Article published in:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 18:2/3 (1991) ► pp. 321–334

A. J. Ellis As Dialectologist

A Reassessment

| Memorial University of Newfoundland
Alexander John Ellis (1814–1890) occupies an important position within the history of phonetics and that of the spelling reform movement. In this article, it is argued that Ellis’s standing as a dialectologist might profitably be reassessed. All too often in the past, Ellis’s work in the field of dialectology has been adversely criticized, underestimated or even completely ignored. Yet Ellis’s dialectological work was pioneering in many ways: he produced the first large-scale survey of English dialects, rejecting printed sources and using the direct method in part; invented an intricate system of phonetic notation (the palaeotype); produced a detailed classification of the English dialects; and illustrated his classification by means of two summary maps complete with isoglosses. A number of scholars have reported in recent years that the results of their investigations accord well with Ellis’s findings. These facts are sufficient to warrant a reassessment of Ellis’s position in the history of English dialectology, and, more generally, within the history of linguistic geography as a whole.
Published online: 01 January 1991
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.18.2-3.05sho
References
Anderson, Peter M.
1977 “A New Light on Early English Pronunciation”. Transactions of the Yorkshire Dialect Society part 77, vol. 141.32–41.Google Scholar
Brook, George Leslie
1981 “Dialect Societies in England”. Journal of the Lancashire Dialect Society 301.3–11.Google Scholar
Chambers, J[ohn] K[enneth] & Peter Trudgill
1980 Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Dieth, Eugen
1946 “A New Survey of English Dialects”. Essays and Studies by Members of the English Association 321.74–104.Google Scholar
Ellis, Alexander John
1889 On Early English Pronunciation. Part V1: The Existing Phonology of English Dialects Compared with that of West Saxon Speech. London: Asher & Co. for the Early English Text Society and the Chaucer Society; Trübner & Co. for the Philological Society.Google Scholar
1890 English Dialects: Their sounds and homes […] London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co. for the English Dialect Society.Google Scholar
Eustace, Sinclair S.
1969 “The Meaning of Palaeotype in A. J. Ellis’s On Early English Pronunciation , 1869–89”. Transactions of the Philological Society 1969.31–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Andreas
1976 Dialects in the South-West of England: A lexical investigation. (= The Cooper Monographs; English Dialect Series, 25.) Bern: A. Francke.Google Scholar
Francis, W. Nelson
1983 Dialectology: An introduction. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Freudenberg, Rudolf
1965 “Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der dialektgeographischen Methode”. Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung 321.170–182.Google Scholar
Klemola, Juhani
1990 “Dialect Areas in the South-West of England: An exercise in cluster analysis”. Paper read at the International Congress of Dialectologists, Bamberg.
Local, John K.
1983 “Making a Transcription: The evolution of A. J. Ellis’s palaeotype”. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 131.2–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDavid, Raven I[oor], Jr
1980 Varieties of American English: Essays by Raven I. McDavid, Jr. Selected & introduced by Anwar S. Dil. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
MacMahon, Michael K. C.
1983 “Thomas Hallam and the Study of Dialect and Educated Speech”. Transactions of the Yorkshire Dialect Society part 83, vol.151.19–31.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov
1984 “Revisionist Dialectology and Mainstream Linguistics”. Language in Society 131.29–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitzka, Walther, et al. eds.
1951–1980 Deutscher Wortatlas. Giessen: Schmitz.Google Scholar
Moulton, William G.
1972 “Geographical Linguistics”. Current Trends in Linguistics ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, vol. IX1: Linguistics in Western Europe, 196–222. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Murray, James Alexander] H[enry]
1873 The Dialect of the Southern Counties of Scotland. Berlin & London: Asher & Co. for the Philological Society.Google Scholar
Orton, Harold
1949 “The Study of Dialectal English”. The Leeds Magazine 11.30.Google Scholar
Petyt, Keith Malcolm
1980 The Study of Dialect: An introduction to dialectology. London: André Deutsch.Google Scholar
Pop, Sever
[1950.] La Dialectologie: Aperçu historique et méthodes d’enquêtes linguistiques. 21 vols. Louvain: Author.Google Scholar
Sanders, Robert A.
1977 Alexander John Ellis: A study of a Victorian philologist. 31 vols. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Nfld.Google Scholar
Shorrocks, Graham
1981 A Grammar of the Dialect of Farnworth and District (Greater Manchester County, formerly Lancashire). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Sheffield. [Available through Information Publications/University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, Mich. & London; ref. no. 81, 70–023.]Google Scholar
1983 Review of Petyt (1980). Journal of the Lancashire Dialect Society 321.32–34.Google Scholar
1986 “A Bibliographical Note on Alexander J. Ellis’s On Early English Pronunciation, Part V, and his Palaeotype”. Journal of the Lancashire Dialect Society 351.16–18.Google Scholar
Speitel, Hans-Henning
1969 “An Early Specimen of Edinburgh Speech”. Work in Progress 31.26–36. Edinburgh: Department of Phonetics & Linguistics, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Speitel, Hans-Henning. & James Y. Mather
1968 “Schottische Dialektologie”. Germanische Dialektologie: Festschrift für Walther Mitzka zum 80. Geburtstag ed. by Ludwig Erich Schmitt, Vol.II1, 520–541. (= Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung’, Beihefte, Neue Folge, 6.) Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry
1888 A History of English Sounds from the Earliest Period. 2nd, entirely rev. and enl. ed. Oxford: Clarendon. (First ed., London: Trübner & Co. 1874.)Google Scholar
Viereck, Wolfgang
1964 “Der English Dialect Survey und der Linguistic Survey of Scotland: Arbeitsmethoden und bisherige Ergebnisse”. Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung 311.333–55.Google Scholar
Wakelin, Martyn F.
1977 English Dialects: An introduction. Revised ed. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Wrede, Ferdinand, Bernhard Martin & Walther Mitzka eds.
1927–56 Deutscher Sprachatlas. Marburg: N. G. Elwert.Google Scholar
Wright, Elizabeth Mary
1932 The Life of Joseph Wright. 21 vols. London: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph
1892 A Grammar of the Dialect of Windhill in the West Riding of Yorkshire. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co. for the English Dialect Society.Google Scholar
1905 The English Dialect Grammar. Oxford: Henry Frowde.Google Scholar
Wright, Peter
1985 “Alexander J. Ellis: On Early English Pronunciation, Part V: Key Dialect Tool or Forgotten Antique?”. Journal of the Lancashire Dialect Society 341.3–10.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Jones, Mark J.
2002. More on the “instability” of interdental fricatives: Gothicþliuhan‘flee’ and Old Englishflēon‘flee’ revisited. <i>WORD</i> 53:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Kemp, J.A.
1995.  In Concise History of the Language Sciences, ► pp. 371 ff. Crossref logo
Klemola, Juhani
1994. Periphrastic DO in South-Western Dialects of British English: A Reassessment. dig 1994:2 ► pp. 33 ff. Crossref logo
MacMahon, M.K.C.
2006.  In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 114 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.