Contributors to the beginnings of language typology
Coseriu’s article, “Adam Smith und die Anfänge der Sprachtypologie”, (the translation of which precedes this article) served as the stimulus for this discussion of the contributions several scholars have made to the beginnings of language typology. The works of A. W. Schlegel, Friedrich Schlegel, Adam Smith, and Gabriel Girard are reviewed in an attempt to place the beginnings of language typology in perspective. Although several parallels are evident in the classification systems of these four, some differences, particularly with respect to the role that language development played, do exist. For example, both Smith and A. W. Schlegel considered the influence of language development, while Friedrich Schlegel did not. Moreover, both Smith and A. W. Schlegel were aware of the effect of the linguistic environment on language; they realized that language changes even in linguistic isolation, although they differed in their reasoning. A comparison between Smith’s and Girard’s systems reveals that the criteria for their classification systems were reversed. Contrary to Smith, Girard considered uninflected languages (analogues – and fixed word order) to be more logical than inflected languages (transpositives – and free word order). Smith also maintained that inflected (uncompounded) languages – and free word order – developed first because indicating modification by changing the structure of the word itself requires less abstract reasoning than does periphrasing with fixed word order.
References (38)
Bibliography
[* Added in proof by the editor.]
Aarsleff, Hans. 1967. The Study of Language in England, 1780–1860. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aarsleff, Hans. 1975. “The Eighteenth Century, Including Leibniz”. Current Trends in Linguistics, ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, vol.131: Historiography of Linguistics, 383–479. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aarsleff, Hans. 1982. From Locke to Saussure: Essays on the study of language and intellectual history. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arens, Hans. 1969. Sprachwissenschaft: Der Gang ihrer Entwicklung von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart. 2nd ed. Freiburg & München: Karl Alber.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benfey, Theodor. 1869. Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft und orientalischen Philologie in Deutschland seit dem Anfange des 19. Jahrhunderts mit einem Rückblick auf die früheren Zeiten. München: J.G. Cotta. (Repr. New York: Johnson, 1965.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berry, Christopher J. 1977. “Adam Smithߣs Considerations on Language”. JHI 381.130–38.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bonar, James. 1966. A Catalogue of the Library of Adam Smith. 2nd ed. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1970. (1968). “Adam Smith und die Anfänge der Sprachtypologie”. Adam Smith: A Dissertation on the origin of language. Ed. by Gunter Narr. Tübingen: TBL Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1972. “Über die Sprachtypologie Wilhelm von Humboldts”. Beiträge zur vergleichenden Literaturgeschichte: Festschrift für Kurt Wais zum 65. Geburtstag, unter Mitarbeit von Wolfgang Eitel, ed. by Johannes Hösle, 107–135. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1972. Die Geschichte der Sprachphilosophie von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart: Eine Übersicht. Teil II1: Von Leibniz bis Rousseau. Tübingen: TBL Verlag Gunter Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diderichsen, Paul. 1974. “The Foundation of Comparative Linguistics: Revolution or Continuation?” Studies in the History of Linguistics: Traditions and Paradigms ed. by Dell Hymes, 277–306. Bloomington & London: Indiana Univ. Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Funke, Otto. 1934. Englische Sprachphilosophie im späteren 18. Jahrhundert. Bern: A. Francke.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Girard, Abbé Gabriel. 1747. Les vrais principes de la langue françoise: ou La parole réduite en méthode, conformément aux loix de lߣusage: en seize discours. 21 vote. Paris: Le Breton. (Repr. in one vol., with an introd. by Pierre Swiggers, Geneva: Droz, 1982.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1974. Language Typology: A historical and analytic overview. The Hague: Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Home, Kibbey M. 1966. Language Typology: 19th and 20th century views. Washington: D.C.: Georgetown University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jellinek, Max Hermann. 1913, 1914. Geschichte der neuhochdeutschen Grammatik: Von der Anfängen bis auf Adelung. Vols. 1 and 21. Heidelberg: Carl Winter. (Vol. 11 reprinted, 1968.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaitz, Barbara. 1980. “‘Les vrais principes de la langue françoise’ de lߣabbé Girard devant la critique du XVIIIe siècle à nos jours”. Progress in Linguistic Historiography ed. by Konrad Koerner, 175–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Land, Stephen K. 1974. “Adam Smithߣs ‘Considerations concerning the First Formation of Languages’”. JHI 351.677–80.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malkiel, Yakov. 1973. “The Third Schlegel (Editorial comment)”. RomPh 271.67–68.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Monreal-Wickert, Irene. 1977. Die Sprachforschung der Aufklärung im Spiegel der grossen französischen Enzyklopädie. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rae, John. 1965. Life of Adam Smith. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Renzi, Lorenzo. 1976. “Histoire et objectifs de la typologie linguistique”. History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics ed. by Herman Parret, 633–57. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robins, R(obert) H(enry). 1967. A Short History of Linguistics. 2nd ed. London: Longmans. (2nd rev. ed., 1979.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robins, R(obert) H(enry). 1973. “The History of Language Classification”. Current Trends in Linguistics ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, vol. 111.3–41. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schlegel, August Wilhelm. 1818. Observations sur la Langue et Littérature Provençales. Paris: Libr. Grecque-Latine-Allemande. (Neudruck der ersten Ausgabe, Tübingen: Gunter Narr, 1971.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schlegel, August Wilhelm. 1963. Kritische Schriften und Briefe. Ed. by Edgar Lohner. Vol. 21. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schlegel, August Wilhelm. 1971. Sämmtliche Werke: Vermischte und kritische Schriften. Ed. by Eduard Böcking. Band XII1. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schlegel, Friedrich. 1808. Ueber die Sprache und Weisheit der Indier: Ein Beitrag zur Begründung der Altertumskunde. Heidelberg: Mohr & Zimmer. (New ed., Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1977.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schlegel, Friedrich. 1980. Kritische Schriften. Selected vols., ed. by Ernst Behler. Paderborn & München: Ferdinand Schönigh.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, Adam. 1853 (1761). The Theory of Moral Sentiments; to which is added, A Dissertation on the Origin of Languages. New prepared by Dugald Stewart. London: Henry G. Bohn.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thomsen, Vilhelm. 1927. Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft bis zum Ausgang des 19. Jahrhunderts. Translated by Hans Pollak. Halle/Saale: Max Niemeyer. (Repr., Bern-Frankfurt/Main-Las Vegas: P. Lang, 1979.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Twaddell, W(illiam) F(reedman). 1943. “Fr. Schlegelߣs Criteria of Linguistic Relation”. Monatshefte 351.151–55.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verburg, Pieter Adrianus. 1951. Taal en Functionaliteit: Een historisch-critische studie over de opvattingen aangaande de functies der taal vanaf de praehumanistische philologie van Orleans tot de rationalistische linguistik van Bopp. Diss., Vrije Univ. van Amsterdam. (Printed, Wageningen: H. Veeman & Zonen, 1952.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wellek, Réne. 1941. The Rise of English Literary History. Chapel Hill, N.C.: Univ. of North Carolina Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Windross, Michael. 1980. “Adam Smith on Language”. Linguistica Antver-pensia 141.277–90.*![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Koerner, E. F. Konrad
1996.
Toward a history of linguistic typology. In
Linguistic Reconstruction and Typology,
► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Koerner, E.F.K.
1995.
History of Typology and Language Classification. In
Concise History of the Language Sciences,
► pp. 212 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.