Review published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 1:1 (1974) ► pp.129136
References
Aarsleff, Hans
1967The Study of Language in England, 1780–1860. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Akhmanova, Olga, and Galina Mikael’an
1969The Theory of Syntax in Modern Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Arens, Hans
1955Sprachwissenschaft: Der Gang ihrer Entwicklung von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart. Freiburg & Munich: K. Alber. (2nd ed. 1969.)Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933Language:. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl
1876 “Nasalis sonans in der indogermanischen Grundsprache”. (Curtius’) Studien zur griechischen und lateinischen Grammatik 91.287–338.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio
1967 “Georg von der Gabelentz et la linguistique synchro-nique”. Word 231.74–100 [1969] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dinneen, Francis P., S.J.
1967An Introduction to General Linguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Godel, Robert
1971 Review of Szemerényi 1971 Kratylos 16:1.87–88 [1973].Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar, and T. L. Markey
1972The Scandinavian Languages: Fifty years of linguistic research (1918–1968) The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helbig, Gerhard
1970Geschichte der neueren Sprachwissenschaft. Leipzig: VEB Bibliogr. Inst.; Munich: M. Hueber 1971 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F.
1965 “Sound Change”. Lg 411.185–204.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1965Phonological Change. MIT diss. Cambridge, Mass. (Reproduced, Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana Univ. Linguistics Club 1971.)Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K.
1971 Review of G. von der Gabelentz., Die Sprachwissenschaft, repr. of 1901-ed. (Tübingen: Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 1969) [and of Coseriu 1967] Lingua 281.153–59. [Cf. also the ensuing discussion in Lingua 301.460–63 (1972).]Google Scholar
1972a Review of Arens 1969 [1955] Lg 481.428–45.Google Scholar
1972b “Hermann Paul and Synchronic Linguistics”. Lingua 291.274–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1970 “The Study of Language in Its Social Context”. Studium Generale 231.30–87.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P.
(ed.) 1967A Reader in Nineteenth-Century Historical Indo-European Linguistics. Bloomington & London: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Leroy, Maurice
1963Les grands courants de la linguistique moderne. Brussels: Presses Univ. de Bruxelles. (2nd rev. ed. 1971.) [E. transl., Main Trends in Modem Linguistics prepared by Glanville Price. Oxford: B. Blackwell 1967.]Google Scholar
Malmberg, Bertil
1959Nya vägar inom språkforskingen: En orientering i modem lingvistik. Stockholm: Svenska bokförlaget. (4th ed. 1969) [E. transi., New Trends in Linguistics prepared by Edward Carney. Stockholm & Lund: Naturmetodens Språkinst. 1964.]Google Scholar
Mohrmann, Christine. Alf Sommerfelt, and Joshua Whatmough
(eds.) 1961Trends in European and American Linguistics 1930–1960. Utrecht & Antwerp: Spectrum.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M.
1968Aspects of Phonological Theory. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Rensch, Karl Heinz
1966 “Ferdinand de Saussure und Georg von der Gabelentz: Uebereinstimmungen und Gemeinsamkeiten dargestellt an der langue-parole Dichotomie sowie der diachronischen und synchronischen Sprachbetrachtung”. Phonetica 151.32–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robins, R. H.
1967A Short History of Linguistics. London: Longmans; Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana Univ. Press 1968 (2nd ed. 1970.)Google Scholar
Schleicher, August
1858Volkstümliches aus Sonneberg im Meiniger Oberlande. Weimar: H. Böhlau.Google Scholar
Schindler, Johann Andreas
1872–77Baierisches Wörterbuch. 21 vols. 2nd rev. ed., prepared by Georg Karl Frommann. Stuttgart: J.G. Cotta. (First ed. 1827–28.)Google Scholar
Zwirner, Eberhard
1969 “Zur Herkunft und Funktion des Begriffspaares Synchronie-Diachronie”. Sprache – Gegenwart und Geschichte: Probleme der Synchronie und Diachronie ed. by Hugo Moser, et al., 30–51. Düsseldorf: Schwann.Google Scholar