Review article published in:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 16:1/2 (1989) ► pp. 149171
References
Anderson, Stephen R.
1985Phonology in the Twentieth Century: Theories of rules and theories of representations. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bieder, Robert E. & Thomas G. Tax
1974 “From Ethnologists to Anthropologists: A brief history of the American Ethnological Society”. American Anthropology: The early years ed. by John Murra, 11–21. New York: American Ethnological Society.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1925 “Why a Linguistic Society?”. Language 11.1–5.Google Scholar
Brinton, Daniel G.
1885 “The Philosophic Grammar of American Languages as set forth by Wilhelm von Humboldt. With a Translation of an Unpublished Memoir by Him on the American Verb”. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 221.306–354.Google Scholar
1891The American Race: A linguistic classification and ethnographic description of the native tribes of North and South America. New York: N.D.C. Hodges.Google Scholar
1902The Basis of Social Relations: A study in ethnic psychology. New York: Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1957Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1959 “Review of B. F. Skinner, Verbal Behavior (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press 1957) Language 351.26–57.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle
1968The Sound Patterns of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Collitz, Hermann
(1855–1935). 1925 “The Scope and Aim of Linguistic Science”. Language 11.14–16.Google Scholar
Cowan, Milton J.
1987 “The Whimsical Bloomfield.” Leonard Bloomfield: Essays on his life and work ed. by Robert A. Hall & Konrad Koerner, 23–37. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Darnell, Regna D.
1969The Development of American Anthropology, 1880–1920. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
1971a “The Powell Classification of American Indian Languages”. Papers in Linguistics 41.70–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1971b “The Revision of the Powell Classification”. Papers in Linguistics 51.233–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1971c “The Professionalization of American Anthropology”. Social Science Information 101.83–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1986 “The Emergence of Edward Sapir’s Mature Thought”. New Perspectives in Language, Culture, and Personality ed. by William Cowan, Michael K. Foster & Konrad Koerner, 553–88. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989Edward Sapir. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Darnell, Regna D. & Dell Hymes
1986 “Edward Sapir’s Six-Unit Classification of American Indian Languages”. Studies in the History of Western Linguistics ed. by Theodora Bynon & F. R. Palmer, 202–244. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A.
1962 Review of Morris Halle, The Sound Pattern of Russian (s’Gravenhage: Mouton 1959) Language 381.284–98.Google Scholar
Freeman, John F.
1965 “Religion and Personality in the Anthropology of Henry Schoolcraft”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 11.301–312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fries, Charles C.
1954 “Meaning and Linguistic Analysis.” Language 301.57–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1963 “The Bloomfield School”. Trends in American and European Linguistics, 1930–1960 ed. by Christine Mohrmann, Alf Sommerfelt & Joshua Whatmough. Utrecht: Spectrum.Google Scholar
Gallatin, Albert
1836 “A Synopsis of the Indian Tribes of North America”. Transactions and Collections of the American Antiquarian Society 21.1–422.Google Scholar
Goddard, Ives
1986 “Sapir’s Comparative Method”. New Perspectives in Language, Culture, and Personality ed. by William Cowan, Michael Foster & Konrad Koerner, 191–214. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1987 “Leonard Bloomfield’s Descriptive and Comparative Studies of Algonquian”. Leonard Bloomfield: Essays on his life and work ed. by Robert A. Hall, Jr. & Konrad Koerner, 179–217. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Mary R.
1969 “Grammar or Lexicon? The American side of the question from Du Ponceau to Powell”. IJAL 351.239–55.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig S.
1951Methods in Structural Linguistics. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Archibald A.
ed. 1962 [1958]Proceedings of the Third Texas Conference on Problems of Linguistic Analysis in English. Austin: Univ. of Texas.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F.
1968The State of the Art. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hodgen, Margaret T.
1964Early Anthropology in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoenigswald, Henry M.
1964 “George M. Boiling”. Language 401.329–36.Google Scholar
1987 “Bloomfield and Historical Linguistics”. Leonard Bloomfield: Essays on his life and work ed. by Robert A. Hall, Jr. & Konrad Koerner, 73–88. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horsman, Reginald
1975 “Scientific Racism and the American Indians in the Mid-Nineteenth Century”. American Quarterly 271.152–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Howell, Kenneth J.
1986 Review of Stephen Anderson (1985) HL 131.85–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell
1983Studies in the History of Linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. & John Fought
1981American Structuralism. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Joos, Martin
ed. 1957Readings in Linguistics. Washington, D.C.: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
Koerner, Konrad
1983 “The Chomskyan ‘Revolution’ and its Historiography”. Language & Communication 31.147–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, Michael
1986 “Edward Sapir and Athabaskan Linguistics”. New Perspectives in Language, Culture, and Personality ed. by William Cowan, Michael Foster & Konrad Koerner, 147–190. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S.
1962The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. (2nd ed. 1970.)Google Scholar
Lamb, Sidney M.
1967 Review of Noam Chomsky, Current Issues in Linguistic Theory (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press 1964) and Aspects of a Theory of Syntax (The Hague: Mouton 1965) American Anthropologist 691.411–415.Google Scholar
Leeds-Hurwitz, Wendy
1985 “The Committee on Research in Native American Languages”. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 1291.129–60.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P.
1987 “Bloomfield as an Indo-Europeanist”. Leonard Bloomfield: Essays on his life and work ed. by Robert A. Hall, Jr. & Konrad Koerner, 163–72. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCawley, James D.
1976¡Madison Avenue, sí, Pennsylvania Avenue, no!”. LACUS Forum 21.17–28. Columbia, S.C.: Hornbeam Press.Google Scholar
Maher, J. Peter
1980 “The Transformational-Generative Paradigm”. Forum Linguisticum 51.1–35.Google Scholar
Murray, Stephen O.
1980 “Gatekeepers and the ‘Chomskian Revolution’.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 161.73–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1981 Review of Frederick Newmeyer (1980) HL 81.107–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1983Group Formation in Social Science. Edmonton: Linguistic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
1984 “Notes on the History of Linguistic Anthropology”. HL 111.449–460. [Review article on Hymes (1983).] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1986 “Reply to Newmeyer”. Language 621.966–67.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1980Linguistic Theory in America. New York: Academic Press. (2nd ed. 1986.)Google Scholar
1986 “Has there Been a ‘Chomskyan Revolution’ in Linguistics?”. Language 621.1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Kenneth W. & Stephen O. Murray
1983 “Historical Inferences from Ethnohistorical Data: Boasian perspectives”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 201.341–48.Google Scholar
Powell, John Wesley
1891 “Indian Linguistic Families of America North of Mexico”. Seventh Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology, 1885–1886. 7–139.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth
1947 “Grammatical Prerequisites to Phonemic Analysis”. Word 31.155–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1925 “Sound Patterns in Language”. Language 11.37–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1986 “The Diachrony of Sapir’s Synchronic Linguistic Description”. New Perspectives in Language, Culture, and Personality ed. by William Cowan, Michael Foster & Konrad Koerner, 67–109. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

Hall, Robert A.
1990. A further note on the joos notes . Historiographia Linguistica 17:1-2  pp. 231 ff. Crossref logo
Joseph, John E.
1995. The Structure of linguistic revolutions. Historiographia Linguistica 22:3  pp. 379 ff. Crossref logo
Kertész, András
2010. From ‘scientific revolution’ to ‘unscientific revolution’: an analysis of approaches to the history of generative linguistics. Language Sciences 32:5  pp. 507 ff. Crossref logo
Kertész, András
2010. Two Notions of ‘Research Program’ and the Historiography of Generative Linguistics. Historiographia Linguistica 37:1-2  pp. 165 ff. Crossref logo
Kertész, András
2019. Fallacies in the Historiography of Generative Linguistics. Foundations of Science 24:4  pp. 775 ff. Crossref logo
Koerner, E.F. Konrad
1995. [no title] - Randy Allen Harris. The Linguistics Wars. New York: Oxford University Press. 1993. Pp. xii + 356. US$42.00 (hardcover).. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 40:2  pp. 247 ff. Crossref logo
Murray, Stephen O.
1990. The reviewer responds. Historiographia Linguistica 17:1-2  pp. 234 ff. Crossref logo
Murray, Stephen O.
1999. More on gatekeepers and Noam Chomsky's writings of the 1950s. Historiographia Linguistica 26:3  pp. 343 ff. Crossref logo
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2019.  The Historiography of Generative Linguistics. By András Kertész. Historiographia Linguistica 46:3  pp. 182 ff. Crossref logo
Nuessel, Frank
1996. Theory groups and the study of language in North America. A social History. Lingua 99:2-3  pp. 155 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.