The abandonment of nómos in Greek linguistic thought
Coseriu (1977) has contended that Aristotle’s abandonment of the term nómos as the counterpart to phýsis represented a clear and willful break from the earlier tradition of linguistic thought. The present article examines a semantic change that nómos (originally “custom”) was undergoing in 5th century Attic Greek, when it became the technical term for a statute law. This change rendered it no longer appropriate in considerations of language. Hence, even if Aristotle had wanted to maintain the term nómos in its late Sophistic sense, he could not have done so. The Aristotelian approach to language may thus maintain a greater continuity with the past than is often recognized. The history of the terms which came to replace nómos as the opposite of phýsis is also surveyed.
References (20)
References
Beardslee, John Walter, Jr. 1918. The Use of Physis in Fifth-Century Greek Literature. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. (Repr. in Early Greek Thought: Three studies ed. by Leonardo Tarán. New York & London: Garland, 1987.)
Casertano, Giovanni. 1971. Natura e istituzioni umane nelle dottrine dei sofisti. Napoli & Firenze: Il Tripode.
Cavazza, Franco. 1981. Studio su Varrone etimologo e grammatico: La lingua latina come modello di struttura linguistica. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
Cornford, Francis Macdonald. 1912. From Religion to Philosophy: A study in the origins of Western speculation. New York: Longmans, Green & Co.; London: Edward Arnold.
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1977. “L’arbitraire du signe: Sobre la historia tardía de un concepto aristotélico”. Tradición y novedad en la ciencia del lenguaje: Estudios de historia de la lingüística by E. Coseriu, 13–61. Madrid: Gredos. [Trans, by Marcos Martínez Hernández of German original first published in Archiv für das Studium der neueren Sprachen und Literaturen 2041.81–112 (1967).]
Di Cesare, Donatella. 1980. La semantica nella filosofia greca. Rome: Bulzoni.
Fédier, François. Interprétations. Paris: Presses Univ. de France. 
Gigante, Marcello. 1956. Nomos basileus. Napoli: Glaux.
Gilson, Étienne. 1969. Linguistique et philosophie: Essai sur les constantes philosophiques du langage. Paris: Vrin.
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1969. A History of Greek Philosophy. Vol.21, Part 1: The World of the Sophists. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Hajistephanou, C. E. 1975. The Use of Physis and its Cognates in Greek Tragedy, with special reference to character drawing. Nicosia: The Cyprus Association of Greek Philologists “Stasinos”. [Ph.D. Diss., Univ. of London, 1968.]
Harris, Roy & Talbot J. Taylor. 1989. Landmarks in Linguistic Thought: The Western tradition from Socrates to Saussure. London & New York: Routledge.
Heinimann, Felix. 1945. Nomos und Physis: Herkunft und Bedeutung einer Antithese im griechischen Denken des 5. Jahrhunderts. Basel: Friedrich Reinhardt. (Repr., Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1972.)
Jaeger, Werner. 1947. The Theology of the Early Greek Philosophers. (The Gifford lectures, 1936.) Transl, by Edward S. Robinson. London: Oxford Univ. Press.
Joseph, John E. 1987. Eloquence and Power: The rise of language standards and standard languages. New York: Basil Blackwell; London: Frances Pinter.
Larkin, Sister Miriam Therese, C.S.J. 1971. Language in the Philosophy of Aristotle. The Hague: Mouton. 

Long, Anthony A. & David N. Sedley. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers. Vol.11: Translations of the Principal Sources with Philosophical Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Ostwald, Martin. 1969. Nomos and the Beginnings of the Athenian Democracy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Steinthal, Heymann. 1890. Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft bei den Griechen und Römern, mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die Logik. 2nd ed. 21 vols. Berlin: Ferdinand Dümmler. (1st ed., 1863.)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Keimpe Algra, Jonathan Barnes, Jaap Mansfeld & Malcolm Schofield
1999.
The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy,

Schenkeveld, Dirk M. & Jonathan Barnes
1999.
Language. In
The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy,
► pp. 177 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.