Starting in the 1950s, there has been renewed interest in the 17th-century English philosophical language movement and in Jan Amos Comenius (1592–1670), who visited England in 1641 and participated in that movement. In that most of the interest in Comenius has been centered on his role in the development of philosophical language, there has been a tendency to take his theory of universal language (‘panglottia’) out of the broader intellectual context of his work. In spite of his diverse range of inquiry, Comenius, for the most part, maintained a unifying theme for his work – educational reform. For Comenius, educational reform was the end and philosophical language was a means to that end. Thus, as the paper tries to demonstrate, the influence of Comenius on the English philosophical language movement in general, and on the work of its leading theorist and practitioner. John Wilkins (1614–1672) in particular, was that he established a means/end relationship for philosophical language and educational reform.
Aarsleff, Hans. 1970. “The History of Linguistics and Professor Chomsky.” Language 461.570–585.
Comenius, John Amos. 1938[1668]. The Way of Light. [Via Lucis], Transi. by E. T. Campagnac. Liverpool: Univ. of Liverpool Press.
Cram, David. 1980. “George Dalgarno on Ars Signorum and Wilkins’ Essay”. Progress in Linguistic Historiography: Papers from the International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences ed. by Konrad Koerner, 113–121. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
DeMott, Benjamin. 1955. “Comenius and the Real Character in England”. PMLA 701.1068–1081. (Repr. in Subbiondo 1992:155–168.)
DeMott, Benjamin. 1958. “The Sources and Development of John Wilkins’ Philosophical Language”. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 571.1–13. (Repr. in Subbiondo 1992:169–181.)
Funke, Otto. 1959. “On the Sources of John Wilkins’ Philosophical Language (1668)”. English Studies 401.208–214. (Repr. in Subbiondo 1992:183–189.)
Přívratská, Jana. 1987. “The Methodological Approach in the Linguistic Studies of Comenius”. Acta Comeniana 71.91–102.
Salmon, Vivian. 1966. “Language-Planning in Seventeenth-Century England”. In Memory of J. R. Firth ed. by Charles E. Bazellet al., 370–397. London: Longmans. (Repr. in Salmon, The Study of Language in 17th-Century England, 2nd ed., 129–156. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1988.)
Shapiro, Barbara. 1969. John Wilkins 1614–1672. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
Slaughter, Mary M.1982. Universal Language and Scientific Taxonomy in the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Trevor-Roper, Hugh. 1972. “Three Foreigners: The philosophy of the Puritan revolution”. Religion, Reformation and Social Change, 2nd ed., 237–293. London: Macmillan.
Turnbull, George H.1920. Samuel Hartlib: A sketch of his life and relations to J. A. Comenius. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Wilkins, John. 1641. Mercury; or, the Secret and Swift Messenger: Shewing how a man may with privacy and speed communicate his thoughts to a friend at any distance. London: John Maynard & Timothy Watkins.
Wilkins, John. 1646. Ecclesiastes: or, a Discourse of the gift of preaching as it falls under the rules of art. London: Samuel Gellibrand.
Wilkins, John. 1651. Discourse Concerning the Gift of Prayer, Shewing what it is, wherein it consists, and how far it is attainable by industry, with divers useful and proper directions to that purpose, both in respect of matter, method and expression. Ibid.
Wilkins, John. 1668. Essay towards a Real Character, and a Philosophical Language. London: for Samuel Gellibrand & John Martyn.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
ÇIRAK, Adnan
2020. Jan Ámos Komenský’nin Eğitim Sisteminin Özellikleri Üzerine: Bir Eğitim Tarihi Çalışması. Journal of Universal History Studies 3:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Burton, Simon J. G.
2017. Jan Amos Comenius’s Trinitarian and Conciliar Vision of a United Europe: Christ as the Universal ‘Centre of Security’. Reformation & Renaissance Review 19:2 ► pp. 104 ff.
2001. Educational reform in seventeenth-century England and John Wilkins’ philosophical language. Language & Communication 21:3 ► pp. 273 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.