The abandonment of nómos in Greek linguistic thought
Coseriu (1977) has contended that Aristotle’s abandonment of the term nómos as the counterpart to phýsis represented a clear and willful break from the earlier tradition of linguistic thought. The present article examines a semantic change that nómos (originally “custom”) was undergoing in 5th century Attic Greek, when it became the technical term for a statute law. This change rendered it no longer appropriate in considerations of language. Hence, even if Aristotle had wanted to maintain the term nómos in its late Sophistic sense, he could not have done so. The Aristotelian approach to language may thus maintain a greater continuity with the past than is often recognized. The history of the terms which came to replace nómos as the opposite of phýsis is also surveyed.
References
Beardslee, John Walter, Jr.
1918 The Use of Physis in Fifth-Century Greek Literature. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. (Repr. in
Early Greek Thought: Three studies ed. by
Leonardo Tarán. New York & London: Garland 1987.)
Casertano, Giovanni
1971 Natura e istituzioni umane nelle dottrine dei sofisti. Napoli & Firenze: Il Tripode.
Cavazza, Franco
1981 Studio su Varrone etimologo e grammatico: La lingua latina come modello di struttura linguistica. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
Cornford, Francis Macdonald
1912 From Religion to Philosophy: A study in the origins of Western speculation. New York: Longmans, Green & Co.; London: Edward Arnold.
Coseriu, Eugenio
1977 “
L’arbitraire du signe: Sobre la historia tardía de un concepto aristotélico”.
Tradición y novedad en la ciencia del lenguaje: Estudios de historia de la lingüística by
E. Coseriu, 13–61. Madrid: Gredos. [Trans, by
Marcos Martínez Hernández of German original first published in
Archiv für das Studium der neueren Sprachen und Literaturen 2041.81–112 (1967).]
Di Cesare, Donatella
1980 La semantica nella filosofia greca. Rome: Bulzoni.
Fédier, François
Interprétations. Paris: Presses Univ. de France.
Gigante, Marcello
1956 Nomos basileus. Napoli: Glaux.
Gilson, Étienne
1969 Linguistique et philosophie: Essai sur les constantes philosophiques du langage. Paris: Vrin.
Guthrie, W. K. C.
1969 A History of Greek Philosophy. Vol.21,
Part 1: The World of the Sophists. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Hajistephanou, C. E.
1975 The Use of Physis and its Cognates in Greek Tragedy, with special reference to character drawing. Nicosia: The Cyprus Association of Greek Philologists “
Stasinos”. [Ph.D. Diss., Univ. of London 1968.]
Harris, Roy & Talbot J. Taylor
1989 Landmarks in Linguistic Thought: The Western tradition from Socrates to Saussure. London & New York: Routledge.
Heinimann, Felix
1945 Nomos und Physis: Herkunft und Bedeutung einer Antithese im griechischen Denken des 5. Jahrhunderts. Basel: Friedrich Reinhardt. (Repr., Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 1972.)
Jaeger, Werner
1947 The Theology of the Early Greek Philosophers. (
The Gifford lectures, 1936.) Transl, by
Edward S. Robinson. London: Oxford Univ. Press.
Joseph, John E.
1987 Eloquence and Power: The rise of language standards and standard languages. New York: Basil Blackwell; London: Frances Pinter.
Larkin, Sister Miriam Therese, C.S.J.
1971 Language in the Philosophy of Aristotle. The Hague: Mouton.
Long, Anthony A. & David N. Sedley
1987 The Hellenistic Philosophers. Vol.11:
Translations of the Principal Sources with Philosophical Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Ostwald, Martin
1969 Nomos and the Beginnings of the Athenian Democracy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Steinthal, Heymann
1890 Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft bei den Griechen und Römern, mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die Logik. 2nd ed. 21 vols. Berlin: Ferdinand Dümmler. (1st ed. 1863.)
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Keimpe Algra, Jonathan Barnes, Jaap Mansfeld & Malcolm Schofield
1999.
The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy,
Schenkeveld, Dirk M. & Jonathan Barnes
1999.
Language. In
The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy,
► pp. 177 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.