Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 17:1/2 (1990) ► pp.1–13

The abandonment of nómos in Greek linguistic thought

| University of Maryland
Coseriu (1977) has contended that Aristotle’s abandonment of the term nómos as the counterpart to phýsis represented a clear and willful break from the earlier tradition of linguistic thought. The present article examines a semantic change that nómos (originally “custom”) was undergoing in 5th century Attic Greek, when it became the technical term for a statute law. This change rendered it no longer appropriate in considerations of language. Hence, even if Aristotle had wanted to maintain the term nómos in its late Sophistic sense, he could not have done so. The Aristotelian approach to language may thus maintain a greater continuity with the past than is often recognized. The history of the terms which came to replace nómos as the opposite of phýsis is also surveyed.
Published online: 1 January 1990
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.17.1-2.03jos
References (20)
References
Arens, Hans. 1984. Aristotle’s Theory of Language and its Tradition. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beardslee, John Walter, Jr. 1918. The Use of Physis in Fifth-Century Greek Literature. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. (Repr. in Early Greek Thought: Three studies ed. by Leonardo Tarán. New York & London: Garland, 1987.)Google Scholar
Casertano, Giovanni. 1971. Natura e istituzioni umane nelle dottrine dei sofisti. Napoli & Firenze: Il Tripode.Google Scholar
Cavazza, Franco. 1981. Studio su Varrone etimologo e grammatico: La lingua latina come modello di struttura linguistica. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Cornford, Francis Macdonald. 1912. From Religion to Philosophy: A study in the origins of Western speculation. New York: Longmans, Green & Co.; London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1977. “L’arbitraire du signe: Sobre la historia tardía de un concepto aristotélico”. Tradición y novedad en la ciencia del lenguaje: Estudios de historia de la lingüística by E. Coseriu, 13–61. Madrid: Gredos. [Trans, by Marcos Martínez Hernández of German original first published in Archiv für das Studium der neueren Sprachen und Literaturen 2041.81–112 (1967).]Google Scholar
Di Cesare, Donatella. 1980. La semantica nella filosofia greca. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Fédier, François. Interprétations. Paris: Presses Univ. de France. DOI logo
Gigante, Marcello. 1956. Nomos basileus. Napoli: Glaux.Google Scholar
Gilson, Étienne. 1969. Linguistique et philosophie: Essai sur les constantes philosophiques du langage. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1969. A History of Greek Philosophy. Vol.21, Part 1: The World of the Sophists. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hajistephanou, C. E. 1975. The Use of Physis and its Cognates in Greek Tragedy, with special reference to character drawing. Nicosia: The Cyprus Association of Greek Philologists “Stasinos”. [Ph.D. Diss., Univ. of London, 1968.]Google Scholar
Harris, Roy & Talbot J. Taylor. 1989. Landmarks in Linguistic Thought: The Western tradition from Socrates to Saussure. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heinimann, Felix. 1945. Nomos und Physis: Herkunft und Bedeutung einer Antithese im griechischen Denken des 5. Jahrhunderts. Basel: Friedrich Reinhardt. (Repr., Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1972.)Google Scholar
Jaeger, Werner. 1947. The Theology of the Early Greek Philosophers. (The Gifford lectures, 1936.) Transl, by Edward S. Robinson. London: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Joseph, John E. 1987. Eloquence and Power: The rise of language standards and standard languages. New York: Basil Blackwell; London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Larkin, Sister Miriam Therese, C.S.J. 1971. Language in the Philosophy of Aristotle. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, Anthony A. & David N. Sedley. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers. Vol.11: Translations of the Principal Sources with Philosophical Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Ostwald, Martin. 1969. Nomos and the Beginnings of the Athenian Democracy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Steinthal, Heymann. 1890. Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft bei den Griechen und Römern, mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die Logik. 2nd ed. 21 vols. Berlin: Ferdinand Dümmler. (1st ed., 1863.)Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Keimpe Algra, Jonathan Barnes, Jaap Mansfeld & Malcolm Schofield
1999. The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, DOI logo
Schenkeveld, Dirk M. & Jonathan Barnes
1999. Language. In The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Joseph, John E.
1992. ‘Core’ and ‘Periphery’ in Historical Perspective. Historiographia Linguistica 19:2-3 ► pp. 317 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.