Review published in:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 12:1/2 (1985) ► pp. 209213


Bunge, Mario
1983 Treatise in Basic Philosophy. Vol. 6: Understanding in the world. (= Epistemology and Methodology, 2.) Dordrecht, & Boston: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
1984 “Philosophical Problems in Linguistics”. Erkenntnis 21.107–173Google Scholar
Griffith, Belver C. & Nicholas Mullins
1972 “Invisible colleges: Small, coherent groups may be the same throughout science”. Science 177.959–64.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell & John Fought
1975 “American structuralism”. Current Trends in Linguistics. ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, Vol.13, part 2: Historiography of Linguistics, 903–1156. The Hague: Mouton. (Reprinted in book form, ibid. 1981.)Google Scholar
Koerner, Konrad
1983 “The Chomskyan ‘Revolution’ and its Historiography: A few critical remarks”. Language & Communication 3:2.147–169.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas
1970The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd enl. ed. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry
1977Progress and its Problems: Towards a theory of scientific growth. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Murray, Stephen O.
1980 “Gatekeepers and the ‘Chomskian Revolution’”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 16.73–88.Google Scholar
1981 Review of Newmeyer (1980) HL 8.107–112.Google Scholar
1982 “The Reviewer Responds”. HL 9.187.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1980Linguistic Theory in America: The first quarter century of transformational generative grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1982 “Reply to Murray’s Review”. HL 9.185–86.Google Scholar
Pearson, Bruce L.
1977 “Paradigms and Revolutions in Linguistics”. The Fourth LACUS Forum ed. by Michel Paradis, 384–90. Columbia, S.C.: Hornbeam Press.Google Scholar
Percival, W. Keith
1976 “The Applicability of Kuhn’s Paradigms to the History of Linguistics”. Lg 52.285–94.Google Scholar