Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 19:1 (1992) ► pp.111–143

Paul Hanly Furfey and the origins of American sociolinguistics

 | University of Maryland
Although his contributions to the study of language are now all but forgotten, Catholic University of America sociologist Paul Hanly Furfey (b. 1896) gave the first known courses on the Sociology of Language starting in 1943. In 1944, he published articles on language and social class, men’s and women’s language, and the Bloomfieldian method of linguistic analysis, and in the early 1950s, he directed the joint dissertation of two of the very first urban dialect researchers to undertake work sufficiently systematic and socially oriented to merit the designation ‘sociolinguistic’ (Putnam & O’Hern 1955). This article surveys Furfey’s career as well as the work of many other pre-1960 contributors to sociolinguistics, notably in North America, most of which fell into oblivion following the great success of William Labov.
Published online: 1 January 1992
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.19.1.07jos
References (115)
References
Adam, Lucien (1833–1918) & Victor Henry (1850–1907). 1880. Arte y vocabulario de la lengua chiquita. Paris: Maisonneuve. (Repr., Nendeln, Liechtenstein: Kraus, 1968.)Google Scholar
Andresen, Julie Tetel. 1990. Linguistics in America, 1769–1924: A critical history. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Atwood, E[lmer] Bagby (1906–1963). 1953. A Survey of Verb Forms in the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Barker, George C[arpenter] (1912–1958). 1945. “The Social Functions of Language”. ETC.: A Review of General Semantics 21.228–234.Google Scholar
. 1947. “Social Functions of Language in a Mexican-American Community”. Acta Americana 51.185–202.Google Scholar
. 1972. Social Functions of Language in a Mexican-American Community. (= Anthropological Papers of the Univ. of Arizona, 22.) Tuscon: Univ. of Arizona Press. [Originally the author’s Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Chicago, 1947.]Google Scholar
Baugh, Albert C[roll] (1891–1981). 1935. A History of the English Language. New York: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard (1887–1949). 1933. Language. New York: H. Holt & Co.Google Scholar
Bright, William [Oliver] (b.1928). 1966. “Introduction: The dimensions of sociolinguistics”. Sociolinguistics: Proceedings of the UCLA Sociolinguistics Conference, 1964 ed. by William Bright, 11–15. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Curran, Charles E[dward] (b.1934). 1972. “Paul Hanly Furfey: Theorist of American Catholic Radicalism”. The American Ecclesiastical Review 1661.651–677.Google Scholar
. 1982. American Catholic Social Ethics: Twentieth century approaches. Notre Dame: Univ. of Notre Dame Press. [Chap.4: “The Catholic Worker and Paul Hanly Furfey” (130–171).]Google Scholar
Currie, Eva Garcia C. (b.1912). 1949. “Linguistic and Sociological Considerations of Some Populations of Texas”. Paper presented at Southern Speech Association, Waco, Tx.
Currie, Haver C[ecil] (b.1908). 1949. “The Relationship of Language to Social Status: An academic paper projecting socio-linguistics”. Paper presented at Conference of Univ. English Teachers, Houston. [Publ. as Currie 1952.]Google Scholar
. 1952. “A Projection of Socio-Linguistics: The relationship of speech to social status”. Southern Speech Journal 181.28–37. (Repr. in A Various Language: Perspectives on American dialects ed. by Juanita V. Williamson & Virginia M. Burke, 391/40–47. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1971.]Google Scholar
. 1980. “On the Proposal of Sociolinguistics as a Discipline of Research”. Language in Society 91.407–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Currie, Haver C[ecil] & Eva Garcia C. Currie. 1976. Sociolinguistics and the Two American Linguistic Orthodoxies. 2nd ed. Austin, Tx.: Regional Research Association. [Mimeographed.]Google Scholar
Day, Dorothy (1897–1980). 1952. The Long Loneliness. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
. 1963. Loaves and Fishes. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
DeCamp, David (1927–1979). 1958–59. “The Pronunciation of English in San Francisco”. Orbis 71.372–391, 81.54–77.Google Scholar
. 1959. Rev. of Sapon 1957. Language 351.394–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Laguna, Grace [Mead] Andrus (1878–1978). 1927. Speech: Its function and development. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press. (Repr., Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press, 1963.)Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1859–1952). 1925. Experience and Nature. Chicago & London: Open Court. [Chap. 5: “Nature, Communication and Meaning” (166–207).]Google Scholar
Dollard, John (1900–1980). 1937. Caste and Class in a Southern Town. New Haven: Publ. for the Institute of Human Relations by Yale Univ. Press; London: H. Milford for Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Doroszewski, Witold (1899–1976). 1933. “Quelques remarques sur les rapports de la sociologie et la linguistique: Durkheim et F. de Saussure”. Journal de Psychologie normale et pathologique 301.82–91. (Repr. in Essais sur le langage presented by Jean-Claude Pariente, 99–109. Paris: Éds. de Minuit, 1969.)Google Scholar
Ellis, Marc H. 1981. Peter Maurin: Prophet in the twentieth century. New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan M[oore] (b.1927). 1964. “An Analysis of the Interaction of Language, Topic, and Listener”. American Anthropologist 66:6, part 21, 86–102. (Repr. in Readings in the Sociology of Language ed. by Joshua A. Fishman, 192–211. The Hague: Mouton, 1968.)Google Scholar
Figueroa, Esther. 1990. Sociolinguistic Metatheory: An utterance based paradigm. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown Univ., Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Firth, J[ohn] R[upert] (1890–1960). 1950. “Personality and Language in Society”. Sociological Review 421.37–53. (Repr. in Firth, Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951, 177–189. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1957.)Google Scholar
Fischer, John L[yle] (b.1923). 1958. “Social Influences on the Choice of a Linguistic Variant”. Word 141.47–56. (Repr. in Language in Culture and Society: A Reader in Linguistics and Anthropology ed. by Dell Hymes, 483–488. New York: Harper & Row, 1964.)Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A[aron] (b.1926). 1967. Rev. of Hertzler (1965). Language 431.586–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fries, Charles C[arpenter] (1887–1967). 1940. American English Grammar: The grammatical structure of present-day American English with especial reference to social differences or class dialects. New York & London: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
Furfey, Paul Hanly (b.1896). 1919. “Conscious and Unconscious Factors in Symbolism”. Psychological Studies from the Catholic Univ. of America, vol.51: Clinical and psychoanalytic studies ed. by Edward A. Pace. (= Psychological Monographs 27), 349–386.Google Scholar
. 1926. The Gang Age: A study of the preadolescent boy and his recreational needs. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
. 1929a. Social Problems of Childhood. Ibid.Google Scholar
. 1929b. You and Your Children. New York: Benzinger.Google Scholar
. 1929c. A Selected Bibliography on Child Development. (= Catholic Univ. of America Educational Research Bulletins 4, no.4). Washington, D.C. [Includes nine items under the heading “Speech” (20–21).]Google Scholar
. 1929d. “Psychoanalysis, Behaviorism, and the Gestalt”. Thought 41.235–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1930. The Growing Boy: Case studies of developmental age. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
. 1935. “A Sociologist Looks at Catholic Art”. Christian Social Art Quarterly 2:4.27.Google Scholar
. 1936. Fire on the Earth. New York: Macmillan. (Repr., New York: Arno Press, 1978.)Google Scholar
. 1937. Three Theories of Society. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
. 1942. A History of Social Thought. Ibid.Google Scholar
. 1943. “ PLOUSIOS and Cognates in the New Testament”. Catholic Biblical Quarterly, July 1943, 243–263.Google Scholar
. 1944a. “The Sociological Implications of Substandard English”. American Catholic Sociological Review 51.3–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1944b. “Men’s and Women’s Languages”. American Catholic Sociological Review 51.218–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1944c. “The Semantic and Grammatical Principles in Linguistic Analysis”. Studies in Linguistics 21.56–66.Google Scholar
. 1952a. An Outline of Phonetics. Mimeographed. Washington: D.C. Unpublished, 102 pp. [In Catholic Univ. of America Archives.]Google Scholar
. 1952b. An Outline of Phonemics. Mimeographed. Ibid., 45 pp. [In Catholic Univ. of America Archives.]Google Scholar
. 1953. The Scope and Method of Sociology. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
. 1961. “The Need for the Clarification of Basic Concepts: A memorandum from Furfey to [George A.] Lundberg”. Sociological Inquiry 311.107–116. [Thoroughgoing epistemological document on ‘supra-empirical’ positivism vs. ‘empirical’ science, directed at his behaviorist opponent in the ‘Furfey-Lundberg controversy’.] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1972. The Subculture of the Washington Ghetto. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Social Research, Catholic Univ. of America.Google Scholar
. 1978. Love and the Urban Ghetto. Maryknoll, N.Y.: Orbis Books.Google Scholar
. 1987. Interview with Bruce H. Lescher, csc., conducted at Hyattsville, Maryland, 15 December 1987. Unpublished. [In Catholic Univ. of America Archives.]Google Scholar
. Ms.a. “Catholic Social Thought and Action in the United States: An eyewitness account of some developments”. Unpublished. [In Catholic Univ. of America Archives.]
. Ms.b. “My Autobiography”. Unpublished. [Other versions entitled “The Light at the End of the Tunnel”.] [In Catholic Univ. of America Archives.]
. Ms.c. Lecture notes for course entitled The Sociology of Language, given at Catholic Univ. of America, 1943[?]. Unpublished. [In Catholic Univ. of America Archives.]
Furfey, Paul Hanly, Martha Anne Bonham & Mae Kathryn Sargent. 1930. “The Mental Organization of the Newborn”. Child Development 1.1.48–51. [Holds that newborns are mental ‘blanks’, with mental organization beginning only after the first month of life.] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Furfey, Paul Hanly & Joseph F. Daly. 1934. The Interpretation of the Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient. (= Catholic Univ. of America Educational Research Monographs 8, no. 4). Washington, D.C. [On the mathematical treatment of relationships in the sciences.]Google Scholar
Gauchat, Louis (1866–1942). 1905. “L’unité phonétique dans le patois d’une commune”. Aus romanischen Sprachen und Literaturen: Festschrift für Heinrich Morf, 175–232. Halle/S.: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R[osamond] (b.1910). 1944. “Men’s and Women’s Speech in Koasati”. Language 201.142–149. (Repr. in Language in Culture and Society: A Reader in Linguistics and Anthropology ed. by Dell Hymes, 228–233. New York: Harper & Row, 1964.)Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar [Ingvald] (b.1906). 1951. “Directions in Modern Linguistics”. Language 271.211–222. (Repr. in Readings in Linguistics: The development of descriptive linguistics in America since 1925 [later changed to: … 1925–56] ed. by Martin Joos, 357–363. Washington, D.C.: American Council of Learned Societies, 1957.)Google Scholar
Hertzler, J[oyce] O[ramel] (1895–1975). 1953. “Toward a Sociology of Language”. Social Forces 321.109–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1965. A Sociology of Language. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Hodson, T[homas] C[allan] (1871–1953). 1939. “Socio-linguistics in India”. Man in India 191.94ff.Google Scholar
Hubbell, Allan F[orbes] (1914–1976). 1950. The Pronunciation of English in New York City: Consonants and vowels. New York: King’s Crown Press, Columbia Univ. (Repr., New York: Octagon Books, 1972.) [Originally the author’s Ph.D. thesis, Columbia Univ., 1950.]Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell [Hathaway] (b.1927), ed. 1964. Language in Culture and Society: A reader in linguistics and anthropology. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
. 1979. “The Origin of ‘Sociolinguistics’”. Language in Society 81.141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto (1860–1943). 1923. Language; its nature, development, and origin. New York: Henry Holt & Co. (Orig. publ., London: George Allen & Unwin, 1922.)Google Scholar
Joseph, John Earl. 1987. Eloquence and Power: The rise of language standards and standard languages. London: Frances Pinter; New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 1989. “Popular and Scientific Beliefs about Language Status: An historical sketch”. Status and Function of Languages and Language Varieties ed. by Ulrich Ammon, 243–255. Berlin & New York: Walter de GruyterKoerner DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. “Ideologizing Saussure: Bloomfield’s and Chomsky’s readings of the Cours de linguistique générale ”. Ideologies of Language ed. by John E. Joseph & Talbot J. Taylor, 51–78. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kenyon, John S[amuel] (1874–1959). 1924. American Pronunciation. Ann Arbor: Wahr. [Many new eds. followed; Furfey cites that of 1940.]Google Scholar
Koerner, E[rnst] F[rideryk] Konrad. 1986. “Aux sources de la sociolinguistique”. Lingvisticae Investigationes 101.381–401. (Repr. in Koerner, Saussurean Studies/Études saussuriennes, 155–174. Geneva: Slatkine, 1988.)Google Scholar
. 1991. “Toward a History of Modern Sociolinguistics”. American Speech 661.57–70. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kurath, Hans (1891–1992). 1939. Handbook of the Linguistic Geography of New England. Providence: Brown Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William (b.1927). 1964. “Phonological Correlates of Social Stratification”. American Anthropologist 66:6, part 21, 164–176.Google Scholar
. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington: D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics. [Described (p.iii) as “essentially the author’s 1964 Columbia Univ. dissertation”].Google Scholar
. 1972. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, M[orris] M[ichael] (b.1898). 1947. Language in Society. London: Thomas Nelson & Sons. (= Language in Society: The linguistic revolution and social change, New York: Social Sciences Publishers, 1948.)Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov (b.1914). 1980. “A Hispanist Confined to His ‘Inner Castle’: Tomás Navarro Tomás (1894–1979)”. Romance Philology 341, special issue, 98–115.Google Scholar
Martinet, André (b.1908). 1952. Review of La dialectologie: Aperçu historique et méthodes d’enquêtes linguistiques by Sever Pop (Louvain: Author, 1950). Word 81.260–262.Google Scholar
Matthews, P[eter] H[ugoe] (b.1934). 1986. “Distributional Syntax”. Studies in the History of Western Linguistics in Honour of R. H. Robins ed. by Theodora Bynon & F[rank] R[obert] Palmer, 245–277. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
McDavid, Raven I[oor], Jr. (1911–1984). 1946. “Dialect Geography and Social Science Problems”. Social Forces 251.168–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1948. “Post-vocalic /-r/ in South Carolina: A social analysis”. American Speech 231.194–203. (Repr. in Hymes 1964, 473–482.) DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDavid, Virginia Glenn (b.1926). 1956. Verb Forms of the North Central States and Upper Midwest. Ph.D. diss., Univ. of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Mead, George H[erbert] (1863–1931). 1934. Mind, Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Ed. with introd. by Charles W. Morris. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. [Cited by Mills 1940 and Barker 1945 as ‘Mead 1928’, but 1934 appears in fact to be the first printed ed.]Google Scholar
Mills, C[harles] Wright (1916–1962). 1940. “Bibliographical Appendix”. Contemporary Social Theory ed. by Harry Elmer Barnes, Howard Becker & Frances Bennett Barnes, 889–912. New York: Russell & Russell. [Part 4, “Sociology of Language” (895–898).]Google Scholar
Moore, Thomas Verner (1877–1969). 1919. “Hypnotic Analogies”. Psychological Studies from the Catholic Univ. of America, vol.51: Clinical and psychoanalytic studies ed. by Edward A. Pace. (= Psychological Monographs, 27), 387–400. Washington, D.C.: Catholic Univ. of America Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Charles W[illiam] (1901–1979). 1939. Foundations of the Theory of Signs. (= International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science, I:2.) Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Stephen O. 1983. Group Formation in Social Science. Carbondale, Ill. & Edmonton, Alta.: Linguistic Research.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. American Linguistic Theorists and Theory Groups: A social history.
Nida, Eugene A[lbert] (b.1914). 1949. Morphology: The descriptive analysis of words. 2nd ed. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press. [1st ed. 1946.]Google Scholar
O’Hern, Edna M. (b.1919). 1954. The Status Significance of the Dialect of an Isolated Urban Group. Ph.D. thesis, Catholic Univ. of America, Washington, D.C. [Directed by Paul Hanly Furfey.]Google Scholar
. 1971. A Phonological Analysis of the Language of Five Black Pre-School Children of Low Socio-Economic Status in Washington, D.C. A Report to the Bureau of Social Research, Catholic Univ. of America, Washington, D.C., July 12, 1971. Distributed through ERIC. [Project funded by National Institutes of Mental Health grant, conducted in cooperation with the Infant Education Research Project of the Bureau of Social Research, of which Bureau Furfey was co-director.]Google Scholar
Ornstein[-Galicia], Jacob [Leonard] (b.1915). 1977. Rev. of Currie & Currie (1976). Language in Society 61.75–78.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott (1902–1979). 1940. “An Analytical Approach to the Theory of Social Stratification”. American Journal of Sociology 451.841–862. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickford, Glenna Ruth. 1956. “American Linguistic Geography: A sociological appraisal”. Word 121.211–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pieris, Ralph. 1951. “Speech and Society: A sociological approach to language”. American Sociological Review 161.499–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Putnam, George N[elson], M.M. (1909–1991). 1954. The Status Significance of the Dialect of an Isolated Urban Group. Ph.D. thesis, Catholic Univ. of America, Washington, D.C. [Directed by Paul Hanly Furfey.]Google Scholar
Putnam, George N[elson], & Edna M. O’Hern (b.1919). 1955. The Status Significance of an Isolated Urban Dialect = Language Dissertation, 53 / Language 31, no.4, Part 21, supplement. (= Catholic Univ. of America Studies in Sociology, 40.) Baltimore, Md.: Waverly Press.Google Scholar
Reuss, Marguerite. 1943. “1942 Research Census of Members of the American Catholic Sociological Society”. American Catholic Sociological Review 41.47–52.Google Scholar
Ross, Alan S[trode] C[ampbell] (1907–1980). 1954. “Linguistic Class Indicators in Present-Day English”. Neophilologische Mitteilungen 551.20–56.Google Scholar
. 1956. “U and Non-U: An essay in sociological linguistics”. Noblesse oblige; An enquiry into the identifiable characteristics of English aristocracy ed. by Nancy Mitford, 11–36. London: Hamish Hamilton (= pp.55–89 in American ed., New York: Harper & Brothers). [Characterized as “a condensed and simplified version” of Ross (1954).]Google Scholar
Rucker, Darnell. 1969. The Chicago Pragmatists. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Sapon, Stanley M[artin] (b.1924). 1953. “A Methodology for the Study of Socio-Economic Differentials in Linguistic Phenomena”. Studies in Linguistics 111.57–68.Google Scholar
. 1957. A Pictorial Linguistic Interview Manual. Columbus: American Library of Recorded Dialect Studies, Ohio State Univ.Google Scholar
. 1958. “A Note on the Gathering and Exchange of Linguistic Data”. Orbis 71.183–185.Google Scholar
Schlauch, Margaret (1898–1986). 1936. “The Social Basis of Linguistics”. Science and Society: A Marxian quarterly 11.18–44.Google Scholar
Serano, Joseph A., O. Praem. 1982. The Social Mission of the Church in the Writings of Paul Hanly Furfey and John Courtney Murray: Analysis and assessment. Ph.D. diss., Catholic Univ. of America, Washington, D.C. [Directed by Charles E. Curran.]Google Scholar
Shuy, Roger W. (b.1931). 1988. “The Social Context of the Study of the Social Context of Language Variation”. Synchronic and Diachronic Approaches to Linguistic Variation and Change ed. by Thomas J. Walsh, 293–309. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown Univ. Press.Google Scholar
1990. “A Brief History of American Sociolinguistics, 1949–1989”. HL 171.183–209. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warner, W[illiam] Lloyd (1898–1970) & Paul S[anborn] Lunt. 1941. The Social Life of a Modern Community. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press; London: H. Milford for Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Warner, W[illiam] Lloyd, Marchia Meeker & Kenneth Eells. 1949. Social Class in America: A manual of procedure for the measurement of social status. Chicago: Science Research Associates.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walter A. (b.1941). 1969. A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wyld, Henry C[ecil Kennedy] (1870–1945). 1927. A Short History of English. New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Karlander, David
2021. Cities of sociolinguistics. Social Semiotics 31:1 ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Karlander, David
2021. The past is a future priority. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2021:267-268 ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Thomas, Margaret
2013. Otto Jespersen and “The Woman”, then and now. Historiographia Linguistica 40:3 ► pp. 377 ff. DOI logo
Benson, Erica J.
2001. The neglected early history of codeswitching research in the United States. Language & Communication 21:1 ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
KOERNER, E. F. K.
2001. WILLIAM LABOV AND THE ORIGINS OF SOCIOLINGUISTICS. Folia Linguistica Historica 35:Historica vol. 22,1-2 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Falk, Julia S. & John E. Joseph
1994. The Saleski family and the founding of the LSA linguistic institutes. Historiographia Linguistica 21:1-2 ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Joseph, John E.
1992. Modern linguistics in post-modern perspective. Language & Communication 12:2 ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.