Cover not available
Part of
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 19:2/3 (1992) ► pp.333–359
Miscellaneous

Lectures Du Cratyle, 1960–1990

| Université de Reims

This study constitutes an attempt to come to grips with the vast scholarly production of the past thirty or so years concerning Plato’s Cratylus. It is noted that the analyses of this text either diverge from or complete each other, depending on whether the commentators subscribe to a dialectic and philosophical or a linguistic and language-oriented interpretation. It is maintained that it is the status accorded by Plato to language in this dialogue that is at the centre of the discussion. The contemporary debate deals with the role of the alphabet in the text, particular levels of analysis (etymology, relative motivation, onomatopoetics), the origin and development of language, and the clash between two theses: conventionalism vs naturalism. It is shown that the valuation of ‘Cratylism’, especially in the form currently found in French scholarship (e.g., Genette), extends an old tradition which tends to retain nothing but attempts at etymological or phonic interpretation. In fact, important developments according to which Socrates supports the conventionalist thesis and notes the impossibility to prove the ‘appropriateness of names’ deserve to receive their full significance.

Published online: 1 January 1992
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.19.2-3.16cle
References

Références bibliographiques

Anagnostopoulos, Georgios
1972 “Plato’s Cratylus: The two theories of the correctness of names”. Review of Metaphysics 251.691–736.Google Scholar
1973 “The Significance of Plato’s Cratylus ”. Review of Metaphysics 271.318–345.Google Scholar
Auroux, Sylvain
éd. 1989 Histoire des Idées linguistiques, Vol.I1: La naissance des métalangages, en Orient et en Occident. Liège & Bruxelles: Pierre Mardaga.Google Scholar
Baratin, Marc & Françoise Desbordes
1981 L’analyse linguistique dans l’antiquité classique. Paris: Klincksieck. Belardi, Walter 1985 Filosofia, grammatica e retorica nel pensiero antico. (= Lessico Intellettuale Europeo, 37.) Roma: Ateneo.Google Scholar
Bestor, Thomas W.
1980 “Plato’s Semantics and Plato’s Cratylus ”. Phro-nesis 251.306–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bollack, Jean
1972 “L’en deçà infini: L’aporie du Cratyle”. Poétique 111.309314.Google Scholar
Burkert, Walter
1959 “Στοιχείοv: Eine semasiologische Studie”. Philologus 1031.167–197.Google Scholar
1970 “La genèse des choses et des mots: Le Papyrus de Derveni entre Anaxagore et Cratyle”. Les Études Philosophiques 251.443–455.Google Scholar
Calvert, Brian
1970 “Forms and Flux in Plato’s Cratylus ”. Phronesis 151.2647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canto, Monique
1987 “Le sémeion dans le Cratyle”. Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 5:1.9–25.Google Scholar
Chambon, Jean-Pierre & Georges Lüdi
éds. 1991 Discours étymologiques: Actes du colloque international (Bâle/Fribourg/Mulhouse) 16–18 mai 1988 Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Crombie, Ian M.
1963 An Examination of Plato’s Doctrines. London & New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Derbolav, Josef
1972 Platons Sprachphilosophie in Kratylos und in den späteren Schriften. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Desbordes, Françoise
1989 “Les idées sur le langage avant la constitution des disciplines spécifiques”. Auroux 1989.149–161.Google Scholar
Druart, Thérèse-Anne
1975 “La stoïcheiologie de Platon”. Revue Philosophique de Louvain 731.243–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferrante, Domenico
1962 “Curiosità etomologiche nel Cratilo di Platone e nel De lingua Latina di Varrone”. Giornale Italiano di Filologia 151.163–171.Google Scholar
Findlay, John Niemeyer
1974 Plato: The written and unwritten doctrines. London & New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Fine, Gail
1977 “Plato on Naming”. Philosophical Quaterly 271.289–301.Google Scholar
Fresina, Claudio
1990 “L’historiographie linguistique à l’épreuve de l’éty-mologie ancienne”. Archives et Documents de la SHESL, 2°série, n°3, oct. 1990, 93–115.Google Scholar
Gaiser, Konrad
1974 Name und Sache in Platons Kratylos. (= Abhand-lungen der Heidelberger Akademie des Wissenschaften; Phil.-Hist., Klasse, 3.) Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Galligan, Edward Michael
1965 Plato and the Philosophy of Language. Thèse de doctorat, Indiana Univ., Bloomington, Ind. [Résumé dans Linguistics 30.46 [1967].)Google Scholar
Gallop, David
1963 “Plato and the Alphabet”. The Philosophical Review 721. 364–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gambarara, Daniele
1989 “L’origine des noms et du langage dans la Grèce ancienne”. Auroux 1989.79–97.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard
1972 “L’éponymie du nom”. Critique No.387.1019–1044.Google Scholar
1976 Mimologiques: Voyage en Cratylie. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Gaudin, Claude
1990 Platon et l’Alphabet. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Goldschmitt, Victor
1986 Essai sur le Cratyle: Contribution à l’histoire de la pensée de Platon. Paris: Vrin. [Réimp. de l’éd. de 1940.] Google Scholar
Guthrie, William K. C.
1965 A History of Greek Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. [Tome V pour le Cratyle .]Google Scholar
Heitsch, Ernst
1984 Willkür und Problembewuβtsein in Platons Kratylos. Wiesbaden & Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Joly, Henri
1974 Le renversement platonicien. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
éd. 1986a Philosophie du Langage et Grammaire dans l’ Antiquité. Grenoble & Bruxelles: Ousia.Google Scholar
1986b, “Platon entre le maître d’école et le fabriquant de mots. Remarques sur les grammata”. Joly 1986a.l05–136.Google Scholar
Kahn, Charles H.
1973 “Language and Ontology in the ‘Cratylus’”. Exegesis and Argument: Studies in Greek philosophy presented to Gregory Vlastos éd. par E. N. Lee et al. (= Phronesis, suppl. vol.1), 152–176. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
1986 “Les mots et les formes dans le Cratyle de Platon”. Joly 1986a.91–103.Google Scholar
Ketchum, Richard
1979 “Names, Forms and Conventionalism: Cratylus”. Phronesis 24:2.133–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman
1971 “Plato on the Correctness of Names”. American Philosophical Quaterly 81.126–138.Google Scholar
Lallot, Jean
1991 “ETUMOLOGIA: L’étymologie en Grèce ancienne, d’Homère aux grammairiens alexandrins”. Chambón & Lüdi 1991.135–148.Google Scholar
Language and Reality in Greek Philosophy: Actes du Colloque d’Athènes (1984)
. Athènes: Société Grecque de Philosophie 1985.Google Scholar
Leroy, Maurice
1968 “Etymologie et Linguistique chez Platon”. Académie Royale de Belgique; Bulletin de la classe de Lettres 541.121–152.Google Scholar
Loraux, Nicole
1987 “Cratyle à l’épreuve de la stasis”. Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 5:1.49–69.Google Scholar
Loraux, Patrice
1987 “L’audition de l’essence: Essai d’homophonie”. Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 5:1.27–48.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Kuno & Jürgen Mittelstraß
1967 “On Rational Philosophy of Language: The programme in Plato’s Cratylus reconsidered”. Mind 761.1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lozano-Miralles, Helena
1988 “Signs and Language in Plato”. Signs of Antiquity ... VERSUS 50/511.71–82.Google Scholar
Luce, J. V.
1964 “The Date of the Cratylus ”. American Journal of Philology 851.146–147.Google Scholar
1965 “The Theory of Ideas in the Cratylus”. Phronesis 101.21–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, Mary-Margaret
1986 “Putting Cratylus in Its Place”. Classical Quaterly 361.124–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mouraviev, S. N.
1985 La première théorie des noms de Cratyle: Essai de reconstruction. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Page, Christopher A.
1978 The Natural Correction of Names in Plato’s Cratylus: An interpretive study. Thèse de doctorat,, Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, Md.Google Scholar
Palmer, Michael D.
1989 Names, Reference and Correctness in Plato’s Cratylus. New York-Berne-Frankfurt-Paris: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan
1975 “Classical Antiquity: Greece”. Current Trends in Linguistics ed. by Thomas A.Sebeok, vol.XIII1: Historiography of Linguistics,.69126. La Haye: Mouton.Google Scholar
Rehn, Rudolf
1982 Der Logos der Seele: Wesen, Aufgabe und Bedeutung des Sprache in der platonischen Philosophie. Hamburg: Friedrich Meiner.Google Scholar
Richardson, Mary
1976 “True and False Names in the Cratylus ”. Phronesis 21:2.135–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rijlaarsdam, Jetske C.
1978 Platon über die Sprache: Ein Kommentar zum Kratylos. Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema.Google Scholar
Riley, Michael Wyman
1981 The System of Plato’s Cratylus. Thèse de doctorat, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.Google Scholar
Robinson, Richard
1955 “The Theory of Names in Plato’s Catylus ”. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 91.221–236.Google Scholar
1956 “A Criticism of Plato’s Cratylus ”. Philosophical Review 651.324–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert
1960 “Letters and Syllables in Plato”. Philosophical Review 691.431–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schofield, Malcolm
1982 “The dénouement of Cratylus ”. Schofield & Nuss-baum 1982.61–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schofield, Malcolm & Martha Craven Nussbaum
1982 Language and Logos: Studies in ancient Greek philosophy presented to CEL. Owen. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Signs of Antiquity / Antiquity of Signs
1988 (= VERSUS: Quaderni di studi semiotici , Nos.50/511, mai-déc. 1988.) Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Swiggers, Pierre & Alfons Wouters
éds. 1990 Le Langage dans l’ Antiquité. Leuven & Paris: Peeters & Leuven Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan
1972 “Introduction à la symbolique”. Poétique 111.273308.Google Scholar
Trevaskis, J. R.
1966 “The μέγιστα γένη and the Vowel Analogy of Plato, Sophist 253”. Phronesis 111.99–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandeyelde, Pol
1987 “Le statut de l’étymologie dans le Cratyle de Platon”. Les Études classiques 551.137–150.Google Scholar
Vervaecke, G.
1990 “Λογοδαίδαλοι: La critique du langage dans la Grèce classique”. Swiggers & Wouters 1990.134–163.Google Scholar
Weingartner, Rudolph H.
1970 “Making Sense of Cratylus ”. Phronesis 151.525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Jones, Tom
2005. Reading about Language. In Pope and Berkeley, ► pp. 10 ff. DOI logo
Taylor, Daniel J.
1994. Studies on the Text of Suetonius ‘De Grammaticis et Rhetoribus’. By Robert A. Kaster. Historiographia Linguistica 21:1-2 ► pp. 202 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.