Article published in:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 48:2/3 (2021) ► pp. 302315
References
Andresen, Julie T.
1991 “Skinner and Chomsky Thirty Years Later”. Historiographia Linguistica 17:1–2.145–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Behme, Christina
2014 “A ‘Galilean’ Science of Language”. Journal of Linguistics 501. 671–704. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, Derek
1984 “The Language Bioprogram Hypothesis”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7:2.173–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boden, Margaret
2006Mind as Machine. A History of Cognitive Science. Volume 11. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1962 “A Transformational Approach to Syntax”. Third Texas Conference on Problems of Linguistic Analysis in English ed. by A. A. Hill, 124–158. Austin: The University of Texas.Google Scholar
1965Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1966Cartesian Linguistics. A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
1975 “Questions of Form and Interpretation”. The Scope of American Linguistics. Papers of the Golden Anniversary Symposium of the Linguistic Society of America, Held at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, on July 24 and 25, 1974 ed. by R. Austerlitz, 159–196. Dordrecht, Boston & London: Kluwer.Google Scholar
1986Knowledge of Language. Its Nature, Origins, and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
2012The Science of Language. Interviews with James McGilvray. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 “The Galilean Challenge”. Inference 3:1.1–7. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020 “The UCLA Lectures (April 29–May 2, 2019)”. lingbuzz/005485.Google Scholar
2021 “Linguistics Then and Now: Some personal reflections”. Annual Review of Linguistics 71.1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crain, Stephen, Takuya Goro & Rosalind Thornton
2006 “Language Acquisition is Language Change”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35:1.31–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Man, Paul
1984 “Autobiography as De-facement”. The Rhetoric of Romanticism, 67–81. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Falk, Julia S.
1992 “Otto Jespersen, Leonard Bloomfield, and American Structural Linguistics”. Language 68:3.465–491. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul
1975Against Method. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1894Progress in Language. With special reference to English. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co.Google Scholar
1909 “Origin of Linguistic Species”. Scientia 61.111–120.Google Scholar
1922Language. Its Nature, Origin, and Development. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
1924The Philosophy of Grammar. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kertész, András
2012 “The ‘Galilean Style in Science’ and the Inconsistency of Linguistic Theorizing”. Foundations of Science 171.91–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kibbee, Douglas A.
(ed.) 2010Chomskyan (R)evolutions. Amsterdam & Philadephia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E. F. Konrad
1972 “Towards a Historiography of Linguistics 19th and 20th Paradigms”. Anthropological Linguistics 14:7.255–280.Google Scholar
1989 “The Chomskyan ‘Revolution’ and its Historiography. Observations of a bystander”. Practicing Linguistic Historiography by E. F. K. Korner, 101–146. Amsterdam & Philadephia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 “Linguistics and Revolution with Particular Reference to the Chomskyan Revolution”. Language and Revolution / Language and Time ed. by F. Brisard, S. d’Hondt & T. Mortelmans, 3–62. Antwerp: University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
Mackert, Michael
1993 “Interpretation, Authorial Intention, and Representation: Reflections on the Historiography of Linguistics”. Language Sciences 15:1.39–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCawley, James
1999 “The Biological Side of Otto Jespersen’s Linguistic Thought”. Historiographia Linguistica 19:1.97–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1986The Politics of Linguistics. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
2014Getting the Word Out: The early generativists’ multipronged efforts to diffuse their ideas. Language 90:1.241–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Janet
2010Private Knowledge, Public Tensions: Theory commitment in postwar American linguistics. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto.
Riemer, Nick
2009 “Grammaticality as Evidence and as a Prediction in Galilean Linguistics”. Language Sciences 311.612–633. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stuurman, Frits
1987 “On Chomsky and Jespersen: two approaches to grammar”. Linguistics in the Netherlands 1987 ed. by Frits Beukema & Peter Coopmans, 205–211. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Thomas, Margaret
2020 “On the Reception and Revivification of Cartesian linguistics ”. History of Linguistics 2007. Selected papers from the 14th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHOLS 14), Paris, 28 August-1 September ed. by Émilie Aussant and Jean-Michel Fortis, 157–169. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar