Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica: Online-First Articles

Anachronistic bias in the study of Arabic grammatical tradition

The case of the term ḥarf in Sībawayhi’s al-Kitāb

| Bar-Ilan University

One of the most obscure and most frequently commented on texts in Arabic grammatical tradition is the opening formulation in its earliest extant book, Sībawayhi’s al-Kitāb, concerning the tripartite division of parts of speech. For the third part of speech, the particle, around which the present article revolves, Sībawayhi uses a complex term, whose head is ḥarf, a term which is commonly used by itself by later grammarians for this part of speech. This article revisits the question of whether the term ḥarf by itself denotes “particle” in al-Kitāb, alongside the denotation “word”. Following Weiss’ article, published more than a hundred years ago, it will be argued that ḥarf does not denote “particle” in al-Kitāb, though occurrences thereof may refer to particles, and that scholars who ascribe the later denotation “particle” to ḥarf in al-Kitāb do so due to an anachronistic bias.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. ḥarf – General notes
  • 3.Studies on ḥarf before Weiss
  • 4.Opponents of ḥarf = “particle”
  • 5.Proponents of ḥarf = “particle”
  • 6.Talmon on ḥarf in al-Kitāb
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 March 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.00136.kas
References

Primary sources

Al-ʿAyn = ʾAbū ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Ḫalīl b. ʾAḥmad al-Farāhīdī
Kitāb al-ʿAyn ed. by Mahdī al-Maḫzūmī & ʾIbrāhīm al-Sāmarrāʾī Beirut Dār wa-Maktabat al-Hilāl n.d.
Al-ʾAzharī, Šarḥ = Ḫālid b. ʿAbdallāh b. ʾAbī Bakr al-ʾAzharī
, Šarḥ al-ʾĀǧurrūmiyya ed. by Ḥāyif al-Nabhān. Kuwait: Dār al-Ẓāhiriyya 2017.Google Scholar
Ibn Ḫarūf, Šarḥ = ʾAbū al-Ḥasan ʿAlī b. Muḥammad b. ʿAlī Ibn Ḫarūf
, Šarḥ Ǧumal al-Zaǧǧāǧī. Pt. 1 (min al-ʾawwal ḥattā nihāyat bāb al-muḫāṭaba) ed. by Salwā Muḥammad ʿUmar ʿArab. Mecca: Maʿhad al-Buḥūṯ al-ʿIlmiyya wa-ʾIḥyāʾ al-Turāṯ al-ʾIslāmī, 1419 AH. Pt. 2 (min bāb al-hiǧāʾ ḥattā bāb al-ḥikāya) ed. by Salwā Muḥammad ʿUmar ʿArab. Jeddah: Markaz al-Našr al-ʿIlmī, Ǧāmiʿat al-Malik ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz 1427 AH.Google Scholar
Ibn ʿUṣfūr, Šarḥ = Ibn ʿUṣfūr
Šarḥ Ǧumal al-Zaǧǧāǧī ed. by Ṣāḥib ʾAbū Ǧanāḥ n.p., n.d.
Ǧābir b. Ḥayyān, Muḫtār rasāʾil
= Muḫtār rasāʾil Ǧābir ibn Ḥayyān (Jābir ibn Ḥayyān, Essai sur l’histoire des idées scientifiques dans l’Islam. Vol I1: Textes choisis) ed. by Paul Kraus. Paris: Librairie orientale et américaine 1935.Google Scholar
Al-Makkūdī, Šarḥ = ʾAbū Zayd ʿAbd al-Raḥmān b. ʿAlī b. Ṣāliḥ al-Makkūdī
, Šarḥ matn al-ʾĀǧurrūmiyya ed. by ʾAḥmad b. ʾIbrāhīm b. ʿAbd al-Mawlā al-Muġaynī. Cairo: al-Maktaba al-ʾIslāmiyya 2005.Google Scholar
Al-Mubarrad, al-Muqtaḍab = ʾAbū al-ʿAbbās Muḥammad b. Yazīd al-Mubarrad
, Kitāb al-Muqtaḍab ed. by Muḥammad ʿAbd al-Ḫāliq ʿUḍayma. 3rd ed. Cairo: Laǧnat ʾIḥyāʾ al-Turāṯ al-ʾIslāmī 1994.Google Scholar
Sībawayhi, al-Kitāb = Le livre de Sībawaihi
ed. by Hartwig Derenbourg. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale 1881–1889.Google Scholar
Al-Sīrāfī, Šarḥ = ʾAbū Saʿīd al-Sīrāfī, al-Ḥasan b. ʿAbdallāh b. al-Marzubān
, Šarḥ Kitāb Sībawayhi ed. by ʾAḥmad Ḥasan Mahdalī & ʿAlī Sayyid ʿAlī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya 2008.Google Scholar
Al-Zamaḫšarī, al-Kaššāf = Ǧār Allāh ʾAbū al-Qāsim Maḥmūd b. ʿUmar al-Zamaḫšarī
, al-Kaššāf ʿan ḥaqāʾiq ġawāmiḍ al-tanzīl wa-ʿuyūn al-ʾaqāwīl fī wuǧūh al-taʾwīl ed. by ʿĀdil ʾAḥmad ʿAbd al-Mawǧūd & ʿAlī Muḥammad Muʿawwaḍ. Riyadh: Maktabat al-ʿUbaykān 1998.Google Scholar

Secondary sources

Baalbaki, Ramzi
1979 “Some Aspects of Harmony and Hierarchy in Sībawayhi’s Grammatical Analysis”. Zeitschrift für Arabische Linguistik 21.7–22.Google Scholar
ed. 2007 The Early Islamic Grammatical Tradition. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
2014 The Arabic Lexicographical Tradition: From the 2nd/8th to the 12th/18th century. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohas, Georges & Michael Carter
trans. 2004 “Prolégomènes au Kitāb de Sībawayhi”. Langues et littératures du monde arabe 51.43–59.Google Scholar
Bravmann, Max
1934 Materialien und Untersuchungen zu den phonetischen Lehren der Araber. Göttingen: Dieterichsche Universitäts-Buchdruckerei (Inaugural-Dissertation, Schlesische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität zu Breslau).
Campbell, Lyle
2020 Historical Linguistics: An introduction. 4th ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, Michael G.
1972 “Les origines de la grammaire arabe”. Revue des Études Islamiques 401.69–97 (English translation, by Philip Simpson, in Baalbaki 2007: 1–26).Google Scholar
1973 “An Arab Grammarian of the Eighth Century A.D.: A contribution to the history of linguistics”. Journal of the American Oriental Society 931.146–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ed. 1981 Arab Linguistics: An introductory classical text with translation and notes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “Parts of Speech”. Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics, vol. III1, 546–552.Google Scholar
2015 “The Grammar of Affective Language in the Kitāb ”. The Foundations of Arabic Linguistics II. Kitāb Sībawayhi: Interpretation and transmission ed. by Amal Elesha Marogy & Kees Versteegh, 36–65. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diem, Werner
1974 “Nomen, Substantiv und Adjektiv bei den arabischen Grammatikern”. Oriens 23–241.312–332 (English translation, by A. Gwendolin Goldbloom, in Baalbaki 2007: 279–299).Google Scholar
Druel, Jean N. & Almog Kasher
2019 “ ‘Though This Be Madness, Yet There Is Method In’t’: The mamnūʿ min al-ṣarf (Diptotes) in Arabic Grammatical Tradition”. Arabica 661.98–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Wolfdietrich
1989 “Zur Herkunft des grammatischen Terminus ḥarf ”. Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam 121.135–145.Google Scholar
Fleisch, Henri
1971 “Ḥarf”. EI2 , vol. III1, 204–205.Google Scholar
Forster, Regula
2018 “Jābir b. Ḥayyān”. EI Three, Brill Online.Google Scholar
Gätje, Helmut
1971 “Die Gliederung der sprachlichen Zeichen nach al-Fārābī”. Der Islam 471.1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guillaume, Jean-Patrick
1988 “ ‘Le discours tout entier est nom, verbe et particule’: Élaboration et constitution de la théorie des parties du discours dans la tradition grammaticale arabe”. Langages 921.25–36 (English translation, by Philip Simpson, in Baalbaki 2007: 261–277). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Defining the Word within the Arabic Grammatical Tradition: ʾAstarābāḏī’s predicament”. The Word in Arabic ed. by Giuliano Lancioni & Lidia Bettini, 49–68. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 “Les parties du discours dans la tradition grammaticale arabe”. Histoire des parties du discours ed. by Bernard Colombat & Aimée Lahaussois, 475–490. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
2021 “L’«hypothèse grecque» et le débat sur les origines de la tradition grammaticale arabe”. Histoire Épistémologie Langage 43:1.61–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamzé, Hassan
1994 “Les parties du discours dans la tradition grammaticale arabe”. Les classes de mots: traditions et perspectives ed. by Louis Bassat & Marcel Perennec, 93–115. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.Google Scholar
Ighbariah, Ahmad
2016 “Grammatical Features in Ibn al-Muqaffaʿ’s Categories ”. Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam 431.251–271.Google Scholar
Jahn, Gustav
1894 “Zum Verständniss des Sîbawaihi: Eine Erwiderung”. ZDMG 48:4.1–21 (also appended to Jahn 1895–1900, vol. I/1).Google Scholar
1895–1900 Sîbawaihi’s Buch über die Grammatik übersetzt und erklärt. Berlin: Reuther & Reichard.Google Scholar
Karabekyan, Samvel & Marat Yavrumyan
2007 “Ḥarf”. Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics, vol. II1, 236–237.Google Scholar
Kasher, Almog
2009 “The Term ism in Medieval Arabic Grammatical Tradition: A hyponym of itself”. Journal of Semitic Studies 541.459–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Anachronistic Interpretation of Sībawayhi’s al-Kitāb: Al-Sīrāfī and the tanwīn-naṣb principle”. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 1011.273–284.Google Scholar
2016 “Is ḫalfa a Preposition? On a subclass of the ẓarf in Arabic grammatical tradition”. Folia Orientalia 531.113–130.Google Scholar
2018 “Early Pedagogical Grammars of Arabic”. Foundations of Arabic Linguistics III. The Development of a Tradition: Continuity and change ed. by Georgine Ayoub & Kees Versteegh, 146–166. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
2022 “Was ʾilā a Noun in Arabic Grammatical Tradition?”. Romano-Arabica 211.227–236.Google Scholar
Kinberg, Naphtali
1996 A Lexicon of al-Farrāʾ’s Terminology in His Qurʾān Commentary: With full definitions, English summaries and extensive citations. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kouloughli, Djamel Eddine
1986–1987 “Les particules ont-elles un sens? Autour d’une controverse dans la tradition grammaticale arabe”. BULAG (Bulletin de linguistique générale et appliquée) 131.215–237.Google Scholar
2001 “Réflexions sur l’origine du terme ‘ǧumla’ dans la tradition grammaticale arabe”. Métalangage et terminologie linguistique: Actes du colloque international de Grenoble, (Université Stendhal-Grenoble III, 14–16 mai 1998) ed. by Bernard Colombat & Marie Savelli, vol. I1, 577–589. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
trans 2004 “Préambule du Kitāb de Sībawayhi”. Langues et littératures du monde arabe 51.29–42.Google Scholar
Kraus, Paul
1942 Jābir ibn Ḥayyān: Contribution à l’histoire des idées scientifiques dans l’Islam. Vol. II1: Jābir et la science grecque. Cairo: Imprimerie de l’Institut français d’archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
Lane, Edward W.
1863–1893 An Arabic-English Lexicon. London: Williams & Norgate.Google Scholar
Larcher, Pierre
2011 “What is a Kalima? ʾAstarābāḏī’s answer”. The Word in Arabic ed. by Giuliano Lancioni & Lidia Bettini, 33–48. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Le système verbal de l’arabe classique. 2nd ed. Aix-en-Provence: Presses Universitaires de Provence.Google Scholar
2017 Syntaxe de l’arabe classique. Aix-en-Provence: Presses Universitaires de Provence.Google Scholar
2019 “ Kalām et ǧumla: proposition, phrase, énoncé dans la tradition linguistique arabe”. Proposition, phrase, énoncé: Linguistique et philosophie ed. by Franck Neveu, 45–72. London: ISTE Editions.Google Scholar
Levin, Aryeh
1985 “The Distinction between Nominal and Verbal Sentences according to the Arab Grammarians”. Zeitschrift für Arabische Linguistik 151.118–127.Google Scholar
1986 “The Medieval Arabic Term Kalima and the Modern Linguistic Term Morpheme: Similarities and differences”. Studies in Islamic History and Civilization in Honour of Professor David Ayalon ed. by Moshe Sharon, 423–446. Jerusalem: Cana. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987 “The Views of the Arab Grammarians on the Classification and Syntactic Function of Prepositions”. Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam 101.342–367.Google Scholar
2000a “The Meaning of ḥarf ǧāʾa li-maʿnan in Sībawayhi’s al-Kitāb ”. Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam 241.22–48.Google Scholar
2000b “Sībawayhi”. History of the Language Sciences: An International Handbook on the Evolution of the Study of Language from the Beginning to the Present ed. by Sylvain Auroux, E. F. Konrad Koerner, Hans-Josef Niederehe & Kees Versteegh, vol. 11, 252–263. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2011 “The Concept of Kalima in Old Arabic Grammar”. The Word in Arabic ed. by Giuliano Lancioni & Lidia Bettini, 17–32. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “What Does Sībawayhi Mean by ḥarfun… laysa bi-smin wa-lā fiʿlin ”. Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam 431.191–208.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977 Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Merx, Adalbert
1889 Historia artis grammaticae apud Syros. Leipzig: Brockhaus.Google Scholar
1891 “L’origine de la grammaire arabe”. Bulletin de l’Institut Égyptien, troisième série 21.13–26.Google Scholar
2023 A History of the Study of Grammar among the Syrians: An English translation of Historia artis grammaticae apud Syros, trans. by Daniel King. Piscataway: Gorgias Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike
1975 Die syntaktische Terminologie bei Sibawaih, PhD Dissertation, University of Munich.
Nasser, Shady Hekmat
2013  The Transmission of the Variant Readings of the Qurʾān: The problem of tawātur and the emergence of shawādhdh. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noy, Avigail S.
2006 The Concept of ʾištiġāl in Medieval Arabic Grammatical Tradition. MA Thesis, Tel-Aviv University [in Hebrew].
1990 Early Arabic Grammatical Theory: Heterogeneity and standardization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peled, Yishai
1999 “Aspects of the Use of Grammatical Terminology in Medieval Arabic Grammatical Tradition”. Arabic Grammar and Linguistics ed. by Yasir Suleiman, 50–85. Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar
2009 Sentence Types and Word-Order Patterns in Written Arabic: Medieval and modern perspectives. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Praetorius, Franz
1894 Review of Jahn (1895–1900). Göttingische gelehrte Anzeigen 705–715.Google Scholar
1895 Zum Verständnisse Sibawaihi’s. Halle a.S: Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
1909 “Ḥarfun = Terminus.” ZDMG 631.504–505.Google Scholar
Rundgren, Frithiof
1976 “Über den griechischen Einfluss auf die arabische Nationalgrammatik”. Acta Societatis Linguisticae Upsaliensis 2:5.119–144 (English translation by A. Gwendolin Goldbloom, in Baalbaki 2007: 75–99).Google Scholar
Schoeler, Gregor
2000 “Wer ist der Verfasser des Kitāb al-ʿAyn ”. Zeitschrift für Arabische Linguistik 381.15–45 (English translation in Chapter 6 of Gregor Schoeler 2006 The Oral and the Written in Early Islam, trans. by Uwe Vagelpohl, ed. by James E. Montgomery. London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Silvestre de Sacy
1829 Anthologie grammaticale arabe, ou Morceaux choisis de divers grammairiens et scholiastes arabes, avec une traduction française et des notes. Paris: Imprimerie royale.Google Scholar
Ṭāhā, Zaynab ʾAḥmad (= Zeinab A. Taha
) 2020 Malāmiḥ min taṭawwur al-fikr al-luġawī: min Sībawayhi ʾilā al-Ǧurǧānī. Cairo: al-Hayʾa al-Miṣriyya al-ʿĀmma li-l-Kitāb.Google Scholar
Talmon, Rafael
1984 “ al-Tafkīr al-naḥwī qabla Kitāb Sībawayhi – dirāsa fī taʾrīḫ al-muṣṭalaḥ al-naḥwī al-ʿarabī ”. al-Karmil 51.37–53.Google Scholar
1991 “ Naẓra ǧadīda fī qaḍiyyat ʾaqsām al-kalām: dirāsa ḥawla kitāb Ibn al-Muqaffaʿ fī al-manṭiq ”. al-Karmil 121.43–67.Google Scholar
2003 Eighth-Century Iraqi Grammar: A critical exploration of pre-Ḫalīlian Arabic linguistics. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Troupeau, Gérard
1973–1974 “La Risālat al-Kitāb de Sībawayhi”. Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph 481.321–338.Google Scholar
1976 Lexique-index du Kitāb de Sībawayhi. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
1981 “La logique d’Ibn al-Muqaffaʿ et les origines de la grammaire arabe”. Arabica 281.242–250 (English translation, by Philip Simpson, in Baalbaki 2007: 27–35).Google Scholar
Versteegh, Kees
1977 Greek Elements in Arabic Linguistic Thinking. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 The Explanation of Linguistic Causes: al-Zaǧǧāǧī’s theory of grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 Landmarks in Linguistic Thought III: The Arabic Linguistic Tradition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weiss, Josef
1910 “Die arabische Nationalgrammatik und die Lateiner”. ZDMG 641.349–390.Google Scholar