Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 1:3 (1974) ► pp.297311
References
Ashley, Maurice
1966England in the Seventeenth Century. Baltimore, Md.: Penguin.Google Scholar
Baugh, Albert C(roll
b.1891). 1963A History of the English Language. 2nd rev. ed. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Bolton, W(hitney) F(rench)
ed. 1966The English Language: Essays by English and American men of letters, 1490–1839. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Bonet, Juan Pablo
(1579–1633). 1620Reduction de las letras, y arte para enseñr a ablar los mudos. Madrid: F. A. de Angulo.Google Scholar
Brightland, John
, see Gildon 1711Google Scholar
Campbell, George
(1719–96). 1776The Philosophy of Rhetoric. 21 vols. London: W. Strahan. (2nd ed. 1801; frequently reprinted. New ed. prepared by Lloyd F. Bitzer, Carbondale: Southern Illinois Univ. Press 1963.)Google Scholar
Comenius, Johann Amos
(1592–1670). 1627Didactica magna. Amsterdam: C. Cunrad & G. van Roy.Google Scholar
Constantinescu, Ilinca
1972 “Pe marginea unei gramatici engleze publicate acum trei sute de ani”, SCL 231.653–55.Google Scholar
Cooper, Christopher
(d.1698). 1685Grammatica linguae anglicanae. Peregrinis eam addiscendi cupidis pernecessaria, nec non Anglis praecipuè scholis, plurimum profutura …. London: B. Tooke. (Re-ed. by John D. Jones, Halle/S.: M. Niemeyer 1911.)Google Scholar
Dobson, E(ric) J(ohn)
ed. 1957aThe Phonetic Writings of Robert Robinson. London: Oxford Univ. Press. (Repr. 1968.)Google Scholar
1957bEnglish Pronunciation, 1500–1700. 21 vols. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. (2nd ed. 1968.)Google Scholar
Fries, Charles C(arpenter
1884–1967). 1925 “The Periphrastic Future of shall and will in Modern English”. PMLA 401.963–1024. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1884–1967). 1965Linguistics: The study of Language. (= Sep. ed. of chap. II of Fries’ Linguistics and Reading of 1963.) New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Funke, Otto (Victor Conrad Wilhelm
1885–1973). 1926 “Sprachphilosophische Probleme bei Bacon”. Englische Studien 611.24–56.Google Scholar
1885–1973). 1941Die Frühzeit der englischen Grammatik: Die humanistisch-antike Sprachlehre und der nationalsprachliche Gedanke im Spiegel der frühneuenglischen Grammatik von Bullokar (1586) bis Wallis (1653). Die grammatische Systematik und die Klassifikation der Redeteile. Berne: H. Lang & Cie.Google Scholar
Gildon, Charles
(1665–1724), and John Brightland (no dates) 1711 A Grammar of the English Tongue, with notes giving the grounds and reason of grammar in general. …. London: Printed for J. Brightland. (2nd rev. ed., printed by R. Brugis 1712; 8th ed., London: J. Rivington & J. Fletcher 1759 Facs.-ed. of 1st ed., Menston: Scolar Press 1967.)Google Scholar
Hall, Robert A(nderson), Jr.
1960Linguistics and your Language. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday & Co.Google Scholar
1964Introductory Linguistics. Philadelphia: Chilton Books. (2nd printing 1967.)Google Scholar
Hart, John
(d.1574). 1569An Orthographie, conteyning the due order and reason howe to write or paint thimage [sic] of mannes voice, most like to the life of nature. London: W. Serres. (Repr. Menston: Scolar Press 1969.)Google Scholar
Helmont, Franciscus Mercurius
, Baron van (1618–99). 1667Kurtzer Entwurff des eigentlichen Natur-Alphabets der Heiligen Sprache; nach dessen Anleitung man auch Taubgebohrne verstehend und redend machen kan. Sulzbach: A. Lichtenthaler. (Re-ed. by Wilhelm Viëtor, Berlin: Fischer 1916.)Google Scholar
Horn, Wilhelm
(1876–1952). 1954Laut und Leben: Englische Lautgeschichte der neueren Zeit (1400–1950). 2nd ed., 21 vols., prepared by Martin Lehnert. Berlin: Akad.-Verlag.Google Scholar
Howell, James
(1594? -1666). 1662The New English Grammar. Also another grammar of the Spanish toung: A perambulation of Spain and Portugall. London: T. Williams.Google Scholar
Hulbert, James R(oot
b.1884). 1947 “On the Origin of the Grammarians’ Rules for the Use of ‘shall’ and ‘will’ ”. PMLA 621.1178–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemp, J. A.
ed. & transl. 1972John Wallis’s Grammar of the English Language, with an introductory Treatise on Speech (or on the formation of all speech sounds). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Arthur G(arfield
1880–1954). 1927A Bibliography of Writings on the English Language; from the beginning of printing to the end of 1922. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press; New Haven, Conn.: Yale Univ. Press. (Repr. New York: Hafner 1961.)Google Scholar
Lehnert, Martin
1936Die Grammatik des englischen Sprachmeisters John Wallis (1616–1703). Breslau: Priebatsch.Google Scholar
1938 “Die Anfänge der wissenschaftlichen und praktischen Phonetik in England”. ASNS 1731.163–80, and 1741.28–35.Google Scholar
Liles, Bruce L.
1972Linguistics and the English Language. Pacific Palisades: Goodyear Publ. Co.Google Scholar
Locke, John
(1632–1704). 1693Some Thoughts concerning Education. London: A. & J. Churchill. (6th ed. 1709.)Google Scholar
Lowth, Robert
(1710–87). 1762A Short Introduction to English Grammar. London: A. Miller & R. & J. Dodsby. (Repr. Menston: Scolar Press 1967.)Google Scholar
Malmberg, Bertil
1971Les domaines de la phonétique. Paris: Presses Univ. de France.Google Scholar
Melchior, A. B.
1972 “Sir Thomas Smith and John Wallis: The problem of Early Modern English [y:] re-examined”. ES 53:3.210–23.Google Scholar
Michael, Ian
1970English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Mulcaster, Richard
(1530? -1611). 1582The First Part of the Elementarie. London: T. Vautrouiller. (Re-ed., with an introd. by Ernest Trafford Campagne, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1925; facs.-repr. of 1st ed., Menston: Scolar Press 1970.)Google Scholar
Murray, Lindley
(1745–1826). 1795English Grammar, adapted to the different classes of learners. With an appendix, containing rules and observations for assisting the more advanced students to write with perspicuity and accuracy [Subtitle varies]. York: Wilson, Spence & Mawman. (Repr. Menston: Scolar Press 1968; 3rd rev. ed., 21 vols., London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme & Brown 1816.)Google Scholar
Poldauf, Ivan
1948On the History of Some Problems of English Grammar before 1800. Prague: Nákl. Filosofické Faculty Univ. Karlovy.Google Scholar
Priestley, Joseph
(1733–1804). 1761The Rudiments of English Grammar. London: R. Griffiths. (Repr. Menston: Scolar Press 1969.)Google Scholar
Ramus, Petrus Pierre de La Ramée
1515–72). 1562Gramere [sic]. Paris: A. Wechel. (Repr., together with Ramus’ Grammaire of 1572 and Dialectiques of 1555, Geneva: Slatkine 1972.)Google Scholar
Raney, George William
1972The Accidence and Syntax in J. Wallis’s “Grammatica Linguae Anglicanae”: A translation and commentary on its alleged relationship to the 1660 Port-Royal Grammaire générale et raisonnée. Unpubl. Ph.D. diss. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Univ. Microfilms.Google Scholar
Robins, R(obert) H(enry)
Robinson, Robert
(c.1580-c.1660). 1617The Art of Pronunciation. London: N. Okes. (Repr. in Dobson 1957a: 1–28.)Google Scholar
Troike, Rudolph C(harles)
In press . “Lest the Wheel be too oft Re-invented: Towards a reassessment of the intellectual history of linguistics”. Festschrift for Archibald A. Hill ed. by Edgar Polomé, et al. The Hague Mouton DOI logo
Vorlat, Emma
1964Progress in English Grammar, 1585–1735. 41 vols. Luxembourg: A. Peiffer.Google Scholar
Wallis, John
1653Grammatica linguae Anglicanae. Cui praefigitur, De Loquela; sive sonorum formatione, tractatus grammatico-physicus. (Facs.-repr. of 1st ed., Menston: Scolar Press 1969; 4th ed. 1674; 6th ed. 1765.)Google Scholar
White, Richard Grant
(1821–85). 1870Words and their Uses, past and present: A study of the English language. New York: Sheldon & Co. (3rd rev. ed., Boston: Houghton, Mifflin & Co. 1880; latest reprint 1899.)Google Scholar
Wildgen, Wolfgang
1973 “F. M. van Helmont (1614–1699): His contribution to phonetics”. Language Sciences 241.7–9.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Isermann, Michael
Mitchell, Linda C.
2019. Grammar Wars. In The Handbook of World Englishes,  pp. 473 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.