Article published In:
Historiographia LinguisticaVol. 48:2/3 (2021) ► pp.302–315
Otto Jespersen, one more broken leg in the historical stool of generative linguistics
Over the years, Noam Chomsky has constructed a historiographic narrative according to which Generative Grammar is the outcome of a mix comprising the early awareness of creativity by Galileo, the Cartesians, and Humboldt, the formalization of recursive functions by computational theorists, and an incipient internalist ‘language’ concept notably foreshadowed by Otto Jespersen. This paper tries to show that the latter ingredient is to be removed from the historical recipe for Chomskyan linguistics. More specifically, the paper claims that the almost ritual repetition of the name of the Danish linguist belongs to a component of the generativist rhetoric that is ‘non-rational’. Such a component is part and parcel of most ground-breaking theories.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.On Jespersen’s psychologism
- 3.Why Jespersen?
- 4.Conclusions
- Acknowledgments
- Notes
-
References
References
Andresen, Julie T.
Behme, Christina
2014 “A ‘Galilean’ Science of Language”. Journal of Linguistics 501. 671–704. 
Bickerton, Derek
1984 “The Language Bioprogram Hypothesis”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7:2.173–188.
Boden, Margaret
2006 Mind as Machine. A History of Cognitive Science. Volume 11. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, Noam
1962 “A Transformational Approach to Syntax”. Third Texas Conference on Problems of Linguistic Analysis in English ed. by A. A. Hill, 124–158. Austin: The University of Texas.
1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
1966 Cartesian Linguistics. A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought. New York: Harper & Row.
1975 “Questions of Form and Interpretation”. The Scope of American Linguistics. Papers of the Golden Anniversary Symposium of the Linguistic Society of America, Held at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, on July 24 and 25, 1974 ed. by R. Austerlitz, 159–196. Dordrecht, Boston & London: Kluwer.
1986 Knowledge of Language. Its Nature, Origins, and Use. New York: Praeger.
2012 The Science of Language. Interviews with James McGilvray. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2017 “The Galilean Challenge”. Inference 3:1.1–7.
2020 “The UCLA Lectures (April 29–May 2, 2019)”. lingbuzz/005485.
2021 “Linguistics Then and Now: Some personal reflections”. Annual Review of Linguistics 71.1–11.
Crain, Stephen, Takuya Goro & Rosalind Thornton
2006 “Language Acquisition is Language Change”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35:1.31–49.
de Man, Paul
1984 “Autobiography as De-facement”. The Rhetoric of Romanticism, 67–81. New York: Columbia University Press.
Falk, Julia S.
1992 “Otto Jespersen, Leonard Bloomfield, and American Structural Linguistics”. Language 68:3.465–491.
Feyerabend, Paul
1975 Against Method. London: Verso.
Jespersen, Otto
1894 Progress in Language. With special reference to English. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co.
1909 “Origin of Linguistic Species”. Scientia 61.111–120.
1922 Language. Its Nature, Origin, and Development. London: Allen & Unwin.
1924 The Philosophy of Grammar. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Kertész, András
2012 “The ‘Galilean Style in Science’ and the Inconsistency of Linguistic Theorizing”. Foundations of Science 171.91–108.
Kibbee, Douglas A.
Koerner, E. F. Konrad
1972 “Towards a Historiography of Linguistics 19th and 20th Paradigms”. Anthropological Linguistics 14:7.255–280.
1989 “The Chomskyan ‘Revolution’ and its Historiography. Observations of a bystander”. Practicing Linguistic Historiography by E. F. K. Korner, 101–146. Amsterdam & Philadephia: John Benjamins.
2004 “Linguistics and Revolution with Particular Reference to the Chomskyan Revolution”. Language and Revolution / Language and Time ed. by F. Brisard, S. d’Hondt & T. Mortelmans, 3–62. Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
Mackert, Michael
1993 “Interpretation, Authorial Intention, and Representation: Reflections on the Historiography of Linguistics”. Language Sciences 15:1.39–52.
McCawley, James
1999 “The Biological Side of Otto Jespersen’s Linguistic Thought”. Historiographia Linguistica 19:1.97–110.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1986 The Politics of Linguistics. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.
2014 Getting the Word Out: The early generativists’ multipronged efforts to diffuse their ideas. Language 90:1.241–268.
Nielsen, Janet
2010 Private Knowledge, Public Tensions: Theory commitment in postwar American linguistics. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto.
Riemer, Nick
2009 “Grammaticality as Evidence and as a Prediction in Galilean Linguistics”. Language Sciences 311.612–633.
Stuurman, Frits
1987 “On Chomsky and Jespersen: two approaches to grammar”. Linguistics in the Netherlands 1987 ed. by Frits Beukema & Peter Coopmans, 205–211. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.
Thomas, Margaret
2020 “On the Reception and Revivification of Cartesian linguistics
”. History of Linguistics 2007. Selected papers from the 14th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHOLS 14), Paris, 28 August-1 September ed. by Émilie Aussant and Jean-Michel Fortis, 157–169. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.