Article published in:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 18:2/3 (1991) ► pp. 335347
References

References

Baldwin, James Mark ed.
1901–1905Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology in Three Volumes. New York & London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl
1934Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Gustav Fischer. (Engl, trans. by Donald Fraser Goodwin, Theory of Language: The representational function of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins 1990.)Google Scholar
Ehrenfels, (Freiherr) Christian von
1890 “Ueber ‘Gestaltqualitäten’”. Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie 14.249–292.Google Scholar
Gardiner, (Sir) Alan H[enderson]
1921–22 “The Definition of the Word and the Sentence”. The British Journal of Psychology 12.352–361.Google Scholar
1932The Theory of Speech and Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (2nd ed., with additions [pp.328–344] 1951; repr 1963.)Google Scholar
Innis, Robert E.
1986Semiotics: An introductory reader. London-Melbourne-Sydney, etc.: Hutchison & Co.Google Scholar
Neriich, Brigitte
1990Change in Language: Whitney, Bréal and Wegener. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Forthcoming]. Semantic Theories in Europe, 1830–1930. From etymology to contextuality. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Paul, Hermann
1880Principien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle/S.: Max Niemeyer. (5th enl. ed. 1920.)Google Scholar
1890Principles of the History of Language. Transl. from the 2nd ed. of the original by Herbert Augustus Strong. New and revised ed. London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Peters, Richard Stanley
1953Brett’s History of Psychology. Edited and abridged by Richard Stanley Peters. Abridged one-volume ed. London: George Allen & Unwin; New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. Walter
1985 “Victoria Lady Welby’s significs: The origin of the signific movement”. Welby, Victoria Lady: Signifies and language. The articulate form of our expressive and interpretative resources. Reprint of the edition London 1911, and two articles by V. Welby. Edited and introduced by H. Walter Schmitz (= Foundations of Semiotics, 5.), ix–ccxxv. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
[Smart, Benjamin Humphrey]
1831An Outline of Sematology; or an essay towards establishing a new theory of grammar, logic, and rhetoric. London: John Richardson, Royal Exchange.Google Scholar
1855Thought and Language: An essay having in view the revival, correction, and exclusive establishment of Locke’s Philosophy. London: Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans.Google Scholar
Steinthal, H[eyman(n) = (Chajim)]
1858 “Sprachphilosophie”. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik n.s.32.68–95. [Continued under the title “Zur Sprachphilosophie. Zweiter Artikel. Ueber die Vorstellung und die Verdichtung des Denkens”, ibid. , 194–224.]Google Scholar
Stern, Gustaf
1931Meaning and the Change of Meaning. With special reference to the English language. Goteborg: Elanders Boktryckeri Aktiebolag. (Repr., Bloomington & London: Indiana Univ. Press 1964 1968.)Google Scholar
Stout, G[eorge] F[ederick]
1888 “The Herbartian Psychology”. Mind 13. 321–338; 473–498.Google Scholar
1891 “Thought and Language”. Mind 16.181–197.Google Scholar
1898–1899Manual of Psychology. London: W. B. Clive.Google Scholar
1902 “Sign-making Function”. Baldwin 1902, vol.11, 529b–530b.Google Scholar
1909[1896]Analytic Psychology. In two vols. Vol.11. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co.; New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
1927[1903]The Groundwork of Psychology. 2nd revised ed. by R. H. Thouless. London: W. B. Clive.Google Scholar
G.F.S.-J.M.B. [= Stout, G. F. & J. M. Baldwin
] 1901 “Apperception”. Baldwin 1901,1, 61a–b.Google Scholar
The New Encyclopaedia Britannica
1985Micropaedia. Vol. XI. 15th ed. Chicago, etc.: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.Google Scholar
Wegener, Philipp
1885Untersuchungen über die Grundfragen des Sprachlebens. Halle/Saale: Max Niemeyer. (Repr. with an introduction by Clemens Knobloch, Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1991.)Google Scholar
Welby, Victoria Lady, G. F. Stout & James Mark Baldwin
1902 “Signifies”. Baldwin 1902, II, p.529.Google Scholar