Cover not available
Review article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 1:1 (1974) ► pp.95–110
Review article

The Neogrammarians: A re-evaluation of their place in the development of linguistic science. By Kurt R[obert] Jankowsky

reviewer
| University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Published online: 1 January 1974
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.1.1.08dav
References

For further bibliographical references for the study of 19th-century linguistics, consult Koeiner 1972b:216–326. Ed.

These studies, together with others pertaining to the Lautgesetz controversy, are scheduled to appear in one volume ed. with an introductory essay by Terence H. Wilbur under the title The Lautgesetz Controversy, 1885–86: A documentation (Amsterdam: J. Benjamins). Ed.

Adam, Lucien
1881 “La linguistique, est-elle une science naturelle ou une science historique? ”. Revue de linguistique et de philologie comparée 141.373–95.Google Scholar
1882 “La linguistique et la doctrine de l’évolution”. Ibid. 151.21–38.Google Scholar
Ascoli, Graziadio Isaia
1886 “Dei neogrammatici”. AGI 101.18–90.Google Scholar
1887 Sprachwissenschaftliche Briefe. Transi, by Bruno Güterbock. Leipzig: S. Hirzel. [New ed. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins (in prep.).]Google Scholar
Benware, Wilbur A.
1970 A History of the Research on Indo-European Vocalism from Rasmus Rask to August Schleicher, 1811–1868. Ph.D. Diss., Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, N.C.Google Scholar
Bezzenberger, Adalbert
1879a Review of G. I. Ascoli, Kritische Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft transl, by Reinhold Merzdorf (Weimar: H. Böhlau 1878) GGA, No. 181.555–63.Google Scholar
1879b Review of Osthoff & Brugmann 1878 GGA, No. 21.641–81.Google Scholar
Bopp, Franz
1820 [1889] “Analytical Comparison of the Sanskrit, Greek, Latin, and Teutonic Languages; shewing [sic] the original indentity of their grammatical structure”. (Techmer’s) Internationale Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 41.14–60. [New ed. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins 1973.]Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl
1876 “Nasalis sonans in der indogermanischen Grundsprache”. Curtius Studien 91.287–338.Google Scholar
1879 “Zur Geschichte der Nominalsuffixe -as-, -jas- und -vas- ”. KZ 241.1–99.Google Scholar
1885 Zum heutigen Stand der Sprachwissenschaft Strassburg: K. J. Trübner.** DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1894 “Zum Gedächtniss [sic] W.D.Whitney’s”. JAOS 191.74–81 [1897].Google Scholar
Chavée, Honoré Joseph
1849 Lexiologie [sic] indo-européenne; ou, Essai sur la science des mots. Paris: A. Franck.Google Scholar
1862 Les langues et les races. Paris: Chamerot.Google Scholar
Collitz, Hermann
1879 Review of Osthoff & Brugmann 1878 Anzeiger für deutsches Altertum and deutsche Literatur 51.318–48.Google Scholar
1886 Die neueste Sprachforschung und die Erklärung des indogermanischen Ablautes. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.**Google Scholar
Curtius, Georg
1885 Zur Kritik der neuesten Sprachforschung. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.**Google Scholar
Davis, Boyd II
1972 A History of the Research on Indo-European Vocalism, 1868–1892. Ph.D. Diss., Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, N.C.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold
1880 Einleitung in das Sprachstudium: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte und Methodik der vergleichenden Sprachforschung. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel. 3rd rev. ed. 1893 [Note that the 4th and subsequent editions of this study constitute an entirely different book altogether.]Google Scholar
1882 Introduction to the Study of Language: A critical survey of the history and methods of comparative philology. Transi, by Eva Channing. [New ed. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins 1973.]Google Scholar
1885 Die neueste Sprachforschung: Betrachtungen über Georg Curtius’ Schrift “Zur Kritik der neuesten Sprachforschung”. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.**Google Scholar
Fischer, David Hackett
1970; Historians’ Fallacies: Toward a logic of historical thought. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Gazdaru, Demetrio
1967 Controversias y documentos Imguisticos. La Plata/ Argentina: Inst, de Filologia, Univ. Nacional de La Plata.Google Scholar
Hovelacque, Abel
1878 “L’oeuvre linguistique de Chavée”. Revue de linguistique et de philologie comparée 111.105–118.Google Scholar
Hughes, John P.
1962 The Science of Language: An introduction to linguistics. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Kluge, Friedrich
1879 Beiträge zur Geschichte der germanischen Conjugation. Strassburg: K. J. Trübner. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K.
1972a Bibliographia Saussureana, 1870–1970: An annotated, classified bibliography on the background, development and actual relevance of Ferdinand de Saussure’s general theory of language. Metuchen, New Yersey: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
1972b “Towards a Historiography of Linguistics: 19th and 20th century Paradigms”. AnL 14:7.255–80. [A thoroughly rev. version is to appear in The History of Lingiustic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics ed. by Herman Parret (The Hague: Mouton).]Google Scholar
Kruszewski, Mikolaj
1881 Ueber die Lautabwechslung. Kazan: Universitätsbuchdruckerei.Google Scholar
Leskien, August
1876 Die Deklination im Slavisch-Litauischen und Germanischen. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine
1912 Introduction à Tétude comparative des langues indoeuropéennes. 3rd rev. ed. Paris: Hachette. (8th rev. ed., prepared by Emile Benveniste, ibid. 1937 Repr. University, Ala.: Univ. of Alabama Press 1964.)Google Scholar
1921–37 Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. 21 vols. Paris: Hachette. [There exist several reprints.]Google Scholar
Müller, F. Max
1867–1875 Chips from a German Workshop. 41 vols. London: Longmans, Green & Co.; New York: Scribner, Armstrong & Co. 1871–76 [Cf. especially vol. 41, subtitled “Essays Chiefly on the Science of Language”, rev. ed., ibid. 1884.]Google Scholar
Osthoff, Hermann
1879 “Kleine Beträge zur Declinationslehre der indogermanischen Sprachen II”. Morphologische Untersuchungen..…21.1–147.Google Scholar
1880 Review of Scherer 1878 Germania 251.109–13.Google Scholar
Osthoff, Hermann, and Karl Brugmann
1878–1910 Morphologische Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen. 61 vols. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.Google Scholar
Paul Hermann
1879 “Zur Geschichte des germanischen Vocalismus”. PBB 61.1–256.Google Scholar
1880 Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. 5th rev. ed. Halle/S.: M. Niemeyer 1920 [Later editions are merely reprints of the 5th ed.]Google Scholar
Pedersen, Holger
1962 The Discovery of Language: Lingiustic science in the nineteenth century. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press. [= Re-ed. of 1931–transl. by John Webster Spargo of the 1924 Dan. original.]Google Scholar
Pott, August Friedrich
1887 Zur Litteratur der Sprachenkunde Europas, Leipzig: J. A. Barth. (Repr. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins 1973.)Google Scholar
Rask, Rasmus Kristian
l932[-35] Ausgewählte Abhandlungen. I[-III]1 ed. by Louis Hjelmslev. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1878a Review of Adolphe Pictet, Les origines indoeuropéennes ou les ary as primitives, 2nd rev. ed., 31 vols. (Paris: Sandoz & Fischbacher 1877) Journal de Genève (17, 19, and 25 April). (Repr. in F. de Saussure, Recueil des publications scientifiques ed. by Charles Bally and Leopold Gautier, 391–402. Lausanne: Payot; repr. Geneva: Slatkine 1970.)Google Scholar
1878 Mémoire sur le système primitif des voyelles dans les langues indo-européennes. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner 1879 (Repr. Hildesheim: G. Olms 1968.)Google Scholar
Scherer, Wilhelm
1878 Zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache. 2nd rev. ed. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo
1885 Ueber die Lautgesetze: Gegen die Junggrammatiker. Berlin: Oppenheim. (Repr., together with an E. transl., in Schuchardt, the Neo-grammarians, and the Transformational Theory of Phonological Change: Four essays by H. Schuchardt, Theo Vennemann, and Terence H. Wilbur, 7–37, and 41–72 respectively. Frankfurt: Athenäum 1972.)**Google Scholar
Techmer, Friedrich
1880 Zur vergleichenden Physiologie der Stimme und Sprache: Phonetik 21 parts. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1884–90 Internationale Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft. 5 vols, and 1 supplement [= Pott 1887] (Repr. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins 1973.)Google Scholar
1890 Beiträge zur Geschichte der französischen und englischen Phonetik und Phonographie. Ulm: Kerler. (Re-ed. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins [in prep.]).Google Scholar
Terrien de Lacouperie, Albert
1867 Du langage: Essai sur la nature et l’étude des mots et des langues. Paris & Leipzig: A. Franck.Google Scholar
Wallensköld, Axel Gabriel
1895 “Zur Klärung der Lautgesetzfrage”. Abhandlungen … Adolf Tobler… dargegebracht, 289–305. Halle/S.: M. Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight
1886 “Remarks on F. A. March’s Paper on the Neo-grammarians”. Proceedings of the American Philological Associa tion 181: xxi.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

ROCHER, ROSANE
1979. The Past up to the Introduction of Neogrammarian Thought: Whitney and Europe. In The European Background of American Linguistics, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.