Cover not available
Review article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 12:1/2 (1985) ► pp.149–164
Review article

On stoic grammatical theory

 | Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.
Published online: 1 January 1985
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.12.1-2.08din
References (33)
References
Barwick, Karl. 1922. Remmius Palaemon und die römische ars grammatica. Göttingen: Dieterich’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung. (Repr., Hildesheim: G. Olms, 1967.)Google Scholar
. 1957. Probleme der stoischen Sprachlehre und Rhetorik. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Berlin, Brent & Paul Kay. 1969. Basic Color Terms. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Bocheński, I(nnocentins) M(aria). 1951. Ancient Formal Logic. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
. 1961. A History of Formal Logic. Transl. by Ivo Thomas. Notre Dame, Ind.: Univ. of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, Jacques, ed. 1978. Les Stoïciens et leur Logique: Actes du Colloque de Chantilly 18–22 septembre 1976. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Corcoran, John, ed. 1974. Ancient Logic and its Modern Interpretations: Proceedings of the Buffalo Symposium on Modernist Interpretations of Ancient Logic, 21 and 22 April, 1972. Dordrecht: Reidel. (Includes the editor’s paper, “Future Research on Ancient Theories of Communication and Reasoning.” [185–87].) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egli, Urs. 1967. Zur Stoischen Dialektik. Basel: Sandoz. (Originally Diss., Univ. of Bern.)Google Scholar
. 1974. Ansätze zur Integration der Semantik in die Grammatik. Kronberg/ Taunus: Scriptor Verlag.Google Scholar
. 1978. “Stoic Syntax and Semantics”. Brunschwig, 1978. 135–54.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, Victor. 1977. Le système stoicien et l’idée de temps. 3rd enl. ed. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Gould, Josiah. 1974. “Deduction in Stoic Logic”. Corcoran 1974. 151–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis. 1961. Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. Transl. by Francis Whitfield, 2nd rev. ed. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Householder, Fred W. 1981. The Syntax of Apollonius Dyscolus. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kneale, William and Martha. 1962. The Development of Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (2nd ed., 1970.)Google Scholar
Lukasiewicz, Jan. 1958. Aristotle’s Syllogistic. 2nd ed. Ibid.Google Scholar
Mates, Benson. 1953. Stoic Logic. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1980. Everything that Linguists Have Always Wanted to Know about Logic. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Minucci, Mario. 1967. Il Significato della Logica Stoica. Bologna: R. Pàtron.Google Scholar
Mulhern, John. 1974. “Modern Notations and Ancient Logic”. Corcoran 1974. 71–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulhern, Mary. 1974. “Corcoran on Aristotle’s Logical Theory”. Ibid., 133–48.Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan. 1962. “Das Sprachdenken der Stoia und Augustins Dialektik”. Classica et Mediaevalia 231.148–77.Google Scholar
. 1967. Die Entwicklung der Sprachtheorie im Mittelalter. Münster, Westf.: Aschendorffsche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
. 1975. “Classical Antiquity: Greece”. Current Trends in Linguistics, vol.131: Historiography of Linguistics, Part I1, 69–126. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, Max. 1939. Die Begründung der abendländischen Sprachlehre durch die Stoa. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
. 1959. Die Stoa: Geschichte einer geistigen Bewegung. 2. Auflage. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Prantl, Carl. 1855. Geschichte der Logik im Abendlande. Bd. 11 Leipzig: S. Hirzel.Google Scholar
Rist, John M. ed. 1969. Stoic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
1978a. The Stoics. (= Major Thinkers Series, 1.) Berkeley: Univ. of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978b. “Zeno and the Origins of Stoic Logic”. Brunschwig 1978. 387–400.Google Scholar
Scholz, Heinrich. 1961. Concise History of Logic. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Wolanin, Hubert
2009. The Origin of the Opposition πτωισς оρθή (ϵυθϵία) - πτώσϵις πλάγιαι (<i>Casus Rectus - Casus Obliqui</i>) in the Linguistics of Ancient Greece. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 126:-1 ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Hyman, Malcolm D.
2005. Terms for "Word" in Roman Grammar. In Antike Fachtexte / Ancient Technical Texts, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.