Review article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 16:3 (1989) ► pp.361377
References
Firth, John Rupert
1935 “The Technique of Semantics”. Transactions of the Philological Society 1935.36–72. (Repr. in Firth 1957.7–33.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1957Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. London: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, W. Terrence
1982aA History of Semantics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1982b “Saussurean Structuralism and J. R. Firth”. Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Linguists, August 29-September 4, 1982, Tokyo ed. by Shirô Hattori & Kazuko Inoue, 860–863. Tokyo.Google Scholar
1988 “Undoing Babel: C. K. Ogden’s Basic English”. Etc. A Review of General Semantics 451.337–340.Google Scholar
1989 “Significs & C. K. Ogden: The influence of Lady Welby”. Essay in Significs ed. by Walter Schmitz, 179–196. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
In press. “C. K. Ogden, Edward Sapir, Leonard Bloomfield, and the Geometry of Semantics”. Papers from the Fourth International Conference on the History of Linguistics ed. by Hans-Josef Niederehe & Konrad Koerner Ibid.
Ogden, C. K.
1927 “The New Word”. Psyche 81.1–2.Google Scholar
Ogden, C. K. & I. A. Richards
1923The Meaning of Meaning. London: Kegan Paul & Company. (References are to the 8th ed., New York: Harcourt, Brace & World 1946.)Google Scholar
Robins, Robert H.
1985Review of Gordon (1982a). Lingua 67:4.329–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand
1926Review of Ogden & Richards (1923). The Dial (26 August 1926), 114–121.Google Scholar
White, A. R.
1958G. E. Moore: A critical exposition. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar