media Center Productions. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan. Accessed 29 February 2020 at [URL]
Falk, Julia S. 2014. “The LSA Linguistic Institutes”. Presentation at the Ninetieth Anniversary of the Linguistic Society of America: A Commemorative Symposium, January 4, 2014. Posted on the website of the Linguistic Society of America. Accessed 6 October 2019 at [URL]
Foley, William A. 1999. Review of The Korowai of Irian Jaya , by Gerrit van Enk & Lourens de Vries. New York: Oxford University, 1997. Language in Society 28:3.470–472.Google Scholar
Fowler, Catherine S. & Don D. Fowler. 1986. “Edward Sapir, Tony Tillohash and Southern Paiute Studies”. New Perspectives in Language, Culture, and Personality: Proceedings of the Edward Sapir Centenary Conference (Ottawa, 1–3 Oct. 1984) (= Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science, Series III, 41) ed. by William Cowan, Michael K. Foster & E. F. K. Koerner, 41–65. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gil, David. 2001. “Escaping Eurocentrism: Fieldwork as a process of unlearning”. In Newman & Ratliff 2001a, 102–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gippert, Jost, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Ulrike Mosel, eds. 2006. Essentials of Language Documentation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gleason, Harold A. 1961. An Introduction to Descriptive Linguistics. Rev. ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R. 1976. “Boas, Sapir, and Bloomfield”. American Indian Languages and American Linguistics: Papers of the Second Golden Anniversary Symposium of the Linguistic Society of America, held at the University of California, Berkeley, on November 8 and 9, 1974, 59–69. Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, Kenneth L.. 1965. “On the Use of Informants in Field-Work”. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 10:2/3.108–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1966. Review of Handling Unsophisticated Linguistic Informants , by Alan Healey. Canberra: Linguistic Circle of Canberra, 1964. American Anthropologist 681.807–808.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken[neth L.], Michael Krauss, Lucille J. Watahomigie, Akira Y. Yamamoto, Colette Craige, LaVerne Masayesva Jeanne & Nora C. England. 1992. “Endangered Languages”. Language 68:1.1–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Zellig S. & C[harles] F. Voegelin. 1953. “Eliciting in Linguistics”. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 9:1.59–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2000. Review of Sprache in Raum und Zeit: In Memoriam Johannes Bechert , Bände 1–2 by Winfried Boeder, Christoph Schroeder, Karl Heinz Wagner & Wolfgang Wildgen. Tübingen: Narr. Studies in Language 24:3.747–750.Google Scholar
Healey, Alan. 1964. Handling Unsophisticated Linguistic Informants. (= Pacific Linguistics Series A, No. 2). Canberra: Linguistic Circle of Canberra.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane H. 2006. “The Ethnography of Language and Language Documentation”. In Gippert, Himmelmann & Mosel, 113–128.Google Scholar
Hill, Kenneth C. 2002. “On Publishing the Hopi Dictionary ”. Making Dictionaries: Preserving indigenous languages of the Americas ed. by William Frawley, Kenneth Hill & Pamela Munro, 299–311. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 1989. “Documentary and Descriptive Linguistics”. Linguistics 361. 161–195.Google Scholar
2008. “Reproduction and Preservation of Linguistic Knowledge: Linguistics’ response to language endangerment”. Annual Review of Anthropology 371.337–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1958. A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999. “Leonard Bloomfield: After fifty years”. Historiographia Linguistica 26:3.295–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kibrik, A[leksandr] E[vgen’evič]. 1977. The Methodology of Field Investigations in Linguistics (Setting up the problem) (= Janua Linguarum Studia Memoriae Nicolai van Wijk Dedicata, Series Minor 142). The Hague: Mouton. [Originally published as Metodika polevyx issledovanij. Moscow: Publications of the Department of Structural and Applied Linguistics, Monograph 101, 1972.] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K. 2004. “Notes on Missionary Linguistics in North America”. Missionary Linguistics / Lingüística misionera: Selected papers from the First International Conference on Missionary Linguistics, Oslo, 13–16 March 2003 (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 106) ed. by Otto Zwartjes and Even Hovdhaugen, 47–80. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonard, Wesley Y. & Erin Haynes. 2010. “Making ‘Collaboration’ Collaborative: An examination of perspectives that frame linguistic field research”. Language Documentation and Conservation 41.268–293.Google Scholar
Lindenfeld, Jacqueline. 1973. Yaqui Syntax. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Loving, Aretta. 1975. “On Learning Monolingually”. Language Learner’s Field Guide ed. by Alan Healey, 267–271. Ukarumpa, Papua New Guinea: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lowie, Robert H. 1940. “Native Languages as Ethnographic Tools”. American Anthropologist 42:1.81–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Makkai, Adam. 1986. “The Lexio-centric Approach to Descriptive Linguistics”. Language in Global Perspective: Papers in honor of the fiftieth anniversary of the Summer Institute of Linguistics 1935–1985 ed. by Benjamin F. Elson, 47–61. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Margetts, Anna & Andrew Margetts. 2012. “Audio and Video Recording Techniques for Linguistic Research”. In Thieberger, 13–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, Bradley, Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker & Gary Holton, eds. 2018. “Reflections on Language Documentation: 20 years after Himmelmann 1989”. Language Documentation and Conservation Special Publication 15. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Fiona & Thierno Seydou Sall. 2001. “The Give and Take of Fieldwork: Noun classes and other concerns in Fatick, Senegal”. In Newman & Martha Ratliff 2001a, 189–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLeod, Ruth A. 1961. “Monolingual Approach”. Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of North Dakota Session 51:Article 111.33–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mead, Margaret. 1939. “Native Languages as Field-work Tools”. American Anthropologist 41:2.189–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2001. “Who Shapes the Record: The speaker and the linguist”. In Newman & Ratliff 2001a, 34–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, Leslie C. 2009. “On Communicative Competence…in the Field”. Language and Communication 291.244–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike. 2006. “Fieldwork and Community Language Work”. In Gippert, Himmelmann & Mosel, 67–85.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Morphosyntactic Analysis on the Field: A guide to the guides”. In Thieberger, 72–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, Stephen O. 1994. Theory Groups and the Study of Language in North America: A social history (= Amsterdam Studies in the History and Theory of Linguistic Science, 69). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, Paul. 2009. “Fieldwork and Field Methods in Linguistics”. Language Documentation and Conservation 3:1.113–125.Google Scholar
Newman, Paul & Martha Ratliff, eds. 2001a. Linguistic Fieldwork Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001b. “Introduction”. In Newman & Ratliff, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nida, Eugene A. 1947. “Field Techniques in Descriptive Linguistics”. International Journal of American Linguistics 13:3.138–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1949. Morphology: The descriptive analysis of words. 2nd ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
1981. “Informants or Colleagues?A Festschrift for Native Speaker ed. by Florian Coulmas, 169–174. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penfield, Susan D., Angelina Serratos, Benjamin V. Tucker, Amelia Flores, Gilford Harper, Johnny Hill Jr. & Nora Vasquez. 2008. “Community Collaborations: Best practices for North American indigenous language documentation”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 1911.187–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L. 1977. “Into the Unknown: Learning language by gesture”. DVD 1 in the series Pike on Language , produced by Mack Woodruff & Marcia Jablonski. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Television Studios.Google Scholar
1982. Linguistic Concepts: An Introduction to Tagmemics. Lincoln, Neb.: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
1993. Talk, Thought, and Thing: The emic road to conscious knowledge. Dallas, Texas: Summer Institute of Linguistics. Posted on the website of SIL International. Accessed 6 October 2019 at [URL]
1998. “A Linguistic Pilgrimage”. In First Person Singular III: Autobiographies by North American scholars in the language sciences (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 88) ed. by E. F. K. Koerner, 143–158. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 1979. Some Syntactic Rules in Mohawk. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University, New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren. 2006. “Ethical Issues in Linguistic Fieldwork: An overview”. Journal of Academic Ethics 41.123–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Documentary Linguistics and Community Relations”. Language Documentation and Conservation 51.187–207.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Ethical Issues in Linguistic Fieldwork”. In Thieberger, 407–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohner, Ronald P., ed. 1969. The Ethnography of Franz Boas: Letters and diaries of Franz Boas written on the northwest coast from 1886 to 1931 trans. by Hedy Parker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sakel, Jeanette & Daniel L. Everett. 2012. Linguistic Fieldwork: A student guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samarin, William J. 1967. Field Linguistics: A guide to linguistic field work. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1923. “Text Analyses of Three Yana Dialects”. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 201.263–294.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward & Alfred L. Kroeber. 1984. The Sapir–Kroeber Correspondence: Letters between Edward Sapir and A. L. Kroeber 1905–1925 ed. by Victor Golla (= Survey of California and Other Indian Languages, Report 6). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sarvasy, Hannah. 2016. “Monolingual Fieldwork in and Beyond the Classroom: The Logooli experience at UCLA”. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society 511.471–484.Google Scholar
Sarvasy, Hannah & Diana Forker, eds. 2018. Word Hunters: Field linguists on fieldwork (= Studies in Language Companion Series, 194). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shulist, Sarah. 2013. “Collaborating on Language: Contrasting the theory and practice of collaboration in linguistics and anthropology”. Collaborative Anthropologies 61.1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanley, Richard John. 1969. The Phonology of the Navaho Verb. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.]Google Scholar
Stocking, George W., Jr. 1974. “The Boas Plan for the Study of American Indian Languages”. Studies in the History of Linguistics: Traditions and paradigms ed. Dell Hymes, 454–484. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Sumbatova, Nina. 2018. “My Fieldwork, from Georgia to Guinea”. In Sarvasy & Forker, 123–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thieberger, Nicholas, ed. 2012. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Fieldwork. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thieberger, Nicholas & Andrea L. Berez. 2012. “Linguistic Data Management”. In Thieberger, 90–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Udell, Gerald, John McKenna, Sara Chapman, Francis Xavier & Johnnie D. Ragsdale, Jr. 1972. “Responses of Co-Workers to the Word ‘Informant’’’. Studies in Linguistics in Honor of Raven I. McDavid, Jr. ed. by Lawrence M. Davies, 441–453. Tuscaloosa, Ala.: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Uhlenbeck, E[ugenius] M[arius]. 1961. “The Study of the So-Called Exotic Languages and General Linguistics”. Lingua 91.417–434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voegelin, C[harles] F. 1959. Review of Eastern Ojibwa: Grammatical sketch, texts, and word list , ed. by Charles F. Hockett. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press, 1957. Language 35:1.109–125.Google Scholar
1974. Review of A Leonard Bloomfield Anthology , ed. by Charles F. Hockett. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, 1970; Mentalism and Objectivism in Linguistics: The source of Leonard Bloomfield’s psychology of language, by Edwin Esper. New York: American Elsevier, 1968; and ‘Review of Hockett’s Anthology, by Z[ellig] S. Harris, International Journal of American Linguistics 391.252–255, 1973. Language Sciences 301.35–37.Google Scholar
Voegelin, Charles F. & Leonard Bloomfield. 1987. “Correspondence in Ojibwa”. Anthropological Linguistics 29:1.1–22.Google Scholar
Voegelin, Charles F. & Zellig S. Harris. 1951. “Methods for Determining Intelligibility among Dialects of Natural Languages”. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 95:3.322–329.Google Scholar
Voegelin, C[harles] F. & Florence M. Robinett. 1954. “Obtaining a Linguistic Sample”. International Journal of American Linguistics 20:2.89–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallis, Ethel Emily & Mary Angela Bennett. 1959. Two Thousand Tongues to Go: The story of the Wycliffe Bible translators. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Werner, Oswald. 1994. “Ethnography and Translation: Issues and challenges”. Sartoniana 71.59–135. Ghent: Communication and Cognition.Google Scholar
Werner, Tom. 2017. “Tracking the Parallelism of Difference with Ostension Schemes”. Language Sciences 621.139–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Leslie A. 1963. “The ethnography and ethnology of Franz Boas”. Bulletin of the Texas Memorial Museum Bulletin 61.1–76.Google Scholar
Wilner, Isaiah Lorado. 2015. “Friends in This World: The relationship of George Hunt and Franz Boas”. The Franz Boas Papers. Vol. 1: Franz Boas as public intellectual – theory, ethnography, activism ed. by Regna Darnell, Michelle Hamilton, Robert L. A. Hancock & Joshua Smith, 163–189. Lincoln, Neb.: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Wise, Mary Ruth, Thomas N. Headland & Ruth Margaret Brend, eds. 2003. Language and Life: Essays in memory of Kenneth L. Pike. Dallas, Texas: SIL International.Google Scholar
Wolff, John U. 1987. “Bloomfield as an Austronesianist”. Historiographia Linguistica 14:1.173–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woodbury, Anthony C. 2011. “Language Documentation”. The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages ed. by Peter K. Austin & Julia Sallabank, 159–186. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yamada, Racquel-María. 2007. “Collaborative Linguistic Fieldwork: Practical application of the empowerment model”. Language Documentation and Conservation 1:2.257–282.Google Scholar
Yegerlehner, John. 1955. “A Note on Eliciting Techniques”. International Journal of American Linguistics 21:3.286–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zgusta, L[adislav]. 1968. Review of Handling Unsophisticated Linguistic Informants , by Alan Healey. Canberra: Linguistic Circle of Canberra, 1964. Archiv Orientalini 36.332.Google Scholar