Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 48:2/3 (2021) ► pp.228–263

Erminnie A. Smith (1836–1886)

A portrait of a linguist

| Adam Mickiewicz University
In this paper I discuss the varied contributions of Erminnie Adele Smith (1836–1886), a linguist, ethnologist, and geologist, who has a significant but underestimated place in the history of the study of North American languages. Among others, Smith was among the first scholars to collaborate extensively with Indigenous consultants and the first woman in the history of Western linguistics who published works on grammatical gender. Such achievements point to the need to reconsider her life and work in the context of the reception of the first generation of women in American anthropology as well as the study of gender in Iroquoian languages since the mid-19th century.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Biography
  • 3.Intellectual milieu
    • 3.1Scholarly contacts
    • 3.2Membership in societies
    • 3.3Women in anthropology
  • 4.Contribution
    • 4.1Geology and mineralogy
    • 4.2Iroquoian languages
    • 4.3Ethnology
  • 5.Recognition
  • 6.Concluding discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 3 June 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.00094.kil
References (134)
References
Abbott, Clifford. 1984. “Two Feminine Genders in Oneida”. Anthropological Linguistics 26:2.125–137. [URL]
Anonymous. 1888. “Erminnie Adelle Smith”. Appletons’ Cyclopædia of American Biography ed. by James Grant Wilson & John Fiske, vol. V1, 563. New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
. 1906a. “Erminnie Adelle (Platt) Smith”. The Biographical Dictionary of America ed. by Rossiter Johnson, vol. IX1, n.p. Boston: American Biographical Society.Google Scholar
. 1906b. “Erminnie Adelle (Platt) Smith”. The National Cyclopaedia of American Biography ed. by George Derby & James Terry White, vol. XIII1, 183–184. New York: James T. White.Google Scholar
Ayres-Bennett, Wendy & Helena Sanson, eds. 2020. Women in the History of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, ed. 1885. Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, Showing the Operations, Expenditures, and Condition of the Institution for the Year 1883. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
1889. Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, Showing the Operations, Expenditures, and Condition of the Institution for the Year Ending June 30, 1886. Vol. I1. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1916. “Tsimshian Mythology: Based on texts recorded by Henry W. Tate”. Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution 1909–1910 311.29–1037.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz & George Hunt. 1902–1905. “Kwakiutl Texts”. Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History 51.403–532.Google Scholar
Bonvillain, Nancy. 1973. A Grammar of Akwesasne Mohawk. Ottawa: National Museum of Man, National Museums of Canada. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Daniel G[arrison]. 1886. “On Polysynthesis and Incorporation as Characteristics of American Languages”. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 231.48–86.Google Scholar
Brinton, Daniel G. 1894. “Characteristics of American Languages”. The American Antiquarian and Oriental Journal 161.33–37.Google Scholar
Browman, David L. 2002a. “Frederic Ward Putnam: Contributions to the development of archaeological institutions and encouragement of women practitioners”. New Perspectives on the Origins of Americanist Archaeology ed. by David L. Browman & Stephen Williams, 209–241. Tuscaloosa, Ala.: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
2002b. “The Peabody Museum, Frederic W. Putnam, and the Rise of U.S. Anthropology, 1866–1903”. American Anthropologist 104:2.508–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. Cultural Negotiations: The role of women in the founding of Americanist archaeology. Lincoln, Neb.: University of Nebraska Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Browman, David L. & Stephen Williams. 2013. Anthropology at Harvard: A biographical history, 1790–1940. Cambridge, Mass.: Peabody Museum Press.Google Scholar
Bruyas, James [Jacques] S. J. 1862. Radical Words of the Mohawk language, With Their Derivatives. New York: Cramoisy Press.Google Scholar
Bryant, Doreen. 2003. Genus-Systeme im Wandel: Spezifität, Animazität und Femininum im Mohawk. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Cass, Lewis. 1826. Review of Manners and Customs of Several Indian Tribes Located West of the Mississippi; Including some account of the soil, climate, and vegetable productions, and the Indian materia medica: to which is prefixed the history of the author’s life during a residence of several years among them by John D. Hunter (Philadelphia: J. Maxwell, 1823) and Historical Notes Respecting the Indians of North America: With remarks on the attempts made to convert and civilize them by John Halkett (London: A. Constable, 1825). The North American Review 22:50.53–119.Google Scholar
Catalogue of Endangered Languages. 2022. Honolulu, Hawaii: The University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa. ([URL]). Accessed: 20 March 2022.
Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. The Caddoan, Iroquoian and Siouan Languages. The Hague: Mouton. (Repr., Tübingen: De Gruyter Mouton, 2013.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1977. “The Evolution of Third Person Verb Agreement in the Iroquoian Languages”. Mechanisms of Syntactic Change ed. by Charles N. Li, 493–524. Austin, Tex.: University of Texas Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999. “Florescence as a Force in Grammaticalization”. Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative linguistics and grammaticalization ed. by Spike Gildea, 39–64. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. “Masculine and Feminine in the Northern Iroquoian Languages”. Ethnosyntax: Explorations in grammar and culture ed. by N[ick] J. Enfield, 99–109. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2015. A Grammar of the Seneca Language. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 2018. Thought-based Linguistics: How languages turn thoughts into sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charlevoix, P[ierre François Xavier] de. 1744. Histoire et description generale de la Nouvelle France, avec le journal historique d’un voyage fait par ordre du roi dans l’Amérique septentrionnale. Vol. III1: Journal d’un voyage fait par ordre du roi dans l’Amérique septentrionnale: Adressé a Madame la Duchesse de Lesdiguieres. Paris: Chez Rolin Fils, Libraire.Google Scholar
Chester, Hilary Lynn. 2002. “Frances Eliza Babbitt and the Growth of Professionalism of Women in Archaeology”. New Perspectives on the Origins of Americanist Archaeology ed. by David L. Browman & Stephen Williams, 164–184. Tuscaloosa, Ala.: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Christy, T. Craig. 1992. “Geology and the Science of Language: Metaphors and models”. Naumann, Plank & Hofbauer, eds. 1992b, 79–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Converse, Harriet Maxwell. 1893. “Induction of Women Into Iroquois Tribes”. The Journal of American Folklore 6:21.147–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creese, Mary R. S. 1998. Ladies in the Laboratory? American and British women in science, 1800–1900; A survey of their contributions to research. Lanham, Md.: The Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Cuoq, Jean-André. 1866. Études philologiques sur quelques langues sauvages de l’Amérique. Montreal: Dawson Brothers.Google Scholar
Cusick, David. 1827. Sketches of Ancient History of the Six Nations. Lewiston, N.Y.: Printed for the Author.Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. 2013. “A History of Iroquoian Gender Marking”. Language Typology and Historical Contingency: In honor of Johanna Nichols ed. by Balthasar Bickel, Lenore A. Grenoble, David A. Peterson & Alan Timberlake (= Typological Studies in Language, 104.), 283–298. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davison, Alice & Penelope Eckert, eds. 1990. The Cornell Lectures: Women in the linguistics profession. Washington, D.C.: The Committee on the Status of Women in Linguistics of the Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Dexter, Ralph W. 1978. “Guess Who’s Not Coming to Dinner? Frederic Ward Putnam and the support of women in anthropology”. History of Anthropology Newsletter 5:1.5–6.Google Scholar
Edwards, Jonathan. 1788. Observations on the Language of the Muhhekaneew Indians: In which the extent of that language in North-America is shewn, its genius is grammatically traced, some of its peculiarities, and some instances of analogy between that and the Hebrew are pointed out. New Haven, Conn.: Printed by Josiah Meigs. (New ed. by John Pickering, Boston: Phelps and Farnham, 1823; Repr. in American Linguistics, vol. I1. London: Routledge, 1997.)Google Scholar
Fairbanks, A. W., ed. 1898. Emma Willard and Her Pupils; Or, fifty years of Troy Female Seminary, 1822–1872. New York: Published by Mrs. Russel Sage.Google Scholar
Fenton, William N. 1962. “This Island, the World on the Turtle’s Back”. The Journal of American Folklore 75:298.283–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleming Blacker, Patricia & Pamela P. Grossman. 1990. “Erminnie Adele Platt Smith, 1836–1886”. Past and Promise: Lives of New Jersey women ed. by Joan N. Burstyn, 192–193. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Alice C. 1909. “Tribal Structure: A study of the Omaha and cognate tribes”. Putnam Anniversary Volume: Anthropological essays presented to Frederic Ward Putnam in honor of his seventieth birthday, April 16, 1909 ed. by Franz Boas, 253–267. New York: G.E. Stechert.Google Scholar
Gaines, Celie & Lizzie R. Burst, eds. 1882. Echoes of the Aesthetic Society of Jersey City. New York: Thompson & Moreau.Google Scholar
Goddard, Ives. 1996. “The Description of the Native Languages of North America Before Boas”. Languages ed. by Ives Goddard (= Handbook of North American Indians, 17.), 17–42. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Golla, Victor, ed. 1984. The Sapir-Kroeber Correspondence: Letters between Edward Sapir and A. L. Kroeber 1905–1925. Berkeley, Calif.: Survey of California and Other Indian Languages, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hale, Horatio, ed. 1883. The Iroquois Book of Rites. Philadelphia: D. G. Brinton (Repr., with an Introduction by William N. Fenton, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1963.)Google Scholar
Heaton, Raina, Eve Koller & Lyle Campbell. 2020. “Women’s Contributions to Early American Indian Linguistics”. Ayres-Bennett & Sanson, eds. 2020, 345–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heckewelder, John. 1819. “An Account of the History, Manners, and Customs, of the Indian Natives Who Once Inhabited Pennsylvania and the Neighbouring States”. Transactions of the Historical and Literary Committee of the American Philosophical Society 11:1–348.Google Scholar
Hewitt, J[ohn] N[apoleon] B[rinton]. 1893. “Polysynthesis in the Languages of the American Indians”. American Anthropologist 6:4.381–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, J. N. B. 1896. “Grammatic Form and the Verb Concept in Iroquoian Speech”. Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science 441.250–252.Google Scholar
1903. “Iroquoian Cosmology: First part”. Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution 1899–1900 211.127–339. (Issued separately, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1904.)Google Scholar
1928. “Iroquoian Cosmology: Second part”. Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution 1925–26 431.449–819. (Issued separately, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1928.)Google Scholar
Hewitt, J. N. B. & Erminnie A. Smith. 1880. Onondaga Words, Phrases and Sentences in Powell’s Introduction to the Study of Indian Languages. [Manuscript 374, National Anthropological Archives, Smithsonian Institution].Google Scholar
. n.d. Tuscarora Dictionary. [Manuscript 2850, National Anthropological Archives, Smithsonian Institution].
Hough, Walter. 1935. “Erminnie Adelle Platt Smith”. Dictionary of American Biography ed. by Dumas Malone, vol. XVII1, 262. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Jayanti, Vimala. 1988. “Erminnie Adelle Platt Smith”. Women Anthropologists: Selected biographies ed. by Ute Gacs, Aisha Khan, Jerrie McIntyre & Ruth Weinberg, 327–330. Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Judd, Neil M. 1967. The Bureau of American Ethnology: A partial history. Norman, Okla.: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Kilarski, Marcin. 2013. Nominal Classification: A history of its study from the classical period to the present. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 121.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “Gender Asymmetries in Iroquoian Languages and Their Cultural Correlates”. Historiographia Linguistica 43:3.363–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. A History of the Study of the Indigenous Languages of North America. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 129.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E[rnst] F[rideryk] Konrad. 1992. “William Dwight Whitney and the Influence of Geology on Linguistic Theory in the 19th Century”. Naumann, Plank & Hofbauer, eds. 1992b, 271–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kurath, Hans & Raven I. McDavid, Jr. 1961. The Pronunciation of English in the Atlantic States: Based upon the collections of the Linguistic Atlas of the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor, Mich.: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, Floyd G. 1953. Oneida Verb Morphology. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lubbock, John. 1870. The Origin of Civilisation and the Primitive Condition of Man: Mental and social condition of savages. London: Longmans & Green.Google Scholar
Lurie, Nancy Oestreich. 1966. “Women in Early American Anthropology”. Pioneers of American Anthropology: The uses of biography ed. by June Helm, 29–83. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
. 1971. “Erminnie Adele Platt Smith”. Notable American Women, 1607–1950: A biographical dictionary ed. by Edward T. James, Janet Wilson James & Paul S. Boyer, vol. III1, 312–313. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Marcoux, Joseph. 1853. Iroquois (Mohawk) Grammar and Dictionary. [Manuscript Mss.Film.579, American Philosophical Society].Google Scholar
Mark, Joan. 1988. A Stranger in Her Native Land: Alice Fletcher and the American Indians. Lincoln, Neb.: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Mason, Otis T[ufton]. 1882. What is Anthropology? A lecture delivered in the National Museum, Washington, D.C., March 18, 1882. Washington, D.C.: Judd & Detweiler.Google Scholar
Merriam, Kathryn Lavely. 2010. The Preservation of Iroquois Thought: J.N.B. Hewitt’s legacy of scholarship for his people. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Michelson, Karin. 1981. “A Philological Investigation Into Seventeenth-century Mohawk”. International Journal of American Linguistics 47:2.91–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Gender in Oneida”. Gender Across Languages: The linguistic representation of women and men ed. by Marlis Hellinger & Heiko Motschenbacher (= IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society, 36.), vol. IV1, 277–301. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Iroquoian Languages”. Oxford Bibliographies Online: Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ([URL]). Accessed: 20 March 2022.
Miller, Darlis A. 2007. Matilda Coxe Stevenson: Pioneering anthropologist. Norman, Okla.: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Gender and Culture”. The Expression of Gender ed. by Greville G. Corbett, 131–160. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. “The Manmade Versus the Natural? Iroquoian nouns in ka- and o- ”. Webs of Relationships and Words From Long Ago ed. by Lucy Thomason, David J. Costa & Amy Dahlstrom, 259–278. Petoskey, Mich.: Mundart Press.Google Scholar
Montgomery-Anderson, Brad. 2015. Cherokee Reference Grammar. Norman, Okla.: The University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Lewis H[enry]. 1851. League of the Ho-dé-no-sau-nee, or, Iroquois. Rochester, N.Y.: Sage & Brother.Google Scholar
Morgan, Lewis H. 1877. Ancient Society or Researches in the Lines of Human Progress From Savagery, Through Barbarism to Civilization. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Naumann, Bernd, Frans Plank & Gottfried Hofbauer. 1992a. “Preface”. Naumann, Plank & Hofbauer, eds. 1992b, xiii–xvi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
, eds. 1992b. Language and Earth: Elective affinities between the emerging sciences of linguistics and geology. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 66.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nerlich, Brigitte. 1990. Change in Language: Whitney, Bréal, and Wegener. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nuttall, Zelia. 1909. “A Curious Survival in Mexico of the Use of the Purpura Shell-fish for Dyeing”. Putnam Anniversary Volume: Anthropological essays presented to Frederic Ward Putnam in honor of his seventieth birthday, April 16, 1909 ed. by Franz Boas, 368–384. New York: G.E. Stechert.Google Scholar
Olsen, Kirstin. 1994. Chronology of Women’s History. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Parezo, Nancy J. 1993. “Anthropology: The welcoming science”. Hidden Scholars: Women anthropologists and the Native American Southwest ed. by Nancy J. Parezo, 3–37. Albuquerque, N.M.: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Pickering, John. 1823. “Notes by the Editor [to Observations on the Language of the Muhhekaneew Indians by Jonathan Edwards]”. Collections of the Massachusetts Historical Society (2nd series) 101.98–151. (Edwards’ Observations on the Language of the Muhhekaneew Indians issued separately, Boston: Phelps & Farnham, 1823; Repr., Boston: Charles C. Little & James Brown, 1843.)Google Scholar
Pilling, James Constantine. 1888. Bibliography of the Iroquoian Languages. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Powell, J[ohn] W[esley]. 1877. Introduction to the Study of Indian Languages; With words, phrases, and sentences to be collected. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Powell, J. W. 1881. “Studies Among the Iroquois, by Mrs. E. A. Smith”. Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution 1879–80 11.xxii.Google Scholar
Rhea, John M. 2016. A Field of Their Own: Women and American Indian history 1830–1941. Norman, Okla.: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Rossiter, Margaret W. 1982. Women Scientists in America: Struggles and strategies to 1940. Baltimore, Md.: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rudes, Blair A. 1994. “John Napoleon Brinton Hewitt: Tuscarora linguist”. Anthropological Linguistics 36:4.466–481. [URL]
1999a. Tuscarora-English / English-Tuscarora Dictionary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
1999b. “Why Collect Texts? The Native, Evangelical, and Americanist traditions among the Tuscaroras”. Theorizing the Americanist Tradition ed. by Lisa Phillips Valentine & Regna Darnell, 209–226. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rudes, Blair A. & Dorothy Crouse. 1987. The Tuscarora Legacy of J.N.B. Hewitt: Materials for the study of the Tuscarora language and culture. 21 vols. (= National Museum of Man, Mercury Series, Canadian Ethnology Service, 108.) Ottawa: Canadian Museum of Civilization.Google Scholar
Saunders-Lee, Sara L., ed. 1890. In Memoriam: Mrs. Erminnie A. Smith. Boston: Lee and Shepard.Google Scholar
Sergeevna, Byša Lidija. 2019. Stanovlenie problemnogo polja v issledovanijax ženščin-antropologov SŠA (1970–2010-e gg.) [The formation of the problem field in the studies of women anthropologists in the United States (1970–2010s)]. Ph.D. dissertation, Tver State University, Tver.
Shea, John Gilmary, ed. 1860. A French-Onondaga Dictionary From a Manuscript of the Seventeenth Century. New York: Cramoisy Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Erminnie A[dele]. 1879. “The Great Oberstein Industry; Method of coloring, cutting and polishing agates and secondary gems. Illustrated by a fine collection of specimens”. Paper presented at the 28th Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Saratoga Springs, N.Y.
Smith, Erminnie A. 1880a. “Concerning Amber”. The American Naturalist 14:3.179–190. (Repr. as “Amber” in Saunders-Lee, ed. 1890, 68–84.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1880b. “The Languages of the Iroquois”. Science 1:11.137–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1880c. “Monograph on Jade, Illustrated With Fine Specimens in All the Different Varieties”. Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science 281.523–525.Google Scholar
1880d. Translation of 90th Psalm into the Seneca Language. [Manuscript 399, National Anthropological Archives, Smithsonian Institution].Google Scholar
1881a. “Myths of the Iroquois”. The American Antiquarian 4:1.31–39. (Repr. in Gaines & Burst, eds. 1882, 176–192.)Google Scholar
1881b. Oneida Vocabulary, Verb Conjugations, and the Lord’s Prayer in Oneida. [Manuscript 377, National Anthropological Archives, Smithsonian Institution].Google Scholar
1882a. “Animal Myths”. Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science 301.321–323.Google Scholar
1882b. “Comparative Differences in the Iroquois Group of Dialects”. Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science 301.315–319.Google Scholar
1882c. “Gems”. Echoes of the Aesthetic Society of Jersey City ed. by Celie Gaines & Lizzie R. Burst, 34–56. New York: Thompson & Moreau.Google Scholar
1883a. “The Iroquois”. Science 2:26.134–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1883b. “Myths of the Iroquois”. Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution 1880–81 21.47–116. (Issued separately, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1883; Repr., Ohsweken, Ont.: Iroqrafts, 1983.)Google Scholar
1884a. “Accidents or Mode Signs of Verbs in the Iroquois Dialects”. Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science 321.402–403.Google Scholar
1884b. “Iroquois Grammar”. Science 4:95.486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1884c. “Iroquois Pronouns”. Science 4:88.351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1884d. “Life Among the Mohawks in the Catholic Missions of Quebec Province”. Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science 321.398–399.Google Scholar
1884e. “Studies in the Iroquois Concerning the Verb to be and Its Substitutes”. Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science 321.399–402.Google Scholar
1885a. “Artificial Wampum”. Science 5:100.3–4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1885b. “The Customs and the Language of the Iroquois”. The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 141.244–253. (Repr. in Saunders-Lee, ed. 1890, 50–65.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1885c. “Disputed Points Concerning Iroquois Pronouns”. Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science 331.606–609.Google Scholar
1886. “The Significance of Flora to the Iroquois”. Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science 341.404–411. (Repr. in Saunders-Lee, ed. 1890, 87–98.)Google Scholar
n.d. Seneca Translation of Second and Third Chapters of Genesis, and First Proverbs. [Manuscript 415, National Anthropological Archives, Smithsonian Institution].
Smith, Erminnie A. & J. N. B. Hewitt. 1880a. Seneca Vocabulary and Verb Conjugations in Powell’s Introduction to the Study of Indian Languages. [Manuscript 380, National Anthropological Archives, Smithsonian Institution].Google Scholar
. 1880b. Seneca Vocabulary, Grammatical Notes, and the Lord’s Prayer in Seneca in Powell’s Introduction to the Study of Indian Languages. [Manuscript 373, National Anthropological Archives, Smithsonian Institution].Google Scholar
. 1880c. Tuscarora Words, Phrases and Sentences in Powell’s Introduction to the Study of Indian Languages. [Manuscript 375, National Anthropological Archives, Smithsonian Institution].Google Scholar
. 1880d. Translation of the 1st Chapter of Genesis Into the Seneca Language. [Manuscript 400, National Anthropological Archives, Smithsonian Institution].Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. 1884 [1876]. The Principles of Sociology. Vol. I1. New York: D. Appleton. (1st ed., London: Williams & Norgate, 1876.)Google Scholar
Swanton, John R. 1938. “John Napoleon Brinton Hewitt”. American Anthropologist 40:2.286–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talvj (= Therese Albertine Luise von Jakob Robinson). 1840. Versuch einer geschichtlichen Charakteristik der Volkslieder germanischer Nationen: Mit einer Uebersicht der Lieder aussereuropäischer Völkerschaften. Leipzig: F.A. Brockhaus.Google Scholar
Tarducci, Mónica. 2015. “Antes de Franz Boas: Mujeres pioneras de la antropología norteamericana”. Runa 36:2.57–73.Google Scholar
Thomas, Margaret. 2020. “Early American Women’s Participation in Language Scholarship”. Ayres-Bennett & Sanson, eds. 2020, 319–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tooker, Elisabeth & Barbara Graymont. 2007. “J.N.B. Hewitt”. Histories of Anthropology Annual ed. by Regna Darnell & Frederic W. Gleach, vol. III1, 70–98. Lincoln & London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Treichler, Paula A. 1990. “Women and Linguistics: The legacy of institutionalization”. Davison & Eckert, eds. 1990, 23–32.Google Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight. 1867. Language and the Study of Language: Twelve lectures on the principles of linguistic science. New York: Charles Scribner.Google Scholar
Williams, Marianne Mithun. 1976. A Grammar of Tuscarora. New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Asher. 1842. A Spelling-book in the Seneca Language: With English definitions. Buffalo Creek Reservation, N.Y.: Mission Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Joseph, John E.
2022. Review of Kilarski (2021): A History of the Study of the Indigenous Languages of North America. Historiographia Linguistica 49:2-3 ► pp. 405 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.