Article published in:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 15:3 (1988) ► pp. 377399
References

References

Bloomfield, Leonard
1933Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz
1920 “The Classification of American Languages”. AmA 22.367–376.Google Scholar
1929 “Classificiation of American Indian Languages”. Language 5.17.Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl
1931 “Phonologie und Psychologie”. TCLP 4.22–52.Google Scholar
1933 “L’onomatopée et la fonction représentative du langage”. JPsych 30.101–119. (Repr. in Pariente 1969:111–132.)Google Scholar
1936 “Das Strukturmodell der Sprache”. TCLP 6.12–22.Google Scholar
Cain, Michael
1980 “Edward Sapir and Gestalt Psychology”. AnL 22.141–150.Google Scholar
Eramian, Gregory M.
1978 “Some Notes on Trubetzkoy’s Abandonment of Disjunctive Oppositions”. HL 5.275–288.Google Scholar
Gelb, Adhémar
1933 “Remarques générales sur ľutilisation des données pathologiques pour la psychologie et la philosophie du langage”. JPsych 30.403–429. (Repr. in Pariente 1969:227–256.)Google Scholar
Graff, Willem L.
1935 “Remarks on the Phoneme”. AS 10.83–87.Google Scholar
Hagège, Claude
1967 “Extraits de la correspondence de N. S. Trubetzkoy”. Linguistique 3:1.109–136.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Tetsuro
1984 “Edward Sapir in Japan: A Survey of Translations, 1940–1983”. HL 11.461–466.Google Scholar
Internationale Phonologische Arbeitsgemeinschaft
1933 “Bulletin d’infor-mation N.l”. ČMF 19.59–64.Google Scholar
1935 “Information Bulletin No. 2”. Supplement to ČMF 22, 12 pp.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1923O češskom Stixe preimuščestvenno v sopostavlenii s russkim [On Czech Verse, Particularly in Comparison with Russian Verse]. Prague. (Repr., Providence as Brown University Slavic Reprint No. VI 1969.)Google Scholar
1928a “The Concept of the Sound Law and the Teleological Criterion”. Repr. in Selected Writings I: Phonological Studies, 1–2. The Hague: Mouton 1962.Google Scholar
1928b “Proposition au Premier Congres International de Linguistes”. Actes du Premier Congrès International de Linguistes à la Haye, 33–36. Leiden: A. W. Sijthoff. (Repr. in Selected Writings I, 3–6.)Google Scholar
1929Remarques sur l’évolution phonologique du russe comparée à celie des autres langues slaves. (– TCLP 2). Prague.Google Scholar
1975N.S. Trubetzkoy’s Letters and Notes. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1979 “The Twentieth Century in European and American Linguistics: Movements and continuity”. The European Background of American Linguistics by Henry M. Hoenigswald, 161–173. Dordrecht: Foris. (Repr. in Jakobson 1985:266–278).Google Scholar
1985Selected Writings VII: Contributions to comparative mythology; Studies in linguistics and philology, 1972–1982. Edited by Stephen Rudy, with a preface by Linda R. Waugh. Berlin-New York-Amsterdam: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. & Morris Halle
1956Fundamentals of Language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jenness, Diamond
1940 “Edward Sapir”. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Canada 1939, 3rd series, 33.151–153. (Repr. in Koerner 1984:9–11.)Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. Konrad
1978 “Zum Ursprung und Entwicklung des Phonem-Begriffs: Eine historische Notiz”. Toward a Historiography of Linguistics: Selected essays, 177–187. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
ed. 1984Edward Sapir: Appraisals of his life and work. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Liberman, Anatoly
1980Review of R. Jakobson, N.S. Trubetzkoy’s Letters and Notes . Linguistics 18.543–556.Google Scholar
Lowie, Robert H.
ed. 1965Letters from Edward Sapir to Robert H. Lowie. [Berkeley: published by Luella Cole Lowie, the editor’s widow].Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, David
1941 “Edward Sapir”. Jewish Social Studies 3.131–140. (Repr. in Koerner 1984.23–32.)Google Scholar
Mathesius, Vilém
1911 “O potenciálnosti jevů jazykových” [On the Potentiality of the Phenomena of Language]. Věstnik Král. české společnosti nauk (Prague), Třída Filos, histor., Section II. (English transl. in Vachek 1967:1–32.)Google Scholar
1926 “Linguistická charakteristika a její místo v moderním j azykopytu [Linguistic characterology and its place in modern linguistics]”. ČMF 13.35–40.Google Scholar
1928 “On Linguistic Characterology with Illustrations from Modern English”. Actes du Premier Congrès International de Linguistes á la Haye, 56–63, Leiden: A.W. Sijthoff 1930 (Repr. in Vachek 1967:56–67).Google Scholar
1929a “La Structure phonologique du lexique du tchèque moderne”. TCLP 1.67–84.Google Scholar
1929b “Ziele und Aufgabe der modernen Phonologie”. Xenia Prageusia Ernesto Kraus, 432–445. Prague: Societas neophilologorum apud Societam mathematicorum et physicorum.Google Scholar
1940 “Funkční linguistika [Functional Linguistics]”. SaS 6:2.112.Google Scholar
Meriggi, Piero
1933 “Sur la structure des langues ‘groupantes’”. JPsych 30.185–216.Google Scholar
Murray, Stephen O.
1981 “Sapiťs Gestalt”. AnL 23.8–12.Google Scholar
Pariente, Jean-Claude
ed. 1969Essais sur le langage. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1921Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.Google Scholar
1922 “The Takelma Language of Southwestern Oregon”. Handbook of American Indian Languages (= Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin No.40, Part II), 1–296. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
1925 “Sound Patterns in Language”. Language 1.37–57.Google Scholar
1930 “The Southern Paiute Language: Southern Paiute, a Shoshonean Language; Texts of the Kaibab Paiutes and Uintah Utes; Southern Paiute Dictionary”. Proceedings, American Academy of Arts and Sciences 65:1.1–296; 65:2.297–536; 65:3.537–730 (1931).Google Scholar
1931 “Notes on the Gweabo Language of Liberia”. Language 7.30–41.Google Scholar
1933 “La Réalité psychologique des phonèmes”. JPsych 30.247–265. (Repr. in Pariente 1969:165–188.)Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris
1934 “The Phonemic Principle”. Language 10.117–129.Google Scholar
1935 “Twaddell on Defining the Phoneme”. Language 11.244–250.Google Scholar
Trager, George L.
1934 “The Phonemes of Russian”. Language 10.334–344.Google Scholar
Trnka, Bohumil
1935 “O definici fonématu [On the Definition Of the Phoneme]”. SaS 1.238–240.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, (Prince) Nikolaj Sergeevič
1929 “Zur allgemeinen Theorie der phonologischen Vokalsysteme”. TCLP 1.39–67. (Repr. in Vachek 1967:108–142.)Google Scholar
1931a “Die phonologischen Systeme”. TCLP 4.96–116.Google Scholar
1931bDie Konsonantensysteme der Ostkaukasischen Sprachen”. Caucasia 8.1–52.Google Scholar
1933 “La phonologie actuelle”. JPsych 30.227–246. (Repr. in Pariente 1969:141–164.)Google Scholar
1935Anleitung zu phonologischen Beschreibungen. Brno: Cercle lin-guistique de Prague.Google Scholar
1936 “Die phonologischen Grenzsignale”. Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 22–26 July 1935, 45–49. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
1937 [Letter to the Linguistic Society of America Accepting Honorary Membership, Vienna, 21 Jan. 1937 under “Notes and Personalia”]. Language 13.152.Google Scholar
. [written in 1934]. 1938 “Die phonologischen Grundlagen der sogenannten ‘Quantität’ in den verschiedenen Sprachen”. Scritti in Onore di Alfredo Trombetti, 155–176. Milano: Ulrico Hoepli.Google Scholar
1939Grundzüge der Phonologie (= TCLP 7). Prague. (4th ed., Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1967.)Google Scholar
Twaddell, William Freeman
1935 “On Defining the Phoneme”. Language Monographs, No. 16. Baltimore: Waverley Press.Google Scholar
Tynjanov, Jurij & Roman Jakobson
1928 “Problemy izučenija literatúry i jazyka [Problems in the study of literature and language]”. Novyj Lef 12.36–37. (Repr. in Texte der russischen Formalisten ed. by Stempel, Inge & Wolf-Dieter Paulmann, vol. II, 386–390. München: Wilhelm Fink 1972.)Google Scholar
Vachek, Josef
1932 “Professor Daniel Jones and the Phoneme”. Charis-teña Guilelmo Mathesio Quinquagenario a Discipulis et Circuli Linguis-tici Pragensis Sodalibus Oblata, 25–33. Prague: Pražský Linguistický Kroužek.Google Scholar
1933 “What is Phonology?ES 15.81–92.Google Scholar
1935 “Several Thoughts on Several Statements of the Phoneme Theory”. AS 10.243–255.Google Scholar
1936 “One Aspect of the Phoneme Theory”. Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 22–26 July 1935, 33–40. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
1966The Linguistic School of Prague: An Introduction to its theory and practice. Bloomington & London: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
comp. 1967A Prague School Reader in Linguistics. Ibid.Google Scholar
1968Dutch Linguists and the Prague Linguistic School. Leiden: Univ. of Leiden Press.Google Scholar
van Ginneken, Jacobus
1933 “La biologie de la base d’articulation”. JPsych 30.266–320.Google Scholar
Wellek, René
1976 “Vilém Mathesius (1882–1945): Founder of the Prague Linguistic Circle”. Sound, Sign and Meaning: Quinguagenary of the Prague Linguistic Circle ed. by Ladislav Matejka, 6–14. (= Michigan Slavic Contributions, 6.) Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

No author info given
2020.  In Last Papers in Linguistic Historiography [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 128],  pp. 164 ff. Crossref logo
Patri, Sylvain
1998. Un Problème de Phonologie en 1922. Historiographia Linguistica 25:3  pp. 303 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.