Review published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 10:1/2 (1983) ► pp.97103
References (12)
Bibliography
Boyadjiev, Jivco. 1975. Review of T. A. Amirova, B. A. Olߣxovikov and Ju. V. Roždestvenskij, Očerki po istorii lingvistiki (Moskva: Nauka, 1975). HL 21.379–85.Google Scholar
Bursill-Hall, Geoffrey L.. 1971. Speculative Grammars in the Middle Ages: The doctrine of partes or ationis of the modistae. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Droixhe, Daniel. 1978. La linguistique et lߣappel de lߣhistoire (1600–1800): Rationalisme et révolutions positivistes. Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
Egli, Urs. 1970. “Zwei Aufsätze zum Vergleich der stoischen Sprachtheorie mit modernen Theorien”. (= Arbeitspapier, 2.) Universität Bern: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Householder, Fred. 1981. The Syntax of Apollonius Dyscolus. Translated with a commentary. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Richard William. 1980. The History of Grammar in the Middle Ages: Collected Papers. Ed. by G. L. Bursill-Hall. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joly, André. 1970. F. Thurot: Tableau des progrès de la science grammaticale (Discours préliminaire à “Hermès”). Introduction et notes par A. Joly. Bordeaux: Ducros.Google Scholar
Koerner, Konrad. 1982. “The Schleicherian Paradigm in Linguistics”. General Linguistics 221.1–39.Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, Gabriël. 1980. Late-Scholastic and Humanist Theories of the Proposition. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan. 1972. Logik und Semantik im Mittelalter: Ein Ueberblick. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Swiggers, Pierre. 1982. “Un modèle pour lߣhistoriographie de la linguistique. Note de discussion”. Bulletin dߣinformation de la Société dߣhistoire et d’épistémologie des sciences du langage 81.26–29.Google Scholar
. 1983. “La Grammaire de Port-Royal et le parallélisme logico-grammatical”. Orbis (to appear).Google Scholar